Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Ok I saw Saw 6 this last weekend for some reason, and I was amazed that after 5 crappy Saw movies they decided to make a 6th crappy Saw movie, but this time inject some political discourse.

I was amazed at how it turned into a pro health reform epic, everything revolved around the failings of private insurance and pre-existing conditions and all that jazz. How did this happen? Did anyone else see the movie and seem perplexed?

The more amazing trend is that although this movie was as terrible as the others, the critics seem to be swayed by the political message.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

andyuhenet

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Sorry about the format above it should read:
Saw 6 44
Saw 5 15
Saw 4 18
Saw 3 25
Saw 2 35
Saw 1 47

Also, why have I seen all 6 Saw's? I don't really know.

I think hacking some people apart with chain saws could help lower the expense of longterm care. It also might help speed up the debate when used against opponents of socialized medicine. I mean, what's the difference between that and abortion? We would be killing only "inconvenient" people.

i think most people who go see saw 6 are for the health reform in the first place.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable