Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

The real story is... fairly obvious. The policies of the Bush administration, which included tax cuts during a time of war and a floundering economy, are clearly the primary source of the current deficits. The Obama administration policies that are beginning to give the economy a needed jumpstartthe American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in particularplace a distant third in contributing to the 2009 and 2010 deficit numbers. The deficit picture for the years beyond still needs to be painted.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

tonyroma

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Shares of contribution to fiscal deterioration 2009 and 2010

Cause Percent of total---

President Bush's policies 40%

Current economic downturn 20%

President Obama's policies 16%

Financial rescues begun by President Bush 12%

All other 12%

Of course, hard numbers won't jibe with the rhetoric coming from the very crew who let W steward our economy over the cliff from which Obama's now trying to salvage it. Everyone should own up to their role in what's happened over the last 8, going on 9 years. There are no easy fixes, just painful ones and no one's immune from the hurting.

As for the deficit's cause, the single most important factor is the legacy of President George W. Bush's legislative agenda. Overall, changes in federal law during the Bush administration are responsible for 40 percent of the short-term fiscal problem. For example, we estimate that the tax cuts passed during the Bush presidency are reducing government revenue collections by $231 billion in 2009. Also, because of the additions to the federal debt due to Bush administration policies, the government will be paying $218 billion more in interest payments in 2009.

Had President Bush not cut taxes while simultaneously prosecuting two foreign wars and adopting other programs without paying for them, the current deficit would be only 4.7 percent of gross domestic product this year, instead of the eye-catching 11.2 percentdespite the weak economy and the costly efforts taken to restore it. In 2010, the deficit would be 3.2 percent instead of 9.6 percent.

The weak economy also plays a major role in the deficit picture. The failure of Bush economic policiesfiscal irresponsibility, regulatory indifference, fueling of an asset and credit bubble, a failure to focus on jobs and incomes, and inaction as the economy started slippingcontributed mightily to the nation's current economic situation. When the economy contracts, tax revenues decline and outlays increase for programs designed to keep people from falling deep into poverty (with the tax impact much larger than the spending impact). All told, the weak economy is responsible for 20 percent of the fiscal problems we face in 2009 and 2010.

Funny how we never saw the right bitching about Bush exploding the deficits and actually doing something to stop him when they controlled Congress, wasn't it?

But Obama trying to clean up the mess is a communist. Isn't that rich?

Funny how we never saw the right bitching about Bush exploding the deficits and actually doing something to stop him when they controlled Congress, wasn't it?

walking backwards leads to falling down and causes head injuries.

some of you dolts should start walking forward for once.

your headaches just might stop.

"walking backwards leads to falling down and causes head injuries."
...
#4 | Posted by eberly

Bush? Who is Bush? Never heard of him.

--Eberly

Democratic congress, democratic president, democratic problem.

Whatever happened to getting the troops out of Iraq?

Wow a tonyroma thread without slandering a minor child it's a miracle I say - a miracle!

"Funny how we never saw the right bitching about Bush exploding the deficits and actually doing something to stop him when they controlled Congress, wasn't it?
But Obama trying to clean up the mess is a communist. Isn't that rich?"
#3 | Posted by tonyroma

The right who? People or politicians? If you are talking about the people you were blinded for your hate of Bush which is present with the conversation you carried on with yourself the first several posts. If the politicians then you should realize they are all the same.

#6 | Posted by mysterytoy

Democrats will never, ever see it that way.

Funny how Lefties give Clinton credit for a strong economy brought on by Reagan's policies (it happened on Clinton's watch) but also blame Bush for the Clinton recession.

If the economy sucks on Obama's watch, it's his fault.

Just using the standards set by the Left

Terrorists fly airplanes into buildings nine months into Bush presidency and the right wing tools said....."Clinton's fault."

nuf said.

Republicans are. I've always known that libbies were for big government, and passing the bills on for our grandkids to pay. It's a disappointment that Republican Congressmen--deep down--felt exactly the same way.

Had the Repubs governed the way they promised back in 1994, there would be no recession, no Fannie Mac or Freddie Mac, no prescription drug bill, no Education Department, no $2 trillion budgets, and the only deficit spending would be on long-term projects that add to the nation's infrastructure.

Dems are just being Dems. Can't blame them for that.

Post a comment
Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable