Judge Drops Cow-Abuse Charges Against Cop | Drudge Retort

Friday, September 25, 2009

Judge Drops Cow-Abuse Charges Against Cop

A Pennsylvania judge dismissed animal-cruelty charges against a Moorestown police officer accused of sticking his penis into the mouths of five calves in 2006, claiming a grand jury couldn't infer whether the cows had been "tormented" or "puzzled" by the situation or even irritated that they'd been duped out of a meal.

Posted by AuntieSocial at 06:33 PM | 24 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry

Menu

Front Page
News Weblog
Comments
Flagged Comments
User Blogs
Write a Blog Entry
Edit Account
Stats Page
RSS Feed
Back Page

Subscriptions

Author Info

major trouble

Private E-mail
No Home Page

Joined 2007/10/08
Visited 2009/11/19

Status: user

MORE STORIES

Unemployment really 20% !!! 1 in 5 Americans (15 comments) ...

10.2% Unemployment. Recovery In Full Swing (30 comments) ...

Wilbur, What are you doing back there??? (2 comments) ...

OReilly & Heraldo: Run This Story- John Farmer Ground Truth (12 comments) ...

RCADE's long lost twin brother finally comes forward (5 comments) ...

NYC CAN 80,000 strong stonewalled by Justice Edward Lehner (2 comments) ...

Millions of SideKick Users Lose All Data (44 comments) ...

Why are we being blindsided? (13 comments) ...

Pfizer releases highly anticipated cure for depression (4 comments) ...

the Pentalawn 2000. it slices. it dices (1 comments) ...

what is on the bottom of flight 175 ????????????? (12 comments) ...

Judge Drops Cow-Abuse Charges Against Cop (24 comments) ...

coincidence: no major news reporting on 9/11 explosions (0 comments) ...

coincedence: Larry Silverstein buys asbestos filled building (0 comments) ...

coincidence: Mohammed Atta passport found in NYC (1 comments) ...

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

This farmer in Ohio got busted for the same thing, having sex with his cow.

He went to court and the judge asked him:

"Mr. Jones what were you thinking when you were having sex with your cow?"

He replied, "I believe I was thinking about a younger sexier cow."

#1 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-09-24 10:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

"who ordered the moo goo gai pan?"

Not me.

I like moo. I like gai pan. But not goo.

#2 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-09-24 10:57 PM | Reply | Flag:

"If the cow had the cognitive ability to form thought and speak, would it say, 'Where's the milk? I'm not getting any milk,' " Judge James J. Morley asked.

Damn cow needs to be patient. The milk is on its way...

#3 | Posted by ZombieHunter at 2009-09-25 12:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

It just occurs to me that I have never seen a cow giving a bull a blow-job. Maybe they only do it when no humans are around.

It also makes me wonder how this man would feel if a bull tried to have sex with his wife?

#4 | Posted by Lipzoidial at 2009-09-25 08:44 AM | Reply | Flag:

I don't get it.

Why would the judge give a hoot about the cow's "disposition"? It doesn't matter if the cow enjoyed it or not. The statute requires penetration, that's it. Physical or emotional harm is completely irrelevant. The question must be asked, "what was the intent of the perp", and all evidence shows intent to sexually assault an animal. It is like a rapist saying, "she liked it" and a judge agreeing on the grounds that 'generally people like to have sex'.

Why was the tape not shown to the grand jury? There wasn't even a defense atty present to object to showing it! Under what objection was the tape dismissed? My understanding is the only thing presented at a Grand Jury hearing is what the prosecution wants to show. Trail is the place to argue the victim's disposition (which should be a short argument).

This isn't just a common case of 'One Law for Cops, Another Law for Everyone Else', is it?

#5 | Posted by BluSky at 2009-09-25 12:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

New Jersey is fucked up.

#6 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2009-09-25 12:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

Wow! Excuse me while I log off the internet for a minute.

Ah...

Er... Ah...

PUKE

uh huh

MAJOR HEAVING

uh er...

sorry SPUD but I just can't handle the thought of this...

PUKE Puke puke...

#7 | Posted by Monstman at 2009-09-25 06:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

This sounds like entrapment to me. His intention obviously was to arrest the cow for lewd conduct and he just got a bit carried away with the act.

#8 | Posted by RingMaster at 2009-09-25 06:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

Brings to mind the album cover to Pink Floyd's "Atom Hearted Mother". Who could resits those big eyes and long eye lashes...

But seriously,

Looks like this guy and his girlfriend is also in trouble for assaulting young girls and for kiddie porn. What a piece of work.

#9 | Posted by SLBronkowitz at 2009-09-25 07:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

Why would fucking a cow be against the law in the first place?

Cows exist to be hooked up to milkers for their lives and finally executed and turned into hamburger.

If that's not animal cruelty, then surely fucking them isn't cruel. Unless there's some law which states you're not allowed to play with your food.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2009-09-25 07:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Why would fucking a cow be against the law in the first place?"

Fuck if I know.

--Pinochet Mao

#11 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-09-25 07:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

What if this guy bought a 5 lb Roast Beef, brought it into the barn and "had his way" with it?
What would he be arrested for? Necrobovia?

#12 | Posted by calldown at 2009-09-25 08:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

"If the cow had the cognitive ability to form thought and speak, would it say, 'Where's the milk? I'm not getting any milk,' " Judge James J. Morley asked.

------

Excuse me judge--you slimy idiotic butthead!

What if the person went after a child the same way?

The reasoning of this judge is enough to barf--he couldn't possibly have passed the bar or school for that matter.

The child doesn't comprehend or know what the heck is going on when being molested!!

This judge needs to step away from the bench.

What a friggin idiot!

#13 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-09-25 09:12 PM | Reply | Flag:

Murphy -- a child is a human. A cow is a barnyard animal whose flesh we slice and grind up to eat.

Don't get me wrong -- the guy's a sick fuck. But you can't compare what happened to that cow to a human child being molested.

#14 | Posted by goatman at 2009-09-25 09:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's the JUDGE'S REASONING that has me pissed off!

The judge feels that the cow doesn't know what the heck is going on--so even if it's against the law--it's no big deal.

We have judges in this country with that same reasoning for KIDS who get molested.

Kids--young ones-- don't know what is going on--don't understand it--so no big phucking deal.

It's against the law!!!

And the judge is trying to think like a bovine!!

#15 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-09-25 09:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

Would you feel better if the judge decided that killing cows is cruelty to animals?

#16 | Posted by snoofy at 2009-09-25 09:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

Oh for fucks sake. The judge was having fun!

Imagine the conversations at the dinner table that night

#17 | Posted by boojiboy at 2009-09-25 10:01 PM | Reply | Flag:

It also makes me wonder how this man would feel if a bull tried to have sex with his wife?

#4 | Posted by Lipzoidial

It reminds me of the old joke, how do you turn a fox into a cow? You marry her.

#18 | Posted by member2586 at 2009-09-25 10:38 PM | Reply | Flag:

What if this guy bought a 5 lb Roast Beef, brought it into the barn and "had his way" with it?
What would he be arrested for? Necrobovia?

#12 | Posted by calldown

I don't know, but I'll never eat stake if it has "secret sauce" on it.

#19 | Posted by member2586 at 2009-09-25 10:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Why would fucking a cow be against the law in the first place?"

If iit's your cow, I see no problem, if it's someone else's cow, that would violate that person's property rights since cows are property.

#20 | Posted by member2586 at 2009-09-25 10:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

Ten to one, the Judge grew up on a farm...

#21 | Posted by BobSF_94117 at 2009-09-25 11:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

Yep, the judge probably knows from direct experience that the little critters have sharp teeth and the cop would have had a mangled tallywhacker if he tried to get a calf to suck him off.

Trying it five times? No way!

#22 | Posted by Mista Kurtz at 2009-09-26 02:50 AM | Reply | Flag:

At least he wasn't horsing around.....

#23 | Posted by daprof at 2009-09-26 11:49 AM | Reply | Flag:

The sick cop was also arrested for abusing 3 small girls. I presume this judge will find some compelling reason to let the cop off on those charges as well. In some places, police just can't do wrong in the eyes of a Rtard judge.;

#24 | Posted by axe at 2009-09-26 06:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable