Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

President Barack Obama's adviser on Muslim affairs, Dalia Mogahed, has provoked controversy by appearing on a British television show hosted by a member of an extremist group to talk about Sharia Law.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

cookfish

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Sharia in its broadest sense is a religious code for living, which decrees such matters as fasting and dressing modestly. However, it has also been interpreted as requiring the separation of men and women.

It also includes the controversial "Hadd offences", crimes with specific penalties set by the Koran and the sayings of the prophet Mohammed. These include death by stoning for adultery and homosexuality and the removal of a hand for theft.

See Danni. See Danni run. Run, Danni, Run!

In the future I see a lot of one-handed Democrats walking around.

The left has just as many ignoramuses as the right. But instead of ignorantly demonizing innocent people, they ignorantly deify pieces of shit. Why listen to what the people who champion Sharia say? Assign other motives to them that are more reasonable instead. Pathetic.

and what they do to homosexuals - YIKES! i would be offed for having a beer:

www.huffingtonpost.com

we were right, cookfish - we were spot on in ALL our assessments of this potus.

not "offed" - "beaten".

Miss Mogahed, appointed to the President's Council on Faith-Based and Neighbourhood Partnerships, said the Western view of Sharia was "oversimplified" and the majority of women around the world associate it with "gender justice".
* * * * *

Really. Well, let's get some of the libbie women here on the DR for their opinion. Oh--wait a minute--she's Obama's advisor? Never mind then.

The fact that Sharia will proscribe homosexuality, gender equality, abortion, adultery, and women's education, and has nothing to say on the subject of genital mutilation is a problem for libbies, as is her status in the Obama White House. So until Randi Rhodes issues talking points on the subject, they'll stay away from this thread.

"we were right, cookfish..."

Sorry, cranc, an infinite number of wrongs do not make a right.

how were we wrong? he's proving everything we said about him is rapidly coming true.

it is misunderstood

and its misunderstood the most by muslims.

sharia law was intended to be like our justice system but without the extremely long time it takes to settle civil matters.

judicial precedence is the foundation of sharia... but if you ask anyone that follows "sharia" today, they don't even know what that means.

in today's incarnation sharia is frightning

judicial precedence translates to constant improvement and striving to always better it self.

todays sharia hasn't changed since 1000 years ago.

like i said, muslims misunderstand it the most... and the f'n mullahs threaten death to anyone that challenge the bullshit system they created.

like i said, muslims misunderstand it the most...
.......#10 | Posted by klifferd

......that's not much of an endorsement of your religion.......

......what you are saying in effect, is that the more Muslims there are, the less understanding of Islam there will be........

Thanks to the application of Sharia, the rejection of Islam will be quicker around the world.

......what propels knowledge of Sharia around the world, are the horror stories of it's barbaric applications........and the more that these horror stories are flashed around the world, by today's technology, the quicker the world will reject Islam as a viable partner in human progress..........

Below is a paste from another thread regarding Islam and it's growth.


......increasing levels of education will eradicate all religions, world over, within one or two generations......


......western Europe is functionally atheistic, with some scattering of blue-hairs still attending churches, close to half of America is non-practising, and those who do practice religion are the 55+ generation who will be gone soon.......


....... the most stringent ANTI-MUSLIM laws are in Islamic majority countries such as Turkey, which shows you the true future of Islam ......these countries found that for a society to make progress, religion had to be restricted........


........and while the number of Muslim heritage people world over grows, the religion is rotting from within, as belief dies out, and secularism (and silent atheism) increases among the young generations.......


.......the future of all religions, is that they don't have one.......


not "offed" - "beaten".

#5 | Posted by nanc at 2009-10-09 08:57 AM

See. The muslims aren't all bad.

"......what you are saying in effect, is that the more Muslims there are, the less understanding of Islam there will be........"

skizz
thats not what i'm saying.

i'm a staunch believer that our founding fathers figured it out.

seperation of church and state.

which follows your turkish thing..

except turkey is overtly nationalistic in that their nationalism is as extreme as religious extremism.

also dangerous.

they rebelled against religion... instead of rebelling against tyranny.

wrong focus... something our forefathers knew.

and if that leads to athiesm eventually so be it.

that doesn't offend me.

and if that leads to athiesm eventually so be it.


Surprisingly, here on DR ... and everywhere else.... I get along just fine and dandy with atheists and agnostics.

It's the "Christians" I find bitter and fighting with everyone all the time.

Just an observation.

As for Sharia, I, being from Pakistan, would of course favor the more modern Hanfi-sharia.

Basically, "Sharia" in a practical sense means laws about crime, inheritance and the economy... what you would call "green economics".

I find nothing wrong with that at all.

And yes, it looks like Obama was the stealth-Muslim he was thought to be. hahahahahahahahahaha

And now he will be ten times worse with Nobel Prize. LOL

skizz by the way..

george bernard shaw said it best when he said (paraphrasing) "Islam is the best religion, with the worst followers."

now of course, personally i don't believe any one religion is the best.

to each their own.

and to those that don't believe, their own as well.

but i totally believe that muslims do the most harm to taint the message of islam, and that we moderate and progressive muslims have a lot of work ahead of us to fix this...

"Obama was the stealth-Muslim"

so why do you hate him toss ;)

so why do you hate him toss ;)


I need a person to surprise me a few times to get me to change my opinion of them.

Maybe he will surprise me.... If he really does something that causes Islam to shoot up White Trash bums... I would change my opinion of him totally.

they rebelled against religion... instead of rebelling against tyranny.
......#14 | Posted by klifferd

.....they rebelled against the tyranny of religion......

no dude

they (attaturk) rebelled against religion only...

they are still tyranical.

ask a kurd.

religion is only a means to tyranny

as is many things..
nationalism (nazi's)
communism
military junta's

etc.


but i totally believe that muslims do the most harm to taint the message of islam....
......#17 | Posted by klifferd

.....up until the 1700's the Christian countries used to execute 'heretics' also, and engage in human rights abuses......then "The Enlightenment" came to the west......

......but Islam seems inflexible enough, that if peoples, like the Turks, want to progress, they just have to abandon it.......

.......no great loss in losing any religion......

.....after all, good people do good things, bad people do bad things, but it takes religion to make good people do bad things.......

they (attaturk) rebelled against religion only...
they are still tyranical.
ask a kurd.
........#21 | Posted by klifferd

......when I said they rebelled against the tyranny of religion, that is what I meant.......

......a religion as inflexible as Islam is either abandoned, or social development stays in the middle ages.....

......there seems to be very little middle ground.....

.....Kamal Ataturk equated belief in Islam with ignorance and backwardness, I do not see compelling evidence anywhere that he was wrong.....

Are all the experts on Sharia Law in here? Oh great. Now I get to learn how a Muslim has it all wrong from all you experts.

Arm Chair Nobodies.

they (attaturk) rebelled against religion only...
....#21 | Posted by klifferd

......now just think for a minute what kind of advertising that is for Islam.....

....a wholly Islamic country decides that it's own religion must be attacked for progress to occur ??......

.....they should have been in the throes of Islamic Ecstasy, having a 100% Islamic nation, instead they had to dump the religion in order to make social progress......if Muslims themselves cannot live with their religion, how can they expect to sell it to the world ??.....on top of that, their advertising campaign of bombing, honor killing, acid attacks, decapitation, ...... with "good press" like that they expect the world to respect them ?......

I get along just fine and dandy with atheists and agnostics.
It's the "Christians" I find bitter and fighting with everyone all the time.
......#16 | Posted by Tosser

.....that's because they are as delusional as you are......

......but you Tosser....I suspect that you are one of the new generation of non-believing Muslims, but you live in an area where you cannot say that you do not believe, otherwise some Loving Muslims may bring the Love of Mohammed to your ass.......


Are all the experts on Sharia Law in here?
......#25 | Posted by Manypaths

......depends......what part of your body do you want cut off ?........


religion is only a means to tyranny
.....#22 | Posted by klifferd

....any religion that proscribes rules for living, with punishment for failure to follow the rules, is a tyranny, because it dictats (dictatorship) how you must act........

.....Islam makes rules for living, and has severe punishments for failure to follow the rules.....

.....that is tyranny (or dictatorship if you prefer)......

....a wholly Islamic country decides that it's own religion must be attacked for progress to occur ??......


and they didn't fix their problems because of it.

and besides i'm not advertizing as i'm mostly agnostic myself and get more and more that way everyday.

i'm telling you how it is.

and i disagree that islam is inflexible
i say today's ingnorant and uneducated muslims are inflexible.


but i can't argue about this with someone who blames religion for all of our political problems.

.....Islam makes rules for living, and has severe punishments for failure to follow the rules.....


no dude muslims make the punishments for failures..

not islam.

there is a major difference between islam and christianity...

in islam the church is not the boss.

the koran is.

the koran is metaphore and poetry not explicit instructions.

but i can't argue about this with someone who blames religion for all of our political problems.
....#30 | Posted by klifferd

......far from it......

....I don't think that religion is the root of ALL of OUR problems, just some.......

....if we are talking about America, I believe our biggest problem is the hold that the American elite, which I call our oligarchy, has on the reins of power......they have corrupted our politicians, so that they (in particular the Republicans) are simply tools of the rich.......

......from that premise.....flow other structural problems.....number one is a terrible public education system, wretched public health policies, sell out of our industries, lack of infrastructure investment, and a general decline of the American civilization.......

......religion in America is not that big of a problem, but it is being used by the Repubs to get masses of voters out (abortion, gay rights) so that those poor religious idiots can vote against their own best interest (public healthcare) in almost anything that the Repubs can get away with......


....but.....

....if we are talking about some Muslim countries......then yes.....their religion is a huge obstacle to national progress.......

....of course ....it all starts with education....
and since in Muslim countries education will invariably conflict with religion......it is a big stumbling block for them.......

.....and they will stay halfway between modern times & the middle ages until they can adopt a progressive model that constricts the role of religion in their societies......

the koran is metaphore and poetry not explicit instructions.

#31 | Posted by klifferd

.....c'mon Kliff.....you don't want me to start quoting the nasty stuff in the Koran do you ?......

.....and they will stay halfway between modern times & the middle ages until they can adopt a progressive model that constricts the role of religion in their societies......


like i said

seperation of church and state.

the lawmakers have to not base their decisions on religion.

which is possible and is the direction they will have to take unless they want to remain medieval

If it means you and your retarded BL2 type posting style go away for a while, yes, yes he does, and so do the rest of us.

Klifim confused.

If the Koran is THE BOSS, they how can it not have explicit instructions??

"you don't want me to start quoting the nasty stuff in the Koran do you ?."

skizz you can do what you want...

you are quoting biased english translations that put interpretation in their translation.


and i for one believe that mohammad's own biases unfortunately make up a significant portion of the koran... i might get my head chopped off for that but it has to be said.

and we as progressives in islamic faith need to start accepting this and take some of the more "arab culture" items with a grain of salt.

And Kliff...in Christianity, true Christianity, the "Church" means all the followers of Christ, not a bulding where one goes to worship, where a man runs what is being done in it.

Lisa, that is the point.. its up to Man to make the world right.

God is only inspiration.

and like i just said, some of that inspiration is biased and based on the culture and morals of the time and don't relate anymore to modern times as we've learned and grown a lot in 1500 years... or 2000 or 4000

"true Christianity"

true islam... no difference

#38

I'll protect you Kliff...no one will chop your head off.

Sad one would have to worry about that.

I was telling you about the the brothers who converted from Muslim. They showed proof from the Koran that those are real fears Muslims have if speaking against Islam.

" true Christianity,"

Cracks me up when anybody says something like that, e.g. "true conservatism", "true liberalism", "real Republican", etc.

Kliff:

I don't believe man will make "the world right"...especially without God.

IMHO, God is more than mere inspiration.

Maybe yet another difference.


And Kliff...in Christianity, true Christianity, the "Church" means all the followers of Christ, not a bulding where one goes to worship, where a man runs what is being done in it.
.....#39 | Posted by Lisa

......just because Sharia sucks does not make Christianity worthwhile .......

......Christians were every bit as intolerant, repressive and repulsive as Muslims, until Europeans began rejecting the excesses of the Church......

.....Christians used to kill old women for "witchcraft" as well as "heretics" for no reason at all other than some neighbors complained about them, and they used to invade the Middle East on their 'Crusades' where they butchered as many Muslims as they could.........

......all religions.......devoutly followed.......are antithetical to human progress........

#43

I say that Null because there are many who claim to be Christians but act nothing like it.

If they are truly Christian, they would obey the commands of Christ.

That's mainly why I say that.

I don't believe man will make "the world right"...especially without God.
......#44 | Posted by Lisa

.......well it hasn't gone too well with Him, now has it ?......

......you can't build a stable, progressive, enlightened society on a delusion.......

......it's been tried......

If they are truly Christian, they would obey the commands of Christ.
......#46 | Posted by Lisa

....."obey"
.....Kliff......remember what we said about the tyranny of religion.....

......there was a time when every one in Europe believed in Christianity.......they called it the Dark Ages......

There were obvious dark periods in our history, done in the name of Christianity.

However, if one follows the teachings of Christ, one would know that those actions were not ordained by Christ.

He taught patients, forgiveness and love.

You help solidify my earlier point.

"Maybe yet another difference"

no its a difference between my personal beliefs and the beliefs of normal followers...

remember i'm mostly agnostic.

Skizz:

It's clear that you truly don't have an interest in hearing anything positive in relationship to God and Christianity, otherwise I would offer thought for discussion with you.

That's right Kliff...sorry.

i once asked a muslim classmate to summarize the difference between chrisitanity and islam and he said quite simply, "we worship god, you worship a man" . at first i told him i was an agnostic punk and not remotely christian, but after i calmed myself down and reaffirmed my anarchist cool I said "what man?" and he said, "jesus"

i told him, "well, i never really understood, but i don't think they worship him as a man but rather as a part of god."

so he said, "why can't god just simply be god? why must he be split up? christianity is too confusing-- and its this confusion, that even you admit to that proves its not the right way"

i admitted he had a point. still, stuff like that can be argued for any religion really, but he did a pretty good job.


Skizz:
It's clear that you truly don't have an interest in hearing anything positive in relationship to God and Christianity, otherwise I would offer thought for discussion with you.
......#51 | Posted by Lisa

........first.....thank you for charitable sentiment......

....however......there is no reality to religions, other than the effect these delusions have on people........

.....and as we have seen, the affected people are capable of doing great harm to the world, based on their delusions.......

.....so whether you believe that your specific delusion more closely resembles reality than say Kliff or Takitez's version, it is a moot point, there is nothing there.......

......it's like comparing the concept of two children who both believe in Santa Claus......how does he come down a chimney?..how does he fly around the whole world in one night?...how many elves does he have ?......

....in the end you are discussing nonsense.....

why must he be split up?
....#53 | Posted by NerfHerder

.....the mistery of the trinity.......

....its one of the most blantant contradictions in Christianity......Jesus is God, God the Father is God, the Holy Ghost is God......but we only have one God......

"there is no reality to religions, other than the effect these delusions have on people"

That is your opinion. That doesn't make it fact.


"and as we have seen, the affected people are capable of doing great harm to the world, based on their delusions"

People are human, Skizz. Everyone makes mistakes. Are you trying to state that only people of religion do bad things????

And God has given us a free will...some do not make wise choices, obviously.


"in the end you are discussing nonsense"

LOL

That's my favorite.

People who believe they know for fact that God does not exist, yet have no proof He doesn't.

We won't know for sure unless we are dead, now will we Skizz?!

People are human, Skizz. Everyone makes mistakes. Are you trying to state that only people of religion do bad things????
........#56 | Posted by Lisa

.....no....I am saying that bad people do bad things, good people do good things, but it takes religion to make good people do bad things.......

People who believe they know for fact that God does not exist, yet have no proof He doesn't.
#56 | Posted by Lisa

......there is an equal amount of evidence for the existence of the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus, as there is for God, but you don't diss me for not believing in them do you ??.......

"but it takes religion to make good people do bad things"

Wow...that's quite the blanket statement you have there, Skizz. And frankly, ridiculous as well.

How do you know that those people who have claimed to do things that were bad in the name of religion, wouldn't have done bad things anyway???

IMHO, those people weren't in their right mind to begin with if they failed to understand the basis of Christianity.

Are all bad things done by people of religion??

We won't know for sure unless we are dead, now will we Skizz?!
.......#56 | Posted by Lisa

......yes, I am certain..........

.....I know that God does not exist......

How do you know that those people who have claimed to do things that were bad in the name of religion, wouldn't have done bad things anyway???
.......#59 | Posted by Lisa

.......because......they did them in the name of religion.........

"there is an equal amount of evidence for the existence of the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus, as there is for God, but you don't diss me for not believing in them do you ??"

I'm not "dissing" you at all, I thought we were having a conversation.

In fact, you have been the one out of the two of us who has been insulting. I'm keeping civil.

"because......they did them in the name of religion"

Do you believe everything everyone says, Skizz??

And that doesn't prove they wouldn't do bad things anyway.

Are all bad things done by people of religion??
......#59 | Posted by Lisa

...of course not...I said before.......bad people do bad things.....

.....even people without faith do bad things, and people of faith sometimes do bad things against their own conscience.......

.....however....there is a great deal of evil wrought in the world in the name of religion.....
ALL RELIGIONS......

Do you believe everything everyone says, Skizz??
......#63 | Posted by Lisa

.......don't be silly......no one believes everything everyone says.......

.....we all filter the information as it comes to us, then we must weigh the unverified information and determine its validity........

......you......the believers......you are the gullible ones........

"of course not...I said before.......bad people do bad things.....


.....even people without faith do bad things, and people of faith sometimes do bad things against their own conscience"

Well, I do appreciate that. Thank you for acknowledging that.

But if you admit that bad people do bad things, how do you know that those who have done bad things claiming to have done them in the name of religion, aren't one of those bad people to begin with.

Skizz...I would agree with you wholeheartedly IF my religion for example, states that we SHOULD do bad things, kill people, persecute people...in the name of my religion. But that is clearly not the case if one understands Jesus.

I'm not "dissing" you at all, I thought we were having a conversation.
......#62 | Posted by Lisa

.....I meant it as being "dismissive" more than as being insulting.....

i think the existence of god is easier to think about if we remove the word "god" from the equation. god infers someone who judges, not creates.

"creator" is easier to deal with, so why not say creator? i would say that most people would agree that there is a creative force in the universe that was there before what we now see as having been created. now the question is, why was it created?

i think skizziks position that there is no god is as absurd as someone who sez jesus saves. they are focusing too much on the judgement aspect of it, so they are both out in left field.

I'm keeping civil.

#62 | Posted by Lisa

......I agree.......

"don't be silly......no one believes everything everyone says"

Ok, what makes it so believable then if someone says they are doing something that is bad in the name of their religion? Especially if that religion teaches peace?

"we all filter the information as it comes to us, then we must weigh the unverified information and determine its validity"

Hmmm...you assume I didn't question and weigh what was presented to me. But...I'll let that one go.

"you......the believers......you are the gullible ones"

It's called FAITH, Skizz. It's not gullible to have Faith.

"But that is clearly not the case if one understands Jesus"

Do you think George Bush understood Jesus? If so, why? If not, how does one know?

But if you admit that bad people do bad things, how do you know that those who have done bad things claiming to have done them in the name of religion, aren't one of those bad people to begin with.
......#66 | Posted by Lisa

.....you take them at their word......

....I worked with a Muslim guy for many years....he prayed five times a day (even at work)...fasted.....he was religious to the point of asceticism........

......but he believed that anyone who gives up Islam should be killed, because his religion told him to......he has six childres.....they have grown up in the west....and I half expect that one day, if one of them says to him that they are not going to follow Islam, he will kill them, I know he believes its the right thing, he has told me so.....

.......same thing with the crusades, same thing with witch-burning.......

.....religions make good pious people do things they would otherwise not do.......

i would say that most people would agree
....#68 | Posted by NerfHerder

......so majority rules on the existence of God ?..

aight would love to talk more but i gotta go

"i once asked a muslim classmate to summarize the difference between chrisitanity and islam "

nerf.

that guy was dumb

the difference is we don't believe in the divinity of christ and original sin.

thus we have no reason for a savior.

we are responsible for our own salvation through our actions in life.

"Do you think George Bush understood Jesus? If so, why? If not, how does one know?"

Nerf:

Long ago in one of my email conversations with someone from here, we discussed Bush. I stated I just got the feeling of pure evil whenever I saw him, heard his voice, etc. I don't know why I felt that, but I did.

As Christians, we are taught "you shall know them from their fruit". In other words, their deeds.

Also as Christians, when we sin, we truly feel remorse for it....deep down to our core.

Now, I can not tell you that Bush understands Jesus, but I will say that by the fruit he bears, I would have to speculate that he doesn't.

However....I am taking that from the political life that we saw. In his personal life, he may be different.

But regardless...I did not find Bush to be an honest man, one who lived even his political life according to the word of God.

God isn't going to say go to war with anyone...The new covenant was built on love, turning the other cheek, forgiveness.

That's not going war.

It's called FAITH, Skizz. It's not gullible to have Faith.
......#70 | Posted by Lisa

........I disagree.......

.....without our capacity to be gullible, there would never be any faith.......

......nor any religions........


....I mean, you must think that Shintos, Bhuddists, Muslims are all gullible to believe their religions......

......but they are just as fervent in their beiefs as you are......as the Wiccans were before the Christians exterminated or converted them......

.......they are all equally gullible......

we are responsible for our own salvation through our actions in life.
#74 | Posted by klifferd

.....then you are all doomed to hell for sure.....

(just kidding Kliff, couldn't resist)

so majority rules on the existence of God ?..


so you don't follow along when folks come to a "consensus" without proof?

duly noted.

"you take them at their word"

Why would you trust someone who is obviously doing something bad, to tell you the truth?? lol...I don't understand that!!

If they can't be trustworthy in their actions, how can you find them trustworthy in their words????


"I worked with a Muslim guy for many years....he prayed five times a day (even at work)...fasted.....he was religious to the point of asceticism........


......but he believed that anyone who gives up Islam should be killed because his religion told him to"

And that my friend, is the Islam religion...not Christianity or other religions. It is not fair minded to blame all religions for the beliefs of one!

"he has six childres.....they have grown up in the west....and I half expect that one day, if one of them says to him that they are not going to follow Islam, he will kill them, I know he believes its the right thing, he has told me so"

And you are probably correct, however...we are watching a series of two ex Muslims, their story, the beliefs of Islam, etc...and when they told their father they converted to Christianity, he told them they had to chooce between their earthly father and the heavenly father they now chose to believe in. He did not murder them, though he was suppose to. He had mercy on them.

I pray your friend does the same if the day comes.

"same thing with the crusades, same thing with witch-burning"

NO. That is wrong Skizz. No where in the NT does it say to kill someone who does not believe in Christianity. We are suppose to love them, try and show them our faith....but never, ever kill them or harm them in any way.

Have you read the NT?? If so, I find it hard to believe that you hold those ideas.

"religions make good pious people do things they would otherwise not do"

Not all religions order people to do things they wouldn't necessarily do!!

However, there have been some people who's lives have been completely changed because of religion where they have STOPPED doing the bad things they had been doing.

"we are responsible for our own salvation through our actions in life."

Kliff:

That is what Islam teaches. However, they are taught that the SURE way to go to salvation is to die in Jihad.

As a Christian, there is nothing I can do myself to be found righteous enough to get to heaven....hence....Jesus Christ.

so you don't follow along when folks come to a "consensus" without proof?
duly noted.
.......#79 | Posted by eberly

.....unlike you......I think for myself.......

is the Islam religion...not Christianity or other religions. It is not fair minded to blame all religions for the beliefs of one!

#80 | Posted by Lisa

......I haven't heard anyone apologize for the Inquistion, for witch-burning, for feudalism (which was made possible by the Church and the Divine Right of Kings), or for the crusades,.....

.....just in the last few days we had strings about people letting their kids die because they did not take them to the hospital.....they prayed instead till the kid dies of diabetes....they were good Christians.......but their religious belief made them kill their daughter.......

#82 | Posted by skizziks at 2009-10-09 04:24 PM | Reply | Flag:gets the irony but deflects anyway

I gotta fly, but thanks for the discussion Skizz.

I hope you think about what we have discussed with an opened mind enough to consider some of what I have said. I don't expect you to start being a believer...but at least agree that some of what I have said made sense to you.

Not all religions want it's followers to do bad things in the name of that religion.

Have a great night.

"......so majority rules on the existence of God ?..
#73 | Posted by skizziks '
"


Read the statement again:

i would say that most people would agree that there is a creative force in the universe that was there before what we now see as having been created.

so, answer the question: do you agree that there is a creative force in the universe that was there before what we now see as having been created?

that's not a "does god exist?" question skizziks. the creative force could be a scientific force, but it had to exist before what we know as having been created.


if you agree, then there are two stands you may take on the nature of that force:

1. the force that created what we now know as creation was itself created, and THAT froce was created, and on and on forever into the infinite past.

or

2. there is one singular force resonsible for all creation that is uniquely UNCREATED.

"they were good Christians"

No, Skizz...they weren't!!!

Nowhere in the NT does it tell us not to help those who are sick.

In fact, the NT says quite the opposite. We are to feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, cloak the cold, etc.

And Jesus has said that if we do not do those things, He will say He does NOT know us.

I really have to go....lol.

Not all religions order people to do things they wouldn't necessarily do!!
#80 | Posted by Lisa

......wrong......

....it is the nature of religion to make people do things that otherwise they would not do(even innocuous things like going to church on Sunday, following commandments, you yourself said that Christians are supposed to follow the commands of Christ )......if there was no compuction in a religion towards specific behavior, then there would be no function to the religion at all, the religion would be meaningless.........


However, there have been some people who's lives have been completely changed because of religion where they have STOPPED doing the bad things they had been doing.
.....#80 | Posted by Lisa

.....true......many a drug addicts and criminals have used religion as a mental focus to stop their criminal/addictive behaviours, that is one of the good uses of religion......

#86 | Posted by NerfHerder

.....two points.....

....first, you cite consesus as proof of validity, which is clearly false.....

.....second.....the start of the universe......does not require the injection of a deity.....

....we do not yet understand all the workings of the universe, and all the workings of time itself, but the day will come when the best amongst us will unravel these mysteries, much as Newton, Hawking and Einstein have begun.......

.....human progress is not done yet......

i would say that most people would agree

.....Nerf.....you have to drop this one, it means nothing......

.....go to Calcutta and most people would agree that Vishnu has 8 arms......still does not make it so......

......go to Mecca and most people will say that there is no God but Allah....does it make it so.?..( I would agree with them if they said that there is no God including Allah, but would that make it so ?)


"they were good Christians"
No, Skizz...they weren't!!!
......#88 | Posted by Lisa

....their faith was just as strong as yours.....

...and without their faith, they would have taken their daughter to the hospital....but they interpreted the Bible literally......

....thats what I mean by religious people doing evil in the name of religion, you keep denying that its possible.......

skizziks, again:

"i would say that most people would agree that there is a creative force in the universe that was there before what we now see as having been created."

is that sentence in itself true or false? i do not use it as a citation of proof. i think that if you took a poll of everyone on the planet, you would probably find the majority of them agree with the sentence "there is a creative force in the universe that was there before what we now see as having been created." so you too could make that statement, even if you yourself does not believe it to be true.

now, again, do you agree with the statement? or will you simply state that your logic for believing there is no god or creator lies in intensive inductive or perhaps deductive reasoning.

"....their faith was just as strong as yours.....
...and without their faith, they would have taken their daughter to the hospital....but they interpreted the Bible literally......
....thats what I mean by religious people doing evil in the name of religion, you keep denying that its possible..
"

I'm thinking if they weren't relgious they probably would have nixed that overgrown fetus at about 12 weeks, never giving it a chance to reach that age.

...so they gave it a bit longer to live before they killed it. perhaps they should be patted on the back.

now, again, do you agree with the statement?
.....#93 | Posted by NerfHerder

.....I agree with the statement, however, in terms of causality, it is meaningless........

......you seem to not understand that no matter how many people agree with a supposition, the agreement has no bearing on the correctness of the supposition.......

......so to say that "most people agree" does not make your idea any more probable or any more correct........

I'm thinking if they weren't relgious

#94 | Posted by NerfHerder

...but they were religious, and they did kill the child with their faith in Jesus.....

.....them's the facts......

.....nite....

skizziks, i was simply implying in my original post that it is much easier to discuss these issues with other people if you start at a point of general consensus, without getting predefined words like "god" getting in the way. re-re-read my original post.

i believed your statements about not believing in god have the same lack of substance as those coming from lisa beleiving in salvation thru jesus. i thought that if you and lisa approached it from a different angle you might find it a more engaging conversation. i'm sure your reasons for not believing in god are just as compelling as hers are for believing, however, on this thread, she comes across as far more compelling with her willingness to engage, even as an admitted jesus freak. you on the other hand, though i tend to side with your viewpoint, come across as a dry wooden stick stuck in some bog who tends to get drawn off on muddled psychological tangents.

Lisa. Find me on fb and remind me of all the things you have said and ill help you understand islam vs muslims.

Lisa. Find me on fb and remind me of all the things you have said and ill help you understand islam vs muslims.

Thanks Kliff...I will do that.

I appreciate it!

"their faith was just as strong as yours"

Skizz..if that were true, they would know what they were doing was not of Scripture.


"and without their faith, they would have taken their daughter to the hospital....but they interpreted the Bible literally"

Here's the problem. It's obvious that they may have read their Bible but they didn't interpret it correctly. And that's what some people do. They don't use the Bible to interpret itself...they look at a verse and don't look at the verses before it, after it..to get the actual meaning. They should have also used the references in Scripture to further study that verse.

And the thing is, it's not even confusing.


"thats what I mean by religious people doing evil in the name of religion, you keep denying that its possible"

I am not denying that some people have done bad things claiming it's done in the name religion. I've made that quite clear I thought.

I do deny that ALL who claim that, are actually doing it because their religion is telling them to do it.

It is by their own uninformed opinions that causes them to do the bad things..at least where Christianity is concerned.

I get up this morning and see this thread has gone to 100 posts and I think to myself "wow fireworks!"

But I come here and I see this

........... Jesus loves me.... Jesus loves me not....

WHEN will you stop using "........." to start a sentence?

As for the rest of you.... I swear, you people can strip paint by boring the paint to death. LOL

As things stand now in this thread, according to the Tosser score of sensible discussion, the Nerfherder gets the highest marks.

Klifferd is a close second.

The rest of you deserve to get a pressure hose enema from a Jesus-impersonator. (I assume there must be Jesus-impersonators in America just like there are Elvis-impersonators?)

The rest of you deserve to get a pressure hose enema from a Jesus-impersonator

Yes we do. The great thing is that we can have jesus impersonators without fear of getting our heads sawed off as one would doing mohammed impersonations in a muslim country.

.....the mistery of the trinity.......

....its one of the most blantant contradictions in Christianity......Jesus is God, God the Father is God, the Holy Ghost is God......but we only have one God......

#55 | Posted by skizziks at 2009-10-09 03:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

Because the true God cannot be conceived of by the human mind is evidence for the existence of God. Sorry, but God is too big for you.

The great thing is that we can have jesus impersonators without fear of getting our heads sawed off as one would doing mohammed impersonations in a muslim country.


If I find a Mohamed-impersonator, I will shoot him myself, that is true. LOL

So yes, I think it is horrible you have Jesus-impersonators. It is not a "great thing" at all. It's rather insulting to Jesus if you put him on the same level as Elvis.

So yes, I think it is horrible you have Jesus-impersonators.

Why?

It is not a "great thing" at all.

A jesus impersonator is not necessarily a great thing (you know I was talking about the freedom of being able to have them is the "great thing") nor is it a bad thing. It is just a "thing". No big deal.

It's rather insulting to Jesus if you put him on the same level as Elvis.

I don't know why. At least Elvis was real.

If people aren't secure enough in their faith that an impersonator gets their panties in a wad, it's not a very strong faith they have. Fuck 'em

It's rather insulting to Jesus if you put him on the same level as Elvis.

John Lennon once said the Beatles were more popular than Jesus. He didn't mention Elvis, though.

It is just a "thing". No big deal.


I beg to differ. It is a big deal.

Why?

Because it tends to make you take him less seriously.

And because it's tasteless.


If people aren't secure enough in their faith


That's not it, at all.

It is a question of "manners" and "etiquette".

TOSSER

I don't think I've seen any Jesus impersonators in the US since the 60's and the era of Charles Manson.

Like if I find a Tosser-impersonator... I would sue the guy for using my name and personality without my permission.

I have a "copyright" on myself.... kind of. I should be able to sue for that.

I don't think I've seen any Jesus impersonators in the US since the 60's and the era of Charles Manson.


Well, that's a good thing then.

I would love to see Goatee do a Jesus impersonation across the border in Mexico when he goes his next shopping trip.

Lets see how them Mexicans like it. LOL

Because it tends to make you take him less seriously.

Though I take many of his alleged teachings and morals very seriously, I can't take him any more seriously than I can Popeye.

And because it's tasteless....It is a question of "manners" and "etiquette"

It may be bad etiquette. But in America they don't cut off people's heads or shoot them for bad manners. That's a great thing.

Oh... and before I forget.. this picture is for the yahoo who thought owning Bibles is "illegal" in Pakistan. LOL

WTF? I thought.....

Anyway, I told him I would take a pic and have his name on it.

i37.tinypic.com

Satisfied?

I would love to see Goatee do a Jesus impersonation across the border in Mexico when he goes his next hopping trip.

Funny you say that. When I had my long hair and beard, people used to tell me I looked like Jesus all the time. LOL. (they also said I looked like Eric Clapton) Let me see if I can find a picture to upload. Stand by.

Ah, yes -- my HS graduation picture. I didn't have the beard yet, though

i239.photobucket.com

I can't take him any more seriously than I can Popeye.


See? Did you all see that?

That's what I was talking about.

Popeye.... LOL


But in America they don't cut off people's heads or shoot them for bad manners. That's a great thing.


No sir, that is NOT a good thing. This is why you have to suffer one idiot after another.

One day soon enough, what you call TV, will be a chip implanted in your brain and you will never be able to shut it off.

Then you will wish you could have shot someone... but by then it would too late.

One day soon enough, what you call TV, will be a chip implanted in your brain and you will never be able to shut it off.

Then you will wish you could have shot someone... but by then it would too late.

I'm not sure what this has to do with capital punishment for bad manners, but I'll cross that chip-in-the-brain bridge when I come to it.

"I have a "copyright" on myself.... kind of. I should be able to sue for that."

Too rich. The guy who doesn't respect anyone else's copyright expects others to respect his.

I come here for the comedy.

TOSSER

I would love to see Goatee do a Jesus impersonation across the border in Mexico

I think you'll grow a long beard waiting for that one. LOL

blaspheme

www.youtube.com

I'm not sure what this has to do with capital punishment for bad manners


There is no capital punishment for bad manners... there is only me and other good folk who will settle it out of the courts, there and then.

At the very least, I would give the guy a thrashing he won't forget.

Well, here's one with the beard, but sans long hair. People told me I looked like jesus then, though. HOw they know what jesus looked like I'll never know.

The time I had the two together was relatively short. I"m not sure I have pictures of myself during that period. I had the beard all my life from 19 YO on, but I had to cut my hair in the Navy. Beards were allowable then.

i239.photobucket.com

The guy who doesn't respect anyone else's copyright expects others to respect his.


It's called "identity theft" you dope and under Pakistani law, you can go to jail for 14 years (max) for that.

If I remember right, (but how could I?) the above picture was taken while I was tripping. That explains the pupils.

Well, here's one with the beard, but sans long hair. People told me I looked like jesus then, though.


You look like a hostage, not Jesus.

the above picture was taken while I was tripping. That explains the pupils.


Ah... that explains the hostage-look.

"It's called "identity theft" you dope"

Oh, so when you steal from others, it's okay, but if anyone were to steal from you, you'd get all pissy.

Got it: you're a raging hypocrite.

there is only me and other good folk who will settle it out of the courts, there and then.

Vigilantism isn't practiced by good folk. At least not in America.

"You look like a hostage"

I guess every American looks like a hostage to a Pakistani.

Oh, so when you steal from others, it's okay, but if anyone were to steal from you, you'd get all pissy.


You can't compare identity-theft with me downloading MP3.

Get real.

tripping can be described as a religious experience.

"You can't compare identity-theft with me downloading MP3."

You're being a moral relativist. Stealing is stealing. You justify it when you steal, yet endorse barbarism if you believe someone is stealing from you.

Like I said: raging hypocrite.

Vigilantism isn't practiced by good folk. At least not in America

Well at least in the past i know they had "he needed killing" (Texas)laws for bullies and the sort

Ah... that explains the hostage-look.

I don't have this picture with me, but on Halloween 1988 I dressed up as an Arab suicide bomber. I had one of those rag hats that they wear over there (I boght it in Jordan) and my wife made the tunic thingy. I made fake dynamite out of dowel rods with wire as fuses and strapped it to myself. I had a fake machine gun.

My wife went as a piggy. We didn't even think of it until someone at the party asked, "Are you taking this American pig hostage?" LOL

If I remember, I'll upload that picture when I get onshore. It's hilarious. Problem is, I don't usually come here when I'm onshore. I'm sure that picture would get a fatwah put on me, anyway.

TOSSER

One day soon enough, what you call TV, will be a chip implanted in your brain and you will never be able to shut it off.

Then you will wish you could have shot someone... but by then it would too late.

We almost have that now. Except we call them 'commercials.'

So you're a little bit right. I'd like to shoot the guy who sings those "FreeCreditReport.com" commercials.

But I doubt if a judge would agree with my "public service" defense.


raging hypocrite.


Starving artist.

I don't think I've seen any Jesus impersonators in the US since the 60's and the era of Charles Manson

~TwinPac

Guess ya don't get down to Orlando much?

/Bill Maher FTW!

On Topic?

Obama advisor sez Sharia Law misunderstood by west?

Well, that's no doubt true.

Where was this said?

On a British TeeVee hosted by a member of an "extremist" group?

A group who wants to see a non-violent global spread of sharia law?

So wot's the beef?

Dialogue is good.

Talking to someone does not neccessarily mean agreeing with them.

Any time spent arond the DR will tell you that.

Be Well.

/Yup
stage left.

"Starving artist."

Hardly. I'm one of those working kinds, appearing in the movies you like so much to steal.

Well at least in the past i know they had "he needed killing" (Texas)laws for bullies and the sort

I never heard of that, but if such laws existed, fucked up as they are, the killings would be within the confines of the law and not vigilantism.

I would think that such laws violated the US Constitution as it punished someone without a fair trial.

Where did you hear about this, bruce?

I'm sure that picture would get a fatwah put on me, anyway.


The only people who can put a fatwa on you are me, Klifferd and YS... and I promise you we won't do anything of the sort.

What movies would we have seen you in, danforth? Or would you rather not say for privacy reasons?

The latter, Goat.

Plus, I don't want Tosser to steal anything more. He's enough of a hypocrite as it is.

I'd like to shoot the guy who sings those "FreeCreditReport.com" commercials.

Yer being entirely too merciful, TwinPac!

Spud idear involved an anthill, a jar of honey and that guys ears.

But I doubt if a judge would agree with my "public service" defense

Meh, a jury of yer peers would prolly still find "Justifiable Homicide".

Just a hunch.

Be Well.

e almost have that now. Except we call them 'commercials.'

And CSPAN.

I guess every American looks like a hostage to a Pakistani.

My second double flag in a day. Funny and newsworthy.

Goat,

I will tell you I've been killed ten minutes into an Ang Lee movie, I've been pulled out of a burning building, I've had an argument with Martin Sheen, and I helped one actor win a Golden Globe. And if you go to where they make most of the American ice cream, I'll be the guy on the video giving the tour.

I've been very vociferous here about intellectual property theft. It is beyond me how otherwise decent people think it's OK to steal movies, music, and software just because they don't carry them out of a store in shrink wrap.

Thieves are scum. I don't care what they steal or the manner that they do it -- they are scum

Where did you hear about this, bruce

Well since I'm not going to document it tonight,I guess you can say I made it up.But

I will tell you I've been killed ten minutes into an Ang Lee movie


LOL... I got the Incredible Hulk.


Thieves are scum. I don't care what they steal or the manner that they do it -- they are scum


OUCH!

"Thieves are scum. "

Agreed. Yet Tosser thinks it's okay...as long as no one steals anything from him.

I will tell you I've been killed ten minutes into an Ang Lee movie, I've been pulled out of a burning building, I've had an argument with Martin Sheen, and I helped one actor win a Golden Globe. And if you go to where they make most of the American ice cream, I'll be the guy on the video giving the tour.

Geez -- wish I was a movie trivia geek. That sounds like a fun puzzle to solve. But I don't think I could do it without a lot of google or IMDB grunt work.

Or, if you trust me, email me. (you know my dirty little secret that only three others here know. LOL)

#148 Don't leave me hanging, buddy!

Yet Tosser thinks it's okay...as long as no one steals anything from him.


There was a whole thread about this, me and you and YS going back and forth....

To summarize, we said:

1. I don't upload movies. I only download what is available and what everyone else is taking anyway. I did not put that movie up there.

2. If you want copyright protection in Pakistan, you have to release the movie in Pakistan, or none of your laws will have any effect.

3. If you want protection for any engineering goods, you have make the thing in Pakistan, or else none of your laws will apply and we can steal your designs.

I believe it is the same set of rules that are in China.

Thieves are scum. I don't care what they steal or the manner that they do it -- they are scum

OUCH!

C'mon tosser, surely you agree. The Koran doesn't condone theft, does it?

The Koran doesn't condone theft, does it?


The Koran doesn't say "thou shall not download movie and MP3".

Let's leave it at that.

The Koran doesn't say "thou shall not download movie and MP3".

Let's leave it at that.

It sounds like you are saying the Koran allows muslims the wiggle room necessary to define their own version of theft. It probably doesn't say "thou shall not ride the train without a ticket" either, does it?

TOSSER

And CSPAN.

LOL Tosser.

Fingernails on a chalkboard maybe.

But there's nothing subliminal about CSPAN.

#148 Don't leave me hanging, buddy!


disingenuous

It sounds like you are saying the Koran allows muslims the wiggle room


The Koran allows plenty of wiggle room for all sorts of situations.

For example, (since the topic of the thread is Sharia), if you are hit by a hurricane like New Orleans was, Sharia law is suspended. You can't punish people for stealing food, for example.

I am just being a bastards actually when it comes to downloading stuff. I simply don't care.

If you talk about wiggle room, it is allowed for me to eat pork, for example but only in survivalist mode. Like there is nothing else to eat... THEN the Koran sez, yeah go ahead.

I can also drink booze if it is for medical use. Fully allowed.

I can also drink booze if it is for medical use. Fully allowed.

Wot about medical marijuana?

Legal in Pakistan or no?

Izza Koran cool with weed?

Be Well.

I can also drink booze if it is for medical use.

Well that's what we use it for Tosser.
Cures the shakes LOL

I can also drink booze if it is for medical use. Fully allowed.

I believe strict adherance to Islam (or any religion) would make me chronically ill, thus getting me allah's blessing to imbibe

I like the way that works

...but only in survivalist mode.

So you would die without MP3s? Doesn't allah allow you to spend money to save yourself?

"Well, here's one with the beard, but sans long hair."

Goatman

That has Kentucky moonshiner written all over it! Maybe it's the black and white that makes it look like a shot the FBI would send out. Oh, they'd definitely use your middle name too, ala "be on the lookout for known moonshiner Earl Bud Carter" LOL

Sorry, Goatman. I was scrolling up to catch up on tonight's tete a tete.

TOSSER

I can also drink booze if it is for medical use.

So . . . what is the substitute for 'booze' in Pakistan?

Are you only talking about the hard stuff? Is beer allowed?

Any bootlegging going on? Home brewed gin? Etc.?

That has Kentucky moonshiner written all over it! Maybe it's the black and white that makes it look like a shot the FBI would send out. Oh, they'd definitely use your middle name too, ala "be on the lookout for known moonshiner Earl Bud Carter"

That picture was taken over thirty years ago. I look like a respectable drunk with a mostly white beard now. LOL

Are you only talking about the hard stuff?

If I was sick and required alcohol, I would insist that allah provide (through whatever of his minions necessary) a nice Hennessy XO or Patron Reposado or a nice single malt Scotch.

If distilled spirits are not allowed, a Chateau LaFitte Rothschild 1941 Cabernet would do. If unavailable, I'd even settle for most any 2006 Willamette Valley Pinot Noir.

But if even that is disallowed, surely a Belgian Trappist ale would be allowable since it is brewed by monks, wouldn't it? What? Can't do it becaus they are Christian monks?

Fuck it. Give me a Budweiser, then.

Wot about medical marijuana?


There is no such thing as "medical weed" over here. There just "weed". It grows freely next to the sidewalks in Islamabad, for example. Stop the car, take it, dry it, smoke it.

Ask Goatee how he got a ton of the stuff from around here.

#169

Got away with it and went legit, did ya? LOL

Black and white photos are fun.

On topic, Tosser might be relieved by the fact that there were many extremely devout Christians in the Civil War who viewed drinking as a sure path to Hell who saw no harm in drinking enough whiskey to get really drunk before their leg was sawed off.

Tosser

Is weed legal in Pakistan? Or is it illegal and the authorities look the other way unless they want to screw with you and throw you in jail?

What is the law and what are the penalties if illegal?

So you would die without MP3s?


Yes!

Well, maybe....

Ok, no.

Consider this... I can stop downloading. Right? So my only choice to get all these movies and tv shows, is to either wait for them to come up on TV... or go to the DVD store and get them.

Fine, you say, go to the DVD store.

OK... all the movies or tv shows are like are over there... all in shrink wrap boxes.

But they are also all pirated.

So I can't help be a pirate no matter what.

Ask Goatee how he got a ton of the stuff from around here.

Actaully, it was only a kilo of Pakistani hash, not a ton. Only $100.

Or is it illegal and the authorities look the other way unless they want to screw with you and throw you in jail?


Technically... and I stress "technically"... I "think" there is some law where you can be arrested for possession of weed.

But really, I have never heard of it happening. Not even as a cop frame-up.

Actaully, it was only a kilo of Pakistani hash, not a ton. Only $100.


My brother tells me, in the 70s when you got it, it was worth $5 only.

You paid a $100 means you wuz robbed.

Black and white photos are fun.

I've been doing B&W since I was 14. I had my own darkroom in the garage my dad helped me build. I did darkroom work on my ship in the navy (that pic was one of them) Every house except my current one, I built a darkroom.

However, I have embraced digital photography now and carry my 'darkroom' (aka Photoshop elements v6) in my laptop. A lot less messy than breaking out trays of chemicals at the airport. lol

$5 a ton?

But I can confirm, it grows free in Islamabad. You run into it when walking your dog.

Even paying $5 for something that is free, is wrong.

$5 a ton?


$5 a kilo... LOL

Funny you mention it, timex, because I've been shopping for a film and slide scanner for a couple of months. I have almost every negative I ever took and I want to digitize them all. I ended up buying the Canon 4000 (something) 35mm and slide scanner tonight. It should be at my house when I get back next week.

That B&W pic here was scanned from an 8x10. I expect to get a lot better quality using the negative.

I can't wait to get home and use it.

This is the one I bought a few hours ago.

photo.net

#178

Nice, Goatman. Black and white photos can be very hard to pinpoint in time without other clues. Your photo could just have easily been taken in Appalachia in the 1930's. Now, the picture of the HASH is another story .... (he says jealously)

You paid a $100 means you wuz robbed.

Not at all. We were able to sell it in the US for $10/gm. You do the math.

So what if I paid $100 instead of $5 when the return was $10,000? LOL I probably dropped $95 worth on the floor cutting it up. LOL

So . . . what is the substitute for 'booze' in Pakistan?


The real stuff is available, but it is expensive.


Are you only talking about the hard stuff? Is beer allowed?


Yes and yes.


Any bootlegging going on? Home brewed gin? Etc.?


That too.

But there is a catch. This EXACTLY the kind of society America had in the 20s-30s "Prohibition era".

We got our Al Capones too.

Right now, the only people who can buy booze in a liquor store are Christians.

This has made Christians pretty rich around here.

They hand out in front of the liquor stores, and ask you what you want, and then for a small fee, they get it for you. By law, nobody can stop them.

"That B&W pic here was scanned from an 8x10. I expect to get a lot better quality using the negative."

Goatman

That's why it looks like a 1930's shot lol

Should be fun going through all those memories! I have all the slides my parents left ... and the projector. I set up a sheet in the living room awhile back and looked at all of them. Took me over a week. That's not counting the chests of other pictures. I've never been an avid photographer outside of vacations and holidays. Traveling I guess I've always just soaked in the scenery and tucked away the memories.

I need a good B&W printer. I have an Epson Artisan 800 that does beautiful color prints, but the B&W prints are crapola. I prefer B&W as a medium, so I'm currently looking for a good B&W printer. Been to a lot of blogs and read a lot of reviews, but I'm having a hard time deciding.

It's important because at least half of the negatives I"ll be scanning and playing with are B&W

So what if I paid $100 instead of $5 when the return was $10,000? LOL I probably dropped $95 worth on the floor cutting it up. LOL


Oh.

Bloody hell... I have been in the wrong business all me life.

I should've been selling weed to foreigners.

Tosser

I wish you ill. In a nice way. So you can drink. lol

I should've been selling weed to foreigners

Actually we're not as backward as you think.
We grow it too

I have all the slides my parents left

That's my next project after my own negatives.

My dad shot only slides. He has finally embraced computer technology (he is 74 YO) and wants his slides archived in case of a disaster and also so that he can burn DVDs or CDs for anyone who wants a copy. I told him I would do that for him.

That is one reason I bought the more expensive scanner (I paid $649) vs the ones in the $150 range. It does multiple slides/negatives which will save time, and the software looks awesome. IT has an infrared scanner so that it can tell a true scratch or dust from something that looks like one and correct it.

I think I'm going to be pleased with it.

Oh, and could you send me a kilo of hash? Label it to:

John Smith
General Delivery
United States Post Office
Anytown, USA

Mark the package as "Kidney for IMMEDIATE TRANSPLANT"

"That is one reason I bought the more expensive scanner (I paid $649) vs the ones in the $150 range."

A friend did a similar thing. He's a fantastic photographer. Been very happy with it.
-------

Tosser, about that hash .....??

Mark the package as "Kidney for IMMEDIATE TRANSPLANT"

medicinal

"I need a good B&W printer. "

Goatman

You can never go wrong with a decent laser printer I'd imagine.

Oh funny... LOL

Mailing weed will get me trouble. Pakistan Post Office takes such things personally.

Mark the package as "Kidney for IMMEDIATE TRANSPLANT"

medicinal

#195 | Posted by bruceaz

ABSOLUTELY!!

In fact, next time I go to California I'm going to have one hell of a backache or something!! lol

You can't mail weed, for God's sake... who does that? LOL

You can never go wrong with a decent laser printer I'd imagine.

Do they work on glossy photo paper?

"Mailing weed will get me trouble. "

It's NOT weed. Look at Goatman's picture of the kilo of hash. Pretty small. Maybe even some other organ would work. Tell them you're saving my life (and get a tad weepy and choked up while you say it).

Pretty small. Maybe even some other organ would work. Tell them you're saving my life (and get a tad weepy and choked up while you say it).


Even if I can convince the clowns here, the American Post Office will land on my package like a ton of bricks and make an official complaint which will get back here and then my ass is cooked.

Although I admittedly don't retain much of the knowledge from my highschool photography classes - notwithstanding my "tenure" as a photographer for my HS's newspaper - I can still recreate the whole scene from our darkroom -- from the chemical scent, to the time spent goofing off while waiting for each process to complete -- to this day. Damn, photography class (and newspaper!) kicked ass.

Digital photography is really convenient, but, as a new friend tonight informed me, a traditional 35mm snapshot is equivalent to a huge number of megapixels; not sure if it's even practical to try to reproduce it, even in RAW format, on a digicam. He shoots film when the resolution really matters.

Pakistan and America still have an agreement to fry anyone who sends drugs to the US. LOL

"Do they work on glossy photo paper?"

I've printed them out on B & W and liked them fine. You don't have the shine of the ink. But, I may not be as picky as you are. I've also printed on really good paper and they looked fine to me.

Go to an office supply place and take a jpeg with you on a thumb drive. Print out on paper and glossy. See how you like it. Like I said, it's personal taste. On decent paper the detail is sharp and focused because there isn't any ink bleeding into the paper - thus why they use glossy paper for photos.

" a kilo of Pakistani hash"

great success!

"Pakistan and America still have an agreement to fry anyone who sends drugs to the US. LOL

#204 | Posted by Tosser"

OK. I'll get a P.O. box in Mexico (where it's legal now) and figure out the rest from there. If I do that we'd better make it 100 kilos. lol

#206 lol

Cohen is a brilliant comedian!

Do they work on glossy photo paper?

#200 | Posted by goatman

The short answer is yes. The image is being burned with a laser onto the media.
----

Zarathustra

Ah, the good old high school photography lab! I used to sneak my girlfriend in there with her kneepads once in awhile lol

Cohen is a brilliant comedian

He's funny in his own right,fooling people candid camera style though is not my cup of tea

BruceAz

Dave Chapelle did a hilarious skit about that called "Pranked"

Their last vignette was them with panty hose over their faces robbing a bank. When he pulls off his disguise, laughs, and tells the bank full of hostages cowering on the ground 'YOU'VE BEEN PRANKED' he gets shot dead by the security guard. The other bits in that skit were just as funny: As a doctor that tells two 8 year olds their parents died on the operating table only to roll them out of recovery. Sick, I know. But, funny to watch.

Wait ...

It was called "Zapp'd". Funny vignettes.

BruceAz

I found the video of Chapelle's 'Zapped'. This is funny. I loved the prank on the unwitting husband:

www.ffwd.com

Alright Timex,I do love the humor,but that was satire.When you watch Chapelle you kinda know what your getting into.But watching Borat,I thought my sister is the best whore or the parade of the Jews was funnier than fucking with a car salesman.

There is no such thing as "medical weed" over here. There just "weed". It grows freely next to the sidewalks in Islamabad, for example. Stop the car, take it, dry it, smoke it.

As it should be.

* nods *

Be Well.

"I do love the humor, but that was satire"

Of course you're right. Borat was a funny concept though.

www.ffwd.com


Timex,that was good but I wouldn't go by me.I'm sure there's plenty on the DR who can direct you to the help you need.Bwahahahahahahah

He shoots film when the resolution really matters

The camera rags and blogs seem to think that the 20 mpixel is the "break even" as far as film v digital is. There are now 20 mpixels cameras on the market. I have my eye on the Canon 5d MKII.

I still have my 3 35mm cameras (2 Pentax KM and 1 Pentax K1000) with their assortment of lenses, but their usage is becoming less and less frequent as I have mastered my Canon 40D.

*sigh*

The end of an era. In a way it's sad. My oldest Pentax KM is 34 YO. I bought it is Sasebo, Japan when I was 19. It still works.

Here's what she looks like:

Pentax KM

Chapelle went were none have gone before in his subject matter. Another funny bit he did is him playing a blind KKK White Supremacist who doesn't know he's black:

vodpod.com

I divorced her cause she was a nigger lover.

AE1 Program was the camera I loved.Visited Mt Larsen an went to Bumpass Hell,Sulfuric fumes apparently ate the electronics,loved that camera.

I don't understand the first line of 221

I coveted the AE1 when it came out. That is part of the reason I'm a Canon man now.

Canon makes the best cameras, followed by Casio and Olympus. I would put Sony and Panasonic at number 4.

Canon is tied with Nikon for best camera, IMO, but there is little doubt that their lenese are far superior.

Before I made the digital plunge I did about a years worth of research since I've dropped some serious coin on their products.

Before I made the digital plunge I did about a years worth of research


LOL... I am doing the same research but only since 6 months.


.....the mistery of the trinity.......
....its one of the most blantant contradictions in Christianity......Jesus is God, God the Father is God, the Holy Ghost is God......but we only have one God......
#55 | Posted by skizziks at 2009-10-09 03:39 PM | Reply | Flag:


Because the true God cannot be conceived of by the human mind is evidence for the existence of God. Sorry, but God is too big for you.
#104 | Posted by vernon

.....no....the concept is just too stupid.......

.....your religion is full of contradictions that prove it to be false.....when the contradictions are pointed out to you, then I become too dense to understand "the bigness" of it.......

......right.......

like i said, muslims misunderstand it the most... and the f'n mullahs threaten death to anyone that challenge the bullshit system they created.

#10 | Posted by klifferd


Well then that would be a problem wouldn't it!!

When you have a fascist type philosophy run by religious fascists--you get what is happening today.

That is why this woman in the Obama WH is an idiot.

Canon makes the best cameras, followed by Casio and Olympus. I would put Sony and Panasonic at number 4.

I used to like Sony products, but I had a very bad experience with their service department. I'll never buy a sony product of any sort again.

but I had a very bad experience with their service department.


I would like Canon over Sony any time, but it seems as if Pakistan is Sony-country.

If I fuck up a Canon I might have to mail it to another city or even Dubai to have it fixed maybe.

With Sony, however, they are everywhere and their stuff is easily fixed. In fact, Sony gives insurance for it's cameras.

For this reason, my next camera would be Sony, even though I don't want it to be.

At least they have Carl-Ziess lenses, so that's not too bad.

Sony is minolta and it has won many awards.

I own a sony and its performance has been outstanding.

Taking action use cannon, taking stills and scenes use sony.

At least they have Carl-Ziess lenses, so that's not too bad.

That was a very large determining factor when I bought my Sony CD300 back in 2000.

But that was the camera that I had the bad service experience with that made me forever shun Sony products. As far as their cameras, that would've been the last one anyway since I cast my die with Canon a couple of years later. But I won't buy a Sony anything anymore.

I own a sony and its performance has been outstanding.

Do you have an SLR? If so, what do you think of Sony's lenses?

That was a very large determining factor when I bought my Sony CD300 back in 2000.


The first time I came across Carl-Ziess lenses was when I played with grandpa's binoculars.

I compared them with top of the line (at that time) Japanese binoculars and believe me the Japanese binoculars performed like shit in comparison even though they were more powerful.

I have been a fan ever since. They let in more light and there is zero artifacts and/or distortion.

That pic I took of the Bible up in the thread...

i37.tinypic.com

... that's only a mobile phone camera BUT it's got a Carl-Ziess lens.

"President Barack Obama's adviser on Muslim affairs, Dalia Mogahed..."

Makes her sound like some sort of in-residence White House aide, doesn't it?

Oh, well, let's just call this what it is: bullshit.

Dalia Mogahed is not "Presidetn Barack Obama's adviser on Muslim affairs." She's Senior Analyst and Executive Director at the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies Obama apponted Mogahed to the Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, created this past February. For more on that group see the White House statement at www.whitehouse.gov

I wouldn't expect Cooky to know any better in posting this article with its misleading description of Mogahed's role since it comports so well with his/her/its existing, well advertised and infantile prejudices.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable