#31 | Posted by crispee_oc
Oh, goodness, punchdrunk Joe Palooka staggers into the ring after the asskicking he took yesterday -- and about which, as usual, he cannot help but focus and bore the knickers off one and all for a day or so after his thrashing -- to comment on something he knows even less about than he does about boxing.
"...blaming it [a reporter's fuck up] on someone else for his own laziness to vet a story before linking?"
Yeah, Palooka, that's what posters on the DR do: run a string of fact checkers to make sure that each and every story that's picked up off the wires or an otherwise reputable site is meticulously fact checked. You do that every time you start a thread, don't you? Personally, I'm shocked -- yes, shocked -- that a story posted on the DR was, after its posting, demonstrated to be in error. What's next, pookie? Gambling in "Rick's Cafe American"?
"Then attacking posters pointing out his gaffe?"
Palooka, try and keep up with the herd, make a decent effort to get up to speed for chrissakes. What I answered were claims by the likes of Quck On The Trigger But Slooooow To Comprehend Joe Blackstone that my credibility sucks because a reporter screwed up. That you can't figure that out, or understand it, is simply indicative of your status as a punchdrunk imbiber in brews you have no business being around.
"He never acknowledged his own error."
You, Palooka, are a liar.
It was posted in good faith in the hope of creating an opportunity for discussion. However, the story misquotes Scalia, someone evidently switching Brown and Plessy.
#116 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis
As I say, Palooka, you're a liar. Now, do yourself a favor: Stop making a fool of yourself -- we already know you're a perfect fit in that category -- and go back and find some moron who wants to listen to your lies about matters pugilistic.
