Rivals Trick Sex-Starved Councilman

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Atlantic City councilman Eugene Robinson, a 67-year-old Baptist minister, was allegedly set up by political rivals who sent a prostitute to lure him to a hotel and film him engaging in sex for blackmail purposes. "I was so surprised," testified Robinson, who began receiving oral sex within minutes of reaching the hotel room. "I, um, hadn't really had any sexual activity since '89. I thought that, naively, we were going to just pet."

Posted by rcade at 01:35 PM | 108 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry

Front Page
News Weblog
Comments
Flagged Comments
User Blogs
Write a Blog Entry
Edit Account
Stats Page
RSS Feed
Back Page

Subscriptions

RSS Feed

Author Info

rcade

Private E-mail
Visit Home Page

Joined 2003/04/04
Visited 2009/11/20

Status: editor

MORE STORIES

Palin Quits Book Signing, Angers Fans (77 comments) ...

Bartlett: Repubs Are Hypocrites on Spending (17 comments) ...

Peru Gang Killed Fat People for Use in Cosmetics (63 comments) ...

Retort: The Friday Nooner (53 comments) ...

Lou Dobbs Mulls Run for Office (73 comments) ...

Oprah Will End Talk Show (34 comments) ...

Muslim Countries Seek Blasphemy Ban (131 comments) ...

Europe Chooses First President (59 comments) ...

Retort: The Thursday Nooner (62 comments) ...

Arkansas Cop Tasers 10-Year-Old Girl (81 comments) ...

Sexiest Man Alive: Johnny Depp (30 comments) ...

Dionne: We Need a Civilian ROTC (41 comments) ...

Study: Fearless 3-Year-Olds Tomorrow's Criminals (34 comments) ...

Microsoft Co-Founder Allen Has Cancer (15 comments) ...

Retort: The Wednesday Nooner (71 comments) ...

Special Features

Daily Nooner

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

DSA.

#1 | Posted by nanc at 2009-10-15 01:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

she lured him in saying she was an alumnist of oral roberts university....

#2 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2009-10-15 01:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I, um, hadn't really had any sexual activity since '89. I thought that, naively, we were going to just pet."

Depends on what your meaning of "is" is.

#3 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-10-15 01:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

I cant help but feel sorry for this old codger.

#4 | Posted by Redneckville at 2009-10-15 02:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

Say no more "Baptist" !

#5 | Posted by satansbeard at 2009-10-15 02:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

I can never feel sorry for these fundie religious types who cloak themselves in holiness, make money as a result of it, and then are exposed.

Paint a big A on his lapel

#6 | Posted by boojiboy at 2009-10-15 02:16 PM | Reply | Flag:

and then are exposed.

Exposed? For what. The guy went 20 years without sex, he gets head and he's exposed?

If God didn't want men to get head, he wouldn't have given women lips.

#7 | Posted by Manypaths at 2009-10-15 02:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

Fucking cruel is what it is. The poor old guy wasn't even married. Hadn't had sex in 20yrs.

Though he has not asserted a cause-and-effect relationship, Robinson's health took a drastic turn for the worse after the existence of the sex video became known. He now lives in a nursing home and was wheeled into court in a wheelchair before the jury arrived, a blanket covering his legs.

He spoke in a frail voice, saying he takes eight prescription medicines daily, including painkillers and prescriptions for diabetes. Under questioning from a defense lawyer, Robinson said his condition is aggravated by stress.

"They said it has something to do with the central nervous system," Robinson said. "That was caused by extreme anxiety."

#8 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 02:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

I need enemies like that!

#9 | Posted by zeropointnrg at 2009-10-15 02:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

"He now lives in a nursing home and was wheeled into court in a wheelchair before the jury arrived, a blanket covering his legs"

That musta been one heck of a hummer...

#10 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2009-10-15 02:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

He should have just ignored the whole thing and gone right into senility if he was that stupid that a 24 year old was going to go after him sent from above. I hope he has a guardian at this point for being that gullible. Oh well, maybe I should start praying or learn to piss off the right people. Just be the one to choose the motel...

#11 | Posted by NonDLR at 2009-10-15 02:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

This is great. I believe AFLCIO should
hire hundreds of prostitutes to "visit" all the clergy in the country, I bet 80% would screw up (sic)

This would be great to clean out the pharisees.
May not be any priests left though, maybe alter boys could take over.

#12 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 02:38 PM | Reply | Flag:

You mean, she didn't even "LIKE" him?
That would be embarassing.

#13 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 02:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

You mean Christians aren't allowed to get the random blow job?

How in the fuck do they talk you into buying into that shit?

Rules for Christians:
Must spend one hour a week pretending to be Holy. Sundays, 10:00am?
Ok, I can do that

No more blow jobs
Huh? Well, why the fuck not? Nevermind, you can count me out. Thanks but no thanks.

#14 | Posted by Manypaths at 2009-10-15 02:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

Actually I have never seen anything in Scripture regarding that.

#15 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-15 02:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

Jeebus, what an old trick to fall for - don't they teach Elmer Gantry in lit courses any more?

#16 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2009-10-15 02:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Actually I have never seen anything in Scripture regarding that."

I thought that 'adultery' thing kind of covered all that sort of behavior.

#17 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 02:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I thought that 'adultery' thing kind of covered all that sort of behavior."

Oral sex with your spouse??

Never heard that.

#18 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-15 02:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Oral sex with your spouse??"

She wasn't his spouse.

#19 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 02:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

I was refering to Many's comment about Christians and sex.

Adultery is even considered lusting for another.

#20 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-15 03:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

Um, its EYE-OPENING TIME.

Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

It was adultery.

#21 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:01 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I was refering to Many's comment about Christians and sex."

Yes, and he was referring to the unmarried baptist minister getting a hummer.

#22 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 03:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

All he has to do is admit it, then he can be forgiven and live correctly, Turn into A noble gentleman with warnings for the kids...

Good could come out of this if he admits error.

#23 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

My mistake, Angry.

I'm so tired I don't even make sense to myself!!

LOL

#24 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-15 03:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

Don't marry her, pastor, she's too good for you.

#25 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

Why isn't anybody talking about the scum who set him up?

#26 | Posted by Pirate at 2009-10-15 03:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

Richard,
Do us all a favor, and STFU. If you see Eddie, tell her I said to do the same.

#27 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-10-15 03:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

Samson got his eyes poked out.
You are lucky, pastor.

#28 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

#26, because I'm still trying to find out how to get ahold of them to let them know how little I think of them, and that I dare them to try those tactics on me.

#29 | Posted by zeropointnrg at 2009-10-15 03:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

Pirate: someone said they don't remember seeing anything about it in scripture, so I posted the Bible verse.

You asked why I don't STFU. Because someone asked me a question.

Why don't you stop being rude and obnoxious?

This thread would be more civilized that way.

#30 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

"My mistake, Angry."

But what about the sodomy thing...doesn't that cover it?

#31 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 03:12 PM | Reply | Flag:

And, Pirate, Why don't you go talk to Eddie yourself, You have to learn how to become responsible before you grow up.

#32 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

"You asked why I don't STFU."

That was 101harebrain, not Pirate.

#33 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 03:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

Well, Ok...I always thought of that as just anal, but you are right.

#34 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-15 03:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

www.m-w.com to look up sodomy.

Adultery is one man lusting after one woman. Or a woman lusting after a man.

If you are man and man or woman and woman it is not adultery.

#35 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Well, Ok...I always thought of that as just anal, but you are right."

I guess hubby's not going to like not getting anymore hummers, eh?

#36 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 03:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

sorry, pirate.

address the last too to hairbrain then. Please forgive me pirate, I made an error.

#37 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

hetero sex is adultery
homo sex is called abomination, it's worse.

#38 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-15 03:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

I guess hubby's not going to like not getting anymore hummers, eh?

#36 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 03:18 PM | Reply Flag: Tentative; Wants an Answer before trying

#39 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-10-15 03:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

"homo sex is called abomination"

So is eating shellfish.

Leviticus 11:12
"Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you."

So according to the Bible, being gay is the equivalent sin as having a shrimp cocktail.

#40 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-15 03:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

"homo sex is called abomination, it's worse."

Can't be.

Nothing in the 10 commandments about gay sex or abominations.

#41 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 03:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nothing in the 10 commandments about gay sex or abominations

Well, it does say not to covet your neighbor's ass.

#42 | Posted by kanrei at 2009-10-15 03:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

poor bastard. who really expects him to turn down a bj after thinking about it since '89?

#43 | Posted by BruceBanner at 2009-10-15 03:27 PM | Reply | Flag:

#39 | Posted by 101Harebrain at 2009-10-15 03:23 PM | Reply | Flag: likes to fantasize about men giving blowjobs

#44 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 03:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

Samson got his eyes poked out.
You are lucky, pastor.

Over a BJ? Get the fuck outta here.

#45 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-10-15 03:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

Note to the lefties:

innocent little facts:

A man can be a highly moral, good person, and know the simple truth that rampent unrestrained sexual promiscuity is a 99% certain recipe for a miserable life......

....and at the SAME TIME, lapse, even repeatedly, and STILL be a good, moral decent person.

HOWEVER!!!!!!

A man CANNOT be a highly moral, good person, and know the simple truth that rampent unrestrained sexual promiscuity is a 99% certain recipe for a miserable life WHILE AT THE SAME TIME supporting such life styles, regardless of if he lapses or not.

Having said that....

A man can be an otherwise decent, kind, good and FOOLISH person and be a complete slut.

#46 | Posted by USAF242 at 2009-10-15 03:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

A man can be an otherwise decent, kind, good and FOOLISH person and be a complete slut.

We call them Republicans.

#47 | Posted by kanrei at 2009-10-15 03:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

AngryDad is very defensive on the topic of giving blow jobs to old men.

#48 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2009-10-15 03:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

usaf242- so a guy can DO "bad" things and be good, but if he supports "bad" things from other people, he's bad?

Religion makes no fucking sense whatsoever.

#49 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-10-15 03:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

Actually I have never seen anything in Scripture regarding that.

#15 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-15 02:46 PM | Reply |

I would tend to think it encouraged it even with all that stuff about subservance to your man or whatever.

#50 | Posted by KnightHawk at 2009-10-15 03:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

"A man CANNOT be a highly moral, good person, and know the simple truth that rampent unrestrained sexual promiscuity is a 99% certain recipe for a miserable life WHILE AT THE SAME TIME supporting such life styles, regardless of if he lapses or not."

So then that means you support gays getting married, and ending all that promiscuity, right?

If not, you're suffering from some severe cognitive dissonance.

#51 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-15 03:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

67 year old man getting a hummer from a 24 year old woman...

You'd think he would've been proud of it. I would've been like, "Go ahead and show the video to whoever you please"... "Please!"

Then I'd walk off all dancin like, "yeah, who can still get a stiffy? I CAN! Who do all the young girls want? THEY WANT ME! WHO'S YOUR DADDY? WHO'S YOUR DADDY? I'M YOUR DADDY! I'M YOUR DADDY!

Start wearing some new "sic threads", get a "phat ride", fix up my crib, get some chains and dark shades...

Bowmp bowmp chicka bowmp bowmp!!!

He's single and 67 yrs old, that's what prostitutes are for!!!

#52 | Posted by Capt_Of_Uranus at 2009-10-15 03:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

"f not, you're suffering from some severe cognitive dissonance."

That's like saying that we could drop the murder rate by making killing legal.

#53 | Posted by salamandagator at 2009-10-15 03:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

67 year old man getting a hummer from a 24 year old woman...

You'd think he would've been proud of it. I would've been like, "Go ahead and show the video to whoever you please"... "Please!"

Any 67 y/o with money can get a hummer from a prostitute. Just ask Buffalo Bob.

#54 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-10-15 03:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Any 67 y/o with money can get a hummer from a prostitute. Just ask Buffalo Bob."

Not anymore, his mom cut off his allowance.

#55 | Posted by salamandagator at 2009-10-15 04:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

Any 67 y/o with money can get a hummer from a prostitute. Just ask Buffalo Bob.

I think he gets his jollies from whatever happens during those abductions.

#56 | Posted by goatman at 2009-10-15 04:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Just ask Buffalo Bob."

You must be thinking of Jackass.

#57 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-10-15 04:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

Not anymore, his mom cut off his allowance.

#55 | Posted by salamandagator at 2009-10-15 04:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

ROFL! FF.

#58 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-10-15 04:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

You must be thinking of Jackass.

#57 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-10-15 04:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

That guy uses food stamps to buy blowjobs. Only because its the easiest way to cheat his kids out of child support.

#59 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-10-15 04:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

According to the article, this Baptist minister and City Councilman said:

... um, hadn't really had any sexual activity since '89. I thought that, naively, we were going to just pet."...

"Pet"??? That term hasn't been used since high school 30 years ago.

The minister said he hasn't had "any" sexual activity since 1989. The article didn't mention anything about him ever being married but no sex of any sort for 20 years since he was 47 years old? Come on. With many "devoted church ladies" often known to get "crushes" on their own preachers I can't believe he wasn't able to meet at least one woman in his congregation more than willing to take care of his needs.

The minister picks up a young girl who asked him for a ride to her motel and figured she was "the one" because "[He] was waiting for God to send [him] the one that's supposed to be [his] Christian wife,...[t]hat's what it says in the Bible...Yet within minutes of taking the girl to her cheap motel the 67-year-old... Atlantic City councilman and Baptist minister was receiving oral sex."

Yes, she certainly fit the bill of the good, Christian wife God had in mind for him. LOL

And the classic line in the entire article was when she was giving him oral sex --

"I was so surprised," he testified...

Hmm, I betcha! Very happily surprised. hahaha

Seriously, from what I gathered in reading the article, this minister/city councilman was single, was not caught with another man, the girl wasn't underage, and he himself didn't pay her for her services so he didn't hire a prostitute.

Unmarried church ministers are not suppose to act like "saints." So why any need on his part to deny he just "needed sex" like most normal men and when the situation presented itself, he took it. No big deal.

#60 | Posted by CalifChris at 2009-10-15 04:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

"That guy uses food stamps to buy blowjobs. Only because its the easiest way to cheat his kids out of child support."

That wasn't the point. Has Bob ever talked about prostitutes on this blog?

#61 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-10-15 04:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

I picked bob cuz hes an old loony that probably hasn't been laid since the carter administration.

#62 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-10-15 04:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

"That's like saying that we could drop the murder rate by making killing legal."

Some idiotic posts defy comment.

#63 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-15 04:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

So you agree with me?

#64 | Posted by salamandagator at 2009-10-15 04:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

"So you agree with me?"

Of course not, idiot. If someone actually believes strong families help strengthen society, why wouldn't they be in favor of creating more strong families? Disallowing gays to marry, and then bitching they're promiscuous, is laughable on its face. That's like denying sex education and contraception, and bitching about an increase in pregnancies.

#65 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-15 04:35 PM | Reply | Flag:

Danforth, the ends do not always justify the means. Not every way to fix problem is the right thing to do. Applying the title of acceptable to abnormal behavior is not an acceptable solution in many peoples eyes.

#66 | Posted by salamandagator at 2009-10-15 04:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

I am not out to get into an argument about gay marriage i was just pointing out how dumb your comment sounded.

#67 | Posted by salamandagator at 2009-10-15 04:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Applying the title of acceptable to abnormal behavior is not an acceptable solution in many peoples eyes."

That's what they used to say about interracial marriage, too. I get it. You don't see gays as real humans, and don't believe they should have the same rights you and I get to take for granted. Noted.

"I am not out to get into an argument about gay marriage i was just pointing out how dumb your comment sounded."

Then explain how one can claim in one breath they believe strong families are the centerpiece to society, and in the next breath deny the creation of more strong families?

#68 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-15 05:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

from the article --

..Robinson's health took a drastic turn for the worse after the existence of the sex video became known. He now lives in a nursing home and was wheeled into court in a wheelchair before the jury arrived, a blanket covering his legs....

He likely needs the blanket to cover him from the waist down 'cause he gets an erection every time he even thinks about that night or has to talk to anyone about what happened.

Hey, at 67 he should be proud he's still feeling frisky and is able to play. He should be wear this tee shirt into court and toss away the blanket.

Isn't it true older men (say 45 and over) aren't always physically able to have sex whenever they want due to not always being able to get an erection? At least that's one problem women never have to worry about -- we gals can be ready and rarin' to go any time we feel like it.

I suppose I should now shut-up and be more ladylike. I certainly don't want to have get a reputation on DR of being a wanton woman. LOL

#69 | Posted by CalifChris at 2009-10-15 05:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

"You don't see gays as real humans"

Just curious, did you have to work hard to become that dishonest?

" and don't believe they should have the same rights you and I get to take for granted."

They have every right i do in the realm that society has deemed acceptable.

"Then explain how one can claim in one breath they believe strong families are the centerpiece to society, and in the next breath deny the creation of more strong families?"

You just don't get it do you?
Lower standards to grant more acceptance, is that the way to go?
Remember strong families are a product of society, the same society that does not deem gay marriage to be acceptable. It is not just about disagreeing with the lifestyle but there is a need to protect what is considered right. you do not continue in strength when you change your standards for each abnormal group out there.

Don't give me more of the "interracial marriage" bullshit, you cannot actually believe it is the same any more then it being the same for incest or polygamy or a few others i am sure you can think of.

It has always amazed me to see the hypocrisy and bigotry of those that preach acceptance when they only mean acceptance of their agenda. This is not about hate although many would lead you to believe in character assassination attempts to try and marginalize the oppositions opinion rather then discussing it.

#70 | Posted by salamandagator at 2009-10-15 05:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

Now if you don't mind i am going to try to get a round of golf in before dark.

#71 | Posted by salamandagator at 2009-10-15 05:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

...That wasn't the point. Has Bob ever talked about prostitutes on this blog?

#61 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-10-15 04:14 PM

Maybe BuffaloBob never had a need to hire a prostitute or wants to discuss them. For all we know he could have a steady girlfriend and gets laid all the time and doesn't need to pay for a hooker.

Besides, BuffaloBob seems to enjoy posting on here about 9/11 conspiracies, 2012 prophecies, UFOs, smokestacks on the Moon, anti-gun issues, and politics more than discussions about details of his sex life -- former or current.

Of course this next example doesn't apply to BBob, but take me for instance. I'd been posting on here for more than four years and no one on DR ever made a comment how I'd never talk about prostitutes or ever join on your sometimes bawdy discussions about women. And four years later you found out why.

#72 | Posted by CalifChris at 2009-10-15 05:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

Awesome. Another homophobe pops up who thinks that majority mob rule makes a decision "right." Just like it did before the abolition of slavery. Just because the majority of society still votes down gay marriage doesn't mean the majority of society is right.

If it negatively affects your own marriage, something was already wrong with it. If what other people do in their bedroom affects you negatively, GTFO of their bedroom.

Finally, minority group does not make homosexuals an "abnormal group," anymore than it does a minority ethnic group, nor is allowing it a lower standard. Gays are consenting adults, not child molesters, the difference is simple - noone is getting harmed. One more time. Consensual. Two adults agreeing to something, which has NOTHING to do with a stupid strawman argument about pedophilia, bestiality, or any of the other ridiculous arguments homophobes like to distract with.

#73 | Posted by zeropointnrg at 2009-10-15 05:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Lower standards to grant more acceptance, is that the way to go?"

No. Equal standards. That's the way to go.

"Remember strong families are a product of society, the same society that does not deem gay marriage to be acceptable. "

The same society that used to not deem interracial marriage to be acceptable. Using your logic, slavery used to be acceptable, because society accepted it.

"It has always amazed me to see the hypocrisy and bigotry of those that preach acceptance when they only mean acceptance of their agenda."

My "agenda" is equality. Yours is treating one group as second-class citizens, not allowing them the same legal access to the same contracts conferring superseding rights to a spouse.

"you cannot actually believe it is the same any more then it being the same for incest or polygamy or a few others i am sure you can think of. "

What a retard, having to resort to equating incest to equality. You lose.

#74 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-15 05:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

No pussy for 20 years?!?! Someone get that man a room full of whores, pronto!!!

Best article I've read in a long time.

#75 | Posted by Pontius at 2009-10-15 05:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

"What a retard, having to resort to equating incest to equality."

Would you really expect anything different from the slimygator?

#76 | Posted by Angrydad at 2009-10-15 06:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

I certainly don't want to have get a reputation on DR of being a wanton woman. LOL

#69 | Posted by CalifChris at 2009-10-15 05:11 PM

You should have thought of that a long long time ago.

#77 | Posted by dxlingr at 2009-10-15 07:16 PM | Reply | Flag:

I missed it in the story, but did this guy even get to finish plastering this gals face with 70yr old face goo?

If he didn't that ought to be a crime right there. I'd countersue!

#78 | Posted by KnightHawk at 2009-10-15 07:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

Honestly now, who could blame the guy for getting a BJ? He's single, he's of age, what the hell? Now the blackmailers, there's a different issue altogethor. Imagine the look on their face when the supeona arrived! Rock on!

#79 | Posted by Mountain_Mano at 2009-10-15 07:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

#18 | POSTED BY LISA
"Oral sex with your spouse??
Never heard that."

LOL. Lisa, you crack me up.

#80 | Posted by TheTom at 2009-10-15 08:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

Adultery is one man lusting after one woman.

Whew. I can safely lust after the Olson Twins and it's not adultery.

Dodged a bullet there for sure!

#81 | Posted by snoofy at 2009-10-15 08:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

Thank you, Jesus

.
.
.
.
...For exposing this hypocrite

#82 | Posted by kirk at 2009-10-15 08:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

The poor old guy let himself be a "victim" to oral sex. Come on, this old guy was just a victim of people trying to blackmail him. Whatever "sin" he committed, it was venial compared to the mortal sins they committed.

#83 | Posted by danni at 2009-10-15 09:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

Dang, that story sucks.

Loneliness in old age is the worst...
Ever visit a nursing home or hospice lately?

#84 | Posted by kirk at 2009-10-15 09:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

Atheists love it when Christians stumble.

It justifies their contempt.

This was a good man who is....well...a man.

Not a perfect man.

I pity the people who set him up.

"Vengeance is mine...sayeth the Lord." Romans 12:19

I am hardly a religious fanatic; however, personally, in my life I have observed this phenomenon on more than one occasion.

#85 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2009-10-15 09:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Atheists love it when Christians stumble."

Not "Christians", Bill...'Holier-Than-Thou' Christians; there's a difference. I agree, no one is perfect. Someone who pretends they are, willfully places themselves on the pedestal.

#86 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-15 10:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

Dan,

You don't have to be a Christian to be "holier than thou".

Frankly, I've known quite a few atheists who...well...think an awful lot of themselves.

#87 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2009-10-15 10:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

WORST DEFENSE....EVER!!

-Comic Book Guy.

#88 | Posted by COMMONSENSE at 2009-10-15 11:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

"You don't have to be a Christian to be "holier than thou"."

You're right, but you have to admit they're in the majority. All too often, they use the Bible to thump someone else. The DR is rife with them.

#89 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-15 11:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Atheists love it when Christians stumble."

Heck, Christians love it when Christians stumble. Look how they mocked Jimmy Carter.

#90 | Posted by snoofy at 2009-10-15 11:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

What happened to the Baptist minister here was nothing more than a reverse of Moses' trick in front of the Pharoah where Moses turning staffs into snakes

#91 | Posted by Timex at 2009-10-16 02:10 AM | Reply | Flag:

she lured him in saying she was an alumnist of oral roberts university....

#2 | Posted by NerfHerder

Really? Spud heard it was Bob Jones University.

She claimed to have graduated from BJU at the Head of her class.

Sum Cum Louda and everything!

^_^

Jeebus, what an old trick to fall for - don't they teach Elmer Gantry in lit courses any more?

#16 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore

That's a FF, right there.

Why isn't anybody talking about the scum who set him up?

#26 | Posted by Pirate

Good point.

By Spud's light the ones who set this old man up for a fall are far more reprehensible than either the old man or the prostitute.

FTA: I thought that, naively, we were going to just pet."...

LOL.

You'd think he would've been proud of it. I would've been like, "Go ahead and show the video to whoever you please"... "Please!"

~CoU.

Actually, this story reminds Spud of a very old joke.

A 68 year old Rabbi walks into a confessional on a Sunday morning and sez to the Priest "Forgive me Father for I have sinned".

The Priest, somewot surprised, asks "Wot are your sins?"

Rabbi sez... Last night after 40 years of being faithful to my wife I met an 18 year old co-ed who sed she wanted to have sex with me. So in a moment of weakness I decided to give in to temptation. We went back to her place and spent the entire night making love. I had 4 orgasms!

Priest sez "Yeah, but yer Jewish why are you telling me all this?

Rabbi sez... Are you kidding I'm telling EVERYBODY!

* bows *

Be Well.

/Yes, here all week.
//Yer server. Don't fergit to tip!

#92 | Posted by dethspud at 2009-10-16 03:02 AM | Reply | Flag:

Why the fuss? The girl got a pearl necklace out of the deal.

#93 | Posted by OohRah at 2009-10-16 04:29 AM | Reply | Flag:

Sex, Smoking and Logic

According to Libs....

....if a person is promiscuous, but ALSO opposes promiscuity, he/she is an evil nasty person....

....so....

....logic would say that according to liberals, any smoker who tells kids to NOT smoke is an evil nasty person. Such a smoker should be a good liberal, and tell kids that smoking is GREAT, or at least keep his closed minded views to himself.

A few simple facts....

Being a slut, male or female, is a recipe for misery. One can honestly debate exactly how much promiscuity is needed, but once the threshold is reached, stay there too long, and misery is nearly certain to follow (a few folks beat the odds, just like a few heavy smokers live to over 90...)

As far as being a decent neighbor/citizen, if someone is single and sleeping around a bit with concenting adults, they are fine, even if their behavior is not especially wise.

In order to be a decent person, you MUST oppose harmful behaviors, even if you practice them (for example: the smoker who tells kids "don't smoke"...)

And finally.....

Wise people understand the difference between a decent but flawed man who advocates good behavior, and a wicked man who uses a moral mask. Anti-faith Liberals DO NOT understand the difference.

#94 | Posted by USAF242 at 2009-10-16 07:57 AM | Reply | Flag:

Dan,

"You're right, but you have to admit they're in the majority."

That hasn't been my experience.

#95 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2009-10-16 09:05 AM | Reply | Flag:

OF course, no mater WHAT you HAVE done or how you act, if, while you are still alive, you are sorry, you repent, then immediately you will be accepted of God and live.

All prior sins are forgiven!

But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die.
All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live.
Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his ways, and live? Ezekiel 18:23-25.

#96 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-16 09:21 AM | Reply | Flag:

This offer is good as long as you are ALIVE!

Once you are dead, you can never repent again. so hurry.
take advantage of the love and mercy of God, before you die.

#97 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-16 09:22 AM | Reply | Flag:

There is no 2012. If you are expecting that lie, it will be too late for you.No 2012, it will never happen.

#98 | Posted by richardrhine at 2009-10-16 09:23 AM | Reply | Flag:

Then what will we call the year between 2011 and 2013?

Is this like the 13th floor in a hotel?

#99 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-16 09:26 AM | Reply | Flag:

Dan,

Being a "left leaning" Christian while attending a very conservative church and having both conservative and liberal friends, has been interesting over the years.

It's left me pondering a dilemma.

Which is better?

Believe in values that are good and wholesome but lofty and difficult to actualize, or believe in values that are easy to obtain but offer much less for the betterment of mankind as individuals and society overall?

Is it better to end up being a hypocrite, or simply immoral?

#100 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2009-10-16 09:26 AM | Reply | Flag:

"That hasn't been my experience."

That the "Holier-Than-Thou" crowd aren't predominantly Christians?!?

You're joking, right?

#101 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-16 09:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

Dan,

"You're joking, right?"

No...I'm not.

I guess it all depends on what is meant by "holier than thou".

I am referring to people who presume to know it all.

#102 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2009-10-16 09:41 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Which is better? Believe in values that are good and wholesome but lofty and difficult to actualize, or believe in values that are easy to obtain but offer much less for the betterment of mankind as individuals and society overall?"

Why not both? Lofty, wholesome values which can be obtained and lived. I find the Beatitudes and the Golden Rule cover almost everything.

#103 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-10-16 09:45 AM | Reply | Flag:

AGAIN:

Wise people understand the difference between a decent but flawed man who advocates good behavior, and a wicked man who uses a moral mask. Anti-faith Liberals DO NOT understand the difference.

#104 | Posted by USAF242 at 2009-10-16 10:42 AM | Reply | Flag:

"If God didn't want men to get head, he wouldn't have given women lips"
Posted by Manypaths

Then why do men have lips?

#105 | Posted by UpL8 at 2009-10-16 11:00 AM | Reply | Flag:

UPL8

A chivalrous gentleman is privileged share pleasure with his lady friend.

#106 | Posted by USAF242 at 2009-10-16 11:22 AM | Reply | Flag:

#94 | Posted by USAF242 at 2009-10-16 07:57 AM | Reply | Flag:

Well, when you run your campaign on the "I don't smoke and my opponent does" platform and then get caught smoking.....

Lemme guess, I bet you worked long and hard on that stupid analogy only to have it crushed.

#107 | Posted by COMMONSENSE at 2009-10-16 01:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

"If God didn't want men to get head, he wouldn't have given women lips"
Posted by Manypaths

Then why do men have lips?
Posted by UpL8

Ask your boyfriend.

#108 | Posted by JOE at 2009-10-16 01:03 PM | Reply | Flag: