Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Referring to an incident in which a white student was beaten by black students on a bus, talk show host Rush Limbaugh declared on his program last week that the United States needed to return to racially segregated buses. "I think not only it was racism, it was justifiable racism," he said. "I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today. Kid shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

silver_ironist

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

I'm sure that white boy won't be riding that black bus anymore.

Where's Al Sharpton?

Did you hear about Imus joining Fox Business Network?

Like Rush rides the bus.

You leftists are a hoot.

You only make Limbaughs audience grow and grow.

I heard his show on Wendsday and he didn't mean what you are trying to say he meant and your article doesn't provide a full transcript. It provides only the pieces convienent to your cause along with commentary. Hillarious.

Rush owns you!!!!

Ditto envy.

"You only make Limbaugh's audience grow and grow..."

Apparently every fart in the wind does that. A wise man might start to wonder how Rush processes so much hydrogen sulfide.

I think republicans should have to sit at the back of the bus.

That would solve a lot of problems.

Uh, Bill, I hate to break this to you, but there are no Republicans on the bus.

A few years back I tried to take the bus: A 15 minute drive took TWO HOURS.

"You only make Limbaugh's audience grow and grow..."

For other things he needs Viagra, someone else's Viagra.

I miss riding the Buses in Riverside California. So many people. It was like communion on 6 wheels.

Larry

Rush who?

Rush Limpbaugh

"Rush owns you!!!!

#5 | Posted by Washboard"

I doubt that rather highly.

Karma's a bitch Limpbritch. There's a beat down coming his way and I just pray it's caught on tape.

I know those on the left have heard of satire -- they just do not know it when they hear/read it.

Limbaugh, Palin, Hannity, we hate them all for torturing us with the truth.

Sincerely, the left

Limbaugh, Palin, Hannity,even YOU buzzy-wouldn't know the truth if it walked into your house and ate your piano-with hotsauce.

Zat,

"Uh, Bill, I hate to break this to you, but there are no Republicans on the bus."

You might have a point there.

A lot of high and mighty republicans would never ride a bus?

We need segregated buses...

~Rush bLimpo

But but but ...he's not a racist!

~The Right

Fanning the flames of racist hate is a Rush speciality.

It's kinda his raison d'etre.

Well, that and Hillbilly Heroin.

Be Well.

"Limbaugh, Palin, Hannity, we hate them all for torturing us with the truth." Sincerely, the left posted by Buzzard

Oh I think we can handle those views on "truth" quite well Buzzard Brain.

Buzzard reminds us of Jack N. and his classic "you can't handle the truth" line.

Crisis

This is stupid. I heard Limbaugh replay that bit. It was satire.

Silver Ironist is cropdusting again. (Cutting loose a huge smelly fart and then disappearing)

Sounds like he was being sarcastic.

Here's a little quiz, though--can you guess who said this?:

In April 1976, however, a glimpse of his old self shone through when he answered a question about integration issues, blurting out, "I see nothing wrong with ethnic purity being maintained."

#25 RiR = LoL!

I just Googled it and discovered it was Old Peanut Breath himself.

Sarcasm or trial balloon?

Beck has thrown down the gauntlet to Rush.

The race is on for who can say the most outlandish thing.

Wherever it ends up, it won't be pretty for the GOP.

"This is stupid. I heard Limbaugh replay that bit. It was satire."

That's fine and dandy, if true, but if you have 12 million listeners (to make up a number) and some large percentage of them don't _understand_ satire, there's a problem. And I will suggest (hardly unique to me) that even "entertainers" have some responsibility when it comes to how their presentations are received. Do you really think that all his listeners, or even most, are thinking, "Oh, how clever of Rush to poke fun at society's foibles!"? Or do you think a large portion are going, "Yeah, get them niggers back on their own goddam buses!" And yes, of course, most of the audience is probably not at either extreme. But using the "It's satire" excuse doesn't work for this show, and it probably doesn't work for some leftwingers too. Do you use that when John Stewart does a _clearly_ satirical piece skewering Sarah Palin, or do you get pissed off that he's bashing a capable, accomplished, voice of the people?

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

Don't try this at home kids.

Obama is a drug addict.

I wonder if people that visit "Onion" are smart enough to know they are reading satire and not real news.

Obama is a drug addict. Oh, that's right, he smokes. Hm. You're right. On a very superficial level.

But then, I don't give a shit that Rush is a drug addict either. I am bothered by him because of what I posted above. I think all the name-calling is pointless, though there is the idea that Rush could be deemed a hypocrite regarding drug addiction.

Don't personally like the man, but good for Rush on this one. He was using sarcasm to make a point. The MSM went batshit on the Cracker Barrel incident, but ignores or plays down hate crimes perpetrated against whites. Rush at least brought a case of a hate crime by blacks against whites to the public arena.

#29 Prag - relax.

The very fact that DR Righties are responding that this is satire is encouraging. If you ever the DR Righties marching in lockstepo with Limbaugh then you should start to worry. It simply hasn't been seen.

Yes, there is a percentage of people out there who might take his words out of context but those are the same ones you always have to worry about. It's not as if Rush is somehow electrifying new legions of mini-Lester Maddoxes with his sweaty schtick.

Give your fellow Americans a little more credit than that.

#32

The difference between this comment you made vs Truth's comment, is that Truth's comment is actually the TRUTH.

Your comment is...well, it doesn't matter.

It's not like you'll stop.

Obama is a drug addict.

#32 | Posted by mysterytoy

Care to show me where he has said this or was admitted to a drug rehabilitation clinic? Both those scenarios pertain to Rush.

He was correct. The blacks have no use for the whites and the whites the blacks. get it out in open. racist are alive and well in both communities, just look at obama, oprha, holder, jackson, sharpton for examples of black racist. hide under a bush and call it racial pride but if a white does the same it is racist so it is racist also if a black does it.

and rush was being sarcastic

Mystery, the Onion has clearly stated its mission as a satirical instrument, just as John Stewart has. Rush doesn't _say_ he's doing satire; it's not his raison d'etre; it's one of the tools in his toolbox.

And you know what, I have indeed seen instances of people visiting the Onion (which also, btw, is not a partisan instrument, though you will probably lump it in with leftwing media) and taking stories as fact. Happens fairly frequently. If they were perpetuating stereotypes and fomenting anger rather than rational discourse (not only what Rush does, but he clearly does some of that), I'd be down on them too.

Now that I think about it liberals don't know satire when they see it as evidenced by the existence of this thread.

MrFair, I'm fully relaxed. I seldom get truly worked up on DR. It's a website, man.

But I have seen enough of people citing Rush to believe that it's as I say. I am NOT saying all his listeners are stupid dupes. Never said that. I'm saying it's an issue. And that the "it's satire" excuse isn't enough. That's all.

And Mystery's last comment is funny 'cause I've been saying for a while that Republicans don't get irony. (Which is my might broad brush. : ) )

"That's fine and dandy, if true, but if you have 12 million listeners (to make up a number) and some large percentage of them don't _understand_ satire, there's a problem...."

Oh??? And the problem is whose??? Rush Limbaugh's? Mine? Yours? The government-run schools? Individuals' disciplinary problems.
Do you REALLY want to limit freedom of speech and prohibit satire, sarcasm, parodies etc. that SOME people may not understand?

#41 - Conveniently, however, his "satire" sounds a lot like his regular shtick - provoke anger, pit liberal against conservative, white against black, offer no real solutions for anything, paint anyone who disagrees as the enemy.

So basically your argument is you have this fear that Rush Limbaugh is going to cause people to want to bring back segregation.

When liberal judges invented forced busing for untegration they said that everything would be peachy keen. Did libs lie again?

#43 That's a pretty broad brush, pal!

The real issue is we need to re-educate conservatives so we will be smart enough to know not to listen to right wing media.

That would solve all your problems.

Then after that is done we would re-educate christians so that they wouldn't listen to christian radio.

I wonder when the athiests will attack christian radio stations and shut them down.

Limbaugh knows what his audience wants and he gives it to them regularly. On the evidence of these quotes he believes it himself too.

"I mean, let's face it, we didn't have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I'm not saying we should bring it back; I'm just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."

"You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed."

"Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."

"The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies."

"Take that bone out of your nose and call me back."

There are plenty of other quotes from him about Jesse Jackson, South Africa, Darfur, Donovan McNabb etc but why bother with them? He is what he is. His audience is what it is.

The only significant thing about him is that the GOP has allowed him to become its de facto leader. It's the right that Limbaugh owns not the left as Washboard(#5) thinks.

I worry that athiests aren't smart enough to know they are listening to christian radio.

#45

I absolutely agree with Cbob!

Rush fuels the fires of the right under the guise of satire.

But as long as they claim it's "satire"...people don't look any deeper at the reactions it causes.

They think Rush is an "enteretainer".

Oh please!

I wonder how many of Rush Limbaugh's listeners are smart enough to even know the man in the box with the knobs is named Rush Limbaugh.

Seriously, I listened for two years before I even knew his name. I thought it was the voice of God.

"The only significant thing about him is that the GOP has allowed him to become its de facto leader."

LOL...if stupidity was a snowflake, this poor boy (or girl) would be a walking blizzard. I think Pragamatist was envisioning this fool back in the post where he said some folks wouldn't understand satire.

"Seriously, I listened for two years before I even knew his name. I thought it was the voice of God."

Now I'm looking for a post from Brock that says, "SEE! I TOLD YOU SO!"

#55

BL2 still does.

"BL2 still does."

Please join Brock in the front seats on the short bus....LOL

(I know you're being facetious, Lisa...I'm not like Brock...really.)

GOP has allowed him to become its de facto leader

Believe it or not the majority of Republicans DON'T listen to Rush Limbaugh and would probably dispute your statement.

Why won't liberals admit that they are deathly afraid of any conservative with a cable or antenna.

You mean a battery cable and a car antenna?

"You mean a battery cable and a car antenna?"

A car antenna is lethal by itself anywhere, anytime. However battery cables must be hooked to a battery and the other ends to a pair of testicles in order to be effective. Always remember...red positive, black negative.

"However battery cables must be hooked to a battery and the other ends to a pair of testicles in order to be effective. Always remember...red positive, black negative."

Thanks for clearing that up. I guess it wasn't really such a bad deal, then, more like a learning experience.

That's fine and dandy, if true, but if you have 12 million listeners (to make up a number) and some large percentage of them don't _understand_ satire, there's a problem.
#40 | Posted by pragmatist

When Limbaugh replayed it, he was mocking liberals for having no sense of humor. When he suggested busing, his voice was dripping with contempt for the idea. How much more can the man do?

You must be a liberal.

"I guess it wasn't really such a bad deal, then, more like a learning experience."

If you listened to Rush more often you'd have known that.

"You must be a liberal."

I think "liberals" are extinct. All I seem to encounter these days are leftist-socialists with the code name, "progressives."


Assclown, yes. Entertainer? Not so much.

"The real issue is we need to re-educate conservatives so we will be smart enough to know not to listen to right wing media."

No. The real issue is we need to educate everyone on the manipulative techniques of _all_ media makers. And we need to foster critical though in _all_ citizens.

As for the rest of you who are yelling at _me_, guys, read my posts, please. If you think I'm saying that he can't do what he does, you need reading remediation. If you think I'm saying it's all his fault, you need reading remediation. I'm just saying the "It's satire" excuse/reason is not enough. I don't have to solve the problem; I'm a critic--I get to point out problems. : )

Honestly, I don't give a shit about Rush Limbaugh in the grand scheme of things. Glenn Beck is another story--bwahahahaha. Oh, I slay me.

"I think "liberals" are extinct. All I seem to encounter these days are leftist-socialists with the code name, "progressives.""

Yer crackin' me up.

You do know that "left" represents a wide range of ideas, right? Like "liberal." Same is true on the right, O Liberals! : )~

"Assclown, yes. Entertainer? Not so much."

Actually, I don't listen to him but I DO tune in when I hear the hew and cry from your little friends about something he said or did. I was lucky to catch the, "Barack, The Magic Negro," parody he did in response to Al Sharpton's remark and I found it hilarious. Same with Barney Frank and, The Banking Queen." Incidently...I saw some really funny ones about Bush over the years too. You and your little friends just have no sense of humor.

He was being facetious. He was making a comment saying Obama is reasonably catering to minorities, or blacks is I guess what he means. Read the full transcript.

The headline is just written to make people get all angry and argue. He clearly wasn't really calling for segregation. He was just being shocking because he's on TV.

He's not saying anything useful or meaningful, just trying to get his ratings up.


"Republican humor", is an oxymoron.

As proven by Dennis Miller and Rush Limpnode.

"Republican humor", is an oxymoron.

Ya gotta get that cob outa your ass, Corky. THIS republican is a real icon and had an unmatched sense of humor:

www.youtube.com


Bob Hope was a Republican when there were liberal and moderate Republicans.

He would gag over what passes for a Republican these days.

-Ya gotta get that cob outa your ass, Corky.

You'll have to move over, then.

I don't think Bob Hope was a Republican because of this joke he told in Washing DC in 1950:


Most towns have juvenile delinquents, but Washington DC just calls them Young Republicans.

If you listened to Rush more often you'd have known that.
#66 | Posted by jestgettinalong


Let's see now...battery cables hook up to my testicular embellishments...or...listen more to Rush Limbaugh...









No, I'm still thinking.

LOL, Doc.

"You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed."

This is satire?

You should be jest getting along to your remedial reading class, shouldn't you?

I will admit that, as much as I dislike the man, sometimes he has a funny bit on his show. He does a pretty good Bill Clinton, for example. And I'm a sucker for humor, no matter the source. But on balance, he just stirs up shit for no real reason other than to boost ratings. Fine for him but bad for anyone wanting to actually understand complex issues.

I'd prefer to look for ways for Americans to get along and solve the serious problems facing us, using civil debate to work through conflicts, rather than harping on our differences all day long.

Rush does satire and the left goes bizerk..

Like this satire??


tvimagecoachblog.com

Good idea by Rush. I guess he will be riding the
bus with the other fat drug addicts.

...and windbags.

Hot off the Press!!

Republicans nor Democrats voted to NEVER ride any bus. That's why they suck.

The real issue is we need to re-educate conservatives so we will be smart enough to know not to listen to right wing media.

No amount of education will help people who are born idiots.

i'm no Rush fan, but do know he's not stupid enough to say that seriously, and that whoever posted had to completely take it out of context.

go ahead and keep it up, it'll make the left seem more desperate on its way to getting steamrolled at the midterms.

This is taken out of context and reported irresponsibly, esp. regarding the headline. I don't like Rush, at all, but I'll give him a fair chance without twisting his words. I'd rather see my team win by playing the game fairly than by bending the rules.

#86 Somoco

"Getting steamrolled at the midterms"

Will there be that many 3rd party candidates on all the states' ballots to do the job?

This is stupid. I heard Limbaugh replay that bit. It was satire.

#23 | Posted by Ray
----------------------
Ray, let's not confuse the liberals with the truth. Nobody uses satire except them, just ask them.

Lonnie

No. Surely he was being sarcastic. And it was funny because.....

Can someone who found it amusing explain the humor, please?

But using the "It's satire" excuse doesn't work for this show, and it probably doesn't work for some leftwingers too.

#29 | Posted by pragmatist
---------------------
I heard the broadcast and he said at least 2 times, that it was satire. Obviously someone doesn't know how to listen. I wonder who the dishonest fuck at media matters that thought this was newsworthy is?

Lonnie

These two comments were nice, all in a row:

So basically your argument is you have this fear that Rush Limbaugh is going to cause people to want to bring back segregation.

#46 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-09-21 10:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

When liberal judges invented forced busing for untegration they said that everything would be peachy keen. Did libs lie again?

#47 | Posted by fwthom at 2009-09-21 10:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

#30 | Posted by truthhurts
-----------------------
If you really want to go there, the fine, let's go there. YOUR messiah did cocaine and marijuana. He admits this in one of his books. Now your argument is that he quit. Well there is no proof that Rush has fell off the wagon so what makes them the same.

Lonnie

Holy Christ, listen to the whole clip people, this is almost as ridiculous as the claim that he offered to buy his mother a can opener if she had to eat dog food.

I heard the broadcast and he said at least 2 times, that it was satire.

Ok. Explain it to me. What was he spoofing, and why was it funny?

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

If you really want to go there, the fine, let's go there. YOUR messiah did cocaine and marijuana. He admits this in one of his books. Now your argument is that he quit. Well there is no proof that Rush has fell off the wagon so what makes them the same.


Lonnie

#93 | Posted by lwalk17


All who experiment with a drug are not drug addicts.

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

Drug addiction is a disease.

Drug addiction cannot be cured, it can be managed.

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

I need to tell you today that part of what you have heard and read is correct. I am addicted to prescription pain medication."
-Rush Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

Considering all the racist things Rush has said in the past, one more racist remark isn't going to make any difference on my opinion of rush, whether it is satire or not. When people eventually figure out that Rush is just a cheap shot, loud mouth, uneducated blow hard, that is when their real education begins. It's like switching on a light of reason. You fools who buy Limbaughs crap are never going to escape the dark, so who cares what you think?

Google 'racist comment by Rush Limbaugh' some day and see how many hits you get.

"I heard his show on Wendsday and he didn't mean what you are trying to say he meant and your article doesn't provide a full transcript. It provides only the pieces convienent to your cause along with commentary. Hillarious.

#5 | Posted by Washboard"


OK, I'll ask: what did he mean by "We need segregated buses."?

Good luck, Montecore

Where's Al Sharpton? Where's Jesse Jackson? Where's Al Farakahn? Where is the Media????? Where is the outrage, the protests, the looting and the rioting? If the color was reversed...it would be a national crisis! Is Barry Soetoro gonna invite the kids to the White House to sit down for a beer?

#81 | Posted by MURPHY

Explain that satire on the link...

So basically your argument is you have this fear that Rush Limbaugh is going to cause people to want to bring back segregation.

#46 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-09-21 10:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

When liberal judges invented forced busing for untegration they said that everything would be peachy keen. Did libs lie again?

#47 | Posted by fwthom at 2009-09-21 10:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

Where's Al Sharpton? Where's Jesse Jackson? Where's Al Farakahn? Where is the Media????? Where is the outrage, the protests, the looting and the rioting? If the color was reversed...it would be a national crisis! Is Barry Soetoro gonna invite the kids to the White House to sit down for a beer?

#103 | Posted by emf958 at 2009-09-21 02:24 PM | Reply | Flag:


(Note to emf958: Rush is filling in for "Al Farakahn" this week.)

Murphy-
re: Explain that satire on the link...

#104 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-09-21 02:27 PM | Reply | Flag:


Sure. The New Yorker cover art was spoofing the ridiculous shit we've all been hearing from teabagging nutcases such as yourself for the last year on a daily basis: Obama is a an angry black socialist revolutionary Kenyan muslim with a "deep-seated hatred for white people....or 'white culture'"...

Your turn.

Sure---Rush is making fun of the racism running across the country during the Obama "transcended racial candidacy" and time as POTUS.

When you have kids being bully's beating up on a another kid on a bus--it's obvious that they need to be segregated.

The media had this bus incident as a hate crime--then retracted.

The simple solution is to separate the kids.

Get it.

AGAIN
you here and in the staterun media can bloviate all you want over this.
We who heard the whole thing know he was being sarcastic in referenece to newsweek which said that white people were born racist.
I heard assholes all over cnn bullshitting about this and not a single one of them got the thing right

"When you have kids being bully's beating up on a another kid on a bus--it's obvious that they need to be segregated.

Posted by MURPHY"

But what if the victim is a special needs kid like Nanc's son? In other words, what if the kid deserved the beatdown, then what?

OK, I'll ask: what did he mean by "We need segregated buses."?

#101 | Posted by mOntecOre at 2009-09-21 02:11 PM

Wow, what a failure of reading comprehension. Are you seriously this retarded? How anyone can take "I think not only it was racism, it was justifiable racism," he said. "I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today. Kid shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses." as anything more than satire, even accepting that Limbaugh is a racist prick, is beyond me.

Is that the quote? The problem is one of puncuation and not racism. Here, I can fix it.


"I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today:(k)id shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses." He is saying that is the lesson being taught by the action, not that it is what is needed.

So between this and Carter, it appears nobody on either side is really concerned with what is actually said when they can score points off misquotes.

#109 FF

So between this and Carter, it appears nobody on either side is really concerned with what is actually said when they can score points off misquotes.

#112 | Posted by kanrei
--------------------------
I have a problem with this. Carter wasn't misquoted. He actually meant what was said. It's apparent when he attempted to quote tea party signs. He missed the word CARE. The sign said "Bury Obama CARE with Kennedy. This was political dishonesty at it's best.

Lonnie

Carter was totally misquoted. He said, and I quote: "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, that he's African-American,"


Is that all protest? No.

Is that all the intense protest? No

Is that a "overwhelming portion" of the intense? Yes.


What percent is the intense? Maybe 20%? Then you can take 75% of that 20% and that is what Carter was talking about.

"I'm sorry I mean, this is the way my mind works. But apparently now we don't choose racism, we just are racists. We are born that way.".....RB.

......well Rush.......some of us are........

......one day, when more of us evolve past our instinctive tribal and clan attachments, the color of one's skin will be no more noteworthy than the color of one's hair or eyes.......a cosmetic difference......

......but it seems that day will never come for Rush.......

As post #114 proves beyond any doubt, nobody on either side is really concerned with what is actually said when they can score points off misquotes.

Kanrei-

Limbaugh was not "misquoted". Please point to the humor in his race-baiting.

What percent is the intense? Maybe 20%? Then you can take 75% of that 20% and that is what Carter was talking about.

#115 | POSTED BY KANREI AT 2009-09-21 03:05 PM | REPLY | FLAG Red Herring.

Betelg,

Is that the quote? The problem is one of puncuation and not racism. Here, I can fix it.


"I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today:(k)id shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses." He is saying that is the lesson being taught by the action, not that it is what is needed.

#111 | Posted by kanrei at 2009-09-21 02:46 PM

#119 | Posted by somoco at 2009-09-21 03:09 PM | Reply | Flag: Has no reading comprehension

I love it...just made a trip to the store and tuned in Rush on the way home. This whole thread reminded me to do it. He had Bo Snerdley doing a skit. It is a brand new one and it's hilarious, especially when he interprets for "the hood." I wondered if he had ever done it before and found one from months ago. Here it is...the brand new one is not up yet.

www.youtube.com

Irony is that the very people who are misquoting Carter want to have their kids home schooled. People with no listening skills and no comprehension are going to teach listening skills and comprehension.

Kanrei-
re: "He is saying that is the lesson being taught by the action, not that it is what is needed."

Thank you for the clarification. Rush is actually saying that in "Obama's America" "we" need segregated buses because of the action of a few black kids on a bus. But he's really just joking.

Hilarious.

I guess I just don't see the humor or "satire" in saying we need segregated buses. Is there a joke there that I'm missing?

Rush is actually saying that in "Obama's America" "we" need segregated buses because of the action of a few black kids on a bus.

No, he didn't. I can hardly expect someone who didin't understand what Rush said to have the ability to understand it explained.

This is stupid. I heard Limbaugh replay that bit. It was satire.

#23 | Posted by Ray

We all know that. But......... it makes great press for the libs. You know, they will suck anything up. Just ask Monica.

Most people on the left, from what I have seen, are not trying to explain that Carter said nothing racist, so they are instead trying to show racism on the other side to change the subject. Neither man said anything racist.

I can hardly expect someone who didin't understand what Rush said to have the ability to understand it explained.

#126 | Posted by kanrei at 2009-09-21 03:16 PM | Reply | Flag:


Try.

I've heard the word "satire" over and over again as an explanation for his rant. Please explain it to me. What was it spoofing, and why was it funny?

Not from me Bet. I have never used satire and never said he was joking. I will repost it one more time. Take it to someone if you still cannot understand what I said and ask them.


Is that the quote? The problem is one of puncuation and not racism. Here, I can fix it.


"I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today:(k)id shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses." He is saying that is the lesson being taught by the action, not that it is what is needed.


#111 | Posted by kanrei at 2009-09-21 02:46 PM

While you're at it, Kanrei, maybe you can explain this to me:

So basically your argument is you have this fear that Rush Limbaugh is going to cause people to want to bring back segregation.

#46 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-09-21 10:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

When liberal judges invented forced busing for untegration they said that everything would be peachy keen. Did libs lie again?

#47 | Posted by fwthom at 2009-09-21 10:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

Where's Al Sharpton? Where's Jesse Jackson? Where's Al Farakahn? Where is the Media????? Where is the outrage, the protests, the looting and the rioting? If the color was reversed...it would be a national crisis! Is Barry Soetoro gonna invite the kids to the White House to sit down for a beer?

#103 | Posted by emf958 at 2009-09-21 02:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

^.^

It's not like Liberalistas listen to Rush, and the few who do are masochists who are just trying to be mad when Rush says something they don't like.

In the case of Rush's comments, beyond the satire, the comments are about the latest spate of school bus violence, which no matter what the talking heads say, seems to have been racially incited. With this in mind, when you have people who do not like each other, in a place where these tensions exist, perhaps the school administration should consider segregattion policies, NOT because to the race of the people involved, but because of the actions of the people involved.

It may sound a bit contorted, but they would not be separating the people specifically because they are Black or White, but because when these groups come in contact with each other, fights are produced.

John B.

He is saying that is the lesson being taught by the action, not that it is what is needed.

What "action"?

And what is the inexorable conclusion of the "lesson"..

Please explain, and don't just re-post your impenetrable comment again.

Bet,
Don't expect me to argue for anyone else or defend what the idiots who post here think. I am accountable for my own thoughts only.

The action is the reversal of the police department from claiming it was a racially motivated attack to saying it wasn't one. Are you that dense? Are you even following the story or just commenting on a headline?

I still don't see how Kanrei's change in punctuation makes the comment anything other than Rush saying "we need segregated buses."

Here, maybe reversing the order of these two paragraphs can help you follow it.


Limbaugh's comments came after a called complained to say that local law enforcement said the attack probably wasn't racially motivated. The incident had been hyped by the conservative Drudge Report, which posted a video of the fracas.

"Police initially said the beating of the white student by two black students appeared to be racially motivated," the Associated Press wrote. "But police on Tuesday backed away from that."

Referring to an incident in which a white student was beaten by black students on a bus, Limbaugh said: "I think the guy's wrong. I think not only it was racism, it was justifiable racism. I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today. Kid shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses it was invading space and stuff. This is Obama's America."

Can you follow it now?

Luna-
re: the comments are about the latest spate of school bus violence, which no matter what the talking heads say, seems to have been racially incited. With this in mind, when you have people who do not like each other, in a place where these tensions exist, perhaps the school administration should consider segregattion policies, NOT because to the race of the people involved, but because of the actions of the people involved.

The "latest spate of school bus violence"?

It's one instance. That hardly makes a "spate of school bus violence".

re: when you have people who do not like each other, in a place where these tensions exist, perhaps the school administration should consider segregattion policies, NOT because to the race of the people involved, but because of the actions of the people involved.

So, your take on Rush's rant is that students should perhaps be segregated by race, but not "because" of race, in "Obama's America".

(Kanrei?)


The point Limbaugh is trying to make (and one I don't agree with) is that in Obama's America, blacks cannot commit hate crimes while everything a white does is not considered one.


I still don't see how Kanrei's change in punctuation makes the comment anything other than Rush saying "we need segregated buses."


Take an English class and study the difference between a period and a colon.

Carter was totally misquoted. He said, and I quote: "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, that he's African-American,"


Is that all protest? No.

Is that all the intense protest? No

Is that a "overwhelming portion" of the intense? Yes.


What percent is the intense? Maybe 20%? Then you can take 75% of that 20% and that is what Carter was talking about.

#115 | Posted by kanrei
--------------------
No kanrei. He held another speech where he quoted the sign. Your right about that particular speech but that wasn't the one I was referring to. Here's the link.

www.youtube.com

Lonnie

not = now.

Kanrei-

Reversing paragraphs and changing punctuation does not change the fact that Limbaugh said "we need segregated buses." I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what that means, other than the fact that the speaker thinks that we need segregated buses.

Boyd's wife.

Kanrei-
re: "I think the guy's wrong. I think not only it was racism, it was justifiable racism. I mean, that's the lesson we're being taught here today. Kid shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses it was invading space and stuff. This is Obama's America."

Can you follow it now?


Sure can. Rush was saying that the white kid shouldn't have been on the bus in "Obama's America".

Thanks for the clarification, and further explanation of how Rush's "satire" is not completely depraved.

He held another speech where he quoted the sign.

That one I didn't know about. Everytime people have talked about the racist Carter quote, they brought out that one. I have no speakers at work and cannot hear the Youtube link until I get home.

"That's all I can stands 'cause I can't stands no more!"

I'll come back tomorrow when Danni, Buffaloed_Boob, Redneckville, Moneywar, DeadPud, and some of the other members of the DR intelligentsia can tell me what Carter and Rush REALLY meant.

"Take an English class and study the difference between a period and a colon."

Take a chill pill, douchebag. Nobody was giving you attitude. Period or colon, the words that come after are the same. Whether you think thats a "lesson" learned from this incident doesn't make that "lesson" any less outrageous than if it were your own thoughts.

Reversing paragraphs and changing punctuation

I put the paragraphs in the order of event so that it can be followed rather than distorting the timeline to create an impression like Raw Story did. I also used the proper punctuation rather than the one Raw Story chose to put in. It was a single sentence and a fluid thought, not separate thoughts.

... Kid shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses it was invading space and stuff. This is Obama's America."

That sounds to me like sarcasm, not an endorsement of segregated buses.

Regardless, the torture couldn't have been that bad. He lived for 54 years afterward.

#2 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-05-08 02:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

(This is 101 in response to this: Col. Harold E. Fischer Jr., an American fighter pilot who was routinely tortured in a Chinese prison during and after the Korean War, becoming along with three other American airmen held at the same prison a symbol and victim of cold war tension, died in Las Vegas.www.drudge.com)

Joe telling someone to take a chill pill is possibly the funniest thing I have ever read here.

That sounds to me like sarcasm, not an endorsement of segregated buses.

#149 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-09-21 03:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's sarcasm, but of the depraved race-baiting kind, and that's all I ever claimed. I'm surprised at those who defend it.

Rush and his possee have thrown down the gauntlet... or more probably the ham hock....or actually the cleaned bone of a ham hock!

"Joe telling someone to take a chill pill is possibly the funniest thing I have ever read here."

His face was red and his neck veins bulging when he typed that. As usual.

I love how the push for home schooling coincides with this rise in a lack of comprehension skills. We must guarantee the DNC and RNC voting bases of tomorrow after all.

Regardless, the torture couldn't have been that bad. He lived for 54 years afterward.-

101 Chairborne

Anyone who reads this article and actually thinks that Rush Limbaugh advocated segregation is a FUCKING MORON!!!

I actually listened to the show that day unlike the dumbass libtards on this site. Rush was making a joke and saying it was the WHITE KID who was the racist and OBVIOUSLY thinking racist thoughts because Whites are born racists according to an article in a major news magazine. He was saying the black kid beating up the white kid was only defending himself against racism.He was joking in saying that the racist white kid should be segregated from the black kids so the black kids won't be hassled or subject to racism from whites. He was clearly joking and making a political point about how events involving people of different races are portrayed.

Even dumb libtards know that if it was bus full of white kids beating up a black kid and cheering the assailant on, we would have seen this event as clearly a racial hate crime. Instead it was not because the assailants were black and the victim was white so it was all just "bullying."

Once again, as black man myself, I am sick and tired of WHITE LIBERALS crying racism on behalf of blacks. We have our own voices. We are not stupid, listening white liberals? We can speak for ourselves even though you white liberals think we are too stupid to speak for ourselves. Quite using black people as political tools!!! The real racists are white liberals!

Rush is awesome. Thank god he is on the radio.

#150 | Posted by BetelG at 2009-09-21 03:35 PM | Reply

As usual, I throw the rock, and you yelp.
Consider yourself owned.

For a guy making more money now than he has ever made or will ever make, Rush sure looks like he is angry huh?

Oh the fools that fall for his act. Rush's life is better than it ever has been or ever will be under Obama.

And the idiots think he's pissed at everything. They have fallen for it Hook, Line, and Sinker.

Too funny.

Rush is awesome. Thank god he is on the radio.

#158 | Posted by utastaff

Bet you would love segregation, eh, shortstaff?

The more I read this thread, the more I am convinced he phrased it the way he did knowing that it would be misunderstood. He wants those who will hate anything that follows the words "Rush said" to go nuts over this because he so clearly didn't say it.

As usual, I throw the rock, and you yelp.
Consider yourself owned.

#159 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-09-21 03:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

Consider yourself a creepy coward who would lessen the experience of a US patriot who was tortured by the Chinese in the Korean War in order to justify the actions of the goober you voted for:


Regardless, the torture couldn't have been that bad. He lived for 54 years afterward.


Rush is now saying it was sarcasm.

And look, that fucking idiot U-Staff fell for it.

You are a fucking idiot USAStaff. Total fucking moron. Enjoy getting your information from an uneducated drug addict. It's funny as shit that you look up to an uneducated drug addict and parrot him daily.

That makes you fucking stupid.

And I laugh

101-
I guess you were 'forced' to shit on the grave of a man who served, and was tortured for his service, in order to justify the same methods that you then applauded when they were used against our enemies, but to go so far as to say this of a captured pilot who was tortured by our enemies:

Regardless, the torture couldn't have been that bad. He lived for 54 years afterward.


?????

I still don't get that, 101.

Rush is awesome. Thank god he is on the radio.

#158 | Posted by utastaff
----------------
GREAT Post utastaff! ^5's.

Lonnie

GREAT Post utastaff! ^5's.

Lonnie

#166 | Posted by lwalk17

Why don't you two pole smokers get a room?

Why don't you two pole smokers get a room?

#167 | Posted by nullifidian

Well the obvious answer is they are Rush fans.

Therefore, they are idiots. Getting their education from an uneducated drug addict.

Hey Null, Obama called and said he wants his balls back. Michelle is getting suspicious!

Lonnie

A few years back I tried to take the bus: A 15 minute drive took TWO HOURS. -- #10 | Posted by Zatoichi

That's pretty bad. I love mass transit (limited patience behind the wheel) and happily read while someone else does the driving, but 3x the time is the worst I've encountered.

Why don't you two pole smokers get a room?

#167 | Posted by nullifidian

Well the obvious answer is they are Rush fans.

Therefore, they are idiots. Getting their education from an uneducated drug addict.

#168 | Posted by Manypaths
------------------------
Like you didn't get your education from a druggie either. LMFAO. That's a fucking prerequisite to be a college professor. I'm sure if I looked into your teachers background, I could make you turn red!

Lonnie

That sounds to me like sarcasm, not an endorsement of segregated buses.

#149 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-09-21 03:34 PM

You have to be retarded NOT to think it was sarcasm. (see ManyPaths)

Kanrei,

I think you nailed it though. Rush did the bit because he knew media matters would take it out of context and create a stink about it.

Lonnie

"You have to be retarded NOT to think it was sarcasm"

I was trying to be nice, as usual.

I still don't get that, 101.

#165 | Posted by BetelG at 2009-09-21 03:52 PM | Reply | Flag


Because you're a fucking retard.

Even when I explain it, you still can't help yourself. I throw rocks, you yelp.

Are buses are segregated and always have been.

I've seen the right side of the lot has the buses that are green. The left side has yellow ones. The center usually has the green ones, but there aren't many of them.

Those that don't work are segregated to the repair shops.

Those who drive them can segregate them to their own houses from the lot itself.

Lots of segregation. I just don't get the point of this issue.

are=OUR

Here's the transcript of what was said for anyone who honestly wants to see and compare to this sham of a news story. Better read today because tomorrow it will probably be gone.

www.rushlimbaugh.com

Lonnie

A movie called "The Last Supper" really made me rethink Limbaugh.

For those who never saw it, it was about a group of liberal friends who decide the best way to save the planet is to kill consdrvatives. They kill a child molesting priest and a right wing domestic terrorist, but they have their sights set on a Limbaugh type person the entire movie. They get him over for dinner and they find out he is more liberal than they are, but feels liberal radio is boring so he screws with the righties instead.

That's fine and dandy, if true, but if you have 12 million listeners (to make up a number) and some large percentage of them don't _understand_ satire, there's a problem. And I will suggest (hardly unique to me) that even "entertainers" have some responsibility when it comes to how their presentations are received. Do you really think that all his listeners, or even most, are thinking, "Oh, how clever of Rush to poke fun at society's foibles!"? Or do you think a large portion are going, "Yeah, get them niggers back on their own goddam buses!" And yes, of course, most of the audience is probably not at either extreme. But using the "It's satire" excuse doesn't work for this show, and it probably doesn't work for some leftwingers too. Do you use that when John Stewart does a _clearly_ satirical piece skewering Sarah Palin, or do you get pissed off that he's bashing a capable, accomplished, voice of the people?

#29 | Posted by pragmatist

If you're going to apply that to Rush's audience then you must apply it to audiences that watch SNL and any other TV programs. I would venture to say that Rush has an audience that is probably a little more intelligent than your average listener. You just think that they are all too stupid to get it. If it were Air America would you have the same opinion?

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

#30 | Posted by truthhurts

And just what do you mean by this? Is it an insult or just a statement? I tend to think it's an insult considering it is obvious that you do not like Rush. Well, I'm here to tell you that America is filled with drug addicts. I bet you know some personally. The ones who choose to fight their addiction and not use deserve nothing but credit and praise. It is obvious that you have never personally suffered from an addiction or you wouldn't insult people who have them. And please don't try and tell me that your statement was not intended to insult or degrade. People fighting to stay clean are better people than you are.

"We are not stupid, listening white liberals? We can speak for ourselves even though you white liberals think we are too stupid to speak for ourselves.

#158 | Posted by utastaff"

You know UTA, I agree with you on this. I would just suggest that perhaps, well actually I'm sure about this, you are not the best spokesperson for this message. I mean, while it is true that not all black people are stupid - far from it, actually - you are clearly one of the exceptions.

Just trying to help a brutha out, you know?

#181 | Posted by everlong at 2009-09-21 05:32 PM | Reply | Flag: Drug addict

I mean, while it is true that not all black people are stupid - far from it, actually - you are clearly one of the exceptions.


Just trying to help a brutha out, you know?

Posted by mOntecOre

how enlightened of you to help him out monte.

Tiny - you just like Al-Rushboo because you resemble the little boys he favors in the Dominican Republic. If you were a normal adult male instead of an adult in a kid-size body, Rush would have no interest in you and you wouldn't defend him. Admit it.

As you know from being here as long as we both have, Ebs, I am a good-hearted soul with only the best intentions for my fellow human beings, no matter which race or side of the political spectrum they are from.

I am a good-hearted soul with only the best intentions for my fellow human beings, no matter which race or side of the political spectrum they are from...unless they are Chinese Left Handed Republican Dentists who Cross dress every other Sunday. I hate those bastardS!

I am a good-hearted soul with only the best intentions for my fellow human beings, no matter which race or side of the political spectrum they are from.

me too.

I know, Ebs. You've been a lot nicer since you stopped hanging out on the park bench with Vernon too.

The attack on the bus wasn't racially motivated. The kid sat where he wasn't wanted. Race had nothing to do with it. Rush is wrong as usual.

www.bnd.com

Was it your Viagra El-Limpbo was caught with, Tiny? Is that why you are called Tiny, Tiny?

"If you're going to apply that to Rush's audience then you must apply it to audiences that watch SNL and any other TV programs. I would venture to say that Rush has an audience that is probably a little more intelligent than your average listener. You just think that they are all too stupid to get it. If it were Air America would you have the same opinion?"

Clearly, you're not reading what I'm writing. SNL is a _comedy sketch show_. See my comment RE John Stewart and The Onion. Different beasts. Though it is true that lots of people repeat Tina Fey's "I can see Russia from my house" as a Sarah Palin quote.

I'll say it again--Rush L, from what I know, uses humor (not to my taste, but I'll give him that) and satire as _some_ of his tools. He also uses ad hominem attacks, name calling, and probably some logic and actual deconstruction skills. The comedy shows are comedy shows--it's their very purpose and structure. As for listeners, I _never_ said they were _all_ too stupid to get it. I use language much more carefully than that (well, most of the time). And if Air America said similarly dangerous, hateful stuff (and maybe they do--I don't get to hear about it, and they don't have the market share Rush does), I would comment on that, too. SNL and Rush Limbaugh have different sets of responsibilities. Or so I believe. : )

Bet you would love segregation, eh, shortstaff?

#161 | Posted by nullifidian

As a black man, I take racism very seriously especially having been the victim of racism on several ocassions. What I do know is that Rush Limbaugh is NOT a racist and NEVER advocated segregation.

Rush never seriously said we should have segregation dumbass. I listened to the show that day. His quotes were taken out of context. He was being SARCASTIC by saying that it was the White kid who was racist and deserved his beating by black kids trying to protect themselves from white racism. He SARCASTICALLY said that there should be segregated buses to protect black kids from racists white kids like the white kid on the bus being beaten and cheered on by black kids.

What is wrong with Democrats these days? They are getting more desperate by the day. Now they have to make up lies to defame people. White liberals just USE blacks as political weapons and don't give a rats ass about any blacks. I bet most of the libtard Dems in Congress don't even associate with anyone black as person friends and probably don't live in neighborhoods where many blacks live. Racism is not a political weapon libtards. If you truly experienced it you would know that.


Great post BROCK:

Limbaugh knows what his audience wants and he gives it to them regularly. On the evidence of these quotes he believes it himself too:

"I mean, let's face it, we didn't have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I'm not saying we should bring it back; I'm just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."

"You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed."

"Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."

"The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies."

"Take that bone out of your nose and call me back."

There are plenty of other quotes from him about Jesse Jackson, South Africa, Darfur, Donovan McNabb etc but why bother with them? He is what he is. His audience is what it is.

The only significant thing about him is that the GOP has allowed him to become its de facto leader. It's the right that Limbaugh owns not the left as Washboard(#5) thinks.

#52 | Posted by brock

You creeps are the racist promoting propagandists and EVERYONE can see that now, except for puling Democrat commie wannabe leftists!

You puling yellow-dog-Democrat creeps are the racist promoting propagandists and EVERYONE can see that now, except for puling Democrat commie wannabe leftists!

"I would venture to say Rush has an audience that is more intelligent than your average listener..."

Not possible. Just strange.

Rush never seriously said we should have segregation dumbass. I listened to the show that day. His quotes were taken out of context. He was being SARCASTIC by saying that it was the White kid who was racist and deserved his beating by black kids trying to protect themselves from white racism. He SARCASTICALLY said that there should be segregated buses to protect black kids from racists white kids like the white kid on the bus being beaten and cheered on by black kids.

#198 | Posted by utastaff at 2009-09-21 07:04 PM | Reply | Flag

You are correct--Rush was being SARCASTIC by saying that it was the White kid who was racist and deserved his beating by black kids trying to protect themselves from white racism. His sarcasm was meant to illustrate that it was the black kids who were racist and were beating the white kid because they were racists. He knows he couldn't SAY that, so he hid it with his sarcasm. What do YOU think he was tryng to say?


You are also correect when you say--He SARCASTICALLY said that there should be segregated buses to protect black kids from racists white kids like the white kid on the bus being beaten and cheered on by black kids.

What he MEANT by his sarcasm is that there should be segregated buses to protect white kids from racist black kids. He knows he couldn't SAY that, so he hid it with his sarcasm. What do YOU think he was tryng to say?

He used his sarcasm to hide what he really wanted to say. There was no racism on that bus--but Rush saw racism, and he pointed out that blacks and whites should have segregated buses to protect them from attacks as seen on that bus. THAT was the meaning of his sarcasm.

I've noticed that Rush only claims his statements are satirical AFTER someone points out the obvious racism in his broadcast.

Santa Claus is racist too. Did you ever notice all the white kids get bicycles and ipods while the black kids get toy guns?

Have you ever seen a black elf?


Have you ever seen a black elf?

#207 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-09-21 09:03 PM | Reply | Flag

www.imdb.com

If Rush was on a bus I wouldn't get on it.

Bob, here is one of the 'themes' that leftists use as a routine to vilify their opponents: dealing the 'race card' like OJ and the black racists wanting to get-away-with-murder ...

It is *obvious* to those Americans who are *not* racists ... that it is Demcrats who are always yelling 'Racisim' when ever they think they can gain *votes* by doing so ...

... verminous liars of politics, libeling fellow Americans for *votes* ...


Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.


#30 | Posted by truthhurts


And just what do you mean by this? Is it an insult or just a statement? I tend to think it's an insult considering it is obvious that you do not like Rush. Well, I'm here to tell you that America is filled with drug addicts. I bet you know some personally. The ones who choose to fight their addiction and not use deserve nothing but credit and praise. It is obvious that you have never personally suffered from an addiction or you wouldn't insult people who have them. And please don't try and tell me that your statement was not intended to insult or degrade. People fighting to stay clean are better people than you are.

#181 | Posted by everlong


What do I mean by that?

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

It is obvious I dont like Rush? Cause I state a simple fact?

Fact is I dont listen to him. I find his brand of radio unlistenable. Boring, infuriating and annoying. I find his affectation most distracting.

Sorry I just dont get his appeal.

But the Fact is that he is a drug addict.

Take it for what it is.

Funny to compare HIS thoughts on drug addicts and him being a drug addict, but I digress.

Oh and BTW, taking drugs alters the brain chemistry either short term, long term or permanently based on the drug, dosage and length of time on the drug. Since cognitive ability is based on brain chemistry it is logical to assume that being drug addicted would effect one's cognitive ability, either when he was on the drug or longer term.

But of course

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

#210 | Posted by tadowe at 2009-09-21 09:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

Maybe you can answer the questions I asked Utastaff in my #204 post and explain what Rush was trying to say with his sarcasm.

How about a "for instance" where libs call a conservative a racist when there was no racism involved? How about an example of the "theme" you claim to have observed?

Bob tries at least, "Maybe you can answer the questions I asked Utastaff in my #204 post and explain what Rush was trying to say with his sarcasm."

Why? You can't understand sarcasm? That places you in the stupid category, for sure, Bob.

He was *MOCKING* the idea that it was the white student's fault for being attacked by a black group displaying their lack of RACISM ...

You and the leftist, wannabe communist, lying yellow-dogs of politics can't understand sarcasm, though, unless you are spouting it like the race baiting verminous mob of liars you are ...

"How about a "for instance" where libs call a conservative a racist when there was no racism involved?"

This site is an *EXAMPLE* of the effort to revile and dehumanize the rightwing as racists ...

... but you an your idiot ilk aren't aware enough to realize that you are being *OBVIOUS* by doing so ...

FO you race-baiting, slimey creeps ...

Why? You can't understand sarcasm? That places you in the stupid category, for sure, Bob.

I understand sarcasm very well, It seems it is you who are displaying a decidedly dim side.

He was *MOCKING* the idea that it was the white student's fault for being attacked by a black group displaying their lack of RACISM ...

So Rush sees racism and says the blacks were displaying a lack of racism by attacking a white kid? You really are as stupid as your posts indicate.

Here is an example of SARCASM and what the person is saying.

SARCASTICALLY Obama is the greatest President the United States has ever known.

What the speaker meant Obama is the worst President the country has ever known.

SARCASTICALLY I can't think of anything I would rather do than spend an evening with you.

What the speaker meant I would rather do anything than spend an evening with you.

RUSH SARCASTICALLYWe know that white students are destroying civility on buses, white students destroying civility in classrooms all over America,

What the speaker meantWe know that black students are destroying civility on buses, black students destroying civility in classrooms all over America,


You and the leftist, wannabe communist, lying yellow-dogs of politics can't understand sarcasm, though, unless you are spouting it like the race baiting verminous mob of liars you are ...

It is you in your ignorance and hatred for other Americans that keeps you from understanding sarcasm.


"How about a "for instance" where libs call a conservative a racist when there was no racism involved?"

This site is an *EXAMPLE* of the effort to revile and dehumanize the rightwing as racists ...

Another deflection--i'm sure in your deluded mind you think you are making sense---how about a specific thread? Post?

... but you an your idiot ilk aren't aware enough to realize that you are being *OBVIOUS* by doing so ...

FO you race-baiting, slimey creeps ...

You are truly scum--if what you post in all your posts is truly how you feel- you are a danger to society.

#213 | Posted by tadowe at 2009-09-21 09:51 PM | Reply | Flag

Hey, Bob!?! Didn't I tell your race baiting, verminous, slimey self to FO???

TADOWE, how about answering the legitimate questions instead of going off on a name calling tirade? You know, supporting your own arguments.

Andy gets pansy, "TADOWE, how about answering the legitimate questions instead of going off on a name calling tirade? You know, supporting your own arguments."

Here ... I'll repeat for you lazy jerks who can't do a 'find' on a thread ... because they are too stupid to even think of tryingd. I originally said:

"He was *MOCKING* the idea that it was the white student's fault for being attacked by a black group displaying their lack of RACISM ..."

How about your take on the subject?

Never mind ... it would be a race baiting tirade demonstrating that leftists are just a bit too dense to understand sarcasm they aren't dishing out by the race baiting bucketfull ...

.. it would be a race baiting tirade...


No, dude. Limbaugh's rant WAS a "race baiting tirade", which you defend.

Blacks beating a White goes to show that there is plenty reverse racism.... but because Blacks suffered hitorically, they tend to get away with it when they show racism to others....

Tadowe

It seems you didn't answer the simple questions asked of you, or Utastaff. Let's try again. I think everyone will be amused by your responses.

He was *MOCKING* the idea that it was the white student's fault for being attacked by a black group displaying their lack of RACISM.

1. So Rush sees racism and says the blacks were displaying a lack of racism by attacking a white kid? Is that what you are saying?

Your deflection goes here______________.

2. RUSH SARCASTICALLY We know that white students are destroying civility on buses, white students destroying civility in classrooms all over America,

What RUSH meant We know that black students are destroying civility on buses, black students destroying civility in classrooms all over America,

Do you have a different take on "What RUSH meant"?

Your deflection goes here______________.

3.RUSH SARCASTICALLY Hey, look, folks, the white kid on that bus in Belleville, Illinois, he deserved to be beat up.

What RUSH meant Hey, look, folks, the white kid on that bus in Belleville, Illinois, he didn't deserve to be beat up.

Do you have a different take on "What RUSH meant"?

Your deflection goes here______________.

4.RUSH SARCASTICALLY We can redistribute everything. Just return the white students to their rightful place, their own bus with bars on the windows and armed guards. They're racists. They get what they deserve.


What RUSH meant We can redistribute everything. Just return the black students to their rightful place, their own bus with bars on the windows and armed guards. They're racists. They get what they deserve.

Do you have a different take on "What RUSH meant"?

Your deflection goes here______________.

Waiting on you.

;-)

Blacks beating a White goes to show that there is plenty reverse racism.... but because Blacks suffered hitorically, they tend to get away with it when they show racism to others....

#219 | Posted by takitez at 2009-09-22 12:52 AM | Reply | Flag:


And that's a big problem in "Obama's America", in your opinion, Takitez?

#221.... Betelg, I didn't say anything about Obama's America.

TakitEz-
No? Limbaugh did. Limbaugh said that "In Obama's America...", etc., etc.

(You are aware of the topic of the thread and what Limbaugh said on the air?)

'night blog

"there is plenty reverse racism."

Linguistic alert! There's no such thing as "reverse racism." There's just racism. It goes in all directions. There's no reverse.

It may seem silly, but words matter. "Reverse racism," in this context, would imply that whites own racism, and would therefore argue against the very point the poster is trying to make.

So there. : )

Get the fuck out of here. How in the fuck was my post in this thread considered dumpable?
The NFL is called the Nation Felon League. For fucks sake, it's not even debatable.
The James Earl Ray is a hero line is a Limbaugh quote, and it was used earlier in the thread.


Complete horseshit as usual. You're a gaping pussy.

#224 I agree.

I heard the audio provided on the link and Rush said no such thing. Liberals are shameless when it comes to lying about their opponents. Surprise, surprise!

I said it last week and I'll repet it, Liberals have a series epidemic of mental illness in their midsts. Not only do they imagine people saying words they never said, but they also imagine Rush Limbaugh promoting something he doesn't promote. Get help Liberals. Nothing wrong with getting help for your mental problems.

#227 | Posted by member2586 at 2009-09-22 10:19 AM | Reply | Flag Incoherent Post

WTF are you talking about?

Bob, you need to try some reading comprehension. My post is very clear, even a person from Rio Linda can understand it.

#227

It's a two way street when it comes to parties lying about their opponate, Member

And not to admit that, would prove my point.

Oh good grief...opponent.


Bob, you need to try some reading comprehension. My post is very clear, even a person from Rio Linda can understand it.

#230 | Posted by member2586 at 2009-09-22 10:29 AM | Reply | Flag:

I comprehend the written word very well. You simply have poor writing skills. If you are referring to Rush not saying we should have segregated buses, you are mistaken. His whole tirade was a hate filled rant against blacks. How about you refer to my #219 post and see if you can respond with some intelligence. I'm especially interested in your response to #4.

Waiting on you.

;-)

"Waiting on you."

Hold your breath.

"Waiting on you."

Hold your breath.

#234 | Posted by member2586 at 2009-09-22 10:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

Naw--serving you a nice cup of STFU, was my satisfaction. You can share it with Tadowe and Utastaff at the losers table. Misery loves company, and you are all miserable people.

Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.

#98 | Posted by truthhurts at 2009-09-21


then so is the chickenshit pussy liar in the white house

then so is the chickenshit pussy liar in the white house

Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-09-22 11:04 AM

No, Bush left, remember?

And the idiots think he's pissed at everything. They have fallen for it Hook, Line, and Sinker.


Too funny.

#159 | Posted by Manypaths


this bullshit from you just shows how out of touch you are to believe what the liberal fucks say about his audience. the REAL funny part is how many of you have been duped by the chickenshit pussy liar in the white house and dont know it..or worse..
dont care

And while we're at it, we should go back to public lashings when one of those Negroes gets too uppity.

Well the obvious answer is they are Rush fans.


Therefore, they are idiots. Getting their education from an uneducated drug addict.

#167 | Posted by Manypaths at 2009


its nice to make a statement knowing you are correct and then have the subject come back in so soon and prove to the whole site that you were correct.

thank you for your tirless effort to show us on the right that we are making a difference because when the left calls us these names, WE KNOW WE ARE WINNING

No, Bush left, remember?

#237 | Posted by kanrei at 2009


right...tell that to dems...

tell that to dems...


They seem to know as they love the office of the President now. It is you righties who I don't think realize Bush is gone. You found your protest bug a little too late.

And while we're at it, we should go back to public lashings when one of those Negroes gets too uppity.

Posted by briwo

hey, that's a Muslim thang, too...

because when the left calls us these names, WE KNOW WE ARE WINNING

#240 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-09-22 11:09 AM | Reply | Flag

You mean like:

the chickenshit pussy liar in the white house

#236 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-09-22 11:04 AM | Reply | Flag

bullshit from you...liberal fucks...the chickenshit pussy liar in the white house

#238 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-09-22 11:07 AM | Reply | Flag

You may have a point---for us.

liberal fucks.....if the shoe fits

chickenshit pussy........SCARED of chris wallace and being asked questions outside of the democrat talking points..
WHICH dont seem to be working anyway...

liar in the white house..I dont have time to list all of those but how about the amount that cap and crap will cost each family..the white house KNEW the amount they gave was too low but put it out anyway.,.,

fuckin liars.

WE KNOW WE ARE WINNING

#240 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-09-22 11:09 AM |


Exactly what are you "winning", Dipshit?

"fuckin liars."

This, from a guy who didn't mind when Bush said,

"The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa ."

so tell us who else said that and thought the very same thing..
and you can take your time since that list will be lengthy.

face it.
obama is a liar and a chickenshit pussy who is afraid to have someone ask him questions harder than how are the sox going to finish.

"so tell us who else said that and thought the very same thing."

What...another idiot who was lying, too? That's, your defense?

Go ahead, Afkabibble, say it: Bush was a liar and a chickenshit pussy.

Since it seems that most people here want to imply Rush was being sarcastic while insinuating racial biases towards minorities.

Let's say for the sake of argument Keith Olberman (?) insinuated that Marines deserved whatever happens to them in Iraq because they are mostly evangelical republicans and they supported Bush and the war?

Now think about that for a moment.

Rush is simply trying to keep up with that wacky Mormon Glenn Beck and his magical underwear...

Has anybody referenced the Newsweek article that spawned this schtick? www.newsweek.com I read it at a doctor's office and was pissed at the premise. It was unbelievable to think anybody could take the cover story seriously. Read it and look again at Rush's statement. At least his was satire; Newsweek was dead serious (and dead wrong). The most telling line of the story to me is: If "black pride" is good for African-American children, where does that leave white children? It's horrifying to imagine kids being "proud to be white." This article is not a study about race, it is a practice in soical engineering.

Basic difference: White kids haven't been made, for generations, to feel that they are less than kids of other races. Far from it. I can agree that black pride goes too far, but I think many of you either don't get the point or willfully don't see it.

I'm not commenting on Rush here, just on the differences between white pride and black pride.

(And I think the idea of having pride for what one simply is, is ridiculous. Pride should be for actions or achievements. But I can still see the point.)

^.^

"So, your take on Rush's rant is that students should perhaps be segregated by race, but not "because" of race, in "Obama's America"."

Basically. Separate one group of losers from the other group of losers because they can't get along and like to bash each other's heads in ... not because of the skin color of either group of losers.

It used to be that schools used to dole out discipline, and when they did, they didn't take skin color into the equation.

John B.

"It used to be that schools used to dole out discipline, and when they did, they didn't take skin color into the equation."

John, I'd love to hear your take on why schools no longer dole out discipline. (I'll agree that, to some large degree, discipline in schools is severely lacking, and not for lack of teacher effort.)

obama is a liar and a chickenshit pussy who is afraid to have someone ask him questions harder than how are the sox going to finish.

#248 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-09-22 12:19 PM | Reply | Flag


What was your take on the questions Jeff Gannon asked? I bet you thought they were toughies. I'd like to see Bush take a lie detector on 911. That traitorous bastard knew it was coming and helped it along. Even if he took the test--failed---you would still be in love with him. Are you Jeff Gannon? You sound like a man in love, or a man paid to love.

#251 | Posted by howardjuneau at 2009-09-22 02:48 PM | Reply | Flag

You need to answer my #219 post. Then take another hit of Kool-Aide

Was it your Viagra El-Limpbo was caught with, Tiny? Is that why you are called Tiny, Tiny?

#196 | Posted by mOntecOre at 2009-09-21 06:01 PM | Reply | Flag: Best watches you's hifallutin mouth.

Posted by TinyElvis


I'll watch my hifallutin mouth, if you watch your Tiny Purdy Mouth, Lil' Elvis.

^.^

"John, I'd love to hear your take on why schools no longer dole out discipline. (I'll agree that, to some large degree, discipline in schools is severely lacking, and not for lack of teacher effort.)"

Because we can't beat the snot out of kids anymore, like they could do when I was a kid (I'm 41) ... oh wait, did I type that with my *outside* voice? ...

Basically I'm right though! With the teen culture getting so violent that you hear about school shootings every other month or so, and with school districts bowing to people who say DON'T YOU DARE LAY A FINGER ON MY CHILD!!! No wonder one group of malcontents can beat the Hell out of another group of malcontents. The only good thing was that the idiots involved will be charged with criminal charges.

John B.

I heard his show on Wendsday and he didn't mean what you are trying to say he meant and your article doesn't provide a full transcript. It provides only the pieces convienent to your cause along with commentary. Hillarious.

Rush owns you!!!!

#5 | Posted by Washboard at 2009-09-20 08:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

Owns us? Don't you mean he 'pwns us'?

You're such a turd.

John, I was hoping for a serious conversation. If you are serious about the problem being we can't beat the children, then we have nowhere to go. I think the problem has much more to do with parents who don't support schools (which I hope is what you were getting at and the rest was a joke) and who don't hold their own children accountable but want teachers and schools to take care of problems for them. My take is that there's been a societal shift. Schools get even less respect than they used to.

Oh, and I'm your age, but I never saw any serious beatings when I was in school, and I would have been quite upset--as in angry and asking my folks about recourse, not crying or acting out. I did see some teachers kick garbage cans, grab, and scream.

"You only make Limbaugh's audience grow and grow..."

For other things he needs Viagra, someone else's Viagra.

#11 | Posted by Zatoichi

You forgot Haitian boys..

Beating children isn't the answer. You can't beat politeness and consideration for others into someone. The answer comes from parents, and too often the parents attitude is reflected in their children. Parents don't take the time to interact with their children, being content to let them study and watch TV while the parents are in their own separate world. The parents of the children on that school bus who did the beating should be arrested.


Beating children isn't the answer. You can't beat politeness and consideration for others into someone. The answer comes from parents, and too often the parents attitude is reflected in their children. Parents don't take the time to interact with their children, being content to let them study and watch TV while the parents are in their own separate world. The parents of the children on that school bus who did the beating should be arrested.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2009-09-22 11:10 PM | Reply


I believe in spankings. I am all for Corporal punishments in schools. I do not believe in "Time Outs". Sometimes a kid needs a good hide tanning.

Larry

Larry:

Then it should be the parents job to spank....not the faculty of a school.

I don't believe in hitting a child to discipline. It teaches them it's ok to hit oiut of anger.

Parents won't hit the kid right cause they actually like the kid for some strange reason. I think you should send them to random strangers.

Or auction the rights to beat your children off on Ebay.


Wait, not "beat your children off," but rather sell the rights to beat them ON Ebay. We don't need THAT kind of auction online!

Then it should be the parents job to spank....not the faculty of a school.


I don't believe in hitting a child to discipline. It teaches them it's ok to hit oiut of anger.

Posted by Lisa at 2009-09-22 11:24 PM | Reply

I guess I was raised wrong. My Mom always made doubly sure that She would have no qualms if they paddled My rear end. I don't know. Maybe that was wrong.

Larry

This is so lame.
I was listening the day Rush said this, and he was being sarcastic. Anyone with any common sense could tell this.

Why don't we take everything the messiah Obama has said completely literally too? You would find plenty of racist comments he's made too.

It was a different era Larry. Smacking one's wife once in a while was acceptable too once. As was beating your kids with a paddle, driving drunk, smoking in restaurants, etc, etc

That's not funny Kan. Even if it was meant as a joke.

Perhaps if you were on the receiving end of those smacks you may see it that way too.

>b>I believe in spankings. I am all for Corporal punishments in schools. I do not believe in "Time Outs". Sometimes a kid needs a good hide tanning.

Larry

#263 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-09-22 11:13 PM | Reply | Flag

Unfortunately, you prove my point. I agree that there are times when a good spanking is necessary, but the point is that the parents have already failed if it gets to that point. They haven't spent the time to explain the situation to the kid.

I would suggest the kid on the bus is due a good spanking from his father. However, the situation on the bus had been going on for sometime. I'm sure the kid made some references as to how he felt about his interaction with others, and his father let it slide--mostly because the father approved of his 'macho" son. Had the father taught the son compassion, and how to deal with others, the incident wouldn't have happened. The kid was obviously strong, intelligent, and a leader. He just wasn't raised with the right guidance---he was mostly raised by his peers, and the majority of kids have the same background.

I am especially critical of parents who say---only I should discipline my child. With that kind of upbringing, the child quickly learns that only their parents can discipline them. That opens a wide door of contempt for abuse to teachers, police, and other adults. I don't think that any adult should be able to discipline any child, but if a student bad mouths a teacher--throws a tantrum--disrupts class, the concept of "we'll tell your Dad" is crap. The other students see what happened, and the disrespect spreads. If the parents were doing their job, the problem wouldn't have happened in the first place. Too often the students with the worst problem have parents who defend them from all outside discipline and fill their heads with religious dogma. The child feels he can do anything, and God is on his side--or will at least forgive him if he comes up with a nice prayer to smooth things over. Since no one can discipline that child, his first brush with reality comes when another adult with a badge takes him to jail.

I was listening the day Rush said this, and he was being sarcastic. Anyone with any common sense could tell this.

#268 | Posted by HawkSprings at 2009-09-22 11:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

You need to answer the #219 post. I'd be very interested in your response.

Waiting on you.

;-)

Sorry Buffalo Bob I can not blame Parents always for their kids failings and failings in discipline. I had good Parents. I rarely got along with My Mother but that was more Me than Her fault. I think it's way too easy just to blame the parents without looking at how they raised their kids. Too many times the Parents are scapegoated in order to rationalize the kids bad behavior. I know Both My parents did the best they knew how with the material that they were given(Me) I can't fault them for much. My Mom did Her best while My Dad went to work to put food on the table and a roof over our heads. I can not in conscience blame them.

Larry

Larry Mohr

Blame them for what? Are you blogging from prison? Have you violated other peoples rights and been a violent individual your whole life? Do you have no regard for the feelings of others.

Everyone has problems that are their own fault, even violent tendencies as discussed in my previous post may be no fault of the parents. But the kid in question who did the beating on that bus, could be a real leader in his community if he had proper parenting in my opinion. As it is, this could be a turning point, leading to a life of misery.

I would be all for tattooing any man who ever hit a woman. The tat would be right in the middle of his forehead. It would look like this * and everyone would know exactly what it meant.

Another form of abuse that is often overlooked is women beating men. Some men won't hit a woman under any circumstances, and some women will beat them. I would be for the same tat being applied in both circumstances.

Blogging from Prison yep sure am I even have a wireless router for My celly to use when He wakes up.(Rolls Eyes)Obviously You've never been locked up. GOOD FOR YOU btw. Am I a violent person and do I condone violence Nope not this fellow. It makes Me sick to My stomache if I see it. Now Murder on the other hand well I support and even thrill to see that at least on NCIS. That Abby Sciuto is so damned Hawt. I just love when She solves a murder case utilizing forensics, computer forensics. She just makes Me melt. So You could say I encourage murder upon the show. In real life not at all.

Larry

Larry Mohr

Then it seems your parents did a good job. If the kid on the bus would have had parents like yours, he most likely wouldn't have attacked the other kid.

Let's put it this way. If I were to have been in a fight at school and I was the instigator I would have My ass beat when I got home. No ands ifs or buts. That was NEVER tolerated.

Larry

If I were to have been in a fight at school and I was the instigator I would have My ass beat when I got home. No ands ifs or buts. That was NEVER tolerated.

Larry

#278 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-09-23 06:48 AM | Reply | Flag

Was that their only alternative---could you not have been reasoned with?

Was that their only alternative---could you not have been reasoned with?

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2009-09-23 12:02 PM | Reply


Sorry but that's what My Mom believed in. Spankings and if the "crime" was big enough Whippings.

Larry

Sorry but that's what My Mom believed in. Spankings and if the "crime" was big enough Whippings.

Larry

#280 | Posted by larrymohr at 2009-09-23 12:16 PM | Reply | Flag:

That really wasn't an answer to the question was it. The question wasn't about your mom---it was about you.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable