Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

"The battle for upstate New York's 23rd Congressional District seat confirms just how swiftly the right has devolved into a wacky, paranoid cult that is as eager to eat its own as it is to destroy Obama," writes Frank Rich in the New York Times.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Doc_Sarvis

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Rich is sayin' - -

a) that people WILL elect officials with principles they admire if they are given a choice

b) Palin DID understand that

c) out-of-touch party bosses DID NOT understand that

d) GOP party bosses gotta go . . and the base WILL make that happen


. . and I said it in less than 50 words - it's no wonder newspapers are dyin'

MARKH you forgot to say "paranoid" and "teabagger" etc etc etc. But the paper people probably get paid by the word.

MARKH you forgot to say "paranoid" and "teabagger" etc etc etc. But the paper people probably get paid by the word.

#2 | Posted by MrFair

"people WILL elect officials"

people = teaparty-ers;

aka; regular Americans which YOU attempt to denegrate with the teabagger the lable originally applied by Oblermann, Maddow, Garafalo.


btw . . aka = also known as

Frank Rich is an intellectual midget(and that is the kindest thing any could say about this guy and remain in the truth) and Stalinism is the archetype of a Post-constitutional American Barrack Obama - Rahm Emanual "wet Dream of the Neo-Communists" regime. The organizationally weak, New York state GOP, is just having a hard time finding any unity.

MARKH - I wasn't denigrating, I was predicting what some Lefty hacks would have said. I actually agree with you here.

MARKH - I wasn't denigrating, I was predicting what some Lefty hacks would have said. I actually agree with you here.

#5 | Posted by MrFair

oops . . I should have known - - your moniker says it all

Frank Rich is an intellectual midget...

A Midget maybe--but hardly intellectual...



There is no civil war within the Repub party--any more than a civil war within the Dem party.


In NY--both sides--about 11 guys in each room chose their candidate. There was no primary--so they did the back room thing.

Why the local guys in the district picked this woman is a wonder. They could have chosen Hoffman.

When you look at Dede--she wasn't even a rino. She was a Dem.

So the GOP needs to correct it's thinking. There is nothing wrong with moderate Repubs--but for goodness sakes--at least get a candidate that is 80% repub.

She was 100% Dem and liberal at that!

Frank Rich is an intellectual midget...

A Midget maybe--but hardly intellectualPosted by MURPHY

There you go Murphy. That's about as close to being "intellectual" as you will ever get.

Murphy doesn't even know the meaning of the word. We need to give her a break because she is so high functioning. Somebody needs to teach her how to change her radio dial though. She is getting fed a lot of BS. Maybe her handlers need to teach her what a lie is.

oops . . I should have known - - your moniker says it all
#6 | Posted by markh

Watch out, Mr. Fair, because based on my experience with Markuh in hardly any time at all he may be fantasizing openly about your sex life and inquiring as to whether or not you have an erection as he's posting. He's a purrty sick lil' pup.

he may be fantasizing openly about your sex life and inquiring as to whether or not you have an erection as he's posting. He's a purrty sick lil' pup.

#10 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

I'm sure by now he has learned that you can't.

She never won a primary, she was picked by some backdoor committie.
If there was a primary the Conservative would have won.

#11 | Posted by Sniper

The results of my informal, unscientific survey of DR posters proclivities as reflected in their posts indicates that a small but statistically significant number of Tiiightie Riiighties here are not only concerned but positively obsessed with:

(1) other posters' (presumably male) sexual preferences
(2) other posters' (presumably male) genitals
(3) the frequency and size of other posters' (presumably male) erections

Why this is I do not know with any satisfactory degree of certainty. I think immaturity, lack of emotional development, and latent (albeit repressed) homosexuality are obvious elements in their complex psychological mix.

Bottom line, Snoops? You can rest easy, since you appear to fit snugly into the hypothesized profile.

The proletariat must be getting distressed at the conservatives (40% label themselves so...) assertiveness. Imagine libertarian-thinking conservatives take over and reduce the size and heavy hand of the government_now_that would be the sight for tired eyes...

that people WILL elect officials with principles they admire if they are given a choice

b) Palin DID understand that

You betcha.

Which is why she tried to hide Bristol's bastard bun in the oven, lied about going to Europe and Iraq and lied about her support/non-support for the bridges to nowhere.

Nice to see the GOPs'biggest quitters supporting Hoffman, though-Fredisded and the Halfenor.


Go GOppers-self-destruction is soo watchable.

My question is, can you oppose your Party's candidate and support someone else in an election and still remain part of the Party? Seems as a matter of principle, you'd have to leave the party. Or the Party should leave you.

Indeed, maybe it's the knee-jerk Trotskyism in me, but I like the idea of the government making sure that working conditions are safe for all workers.

I like the government mandating a forty hour work week.

I like the government monitoring my food and drugs for safety.

I like the government requiring that the cars and airplanes I ride in are safe.

I want the government to make sure that industries don't pollute the land and air and water we all share, padding their profits through environmental destruction.

I know, I know. It's weird. But somehow I think that's a better country than the one my regressive friends have in mind.
Speaking of whom ...

Liars? Delusional? Petrified? Hypocritical? Idiotic?

I guess it is all of the above, after all. Petrified and delusional regressives tell massive lies about supposed freedom that are riddled with idiotic hypocrisy.

I hope they'll forgive me for choosing my big-city, left-wing, European socialist, liberal slavery, radical vision of the good life over theirs.

After all, it goes better with my government-restricted, nanny-state regulated, mandatory latte.

Excerpted from David Michael Green @ Counterpunch

^.^

I'm glad the Republican candidate dropped out. Republicans can now vote for Hoffman, a man who is a lot more conservative than the closet Liberalista that was running as a Republican.

Whomever put this woman up to this should have known that when you pick between a Liberalista, and a Liberalista Lite, people who are leaning that way will pick the REAL THING over the cheap imitation ... so most of them will have voted for the Democrat.

Having a real conservative alternative is actually a service to the people in that district, as they will have two candidates that have differing views on the issues ... which should give them a good debate, more information, and the district will have a more informed vote.


JEB

"Joseph Stalin, was born in Gori, Georgia on 21st December, 1879. In 1901 Stalin joined the Social Democratic Labour Party where he helped to organize industrial resistance to Tsarism. On 18th April, 1902, Stalin was arrested after coordinating a strike at the large Rothschild plant at Batum."

So..Stalin was a Socialist that was pro-Unions and anti-business - Does that sound like a Republican?

"In 1928 Stalin began attacking kulaks for not supplying enough food for industrial workers. (Farmers were allowed to sell food on the open market and were allowed to employ people to work for them. Those farmers who expanded the size of their farms became known as kulaks.)

He advocated the setting up of collective farms. However, the peasants liked farming their own land and were reluctant to form themselves into state collectives. Stalin was furious that the peasants were putting their own welfare before that of the Soviet Union. Local communist officials were given instructions to confiscate kulaks property."

So Stalin used the government to take property because it did not meet his direction - Sounds like the Government closing the car dealerships, or taking over GM, or the banks. Doesn't sound like a republican to me

"Every factory had large display boards erected that showed the output of workers. Those that failed to reach the required targets were publicity criticized and humiliated. Some workers could not cope with this pressure and absenteeism increased. This led to even more repressive measures being introduced. Records were kept of workers' lateness, absenteeism and bad workmanship. If the worker's record was poor, he was accused of trying to sabotage the Five Year Plan and if found guilty could be shot or sent to work as forced labour on the Baltic Sea Canal or the Siberian Railway. "

Can you say "WAGE CZAR"?

"Although the superficial aspects of Stalinism was removed, the system that he created remained. Stalin had developed a state apparatus that protected those in power. It was a system that the Soviet leaders who were to follow him for the next thirty years,"


So...focus on a centralized government than supresses individual freedom. Takes property from those who own it under the auspices that it think it can do better. Controls the wages of those who work - and create a system that keeps those in power by attacking any press that openly opposes it (can you say FOX?)

Given the "cult of personality" aparent in Stalin...I think a tall guy with big ears foots the bill rather nicely don't you?

'd) GOP party bosses gotta go . . and the base WILL make that happen'

#1 | Posted by markh

RIIIGGGHT...

Sure ok

What BASE exactly is gonna make this happen?

The rightwingnut lunatic fringe are gonna take back the GOP?

Great - have at em!

frank rich is an assclown, has his head jammed so far up his own butt he has toxic brain damage, and he also knows that the bitch was a lib, and she had talked about changing party after she won, to hell with her.

Frank Rich is putting out a bunch of propaganda from the throat cutting left, hoping the GOP will declare war on one another.
If they were to publish the truth it would read the other way around.
The wacky, paranoid cult on the left are always pointing fingers and accusing, bribing, name calling, Slandering, and using any dirty extremes they can possibly drag out from their evil warped minds to discredit any potential gain the GOP may garner.
N.Y. is worse than a stinking cesspool esp. with the Jackasses crawling out of the gutters trolling for political offices, only idiots would want to live there...

Rich is sayin' - -

a) that people WILL elect officials with principles they admire if they are given a choice

b) Palin DID understand that

c) out-of-touch party bosses DID NOT understand that

d) GOP party bosses gotta go . . and the base WILL make that happen


. . and I said it in less than 50 words - it's no wonder newspapers are dyin'

#1 | Posted by markh at 2009-11-01 08:43 AM

Well stated.

Frank Rich is either a partisan attack hack.

Or does not understand how conservatives are not always republicans and visa versa.

Or just says stupid stuff because he knows the libs eat it up.

The proletariat must be getting distressed at the conservatives (40% label themselves so...) assertiveness. Imagine libertarian-thinking conservatives take over and reduce the size and heavy hand of the government_now_that would be the sight for tired eyes...

#14 | POSTED BY LIBERTY

oh sure..it would be 1933 economy all over again.

You retards couldn't run a fucking 7-11 much less a country.

Libertarians=Anarchist with Money

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable