Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.) locked Republicans out of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee room to keep them from meeting when Democrats aren't present.

Towns' action came after repeated public ridicule from the leading Republican on the committee, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), over Towns's failure to launch an investigation into Countrywide Mortgage's reported sweetheart deals to VIPs.


For months Towns has refused Republican requests to subpoena records in the case. Last Thursday Committee Republicans, led by Issa, were poised to force an open vote on the subpoenas at a Committee mark-up meeting. The mark-up was abruptly canceled. Only Republicans showed up while Democrats chairs remained empty.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

buzkiller

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Do Democrats know no shame?

Will Nancy Pelosi crack right on camera?

Who hates Harry Reid more people from Nevada or the rest of the country?

Well these and other important questions can be answered by watching "As the democrats twist(in the wind) of course.

Its time to send the children home and put some adults back in charge. This experiment with socialist democrats has proven a failure now its time to get back to a working government.

The do nothing democratic party and administration once again show wy they are going to be one term and gone.

Helping Americans and America they are not.

Its time to send the children home and put some adults back in charge

Cos the GOP are more mature than the Dems?

FTA: Democrats objected when Thomas brought up a 90-page substitute measure that had been released shortly before midnight the night before. Democrats said they needed more time to read it. Thomas disagreed.

In response, Democrats objected to a normally perfunctory motion to dispense with the reading of the dense legislation. A clerk obligingly began reading it line by line.

Democrats departed to a library just off the main hearing room, leaving only Rep. Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-Calif.) to prevent the Republicans from obtaining unanimous consent to skip the reading. After a few minutes, Thomas asked again for the unanimous consent, and instantly brought down his gavel. Stark told reporters he had objected, but Thomas had replied, "You're too late."

Even before Thomas gaveled the reading to an end, he had directed staff to call the Capitol Police to remove the Democrats form the library.

Sounds like both sides are acting pretty childish to Spud.

Sounds like both sides are less interested in the truth than in only revealing things to make the other side look bad while scrambling to cover up anything that makes themselves look bad.

Both parties talk about tranparency but then both deliver secrecy.

But in Spud's considered Dems remain the lesser of two evils by a wide margin.

Be Well.

But in Spud's considered Dems remain the lesser of two evils by a wide margin.

Why we're in the shape we're in. Because idiots think "the lesser of two evils" is a perfectly acceptable situation.

Maybe 30 or 40 years ago "vote the bums out" would have been the solution to the issue people like you created with your philosophy, but now the place is full of the "lesser of two evils".

Way to go!

Spud: But in Spud's considered Dems remain the lesser of two evils by a wide margin.

Axiom: Why we're in the shape we're in. Because idiots think "the lesser of two evils" is a perfectly acceptable situation.

Who thinks this?

Maybe 30 or 40 years ago "vote the bums out" would have been the solution to the issue people like you created with your philosophy, but now the place is full of the "lesser of two evils".

Wot pray tell is Spud's "philosophy" in yer mind?

Accepting that things are the way things are is a necessary first step in changing how things are.

It doesn't mean "accepting" as in being completely okay with the inequalities and injustices that exist in some fatalistic "can't change it so why not just give up" kinda way.

Quite the contrary, in fact.

"Disillusioned" is a good word.

Freed from illusion we are able to see reality.

And change it.

If we as a species wish to survive in the long term much change is necessary.

Only an informed electorate can make participatory democracy work.

As it stands today in our so-called information age the powers-that-be make sure the airwaves are filled with misinformation, disinformation, lies, distractions, deflections and think tanked sound bytes.

Spud's purpose in blogworld (aside from amusing hisself, of course) is to cut through the bullshit, deconstruct the spin, hold feet to flame, demand accountability and present the underlying moral arguments in an easily comprehended way.

This is not because Spud philosophy dictates a blind acceptance of the way things are.

The corporate Dem/Rep duopoly that functions for the elites of not only America but around the world is a sham.

America needs a third party unbeholden to the corporate slimeballs who are mostly responsible for the direction the American government has gone over the last sixty years or so.

Till then the lesser of two evils is still the best choice you can make realistically.

Now, splain again how yer philosophy is an improvement over Spud's.

If you can.

Be Well.

America needs a third party unbeholden to the corporate slimeballs who are mostly responsible for the direction the American government has gone over the last sixty years or so.

Till then the lesser of two evils is still the best choice you can make realistically.

#5 | Posted by dethspud at 2009-10-22 04:23 AM

Therein lies the problem. America needs a new party, but won't vote for one, because realistically only the lesser of two evils has a chance.

The lesser of two evils has the only chance of winning because America won't vote third party, and America won't vote third party because they don't have a chance to win. Self-fullfilling prophecy. Circular logic.

Lock the doors!

Who thinks this?

You do, by justifying voting for one evil over another because it is "less evil".

Which answers your second question as well.

Spud's purpose in blogworld seems to be to swoop in, make broad generalizations about anything to the right of spud while occasionally, lightly criticising things on spud's side of the political spectrum in an effort to appear "fair and balanced".

Spud appears to be as full of shit as a christmas goose.

Now, splain again how yer philosophy is an improvement over Spud's.

First, it doesn't rely on the massive change in thinking that "the lesser of two evils is the best choice...until". The argument we have to settle for it until something better comes along is bullshit.

It's bullshit because settling is perpetuating the problem. We're not biding our time until a hero shows up that we can all get behind.

The answer is there is no answer because people, similar to yourself, who had good intentions sent assholes, thieves and liars to Washington long before I was even born because they were "the lesser of two evils". At this point, my participation in the system is an exercise in mental masturbation.

I don't really need to think about who I am voting for. I can hope that the guy that wins will actually make progress, but I understand that they're all bought and paid for by the same corporations.

In short. It can't be fixed. Ever.

Because the lesser of two evils was good enough.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable