Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

John Allen Muhammad, the mastermind of the 2002 DC-area sniper attacks, will die by lethal injection Nov. 10 for one of the murders, Virginia officials announced Tuesday. Muhammad's killing spree over three weeks of October 2002 left 10 dead in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

cookfish

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

He should have to die by firing squad.

He should have to die by firing squad.

#1 | Posted by cookfish

Right in front of Home Depot.

What was his weapon of choice? The Bushmaster or Bushwacker or something.

:+(

Thinking back to the timing of his murder spree I think it helped elect Bush. For many days leading up to the election it captured much of the news media's attention.

And safety/law enforcement has traditionally been a Republican issue, so I certainly don't think it hurt Dubya's chances to have this guy doing his thing leading up to the election.

WOW OohRah politisizing this thing. Who would have thunk it.............NOT. This happened in 2002 OohRah Dubya was in the White House already thanks to the SCOTUS. But continue with the Republican politisizing of this terrible thing. It's Your MO

Larry

I never thought of it that way. The Bushmaster conspiracy.

Oh and I just love how You claim Law Enforcement is a Republican thing when it's an American thing but continue with Your balderdash OohRah that's all You've got.

Larry

LAR-
Traditionally Republicans have had issues like smaller government, lower taxes, national security.

Democrats have had education, environment, higher taxes.

So yes, when there's a crime spree or terrorist attack, people want to be reassured that they'll be safe. Call it balderdash or whatever term you wish... that doesn't negate the public's perception.

And that's why I felt it aided Bush. Just as some sort of environmental crisis would have played into Gore's hand.

Funny how their rhetoric doesn't match their actions OohRah. Oh and it happened in 2002 how did it help Dubya??

He is referring to the second time--in 2004.

--------------------


He should have to die by firing squad.


#1 | Posted by cookfish


Right in front of Home Depot.

#2 | Posted by mysterytoy

Riding a lawn mower


LAR-
The general election occured on November 5, 2002.
The killing spree was in October, 2002.

Then they threatened to take out kids getting off the school bus.


bye bye Muhammad...

#12 | Posted by OohRah

The election was Nov 2000 and sworn in Jan 2001.


I thought you were referring to the 2004 election--as the story went on and on--the trial, the idiot cop who was planting this on a serial white guy.

Wrong OohRah see Murphy's post.

MUR-
Speaking of death on a lawn mower...

In our Sunday School class one woman requested prayer for the relative of a recent intern at our church.

Apparently the relative (a male) has a landscaping business. He was mowing grass at an apartment complex a week or two ago when he nearly died.

It was a stand up mower with a high back. As he was riding along he came upon a tree and tried to hold his arm out to bend the limb to allow him to pass by.

The limb didn't bend. The mower continued forward till the dude was getting choked out... the branch had pushed his forearm into his throat, pinning him against the high back.

The controls were out of reach. He had no air to be able to yell for help. Apparently the mower has a safety shut off if there's no movement for a period of time.

His brain had been deprived of oxygen for an undetermined amount of time. Talk about a freak accident! It's doubtful he'll ever regain full health.

My bad.

I still recall thinking how this was helping Dubya. Must have been regarding the congressional elections.

That is a freak accident.

Riding a lawn mower

#11 | Posted by MURPHY

That's funny. I guess you are referring to the guy he killed who was cutting the grass.

At the risk of the horrors of being called political correct what does his being black have to do with anything? He killed people for no good reason and he's going to die for doing that as he should white, brown, black, red, yellow or purple.

Lobster Red in Summer, crimson red in Winter and tanned in Spring and Fall Gimme

At the risk of the horrors of being called political correct what does his being black have to do with anything?

#20 | Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch

I believe at the time profilers believed he was probably white male in late 20's to early 30's.

With a mullet.

I made up the mullet part. LOL.

#9 | Posted by OohRah

Nothing helped more than Bin Laden's videotape, timed to keep W in office so America could slip further and further into the tank. That was largely Al Qaeda's plan all along anyway. Worked like a charm with a lot of help from W and his cowboy swaggering BS. Economy in the tank? Check Military stretched too the gills? Check. America's image in the toilet? Check.

Why did Bush never follow through with getting Bin Laden 'dead or alive'?

A serial killer's race matters? News to me.

Why did Bush never follow through with getting Bin Laden 'dead or alive'?

#24 | Posted by Timex

I thought they found Bin Laden working at a 7-11 in New Jersey.

themoderatevoice.com

"I thought they found Bin Laden working at a 7-11 in New Jersey."

Bin Laden: "Sorry, Slurpee machine no good. Allah O Akbar"

With all the needless pain this guy caused, it seems that lethal injection is too good for him. It would be more poetic to let the families draw straws to see who would get to use a wire garrote on him. It should be televised. This would be Justice and a deterrent.

Let's give this guy a free education instead!

--DonnerBoy

Society has failed this Africanus Americanus.

Free Tookie! Oh, too late.

Free Mumia Abu-Jamal!

I thought they found Bin Laden working at a 7-11 in New Jersey.


Why does America love to hate New Jersey?

Hooray?

#31 | Posted by Tosser at 2009-10-28 09:26 AM | Reply | Flag: Never been to New Jersey.

How did he burn through all of his appeals so quick?? It should have taken 10 plus years.

In Virginia? They don't messa round with no stinking appeals.

While I don't believe in the death penalty, I hope this one is not stayed.

Then you do believe in the death penalty.

One hilarious note is how lefties will claim they are against the death penalty, either out of some moral indignation or concern for killing a wrongly accused person, but will then go on to wish they basically go through hell while in prison, submitting to beatings, rapings, and possibly even killing by the other inmates. Which of course negates any concern they have for morals or punishing the wrongly accused.

Let's give this guy a free education instead!

--DonnerBoy

#29 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

heh nice try LOD-actually I was going to remind you blood thirsty killers that it is letting him off the hook to kill him. Why let him out of the mental trap he created by letting him die?

Keep him alive to ponder his crimes for the rest of his natural life behind bars.

Life in Prison without parole is more humane (and cheaper) than Capital Punishment and is probably more real punishment than lethal injection which only (theoretically) hurts for as second and then it is over for him.

heh nice try LOD-actually I was going to remind you blood thirsty killers that it is letting him off the hook to kill him. Why let him out of the mental trap he created by letting him die?

Keep him alive to ponder his crimes for the rest of his natural life behind bars.

#39 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 12:06 PM

I'm OK with the notion of life without parole in lieu of the death penalty, just not spending tax dollars "rehabilitating" a violent criminal.

just not spending tax dollars "rehabilitating" a violent criminal.

really? Are you a Christian? Amazing to me how many Christians want to see other humans "fry" for their sins.

What would Jesus do?


really? Are you a Christian? Amazing to me how many Christians want to see other humans "fry" for their sins.

What would Jesus do?

#41 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 12:59 PM

Are you retarded? You just supported life without parole in lieu of the death penalty, and the criminal being locked in his mental trap, and I agreed with that.

"What would Jesus do?"



I don't know, ask Judas. Or Him.


Or Corkly. He is the payback mater here.


Then you do believe in the death penalty.

#37 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2009-10-28 11:56 AM | REPLY | FLAG

No. I think I can make a distinction between what I want to see in my heart (i.e., this guy fry), and what ought to be our policy with respect to death penalty cases.

btw, I'm no liberal.

What would Jesus do?

#41 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 12:59 PM

Are you retarded?

maybe...but the question about Jesus is in regards to your position on the taxpayer paying for the rehabilitation of your fellow humans.

You beleive that we as humans should not rehabilitate our fellow man especially if he is a violent criminal.

I am asking you if you are a Christian and if so what would Jesus do.

Chapel are you a Christian? If so, then you theoretically have a "personal relationship" with Jesus and therefore your answer is disingenuous isn't it? You SHOULD know what Jesus would do to this criminal if you understand and believe in Jesus.

Would he kill him?

or

Would he try and help him?

What would Jesus do?

#41 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 12:59 PM

Are you retarded?

maybe...but the question about Jesus is in regards to your position on the taxpayer paying for the rehabilitation of your fellow humans.

You beleive that we as humans should not rehabilitate our fellow man especially if he is a violent criminal.

I am asking you if you are a Christian and if so what would Jesus do.

Chapel are you a Christian? If so, then you theoretically have a "personal relationship" with Jesus and therefore your answer is disingenuous isn't it? You SHOULD know what Jesus would do to this criminal if you understand and believe in Jesus.

Would he kill him?

or

Would he try and help him?

oops...sorry bout the double post!

maybe...but the question about Jesus is in regards to your position on the taxpayer paying for the rehabilitation of your fellow humans.

You beleive that we as humans should not rehabilitate our fellow man especially if he is a violent criminal.
#46 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 01:24 PM

Strawman. We're talking about "violent criminals," not "fellow humans." You're broadening the category of what we're talking about to try and include less repulsive beings in your rant, like say thieves or drug addicts, as if to make a point. Sorry, not working.

I am asking you if you are a Christian and if so what would Jesus do.

Chapel are you a Christian? If so, then you theoretically have a "personal relationship" with Jesus and therefore your answer is disingenuous isn't it? You SHOULD know what Jesus would do to this criminal if you understand and believe in Jesus.

Would he kill him?

or

Would he try and help him?

#46 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 01:24 PM

Are you seriously questioning whether the Jesus who taught about eternal hell and damnation for not following him has a problem with harsh punishment? LOL!

Violent Criminals are STILL our fellow humans. How many so called puratins have lusted after the blood of killers when they soght their executions?? What makes them any different than the actual killer?? None whatsoever. They had the same violent thoughts in their hearts making them no better. But You do carry on LoD.

Larry

I think Jesus was a Liberal.

Did Jesus not forgive the sinner if he asked for it? That eternal damnation stuff was reserved for AFTER death.

I thought Jesus was concerned for ALL souls not just the good ones. I always believed he wanted to help his fellow man become part of the spirit of God before they died. After it was too late.

Sometimes I think I am more "Christian" than Christians are.


One of almost ten terror attacks, which according to Shrub never happened, because he implemented such tough anti-terror policies. Stupid.

I think Jesus was a Liberal.
#50 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 01:50 PM
Sure you do. And similarly retarded conservatives think he was a fellow conservative.

Did Jesus not forgive the sinner if he asked for it? That eternal damnation stuff was reserved for AFTER death.

I thought Jesus was concerned for ALL souls not just the good ones. I always believed he wanted to help his fellow man become part of the spirit of God before they died. After it was too late.

#50 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 01:50 PM

Jesus forgave the thief on the cross, but didn't demand anyone take him down.

Sometimes I think I am more "Christian" than Christians are.
#50 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-10-28 01:50 PM
With that line, you sure sound like a lot of them. LOL!

Violent Criminals are STILL our fellow humans. How many so called puratins have lusted after the blood of killers when they soght their executions?? What makes them any different than the actual killer?? None whatsoever. They had the same violent thoughts in their hearts making them no better. But You do carry on LoD.

Larry

#49 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-10-28 01:48 PM

What makes them different? You really can't see the difference in someone killing an innocent person to a government executing a convicted murderer? Using your logic, if we are invaded by a foreign military, we shouldn't fight back, because we'd be killing their soldiers and that would make us no better. (LMFAO)

Besides, I already said I would agree to life terms in lieu of executions. But you do carry on defending the honor and humanity of murderers, Larry.

Killing is killing even if said killing is only in your heart. You are still a killer.

Deep thoughts from LarryMohr.

LOL!

Jesus forgave the thief on the cross, but didn't demand anyone take him down.

Good example.

But, Jesus helped his soul before he died. He did not condemn him to die. He forgave him. It does bother me that if Jesus was a God then why does He let anyone "die" but that is a totally different logic problem to ponder.

You want some even deeper thoughts LoD?? He will be executed on the same day albeit 38 Years later that I was borned into this world. Mom gave life to Me the same day they plan to take this dudes life. How fucked up is that??

Larry

Mom gave life to Me the same day they plan to take this dudes life. How fucked up is that??

Larry

#57 | Posted by LarryMohr

They captured him on my birthday... 10/24

Jesus forgave the thief on the cross, but didn't demand anyone take him down.


The thief ASKED for it and ACCCEPTED Jesus as Messiah and then paid his debt for crime in death. The went to heaven.


And the guy on death row has the SAME option. Most likely has already exercised it and got right with his Lord prior to death like the thief did.

He will be executed on the same day albeit 38 Years later that I was borned into this world. Mom gave life to Me the same day they plan to take this dudes life. How fucked up is that??

I'm glad you're unincarcerated and alive, and I'm glad that he's in jail and a soon-to-be-goner, even though both of you nauseate me. How's that?

I'm glad you're unincarcerated and alive, and I'm glad that he's in jail and a soon-to-be-goner, even though both of you nauseate me. How's that?

Posted by cookfish at 2009-10-28 03:24 PM | Reply | Flag: nice olive branch there, lol.

Jesus (Mr. Immaculate conception man, yet funny the Pope doesn't believe in fertility treatments...-side note) I think has left us due to his (God's) experiment gone awry. Over population likely will cause eventual extinction without major birth control, should have never let it happen in the first place. The piece of s*** should have been executed quickly a long time ago. There was no question of his net worth and therefor I think he exceeded his Carbon Footprint credits. Dirt nap is all he deserved about a couple weeks after his sorry a** was caught.

So cookfish instead of giving Me a wedgie You gave Me a Harvy Wall Banger instead. Still sounds like a doule cross to Me

Larry

What makes them any different than the actual killer?? None whatsoever.
Larry #49 | Posted by LarryMohr

Wrong. What makes Tiller (the abortion doctor) different than the person that murdered him (if you believe abortion is murder)? As I read on the other thread - Tiller had the weight of the law behind him i.e. he was acting within the bounds of the law when performing late term abortions.

In this case, the people seeking the beltway murderer's death have the full weight of the law behind them and that makes ALL the difference. They may be killers but they aren't MURDERERS. The current law legally states that the beltway murderer can and will be put to death, thus exempting those seeling that death from the charge of murder.

You may disagree with the death penalty, but going around name-calling people who seek redress within the bounds of the law won't do anything for your case. Seek to change the law before you start accusing people of being the same as those who act outside the law.

"Why does America love to hate New Jersey?

#31 | Posted by Tosser"

Give me your address and I will Fedex "The Sopranos", "CopLand", and "Garden State".

just not spending tax dollars "rehabilitating" a violent criminal.

really? Are you a Christian? Amazing to me how many Christians want to see other humans "fry" for their sins.

What would Jesus do?


#41 | Posted by donnerboy
----------------------
Jesus would have probably stoned him to death. Hey, I heard home depot was selling stones for cheap! Why go through all of the expense of lethal injection?

Lonnie

You forget that Jesus forgave that Adulator that was slated to be stoned to death who declared Those without sin may cast the first stone. They all dropped their stones. Let us also not forget that before Jesus died upon the Cross at Calvary the wages of sin was death(Capital Punishment) Jesus took that punishment for ALL Mankind when He was execused for the redemption of our sins. After that we were saved from Death for our sins because the penalty has already been paid By Jesus HIMSELF so no need for death as punishment.

Larry

"Jesus would have probably stoned him to death. "

Riiiiiiiight...just like Jesus stoned...um...umm...ummm...

...help me out here...I must've missed that chapter and verse.

"the penalty has already been paid By Jesus HIMSELF so no need for death as punishment."

Jesus condones murdering with no earthly punishment? Totally nonsensical rationale.

Eye for an eye....

What would Jesus do?

#41 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY


Probably kill the motherfucker.


~~~~~~~~~~~

Matthew 10:34 (King James Version)

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.


Luke 12:51

Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: 52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. 53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.



Luke 22:36

...He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.



Revelation 19:11

And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.


~~~~~~~

Turn the other cheek, indeed...

...and the fundie faithful continually scream about Islam being the hypocritical "religion of peace"...what?

So Jesus and Mohammed were both conquerers and/or inciters of violence. Who cares? They've been dead for a long, long time.

Fuck them both.

Jesus condones murdering with no earthly punishment? Totally nonsensical rationale.


Eye for an eye....


#69 | Posted by Greatamerican at 2009-10-29 03:25 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Try again


MATTHEW CHAPTER 5

38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:


39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.


40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.


41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.


42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.


43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.


44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;


45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.


46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?


47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?


48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.


49 He that snipeth at the general population shall indeed feeleth mine boot in his ass, as shall his mutant prodigies.

If you prefer to keep a murdering sub-human thug in prison....

....sure, IF, and ONLY IF.....

The thug gets NOTHING that was not available to a cave man.

--No AC in the summer, minimal heat in the winter.
--No dentist
--No doctor
--Dull food, everyday, ESPECIALLY holidays.
--If he behaves COMPLETELY, and is COMPLETELY compliant, require guards to not abuse him.
--If he so much as mildly mouths off to a gurad, REQUIRE the guards to beat the shit out him
--Require hard labor, everyday.
--etc

#73 | Posted by USAF242 at 2009-10-29 08:21 AM | Reply | Flag: Loves the Constitution.

--If he behaves COMPLETELY, and is COMPLETELY compliant, require guards to not abuse him.

Sounds like someone wishes they were a prison guard.

Jesus would not condone killing this guy.

But I do.

ALEXANDRITE

If a death row inmate throws feces at a guard, NOT ONLY does that guard have my BLESSING to literally kick the thug's teeth in, I'd like to see it be a REQUIREMENT.

Remember: These thugs are NOT people being rehabilitated. They are Less-Than-Animals being "contained".

--If they don't cause trouble, just contain em.

--If they CHOOSE to cause trouble, NO mercy. They don't rate mercy.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable