As far as the "taliban" or Al-Qaeda are concerned, Pakistan has dealt with the problem very effectively.

We need do no more.

It is time for the incompetent Americans to step up to the plate and do their jobs like they were supposed to.

Pakistan will not do their work for them. LOL

Anyway, trust Jackass to post old regurgitated reports that are no longer of any relevance.

k-tons as compared to the multi mega tons in the arsenals of the US

America has standardized it's nukes to be around from 100 to 180 kilotons.

When you use MIRVed missiles, like the US does.. like we do.. like Russia does... you HAVE TO make lots of smaller nukes rather than a few large ones.

Look up MIRV.

If it wasn't for the (paltry) nuclear arsenal

It's enough to keep you away. LOL

except maybe the Caspian Connection.

And the oil and gas from the Caspian area will have to come through Pakistan to get to the US.

Time to kiss our ass. LOL

and most dangerous area on the planet.

Only for Americans.

I don't think it dangerous at all for me.

The largest nuclear explosion ever was 50 megatons

Yes, we know that, thank you very much. LOL

Zar Bomba.

He knows the full extent of the American nuclear arsenals and presumes that everybody is ignorant.

No... but there is much material that is disussed in public.

I know what a MIRV is,

I doubt it from the way you responded.

Hardly keeps us away.

Then come inside Pakistan and take Osama away. LOL

You can't.

Since MIRV'ed ICBMs, large yield weapons have given way to smaller yield weapons. They are more effective than the megaton monsters of yesterday.

If only that were true.

"We can't go into Pakistan", Mullen.

LOL

Poor guys.

all forget that pakistan has nuke subs as well.

probably off the coast of nyc right now...

That's right. They could be anywhere specially since these are "stealth" subs (fuel cell powered).

there is no reason for either countries to start pushing the red buttons.

No reason at all.

Fortunately, for the world, American foreign and military policy isn't made by the idiots you find on DR. LOL

I think next target for Pakistani scientists is much longer range missiles like the Shaheen III which has a range of 3,600Km.

It's over 4,500Kms actually.

The Shaheen-2 meanwhile was tested successfully with MIRV.

It isn't as big a deal... at least not for us... that you think it is.

Is this just bullshit or is any of this true?

It is no longer true.

Finding old or re-hashed material on the internet to prove some point that is no longer valid is pretty pathetic.

The Pakistani government, meanwhile, has acquiesced in to the demands of the radical Islamists and imposed Islamic law, Sharia, in its Swat valley region

Were you dead drunk or something when we went to war and killed all them terrorists in Swat? LOL

Read this here, Stupido:

and this military superiority has enabled it to win three wars against Pakistan, four if one includes the Kargil conflict.

India won???

LOL

1. 1948. Pakistan took half of Kashmir away from India. And we still have it.

2. 1965. India launched an attack on Pakistan but was stopped dead with nearly all it's tanks and aircraft destroyed. Their objective was not achieved... to cut off Lahore from Pakistan.

3. 1971. The people of Bengal rebelled against Pakistani rule and fought us from the inside. The Indians later came in to pick up the pieces and Bangladesh was created.

4. Kargil. Pakistan is still holding on to territory that is captured from India during Kargil. No Pakistani aircraft were destroyed. However, at least two Indian aircraft were shot down and about 10 others damaged.

And it finally got its answer in the Agosta 90B submarine. Let's hope they don't have the money to operate it.

Pakistan not only is successfully operating them, but is thinking of building more.

We are also going to make the German U-214... which in many ways is better than the Agosta. Far longer range and depth and again.. it's "stealth" is unmatched.

As far as missiles are concerned:

So you're in perpetual border wars

It's been quiet for some time now.

The Wanking Oracle knows all yet again.

I can make a pretty good guess when it comes to you... you are not a complex man.

You were too defensive and angry. And you didn't know the standard yield of today's weapons and the reason for it. And as usual, I am right.

Pakis and Muslim extremist invaded Kashmir

Ho hum.... the ignorant-Amreekan syndrome strikes again.

It was rather more than THAT going on back then. But you are no historian so....

some win,you invaded an entire region and got a sliver!!

Oh we got hell of a lot more than that.

In fact we gave part of the Kashmir we got from India, to China. (India still makes an issue out of that detail)

That is how Pakistan/China friendship started.

nd in 71, the eastern half of your country was lost and so were roughly 100,000 troops as prisoner to India.

Yes, I said so didn't I?

The Bengali people rebelled and fought Pakistan from the inside in the shape of the Mukti-Bahini terrorist movement.

When it was all over, the Indians walked in and took over 90,000 Pakistani prisoners of war from the Bengalis.

However the creation of Bangladesh turned out to be a blessing.

Pakistan could NEVER have got nukes and missiles today if we were still feeding those people.

Bengal was the biggest drain on our resources. And they still can't feed themselves even after getting their own country.

citing revised history

Oh, I don't do revised history.

You do that.

You see, I am not an American who would lie about his country's military history all the time putting this or that spin on things.

WMD... no WMD.... we are winning in Vietnam... we lost Vietnam... we are winning in Afghanistan (LOL)... the people of Iraq LOVE us... America defeated Hitler (Russia did most of the work)... etc etc

Correct: See Stalingrad.

Exactly.

Japan however was done in by the US.

BUT... we (by "we" I mean British-Indian army) gave the Japanese their first major defeat at Imphal around Burma.

Also, one of the first Japanese ships to sink, was sunk by the British-Indian navy. By accident, but it was a kill nonetheless. (my dad's aunt's husband was a sailor on board). LOL

Even when you try to agree with this dufus, you get some bragging

Happens to be true, Tadpole.

when civil war erupted in Pakistan

That's right. We shot ourselves in the foot, so to speak.

bengali's uprised legally through election and you paki's wouldn't allow them to form a govt

Yes, true.

Bengali's lawmakers fled to India and asked for assistance

More or less true.

It was all planned beforehand we now know.

400,000 Indian troops marched on 65,000 Paki's and captured them all.

After all our stuff was sabotaged overnight and most of our key people were killed.

No supply lines, everything cut off.

That is what happens when you are attacked from the inside.

Civil war.

Paki's were the illegal aggressors

Not illegal... but it is now felt we over-reacted and yes, we shot up the place. LOL

We did have very poor leadership back then.

Just curious- do you afford Israel the same latitude?

Never thought of that, to be honest.

It has been pointed out many times... by many people... that Israel and Pakistan are similar in many ways.. in our reasons for being... in our doctrines... in the way we fight... in the way we take from our favorite bastard Uncle... in our history. Too many similarities.

Isn't the PAK in Pakistan made up of Persia, Afghan, and Kashmir?

Punjab
Afghania (notice it's not "Afghanistan")
Kashmir

That's the story anyway.

Otherwise it just means "Pure-land".

I knew that came way later.

No, it was there at the time, I think.

"Afghania" was a general name for all Pathan areas combined.

Like parts of America and Canada/British Columbia are generally known as "Cascadia".