Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Neil Barofsky, special inspector general of Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program, was asked last Wednesday by CNN about the changes being made to ensure that a disaster like the one starting last year would not recur. "I think actually what's changed is in the other direction," the refreshingly candid Mr. Barofsky said. "These banks that were too big to fail, are now bigger. Government has sponsored and supported several mergers that made them larger. And that guaranteed that implicit guarantee of moral hazard. The idea that the government is not going to let these banks fail, which was implicit a year ago, its now explicit."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Phoenix

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Call me crazy, but it seems to me that the last few paragraphs in this story are the REAL story -- much more important than the lengthy discussion of why CEO pay isn't that interesting.

Also remarkable: the government's role in sponsoring dangerous mergers has been reported openly -- e.g., www.nytimes.com .

"Generous pay for new Freddie Mac CFO"

"The government-controlled mortgage finance company is giving CFO Ross Kari compensation worth as much as $5.5 million. That includes an almost $2 million cash signing bonus and a generous salary that could top $2.3 million."

www.businessweek.com

Neil Barofsky, special inspector general of Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program, was asked last Wednesday by CNN about the changes being made to ensure that a disaster like the one starting last year would not recur. "I think actually what's changed is in the other direction," the refreshingly candid Mr. Barofsky said.
Go Obama / Bush!!

Well Obama will just call his expert SEIU union rep he put on the brd of the Fed, for advise. Forget about asking volcher or seidemann

There have never been any guarantees we won't have a crash. Never has been, NEVER WILL BE!

"I think actually what's changed is in the other direction," the refreshingly candid Mr. Barofsky said.
Well, Obama did say he'd bring change.

Obama's doing some things I like, but I am major not happy with how the banking stuff has gone. I wanted them bailed out only on some very strict conditions that included no-excuses mandates to lend to credit-worthy consumers and businesses, fairer treatment of customers and caps on exec pay. I also wanted mega-banks broken up into smaller units. Geithner is a huge mistake - you do not hire a dyed-in-the-wool fox to guard a henhouse.

The big banks are hiding their insolvency, hoping for a recovery. As the layoffs continue. As the foreclosures continue. As businesses continue to fail. They don't have a chance to survive. It's only a matter of when and how. The FDIC can't handle the big banks.

You never want to trust a bank with more than you can afford to lose. Keep some cash at home for a couple of months of food and gas. Use a bank for no more than paying bills. It's prudent precaution with no risk.

2012!

"Keep some cash at home for a couple of months of food and gas. Use a bank for no more than paying bills. Burn the rest, it's just worthless paper. I'd sell you some gold but what would you pay me with, paper? Muahahaha!"

This article is sacrilegious to the Church of Obama. Obama is perfect and there is clearly no banking problem. Unemployment is under control and the mortgage crisis has dissipated.

Seriously, if all of these problems really existed would Obama be throwing parties every Wedneday at the White House and going golfing all the time?

The big banks are hiding their insolvency, hoping for a recovery. -- #8 | Posted by Ray

I thought we knew at this point that they're leveraged at 30:1 or so -- i.e., they're not hiding their insolvency at all! They're just de-leveraging with taxpayer dollars.

Wonder what would have happened if we had cut them loose, and used the TARP money to re-finance homes and shore up community banks so THEY could lend.

It's prudent precaution with no risk.

#8 | Posted by Ray

What about inflation?


The whole system runs on inflation.

I'm shocked, they haven't done anything.

They have the same people working for the SEC as they did under Bush.

Have they passed any new legislation to confront bank risk or capital? No

The only thing they have done to my knowledge was conduct a stress test, and are talking about going after bank CEOs salaries.

One conclusive hallmark of a failed state is that the crooks are inside the government, using government to protect and to advance their private interests.

Another conclusive hallmark is rising income inequality as the insiders manipulate economic policy for their enrichment at the expense of everyone else.

Income inequality in the US is now the most extreme of all countries. The 2008 OECD report, "Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries," concludes that the US is the country with the highest inequality and poverty rate across the OECD and that since 2000 nowhere has there been such a stark rise in income inequality as in the US. The OECD finds that in the US the distribution of wealth is even more unequal than the distribution of income.

United Nations Development Program concluded that the US ranked third among states with the worst income inequality, after Hong Kong and Singapore, both city states, not countries, leaving the US as the country with the most inequality in the distribution of income in the world.

The stark increase in US income inequality in the 21st century coincides with the offshoring of US jobs, which enriched executives with "performance bonuses" while impoverishing the middle class, and with the rapid rise of unregulated OTC derivatives, which enriched Wall Street and the financial sector at the expense of everyone else.

A pathetic Greenspan had to admit that the free market ideology on which he had relied turned out to have a flaw.

Is there another country in which in full public view so few so blatantly use government for the enrichment of private interests, with a coterie of "free market" economists available to justify plunder on the grounds that "the market knows best"? A narco-state is bad enough. The US surpasses this horror with its financo-state.
As Brooksley Born says, if nothing is done "it'll happen again."

The crooks control the government.

The OECD report shows that despite the Reagan tax rate reduction, the rate of increase in US income inequality declined during the Reagan years. During the mid-1990s the Gini coefficient (the measure of income inequality) actually fell. Beginning in 2000 with the New Economy (essentially financial fraud and offshoring of US jobs), the Gini coefficient shot up sharply.
Excerpted from Paul Craig Roberts @ Counterpunch

Barofsky is one of those rare straight shooters in Washington and they tried to shut him up awhile ago but one of the congressional members came to his defense.

I think trying to fix or reform any other issue before this issue is addressed is futile. We can't try to build or even help anything while our economy is based on the decisions of bankers. The same bankers that run the Fed. It is a scam and an insult to free market.

What about inflation?
#13 | Posted by Lipzoidial

It depends on how fast the dollar falls relative to other currencies. Dollar assets like real estate, stocks and bonds going to hell. Commodity assets like food and energy going to heaven. Gold and silver will be sitting on each side of God's throne.

The idea that the government is not going to let these banks fail, which was implicit a year ago, its now explicit."

No shit Sherlock.

We can't try to build or even help anything while our economy is based on the decisions of bankers. The same bankers that run the Fed. -- #18 | Posted by wurster

Most important, the same bankers who got us into this mess in the first place.

That's what I've found most mind-boggling from the start. Can you imagine screwing up so badly at work that you have to tell your boss the world economy will collapse if he doesn't write you a blank check for $700B -- and getting what you ask for??!

Derivatives may be hard to understand, but this part isn't. Firing the incompetent employees is a no-brainer -- unless you're HAPPY about the huge transfers of wealth that their screwups have led to. Using taxpayer money to fund mergers and acquisitions that create bigger banks is a good indication that that's exactly what's going on.

Using taxpayer money to fund mergers and acquisitions that create bigger banks is a good indication that that's exactly what's going on.

#21 | Posted by Phoenix at 2009-10-28 10:16 AM

The O'tards wave the pom-poms for Obama's handling of the crisis, spending hundreds of billions to ensure that it will happen again.

What were you thinking? Obama and his minions will fix it? As long as both parties control the government via their "lobbies" and "wall street cronies", these issues will only get worse until, of course, the final collapse. It is inevitable, and facts support this conclusion. Now, the fed bank is totally in power to do whatever...

the next crisis is months away, commercial real estate, expectations are that it will dwarf, or small people the current private real estate crisis.

#24 Scooter: do you have more info on the coming commercial real estate crisis (links, articles, etc.)? I'm interested.
Thanks!
AKAT

Just hang-on to your ass when the commercial real estate market collapses. That could lead to a stock market crash worse than the last one. However, when the dollar will no longer be accepted as payment for oil is when things will really get dire!!

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable