Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

A district court judge in Georgia has thrown out a complaint questioning the president's birth from an Army captain fighting deployment to Iraq and admonished her lawyer Orly Taitz. "Plaintiff's challenge to her deployment order is frivolous," ruled District Court Judge Clay Land. "She has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as President of the United States."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

dave

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

She should be fined for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

Or held in contempt. She showed up with no factual evidence? LOL. She could have at least digged up that birth certificate on the internet, and claimed it was a fake, but NO, not even that.

She straight up walked in there, and thought she was on Fox.

In an interview with Talking Points Memo, Taitz said she would keep fighting if Rhodes wanted to, despite the judge's threat. "Listen, Nelson Mandela stayed in prison for years in order to get to the truth and justice," she said.

How awesome is that? She frames her persistence with an analogy comparing birthers to Mandela.

No scruples.

Her again?

tort reform now!

And a court martial for insubordination under fire for her idiot client.

North says, "And a court martial for insubordination under fire for her idiot client."

Won't happen, and because any such formal trial would necessitate a thorough investigation of the facts concerning the certificate of birth signed by physician/midwife, tests and treatments required by state regulatioons of the time, and testimony by those involved in the live birth in Honolulu, Hawaii ...

See?

See?

That you're an idiot, Tad?

Already common knowledge.

For quite some time.

Seriously.

"Won't happen, and because any such formal trial would necessitate a thorough investigation of the facts concerning the certificate of birth signed by physician/midwife, tests and treatments required by state regulatioons of the time, and testimony by those involved in the live birth in Honolulu, Hawaii ...

See?

#6 | Posted by tadowe"


The fuck it would. You don't know what you're talking about, Tadly. I realize, nothing new there.

JPW says, "Already common knowledge. For quite some time. Seriously."

Of course it is! Everyone knows that soldiers are getting off by claiming that the president is not a 'native' born citizen. That's why all of you immediately misdirect the subject onto 'Birthers' and, or other messengers informing you of the facts.

That's why the president can't let any military courts martial, or civil for that matter, proceed ... and why no trial is proceeding even though out-and-out mutiny is taking place by more than just one (1) member of the military ...



Seriously.

Or it could be Obama is kind of a pussy and doesn't want to make waves.

Or it could be Obama knows that if he did court martial the soldiers refusing to perform their duty Birthers would claim THAT was proof he is guilty and that he's just trying to silence them.

Or it could be addressing the Birthers "concerns" is a waste of his time.

These soldiers may have court martials coming. They may not.

Interpreting the lack of court martials to this point as anything one way or the other is what makes you and idiot.

Well, that and everything else you think.

Monte says, "The fuck it would."

Very logical argument, Monte. Democrats can be proud for having members of your ilk amongst them, like some kind of yellow-dog-fleas ...

Or, JPW, pigs might fly, if they had wings ...

"Everyone knows that soldiers are getting off by claiming that the president is not a 'native' born citizen.

#9 | Posted by tadowe"


That is one of the weirdest things you have ever posted here, Tadly - and that is saying something.


Seriously.

Seriously.

#9 | Posted by tadowe at 2009-09-16 07:41 PM | Reply | Flag: retard flag

Tadowe, you have seriously gone over the edge of the border of reason into the abyss of blind hatred and paranoid idiocy. And I say that while weighing your comments on a relative scale (with your previous mode of conduct as a center), which is already weighted towards the paranoid and idiotic.

I'm outta here. Seriously.

Good! Charge Oily Taint with stupidity while yer at it!

tadthepolesmoker: Like a "true" birther-every time you post on this subject-you get even more ridiculous.

You are 1 squirrely dude-seriously!

Some dreams die hard.

You guys yuck it up at the 'birthers.' The majority of them will help fund your progression. So will there children.

These lawmakers aren't honest about their taxes but the back breakers are. Many of these 'birthers' just want their hard earned money and maybe save some for the KIDS! Mine are 3-6.

POSTED BY WURSTER:
"You guys yuck it up at the 'birthers.' The majority of them will help fund your progression. So will there children.

These lawmakers aren't honest about their taxes but the back breakers are. Many of these 'birthers' just want..."


TO CONTINUE TO WHINE THAT THEIR CANDIDATE LOST THE LAST ELECTION!!!

What a looser this lawyer is - throwing an accusation at the judge and the president of treason! HA HA HAH THAT IS FUNNY!!! Takes one to know one I guess.

Put this asshole lawyer up against the wall.

"Many of these 'birthers' just want their hard earned money and maybe save some for the KIDS! Mine are 3-6."

Well, at least that's progress, Wurster is at least acknowledging that the motivation of the birthers has nothing to do with an honest belief that the president is not an American or that he is not the legitimate president of the United States. Disagreements about taxes, etc. are a legitimate argument though I think it is ironic that he complains about taxes so soon after Obama got him a tax cut.

If these stupid inbred assholes wanted to object to state secrecy then the time to have done so was over the partriot act and homeland security bills(which they mostly cheered). These motherfuckers just don't like their president because he's not white.

From the story: "In further support of her claim, Plaintiff relies upon 'the general opinion in the rest of the world' that 'Barack Hussein Obama has, in essence, slipped through the guardrails to become President.'"

Taitz submitted as evidence "general opinion in thr rest of the world." That's some brilliant lawyering.

How dumb does that Army captain have to be to use Taitz as her attorney?

"How dumb does that Army captain have to be to use Taitz as her attorney?"

How would you like to be going into battle with a nit wit like that as your commanding officer???
They should let him leave the service quietly for the good of the service.

Well, I think it's pretty obvious the judge was either paid off, threatened with elimination by Obama's secret Muslim police, or a member of ACORN. I wouldn't be surprised if the "judge" is actually Van Jones, in his new job. "Judge Clay Land?" Sounds made-up. I do know there's a lot of "clay" in the "land" of Georgia, which is where Vince Foster was buried, I think. That or Arkansas.

Either way.

"They should let him leave the service quietly for the good of the service."

But Danni, I don't think he wants to leave.

I also love the "general opinion" thing because lefties use it all the time--world respect--and get shot down by conservatives. "Who cares what the rest of the world thinks of us as long as they STFU?!?" You know, it's best to rule by fear rather than leading by example.

"Well, I think it's pretty obvious the judge was either paid off, threatened with elimination by Obama's secret Muslim police, or a member of ACORN. I wouldn't be surprised if the "judge" is actually Van Jones, in his new job. "Judge Clay Land?" Sounds made-up. I do know there's a lot of "clay" in the "land" of Georgia, which is where Vince Foster was buried, I think. That or Arkansas."

Good stuff! You ever think of working for The Onion?

Good stuff! You ever think of working for The Onion?

----------

I was thinking faux news.

#27 - Ha ha, thanks, Pragmatist. Yeah, I think absurdity is my calling.

Would be fun to collaborate with Lipzoidial, Doc Sarvis and Dethspud on some monumental work of literature.

Good.. quit bringing this crap up for crying out loud.. there's plenty to protest and argue with regarding Obama's policies..

But.. he's elected, he was eligible, and he's the President..

This stuff is a distraction..


Orly Taitz appears to have been maneuvering for the US Attny Gen job in the Palin/Bachmann administration.

Damn.

I was planning on using the "rest of the world" argument in my suit against NASA.

It maintains that the moon is actually made of green cheese.


"Won't happen, and because any such formal trial would necessitate a thorough investigation of the facts concerning the certificate of birth signed by physician/midwife, tests and treatments required by state regulatioons of the time, and testimony by those involved in the live birth in Honolulu, Hawaii ...


See?


#6 | Posted by tadowe"

Actually, it wouldn't. Whatever the charge would be, they defendant would be using the question of Obama's birth as an affirmative defense. The question wouldn't be is the President a natural born citizen and the burden wouldn't be on the government/military to prove he was. The question would be did the defendant have a reasonable belief that the president would not. In essense, the defense would have to prove Obama is not a natural born citizen. All the government would have to show is that it is not a reasonable belief, and going by the way these cases are booted out as frivolous, it wouldn't be too difficult, and certainly would not require, "a thorough investigation of the facts concerning the certificate of birth signed by physician/midwife, tests and treatments required by state regulatioons of the time, and testimony by those involved in the live birth in Honolulu, Hawaii"

total bullshit

in other words

food for Fox

"Good stuff! You ever think of working for The Onion?"


----------


"I was thinking faux news.
#28"



A distinction without a difference.

While the frivilous lawsuit probably won't cause too many problems for her besides being forced to pay opposing party's attorney's fees, the accusation at the judge is very serious. She can be reprimanded, suspended or even disbarred by the state bar association where she has her license. That type of accusation is definitely not tolerated. That is basic Professional Responsibility 101.

even disbarred by the state bar association where she has her license

A complaint has been filed with the bar association in CA.

nativeborncitizen.wordpress.co
m

"...Many of these 'birthers' just want their hard earned money and maybe save some for the KIDS! Mine are 3-6....#19 | Posted by wurster"

So let me get this straight: The Birthers complain about being taxed to provided healthcare to all citizens of the U.S. Which is a good thing

But have no problem being taxed for an6 year old war made up from lies that has destroyed the u.s. economy, treasury and split the country in to pieces. Which is a very bad thing.

Weird Lot, these Birthers. They should change their name to 'Deathers' as their obsession with the 'other' being killed is so...natural to them.

"Have you bitch-slapped a Birther today?"

No, I but I can't stop laughing at how fucking stupid they are. Let them be. They are fun to watch.

So, what does your Certificate of Live Birth say on it?

Still lauging at how pathetically stupid these birthers are. It's what happens when you get your information from uneducated drug addicts like Beck and Limbaugh.

Why do you do it? Don't you know how fucking stupid you look?

Really!

How dumb does that Army captain have to be to use Taitz as her attorney?

#23 | Posted by rcade

She's a fucking birther dude.

She is THAT fucking dumb. You know the type.

Palin/Bachmann administration.
#32 | Posted by Corky

Wow, now isn't that a threesome of crazy?


#42

Peas in the Bimbo Pod

Peas in the Bimbo Pod
#43 | Posted by Corky

How much alcohol would it take.... ?

Forget I asked.

#22 | Posted by Shawn at 2009-09-17 09:23 AM | Reply | Flag: deflection

common' racist. You're side is not even losing the argument! why don't you do the "pelosi" and call him a nazi now?

hell, i agree with you. ship her ass to the front.

How would you like to be going into battle with a nit wit like that as your commanding officer???
They should let him leave the service quietly for the good of the service.

#24 | Posted by danni at 2009-09-17 10:02 AM

danni, don't let her "tank track" Captain bars fool you: she's a surgeon. she won't be commanding anyone other than a couple nurses or op techs. besdies, joining the Army is probably how she repaid becoming a surgeon. probaly went in as a Captain. i bet she has less than 3 years time in service. ship her butt off.

how did you all of you anti-birthers feel about the conscientious objectors? the same? i did.

Two points on the Birthers.....

One: They are wrong.
Two: Even if they were right, they are still wrong.

"But USAF242, how could they be wrong even if they were right?"

The crux of the Birther arguement is a FLAWED LAW.

It is simply this:
If a 21+ year old female US citizen gives birth ANYWHERE, the kid is concidered born American.
HOWEVER....
If an American born, US citizen teenage girl gives birth in the U.S., then the kid is born American, but if she does so overseas, the kid is not???

I'm sorry, that is as silly as illegal aliens being able to use anchor babies. If it is the law, it should be changed, effective immediately and even retro-actively. (and get rid of anchor babies while you are at it....)

I don't like Obama (although I don't hate him. That I reserve for John Kerry. No Joke.....), I don't like his presidency. He a racist, he is a STUPID socialist, but even if the Birthers had hardcore PROOF of their claims, THE LAW IN QUESTION is so bad, I don't want it used ever.

And again, its all moot, because he was born in Hawaii.

That's why the president can't let any military courts martial, or civil for that matter, proceed ... and why no trial is proceeding even though out-and-out mutiny is taking place by more than just one (1) member of the military ...


Seriously.


This is exactly the kind of logic that makes me question the entire republican party. Where he is getting this shit? It is an abomination of principles of logic and fair journalism.

Did it ever occure to Tadowe that you cannot court martial a soldier for challanging the law? It was not against the law or military regulations and the judge has ruled fairly. End of story. Now, if she still refuses to serve the country she swore an oath to (not just the president) then she should be court martialed and likely will be.

What this bitchy whiney soldier needs now is her drill seargent to kick her in the ass and onto the plane and in the job classification a toilet maid.

"how did you all of you anti-birthers feel about the conscientious objectors? the same? i did."

No. Conscientious objectors are different. Very. Though how a CO would end up in the military is beyond me anyway. There's a huge difference between signing up for war and then refusing to serve because you don't like your new commander-in-chief (even if you believe the birther argument), on the one hand, and averring that war is wrong and refusing to serve to begin with.

I think there also is some CO status for people who are in the military, but I don't fully get that.

"how did you all of you anti-birthers feel about the conscientious objectors? the same? i did."

REAL "conscientious objectors" are cool, so say I, a man very proud of 22 years of military service.

There are (at least) two catagories of real conscientious objectors.

One type will NEVER be in the military to begin with. If the Objector has any brains, they don't try to argue against using military force for taking out violent dictators (a good act in and of itself), but they just can't bear taking part in violence, even if in a support function.

The second type of Conscientious Objectors do join the military. The second type can't bear to PERSONALLY pull a trigger, but they are willing to do jobs like combat medic (one of the most extreme risk jobs in the military, balls of titanium steel required....).

IF REAL, a conscientious objector does NOT object to jobs that involve personal risk and possible horrible death (They could be a fire fighter).

FAKE conscientious objectors talk of "illegal wars", or "birth certificates"

I've given advice to many kids thinking of joining the military. I always start with the NEGATIVES, and tell them that if they can't get past the negatives, then stay out. One negative is that the soldier NEVER is the one to decide if a war is "legal", not even if the soldier has 4 stars on his soldier. Heck, even if the soldier KNOWS for 100% sure that it is illegal, you go, and do your job, even if that involves pulling triggers. HAVING SAID THAT, I also cover My Lai and Lt Callay. ALL soldiers, even if they have only one stripe are REQUIRED, by U.S. military law to DISOBEY and REPORT illegal orders.

Orders to deploy and conquor are NEVER "illegal Orders"

Orders to shoot unresisting non-threating non-combatants are ALWAYS illegal orders. (I give the example of Hugh Thompson as the proper response to 'real' illegal orders.....)

Excellent post USAF242, considering it's coming from a jarhead, but the world as seen by you is still just a narrow view. Your statement that, "One negative is that the soldier NEVER is the one to decide if a war is "legal", not even if the soldier has 4 stars on his soldier.", is flawed. The world is never as black and white as the military paints it. Soldiers can and do 'see the light' and can go through profound mental changes that should not be ignored by the brass just because of a coerced signature on a piece of paper. Anyone can wake up from a bad dream, like any war is, and find killing abhorrent.

A volunteer should be able to quit when they finally meet the dragons in depths of their subconscious. Once they are in battle, it's too late already.

"A volunteer should be able to quit when they finally meet the dragons in depths of their subconscious. Once they are in battle, it's too late already. "

Maybe, but if you've signed a contract... The military is not the volunteer fire department.

And USAF, man, I disagree with you on many things, but ... Well. You nailed it. And this from a basically pacificist, mostly antiwar onetime Quaker (who nonetheless understands that war is sometimes necessary).

Ringmaster

I don't mind someone, even a hardened combat soldier 9or perhaps especially such a soldier) waking up one day, and deciding "I can no longer pull a trigger".....

....but the manner in which the soldier then acts is telling.

If he ends up surrounded by Micheal Moore and Code Pink, trashing Bush, and talking about illegal wars, he should be convicted and put to death (No joke).

If he goes to his superiors, and tells them he can longer kill, and REFUSES to get involved in Bush trashing or "illegal war" talk, then re-assignment to a non-trigger pulling job (if he is willing to non-trigger pulling military work), or seperation from the military would be appropiate.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable