Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

A new value-added tax (VAT) is "on the table" to help the U.S. address its fiscal liabilities, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Monday night.

Pelosi, appearing on PBS's "The Charlie Rose Show" asserted that "it's fair to look at" the VAT as part of an overhaul of the nation's tax code.

"I would say, Put everything on the table and subject it to the scrutiny that it deserves," Pelosi told Rose when asked if the VAT has any appeal to her.

The VAT is a tax on manufacturers at each stage of production on the amount of value an additional producer adds to a product.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

taxman

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Here we go.

Thats the problem with letting a leftie have power, sooner or later they go after your wallet.

So much for all those programs Obama says are going to save money. Only a fool would believe him.

Of course it is. Everything's on the table for these power hungry fucks.

Here comes the middle class tax that Obama said wouldn't happen. How did SNL miss this one.

As th Chosen One said several months ago, "You ain't seen nuthin, yet".

I don't make a lot of money but I make enough. I try to save and pay my bills. My family and I are doing fine.

We cannot take any more financial stress. I anticipate more stress and am trying to prepare. This is not good.

"Value Added Tax is on the Table"

Well, for all you who desire that the US be more like those other industrial countries (socialized health care, etc.), you should welcome this opportunity for parity.

Here comes the middle class tax that Obama said wouldn't happen. How did SNL miss this one.

#5 | Posted by mysterytoy

Sigh...

Obama never stated that there would not be a middle class tax increase. If he did, please cite exact time and speech that he stated this. But you can't because he didn't.

Obama stated that there would not be an increase in the federal income tax.

A VAT is not an income tax.

The Euro countries all have VATs, up to 15%.

Also note that the tourist industry, specifically in the hospitality sector, has been charging VATs for decades.

You really need to get your facts in order.

Mystertoy and facts is like oil and water.

We cannot take any more financial stress. I anticipate more stress and am trying to prepare. This is not good.

#7 | Posted by wurster

You are right: it is Not Good.

But we, the collective we, are responsible for letting things spiral out of control. And we, the collective we, are going to have to pony up a larger share to get us out of the Deep Stuff.

What's the alternative?

Damn unfortunate to be sure.

A real downside of a VAT (other than having to pay one at all!) is that it will affect the less income enhanced to a much greater degree.

less income enhanced

Sorry, I just found a new euphemism.

Good. I don't mind paying more as long as I know republicans are suffering.

What's the alternative?

Cut spending across the board. Streamline costs associated with entitlement programs. Incentivize work rather than reliance on entitlement programs. Stop allowing people to use credit cards and take on debt that they will never be able to pay off. There are lots of alternatives to raising taxes that will only drive up manufacturing costs which in turn drive up the cost of goods and eliminate jobs.

"What's the alternative?"

You seem to be starting with the premise that every dollar spent by our government is necessary.

"Streamline costs associated with entitlement programs."

You mean costs like these? And we want the government to take over a system that comprises about a fifth of the economy?

www.foxnews.com


"Incentivize work rather than reliance on entitlement programs."

What!? You're dreamin'. That's not gonna garner any votes. Freebies...that's what gets the votes.

"There are lots of alternatives to raising taxes that will only drive up manufacturing costs which in turn drive up the cost of goods and eliminate jobs."

Who cares...we ain't payin' taxes anyway and we don't need no steekin' jobs 'cause we got Dear Leader! I already just cashed my October check.

#9 | Posted by ZOT at 2009-10-07 08:07 AM | Reply | Flag: I am a liar just like the idiot I elected.

www.youtube.com


#16 | Posted by jestgettinalong at 2009-10-07 09:33 AM | Reply | Flag

#17 | Posted by ELCIDCE90 at 2009-10-07 09:45 AM | Reply | Flag:

These two responses are indicative of why moderates have been flocking to the Democrats.

17 | Posted by ELCIDCE90

Thank you so much for calling me a liar. Easy and cowardly to do from behind your screen.

But you're right. I did not see that clip.

So, why do you go out of your way to be a dick?

What's the alternative?

Cut spending across the board.

#14 | Posted by taxman

You seem to be starting with the premise that every dollar spent by our government is necessary.

#15 | Posted by JOE

It was not my intention to imply that the only method to increase revenues is by an increased fleecing of the people. We only got so much wool for the shearing and it takes time to grow it back.

Yeah, government spending can be curtailed, but there are always other projects that need immediate attention. Highways, byways, roads, and bridges. Sad, sad, sad shape so may are in. Talkin' Carl's billions and billions here.

My GF always tells me when we have these discussions that the US can bring its troops home: the billions not being pissed away Over There could be well dispersed around domestic projects that do demand immediate relief and major funding. Not just infrastrructure, but that is definitely a priority.

A VAT ain't gonna do it. 'Sides, where is the "Value Added" for me? Except maybe weight reduction, as in making my wallet lighter.

A VAT is not an income tax.


The Euro countries all have VATs, up to 15%.


Also note that the tourist industry, specifically in the hospitality sector, has been charging VATs for decades.


You really need to get your facts in order.

#9 | Posted by ZOT at 2009-10-07 08:07

I am dissapointed that it took 9 posts before this
'explanation' appeared..
dont you anti tax people understand that you are just too goddamn stupid to know whats a tax and whats not?

and ZOT
so what???

this tax will hit every man and woman and child in the country but its NOT an income tax. I dont recall the fuckin liar using JUST the words income tax?
ah but since he can lie everyday and get away with it..I guess it doesnt matter

and ONE MORE Thing

whatever the starting out rate is.
does ANYONE think it will stay there long?

SORRY to post again but forgot

so the EURO countries have had one??

so hows that working out for thier unemployment rates and how is that working out for thier level of life and how is that working out for thier level of inovation?

" how is that working out for thier level of inovation"

How's this:

www.bugatti.com

Damn innovative. Only cost y'a $2.5 million.

dont you anti tax people understand that you are just too goddamn stupid to know whats a tax and whats not?

#21 | Posted by afkabl2

There always be ways 'round it too. Instead of increasing taxes on utilities, specifically water, to upgrade infrastructure for water drainage and sewage systems, my city imposed what is called a storm water fee, based on how much impermeable area one has on one's property. It's still a tax, but it was called a fee and not voted on by the people.


#19 | Posted by ZOT at 2009-10-07 10:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

Its the DR ZOT - grow some thick skin before you make statements you can't back up - its happened to all of us. Play at your own peril.

Corporations don't pay taxes - people do - whether its passed on to the consumer, or eaten by lower benefits/wages to the employees. I have never met a "corporation", just like I have never met "The U.S. government".

Only cost y'a $2.5 million

And it only cost Volkswagen about 8 million to produce. It is a fine car, no doubt. It is a testament to innovation and design; it's also a money loser for the company. The more they sell, the more they lose. So in that respect I guess it is a great example of the products we could expect to see from a VAT.

Obama never stated that there would not be a middle class tax increase. If he did, please cite exact time and speech that he stated this. But you can't because he didn't.

Obama stated that there would not be an increase in the federal income tax.

...

You really need to get your facts in order.

#9 | Posted by ZOT at 2009-10-07 08:07 AM

Watch the video. This could be his "read my lips" moment. Your last line is kind of ironic btw.

www.youtube.com

To be fair, this is Pelosi talking, NOT Obama.

So until Obama comes out in favor of it, there is no contradiction between his campaign rhetoric and putting this on the table (which isn't even proposing it, btw).


Whether anyone likes it or not, the whole world is slowly shifting in a moderately socialistic direction. Kruchev and Karl Marx were right.

Come on BL2AFka.

A tax is a fucking tax. Yeah, If I had my way I would go for the fair tax. I want my checks virgin. But what is the difference between getting a lower pay check or the costs of goods being higher? Either way it is a tax.

But we, the collective we, are responsible for letting things spiral out of control. And we, the collective we, are going to have to pony up a larger share to get us out of the Deep Stuff


I am deeply aware of this. However, I am not willing to bust my ass and downgrade my standard of living for a Federal government that I don't believe in. When that changes I will feel differently about this matter.

Another tax passed down the line to the consumer. And if the President signs it, he's a lying S.O.B.

I have a big problem with a VAT tax, as it is too easy for the people in congress to slip in a fraction of a penny here and another there, and the price goes up but the consumers don't see it.

Scrap the entire federal tax system and replace it with a national sales tax. One rate for everything. Exempt nothing. We can debate how much the tax should be, and that is the amount the gov't has to spend. Do not allow the feds to pass unfunded mandates, so they can't force the states to foot the bill, which is kind of a tax by proxy.

The advantage of a sales tax is that it collects from everyone a percentage of the amount they spend. It collects from illegals and foreign countries that dump goods in the US, etc.

Of course, if it lowers the powers of congress, it will never happen.

NP: "Value Added Tax is on the Table"

The chick who took impeachment "off the table" has just put VAT "on the table"?

Damn, she's annoying.

Done right, a VAT could concievably make the tax burden fairer in that those who consume more would pay more but done wrong it will just increase the financial burden on too many already struggling families.

Worth keeping an eye on.

Be Well.


Come on BL2AFka.


A tax is a fucking tax. Yeah, If I had my way I would go for the fair tax. I want my checks virgin. But what is the difference between getting a lower pay check or the costs of goods being higher? Either way it is a tax.

#32 | Posted by wurster at 2009-10


it may or may not have come out that way but your point is the one I was trying to make.
there are hidden taxes all over the health care bill but I will bet the house and the truck that the white house will run everything imaginable to tell us stupid cornpone hicks that its not a tax and we are just too fuckin stupid to know the difference.

Done right, a VAT could concievably make the tax burden fairer in that those who consume more would pay more but done wrong it will just increase the financial burden on too many already struggling families.


Worth keeping an eye on.


Be Well.

#36 | Posted by dethspud at 2009-10-08


ALL RIGHT THEN

lets get together and call for the END of the irs and have a flat tax...or is that taking resoned and logic to a level that libs cant take?

again

what are the odds that a VAT will start out fairly low and be used by politicians whenever they need it by raising the number

being a betting man, this would be the difinitive of a 'sure thing"

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable