Hey fish, toy amd nanc here's a site I where you would fit in better....www.niggermania.net

Oh, I get it. If someone wants to question that Michelle Obama has more "ladies in waiting" than any other first lady in history, they are a racist?

Do I have this right, boi?

If so, you are a blind partisan shill who could probably secretly desires to become lady in waiting #27. If not, what is your point here with the racist reference?

YAWN.

I really didn't think you would attempt to justify your illogical racist reference and minimize my valid point of invalid racism.

Hint: You would have looked less idiotic and shillish if you had just remained silent.

I'm sick of people pulling the race card just because someone disagrees with something one of the Obamas do. Grow up, boi. Strive for prozacman -- please.

"I really didn't think" SNIP!

And once again, no explanation why you brought up a charge of racisim in an un-racist situation. Plus, you throw in an out of context quote of mine.

It just gets better, boi. You do all my heavy lifting for me.

Thanks

Now, maybe you will try to redeem yourself (but I doubt it): Why do you think that questioning all of Michelle's staff is a racist issue?

Katie McCormick Lelyveld, Michelle Obama's press secretary... said ...

Michelle's press secretary said? LOL Color me skeptical, but I have never seen a press secretary say what his/her boss didn't want him/her to say.

Please, Danforth. You can to better.

That number came from factcheck.org who is part of the annenberb public policy center. Their liberal to conservative bias is 3.4:1.

In a 2005 Annenberg Public Policy Center poll of nearly 700 journalists, the liberal-to-conservative ratio was 3.4 to 1.

"And once again" SNIP!

And once again, you tacitly admit that your charges of racism by disagreeing with an Obama policy is unwarranted and a partisan knee-jerk reaction.

Thanks, "SNIPpy". LOL

Go ahead and "SNIP" again -- I won't reply and that way you'll think you "won" your point.

But we all know that pulling the race card is an idiotic thing to do when debating the president or the first lady's policys. And you are an idiot for pulling it.

You ball and no return from me. Have fun, SNIPpy. LOL

What a bunch of hypocritical pussies.

???

How are they hypocritcal? Which republican first lady has ever had this large of a staff?

Factcheck.org is run by the Anneberg Foundation, which is very conservative leaning and big supporter and contributor to John McCain

Factcheck.org is conservative? (by proxy of the folks who run it)

LOL

Here are snippets of the current stories on factcheck.org:

: Does Obama have an unprecedented number of "czars"?
A: "Czar" is media lingo, not an official title. But our research shows that George Bush's administration had more "czars" than the Obama administration.
--------------
In 2004 we accused President Bush of using "dubious statistics" to support his claim that limiting malpractice awards to injured patients could save the economy between $60 billion and $108 billion per year. Ever since, we've said most independent research indicated little if any savings from limiting malpractice liability, and just a few weeks ago
------------
RNC Tax Attack Goes Too Far
An RNC Web ad claims Democrats would tax ordinary wheelchairs. Not true.
---------------
A new health care ad from a conservative group claims that "Medicare will be bankrupt in eight years." That gives a false impression

Wouldn't it just be easier to admit that you were a knee-jerk jerk when you played the race card upthread? You FAIL every time.

You were flat-ass wrong. Live with it.

And you were flat-assed wrong for pulling the race card on this issue. It's people like you and Al Sharpton (who does the same thing) who keep racism alive.

Live with it, boi.

"Factcheck.org is conservative?"

I didn't say that, try again.

???

Then what is your implication here?:

Factcheck.org is run by the Anneberg Foundation, which is very conservative leaning

#36 | Posted by prozacboi at 2009-10-25 11:01 PM

If I hear one more dumbass use the phrase "race card", I'm gonna fuckin' hurl in vivid color.

As long as it gets played (as boi clearly did in post #8), I'll keep using that phrase. But then, I'm not a dumbass, so I guess you won't hurl if I use it.

And you took the bait like the sucker that you are.

Pathetic. After getting drubbed by me on several posts, you finally say you were only trolling.

Whatever helps you sleep at night, race card player. LOL LOL LOL

On the other hand, Goatman EXPLICITLY stated that factcheck.org was "liberal".

What would you call a site whose liberal v conservative journalists were 3.4:1? LOL

God you are one dumbass troll

Nice try, but you are still a race baiter.

Who else would use an insipid phrase from twenty years ago...???

I use phrases from 50 years ago! What is the statute of limitations on political lingo, boyd? I didn't know there was one. Please enlighten me.

Give it up. Goatfart is DR's most stubborn moron.

Sad to see that you support race baiting, axe, but knowing the political partisan shill you are, I'm not the least bit surprised.

So is that all you have, axe, to address boi's race baiting? That I'm a stubborn moron? LOL

The regulars here know he is wrong 99.97% of the time...

Oh yeah? Well they also know you are a dick 100% of the time. Neener, neener, neener.

*snark off*

Grow up.

And his favorite trick is calling everyone he disagrees with racists.

???

I've never called anyone here a racist except celery. (and she is) God, it's pathetic when you have to pull a boyd and invent things I've said to "win" or whatever it is that is so important to you that you lie.

As I said, grow up.

This is rich coming from someone who sleeps in KKK jammies.

Don't ask him how he knows what I look like in bed, folks.

What would I call someone who gets their statistics/facts from "conservapedia"?

A dumbass.

So do you have a link to dispute mine, or is calling me a "dumbass" your final answer? LOL Great debate skills you possess, boyd.

'night blog

"Dear Diary -- goatman left me in an indefensible position again. Plus it got to be really awkward sticking up for a race baiter. So I only spent 20 or so minutes on the DR tonight. 'night diary"

Boyd

You have called me a racist at least 5 times back when you were relentlessly stalking me.

My bad. I do remember you gratuitously using the word "nigger" and I did call you a racist for that.

Goatman complaining about race bating when his buddy jak is one of the worst, and he never says anything then?

That's cute.

Cute? I'll tell you what's cute -- you trying to get me to post what you want me to post. LOL

...race bating when his buddy jak is one of the worst, and he never says anything then?

He's the master at pulling y'all's strings, alex. I love watching the master puppeteer at work.

Pathetic troll turd.

Actually, I'm a very good, not pathetic, troll turd. You bit didn't you? LOL

He must just be a trolling fraud like you, right?

I'm a genuine troll, not a fraudelent one, alex. You too keep biting. I can't speak for jak, but my observation is that he is pretty good at it as well.

My 'gratuitous' use of the word was saying what everyone with 3 functioning brain cells knew

No. That is a lie. You were putting words into someone's mouth. You call me a moron, but at least I'm able to get my message across without putting words -- especially hateful ones like "nigger" -- into someone's mouth. Yet you do. So who's the moron? LOL

Moosefart.

You going to call me sexist for that one?

I didn't know moosefarts are gender specific.

Just. Wow.

???

PLEASE DO educate us all on the fine art of race baiting, and how very wrong it is.

See post #8 for an excellent example.

Before I call it a night, I'd like to ask the Goatfart to explain again how the cost of production has anything to do with the cost of gasoline at the retail pump

???

Are you blocked from the archives? I'm not really sure what petrol has to do with Michelle Obama's staff. I know threads drift, but going from M.O.'s excessive staff to the price of petroleum is more than a drift -- it's more like a violent careening.

Hatin "wetbacks"

???

You support them? I hate all lawbreakers, alex, especially the ones whose family that my tax dollars have to support.

Sorry you have a problem with that. Perhaps you wouldn't mind increasing your tax burden and decreasing mine to pay for these wetbacks you think I should tolerate?

And you're both egomaniacal bigots from Texass

That's your best? Name calling like boi, axe and betelg?

Sad, but not unexpected. You quickly devolve into that phase of a debate.

Annenberg is a Republican. Factcheck has also debunked liberal lies

My point exactly, danforth. So who do you think would have a more unbiased view of M.O.'s staff: Factcheck.org, or M.O.'s press secretary?

Hint: Factcheck.org won't lose their jobs for saying something that puts the first lady in a bad light.

And you complain about Annenberg, but cite Conservapedia?!?

What's the liberal to conservative ratio there?

Do you have a link that says otherwise? If so, I'll be glad to entertain it.

But back to M.O. before it slips your mind: Who would be more likely to be accurate: Her press secretary, or factcheck.org?

The though of you in a debate is pretty funny, though.

Not if you're my opponent. The laughter comes when my opponent spins, lies, and calls names.

I actually did quite well on the HS debate team. yes, that was 35 years ago, but I can still hold my own.

Dan- It's OK when goat cites hard core conservative sites like conservepedia, but when you pick FACTCHECK.ORG, which beats up everyone, he cries foul.

???

I didn't cry foul. Just the opposite. I said I believe their story over M.O.'s press secretary. Also, it was I not Danforth who "picked" factcheck.org. He "picked" M.O.'s press secretary.

Please try to keep up, alex.

Factcheck states it was able to confirm 18 staffers for Laura Bush, possibly 19. Not that far from

???

From the featured story:

She is served by twenty-six attendants, including a hair dresser and make-up artist

The annual cost to taxpayers for such unprecedented attention is approximately $1,750,000 without taking into account the expense of the lavish benefit packages afforded to every attendant.

Little did American voters realize the call for "change" would result in the establishment of an Obama oligarchy.

The discovery of the additional attendants was made by D'Angelo Gore of factcheck.org and by calls to Katie McCormick Lelyyeld, Michelle Obama's press secretary

I'm sure that Laura Bush had more people on her staff than Hillary Clinton...

???

Why are you 'sure'? Because Hillary is a democrat and so are you?

You seem to use the "I'm sure" phrase a lot, bOoB, yet you claim you back up everything with logic and links.

So . . .

Link, please? If you don't have one, please don't make that outrageous claim of always backing up with links again, OK?

Too bad that Rogers, alleged programmer and alleged author of computer books, can't fix his killfiles.

WAAAAH! I want my killfiles, rogers! I'm still too stupid/lazy/stoned to skip goatman's posts. I am a mindless zombie who can't stay away from him without killfiles!. I need you to do it for me rogers!

signed:
Null

So are you now believing the press secretary, or not believing the press secretary

I believe both, danforth. Did you miss the operative word "and"? I presume that to mean that the secretary confirmed some and factcheck confirmed the rest.

And do you actually believe the make-up artist is a full-timer, and/or only "attends" the first lady?

I have no idea, danforth. I just go by the story. If you have something to dispute it, post the link.

And BufaloBob comes on the field in the last 10 seconds to flatten the Goat and dance on his corpse.

LOL

Probably because Bob is the only person he can ever beat.

According to you. I've heard differently from other people on this blog. I guess you were sick that day when they posted, alex.

No wonder you have such a lopsided opinion of my views and "winnings". You seem to miss a lot of what is posted here and it seems that against all statistical probabilities, the things you miss are the ones that would change your opinion of me.

How odd. I'd buy a few lottery tickets if I were you.

It's amazing how you keep moving the goalposts and restating your position.

example, please?

As it is made clearer and clearer by everyone in herehat you have NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

Are you the new self-appointed spokesmand for everyone on the DR? Did null give up the post?

Put on some underwear, goatie.

As long as they are boxers. I still won't comply with your request for the pink lacey things.

Why is bOoB bringing up the smokestacks on the moon again? Does M.O. have a staff member who deals with this?

LOL, axe -- this is your man!

I see him wimping out on his bet aliens will reveal themselves in 2012

???

Oh yes, I remember. I made a challenge. You set a condition that was unacceptable to me. You call that wimping. I'm used to the English the other 299,999,999 US citizens speak.

This is really funny coming from someone who outright welched when he lost. We had a bet about satellites in Geosynch orbit. When I proved to you you were wrong, you admitted I was right and said, "See you in a month". But two weeks later you were back.

So pardon me if I don't put much stock in your 'weaseling' remarks, welcher. LOL

...so I aint gonna like you.

I'm shattered.

Meaning, everyone has had a turn knocking your dick into the dirt.

If only we could all be as perfect as you, alex.

The makeup artist was part of the Europe trip. Not a full-timer, but that won't stop the ludicrous chain emails.

The story at least didn't list a full time make up artist, so I wasn't really counting him/her as part of M.O.s staff. (sound's like and alternative title for the press secretary.)

Good night alex, from the guy you don't like. Just to let you know you don't bother me at all. I've got no reason to dislike you. Hell, I've never even met you.

The videos speak for themselves

#138 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2009-10-26 01:14 AM | Reply | Flag believes in wookies, too, because of the far superior video footage of them that surfaced in the '70s

You punked out--it's as simple as that.

I'm glad you are convinced, bOoB. Self delusion seems to be a very important part of your life. LOL

Another lie by you---

The wookie thing isn't true? I just assumed that since all it takes is a grainy video on youtube.com to make you a believer, that a clear sharp color one would even more accectable.

No?

What was the original statement about aliens revealing themselves, and what new condition did I set?

You should've taken notes, bOoB. But if your memory is really that bad that you don't remember, feel free to use the archives. I've no intention of repeating myself.

Why don't you get that memory thing checked out, bOoB? And until then, please take notes so you don't have to keep repeating the same questions like an idiot.

I did take notes.

???

Then why are you asking? The answers are the same. Is redundancy a symptom of the dementia you suffer?

That makes you a Punk Boy.

As I said, bOoB -- I'm glad you are convinced. That's all that is important. It doesn't mean a shit that no one else believes you. All that matters is that your little delusional mind is convinced, little man. LOL

We are all very happy for you.

I ask because I enjoy watching you lie and punk out in front of everyone time and time again.

Cool. I'll bet you have that thread printed out and used for wallpaper in your bedroom and you jerk off to it everynight. LOL

No wonder self-delusion is such an important part of your life. Sex is a powerful motivator.

Besides, bOoB -- why would I want to make a bet with you when you welched out of our last one? You said you would be gone a month from the DR, but you only stayed away for two weeks.

Who could possibly trust you after that?

Since bOoB is insisting on his punk thing, I thought it would be good that everyone know who the real punk is.

bOoB and I had a bet about satellites in geosynchronous orbit. His inability to wrap his mind around the simple orbital geometry involved(satellites in GS orbit are above the equator whose plane is tilted 23 degrees to the ecliptic) led him to believe that GS satellites are in the dark 12 hours a day. He said if he lost, he would not post on the DR. Here is his concession, yet he was gone only 2 weeks, then claimed he never made the bet. Yet here is his concession:

Goatman

It seems you are correct.

See you in 30 days DummY.

;-)

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-01-05 02:42 AM

Not that I care but don't offend the jelly makers

Or the heir to the British throne. You are right.

Thanks for the correction.

That means there was no bet.

Then why did you say:

It seems you are correct.

See you in 30 days DummY.>/blockquote>LOL

Goatman

It seems you are correct.

See you in 30 days DummY.

;-)

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-01-05 02:42 AM

Well, bOoB? Why did you say that? Furthermore, why did you stay away for a while then come back two or three weeks later then say there was no bet?

LOL

All it takes is to give you enough rope and you hang yourself.

I was mistaken in thinking you had accepted the bet.

Nice try. Are you saying you are so stupid that it took you three weeks to realize there was no bet? LOL

You're dumber than I thought.

--it took me that long to realize you had never accepted the bet.

LOL What a fucking idiot. Three weeks, huh? LOL

I see your strategy: Admit to being an idiot since everyone already know that, but at least being a known idiot is not as bad as being a known welsher.

Goatman

It seems you are correct.

See you in 30 days DummY.

;-)

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-01-05 02:42 AM

LOL

A much larger and more important point was established with that bet last year. It is very, very simple mental geometry to understand why a GS Satellite cannot possibly be in the shadow of the earth 12 hours and also why the eqinoxes make a difference. Yet you argued against this point vociferously.

This just proves what I have said all along -- you don't have the brainpower it takes to do the most elementary geometric experiment. That's why you choose to invoke invisible sky fairies to explain a shadow that your mind can't grasp. That's exactly what theists do to explain things they don't understand. Yet you make fun of them for doing exactly what you do.

bOoB, it's no disgrace to be that stupid. But what is disgraceful is that you have to invent invisible little friends to explain what 95% of the rest of us understand intuitively -- then argue about it! LOL

Goatman

It seems you are correct.

See you in 30 days DummY.

;-)

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-01-05 02:42 AM

And you're still too stupid to perform a basic geometric thought experiment as you proved on that thread. Bring in the invisible sky fairies! LOL

Spamming doesn't make you smarter, dummy. LOL

Easy geometry. Can't do it? Then bring in the invisible sky fairies. LOL Shadows on the moon combined with photographic errata? Smokestacks!

But if you are so stupid it takes you three weeks to figure out you never made a bet (LOL!) I guess simple geometric thought experiments are light years ahead of you --

right?

waiting on you, dummy!

I wish I had had da bOoB for some of my math classes in elementary school. I would just say, "Mr. bOoB, I don't understand how this angle can be". Then he'd say, "Don't worry about it. Just put down 'invisible sky fairies' and I'll give you an A."

LOL

No acceptance of a bet---there is no bet.

No understanding of angles and light? Then bring in the invisible sky fairies! LOL

The point is that you never accepted the bet

Actually I did as you admit:

Goatman

It seems you are correct.

See you in 30 days DummY.

;-)

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-01-05 02:42 AM

#181 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2009-10-26 03:39 AM | Reply | Flag: Not man enough to admit he can't do the geometric equavalent of 2+2. Indeed, admits he is so stupid it took him three weeks to make up this excuse of "no bet".

LOL

Hey, bOoB -- have you ever sat at a craps table in Vegas and suddenly become aware that you are very thirsty and hungry, your pants are loaded with shit and piss and you have a three week growth on your face? Then you notice the croupier is desperately nudging you telling you that you lost the bet you placed three weeks earlier? How do you respond? Do you get argumentative when you insist there was never a bet?

Yeah, it happens to a lot of the rest of us, too. LOL

More faux outrage packaged fer ready consumption by rubes, hicks and mouth breathing KluKKKers

Someone else who sees fit to ignorantly play the race card on a non-racial issue. And you think this makes you better than the "rubes, hicks and mouth breathing KluKKKers" you reference?

It makes you worse.

Grow up. Not every criticism of the Obamas is seated in racism. Learn that.

You're on you own bOoB. We all see your concession. We all know you can't do simple math in your head.

Why should I waste my time trying to convince you? LOL You must have your delusions or you die. Far be it from me to hasten your death.

Spam away, welsher!

Here's your ass--take it with you.

???

I take my ass with me everywhere I go.

#187 |

#187 |

Not acknowleging the obvious bias of the sources of this piece is even stupider than that

???

You think I'm stupid for having not every heard of knowing who Dr Paul L Williams is, much less be intimately aware of his political leanings?

Well color me stupid then. But I'll have to color you extremely presumputous. The only Paul Williams I ever heard of was that faggy little blonde songwriter and the not so faggy singer from the Temptations.

But unless I'm mistaken it was you brought up the klan -- clearly a racial reference.

Is this story really a BFD to you, Goat?

No. If you follow my posts from the beginning, you'll see I was railing against prozacboi for also playing the race card. See post 8. People playing the race card for simply disagreeing with the Obamas irks me. It's as if no one ever in the history of this great country ever disagreed with their leaders until a black one was elected

bOoB, you aren't too bright, are you -- or you just like seeing your posts in print.

Answer is still in post 187. Sorry if you don't get it, but you've never displayed anything that nears intelligence.

Put the cats down and see if your neighbor can help you understand post 187, dummy

you never accepted the bet.

???

You sure implied I did:

Goatman

It seems you are correct.

See you in 30 days DummY.

;-)

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-01-05 02:42 AM

Deal with it, bOoB. You are a welsher.

Now, I'll explain the first sentence in 187 very slowly in hopes you'll get it.

You (second person singular pronoun referencing da bOoB) are (second person singular of the infinitive 'to be' on (connecting conjuntion) your (second person sigular possive, in this case referring to da bOoB) own (that's you, bOoB). IOW, I'm not responding to your lies anymore on this thread.

As I said, it's a toughy for someone who can't do simple mind geometry, but get the neighbor to help you on the really hard words like 'are'.

What a friggin' idiot and liar you are. I post your admission of a bet and your concession and you still deny it. How delusional can a little man like you get?

But you're interrupting a perfectly good non-sensical Troll War.

It's over, at least bi-laterally. da bOoB will probably continue on his own. He still has to convince himself of . . .

. . . I don't even know anymore. I've lost track of his torrent of lies.

Naw, that aint stupidity that's just good ole fashioned ignorance.

Whatever.

Does this arrogance come naturally or did you have to work to be so lofty?

With an attitude like that, I presume you are familiar with all American journalists and thier political biases?

He's currently going around speaking on behalf of his WorldNutDaily...

Which explains why I've never heard of him. I depend on the lefties to keep me up on Rush, Beck, and all the other RW extremists. They seem much more enamored with them than I am, as you just proved.

Calling into question the number of personal servants she has is a 'mean' attack?

Where have you been? If you question anything the Obamas do, you are a racist. See post #8 if you don't believe me