Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Chris Matthews Proclaims Criticizing Michelle Obama Having 26 Aides Is Racist

Chris Matthews Clip Airing Date Sept.01, 2009

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

JeffnDenmark

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

YeeeeeeeeeHawwwww

Alex Jones yammering on about "dumbed-down people"? Too, too funny!

And he remark about, "See how that works?" That one nearly doubled me over.

No question about it, Alex Jones should see if Seven Wright needs a warm-up act for his next tour.

So...if I melt enough dry ice, can I swim in it without getting wet?

So...if I melt enough dry ice, can I swim in it without getting wet?

No, but if we're lucky you'll asphyxiate li'l jeffy

We're all asphyxiated with your breath taking retort, Goatflop.

Alex Jones or no Alex Jones. The fact is that Cris the shill Mathews did say it.

And Alex Jone is right about stupid people believing it.

You can tell that by all of the moronic deflections posted by the same usual brain dead people, on this thread.

What were the previous First Lady's count and amount?

26 Aides? You would think one of them would know how to clean her up before she appears in public.

speaking of aides does anyone remember ayds diet pills??

"What were the previous First Lady's count and amount?"

From FactCheck:

"The combined annual salaries for the 22 staffers we can specifically identify as working for Michelle Obama come to $1.6 million. For the 18 we could identify as working for Laura Bush in 2008, the total is $1.4 million."
factcheck.org

If you check out the article -- which definitely gets into the subject and shows why a snapshot is not the whole picture -- and take into account flucutations in the number of staff over time, the staffing requirements of POTUS spouses Clinton, Bush, and Obama appear to be pretty much the same.

Just another tempest in the teapot of those with no real tea on offer.

Just another tempest in the teapot of those with no real tea on offer.

#9 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Boy oh boy. I'll bet you let out a sigh of relief after posting that Michelle is only costing $.2M more than Laura. You're just lucky Michelle didn't hire a make-up assistant.
That would cost more than the NASA Budget.

"I'll bet you let out a sigh of relief..."

No, that'll come when you loonatics get a dose of oxygen, return to earth from Planet Malcontent, and decide to rejoin the normals.

And yet still no comments on the fact that criticism of the first lady equals racism...

#12 | Posted by JeffnDenmark

Not all criticism of Michelle Obama is motivated by racism. Nor is all criticism of Barack Obama motivated by racism. But if you read many of the posts made on the DR by some of the loonatics on the riiight -- that would represent some portion of the loons who are actually able to hunt-and-peck their way through a keyboard -- and tell me you don't pick up the nasty whiff of racialist thinking when it comes to comments made about the Prez and his wife, well, I'll be surprised. And, no, I'm not going to spend all day fishing them out. But if I get a chance I'll start putting together a collection and see what I come up with. Should make interesting (and disturbing) reading.

Everyone knew before the election that if B-Rock won, every criticism would be labeled as "racist" by his sycophantic followers. Chris Matthews, for example.

Socialism is the new Nigger. Seriously. Somebody actually thinks that.

From the youtube message board...

"Those who inject race into arguments not about race are the true racists..."

No doubt. Matthews is the racist in my book. No wonder I get my news from the internet. This is why MSM is dying on the vine.

But if I get a chance I'll start putting together a collection and see what I come up with. Should make interesting (and disturbing) reading.

#13 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Why not do one on the Bush-Hitler references? Or is it bacause that was aceptable and Bush was white?

Why not do one on the Bush-Hitler references?
#16 | Posted by wisgod

I'll leave that to you; time you did some work around here, anyway.

Just another tempest in the teapot of those with no real tea on offer.

#9 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009


HEY how much money is she saving the white house with her garden???

Not all criticism of Michelle Obama is motivated by racism. Nor is all criticism of Barack Obama motivated by racism. But if you read many of the posts made on the DR by some of the loonatics on the riiight -- that would represent some portion of the loons who are actually able to hunt-and-peck their way through a keyboard -- and tell me you don't pick up the nasty whiff of racialist thinking when it comes to comments made about the Prez and his wife, well, I'll be surprised. And, no, I'm not going to spend all day fishing them out. But if I get a chance I'll start putting together a collection and see what I come up with. Should make interesting (and disturbing) reading.

#13 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-09-


OH BOY>..I am so glad you brought this up
so can I also say that whatever I read on the DR means that many or most libs around the country share these views.


HEY CELISARY>..COME HERE FOR A MOMENT.....!!!!!

OH BOY>..I am so glad you brought this up
so can I also say that whatever I read on the DR means that many or most libs around the country share these views.

C'mon Box a' Chocolates Boy, even you can't be that stewed that early in the day.

What I said was, "But if you read many of the posts made on the DR by some of the loonatics on the riiight -- that would represent some portion of the loons who are actually able to hunt-and-peck their way through a keyboard -- and tell me you don't pick up the nasty whiff of racialist thinking when it comes to comments made about the Prez and his wife, well, I'll be surprised."

How you see that as a statement about (borrowing your terminology and inserting "riiightwing nutjobs" in place of "libs") how "whatever I read on the DR means that many or most riiightwing nutjobs around the country share these views" is beyond me. The operative phrase in my statement is "would represent some portion of the loons who are actually able to hunt-and-peck their way though a keyboard." My guess is that's probably not a majority of the riiightwing nutjobs, but a minority. In fact, the minority of the minority who might be able to walk three blocks in a medium-sized American city and not attract the interest of law enforcement officers. Take it as a given that the majority of the riiightwing nutjob minority wouldn't make it much more than a block.

Weird that a First Lady needs more than 5 or 6 aides but as long as she's hiring does she need an unlicensed masseur? And I do mean unlicensed

#12 | POSTED BY JEFFNDENMARK AT 2009-09-03 09:08 AM | REPLY | FLAG

Says you.


Did he say...

(im sorry i cant watch your little video here at work)

Michelle obamma has 2 dozen aids and thats too many..
or did he say
Michelle Obamma has 2 dozen aids because she is black?

one is racist.
the other is not.
if you cant figure it out.
Well you cant fix stupid.

Why does Michelle Obama have 26 aides? Its not like she does anything important. That money could be used to feed the hungry.

That money could be used to feed the hungry

That's what Judas said to Jesus

Are you comparing me to Judas for asking a question about Michelle Obama?

Is there no depth to which slimy democrats will not stoop?

Bruceaz, do you think Michelle needs 26 aides?

If so, do you think Laura Bush should have had 26 aides also?

Buzz,
Answer to your questions:
no
no
no
no
Just sarcasm,who says I'm a democrat

If so, do you think Laura Bush should have had 26 aides also?

#25 | Posted by buzkiller at


not on topic
thread is about the typical democrat response to anything critical of these two people in the white house

#22 | Posted by Valisk,
Admits he didn't watch the video, but assumes he knows what was said, and I'm not smart enough to understand what was said in his assumed interpretation...
ROFL!

Watch the video then get back to me.

Why doesn't Chris with the twinge up his leg point out that prior First Ladies had just as many and move on?

Why call the bonehead a racist?

Why is any criticism of Obama end with someone calling the criticiser a racist?

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable