Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, October 15, 2008

A Nebraska district court judge has dismissed state Sen. Ernie Chambers' lawsuit against God, finding that "there can never be service effectuated on the named defendant." Chambers sued God in 2007, seeking an injunction against acts of violence such as earthquakes and tornados. He's considering an appeal.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

anton

MORE STORIES

Special Features

World Readable

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

So THAT'S why we haven't heard from him in 2000 years....he's afraid he'd get served.

So THAT'S why we haven't heard from him in 2000 years....he's afraid he'd get served.

#1 | Posted by Snark_Needleton

Now that's funny!

2000 years worth of back child support would really be a pisser.

If I had been the judge in this case, I would have defaulted God and entered judgment against Him in the amount of one trillion dollars. Then I would have told Senator Chambers, "Now go collect it, you twit."

www.evilbible.com

Any lawyer who files such a stupid lawsuit should have to pay back the taxpayers for whatever amount of time the judge wasted writing an opinion for this doofus.

Any lawyer who files such a stupid lawsuit should have to pay back the taxpayers for whatever amount of time the judge wasted writing an opinion for this doofus.

#6 | Posted by JOE at 2008-10-15 04:55 PM | Reply

Censorship or disbarment wouldn't be a bad idea, either. The profession's reputation suffers enough without imbeciles like this making it worse.

Now wait just one damned minute, you're telling me that the guy in charge of monitoring and keeping track oof the behavior of everyone on the entire planet pipn't know that he was supposed to appear in court? Why it's almost like the judge is saying there's no such aminal.

I think he has a chance for an appeal based on the Declaration of Independance where it says .... Laws of Nature and of Nature's God.... endowed by their Creator.....

I guess the Supreme Court could hire a theologian and proceed with the case.

While God in mercy looks down on him and offers patience and compassion.... knowing the litigant is headed for hell if he does not repent....

God does not want htis guy to go to hell, but its his choice to go to hell if he is bent on 'I DID IT MY WAY'.

Fine. Tell it the the insurance cocksucker who rejects my claim on behalf of an 'act of god'.

FUCK YOU!!!

Sen. Chambers: "God, why is this elevator going down?"

God says to Chambers: "To a courtroom in the basement to continue your case against me with a mediator. BTW, you wont need that sweater and jacket."

Boaz-
Your God sounds petty and vindictive. Project much of yourself onto the omnipotent and omniscient one?

Naw Betelg,

I was just playing. No one knows what waits beyond in that undiscovered country. The place from whose bourne no traveller ever returns. I do believe in GOD, but you never know, it could be the great flying spagetti monster!

The asswipe should sue all doctors who violate their Hypocratic oath by performing abortions.
I guess the only time doctors live by the oath is when it comes to bankrupting hospitals by providing medical treatment to illegals, then scam the government ( the American taxpayer ) by sending us the bill.The hypicritical oath.

The guy who filed the suit must be wackier than the libs on DR.

Hippocratic. The hypocrite is the Right Nut.

Imagine anything loonier than running fetal rights into this thread.

And then along comes Futile Willie Thom, saying "me too." herm

The Judge should have said that the case could not go forward because there is a separation of powers clause found in the Good Book. You know the one about rendering unto ceaser that which is ceaser render unto God that which is of God. Since this Lawsuit was filed under the jurisdiction of Mans Law the case could not procede because God is not bound by Man's Laws.

Larry

When Obama gets elected, and it look right now as though he may, "Render unto Caesar" will be the theme of the day. He's already promised to spend more money than we have!

Obama will NEVER beat the massive increases in spending, deficits, and national debt increases Bush and Co dumped on us.

Why can't the Rushbots see that it's the GOP Presidents who've massively increased our debt and spending?

We paid nearly $500,000,000,000 (billion) just LAST YEAR to service the national debt.

It was $250,000,000,000 (billion) approx. when Jimmy Carter left office. $1.5,000,000,000,000 (trillion) when Reagan left office.

It's risen exponentially under Republican presidents who've borrowed to give the appearance of prosperity.

Bush and the GOP Congress raised the national budget over 40% in only 8 years.

They were left with surpluses when they took office.

They've left us a mountain of debt - much of it to people who don't like us so much.

The chickens have come home to roost.

It really doesn't matter how we got to where we are. The past is past. The fact is the best way to get out of the hole is to stop digging. Obama has already stated how big his shovel is. Income tax breaks to 95% of Americans, 40% of which don't pay any income tax. Only one of his brain storms!He has a litany of spending programs that would give a Dem a wet dream!

Obama has already stated how big his shovel is. Income tax breaks to 95% of Americans, 40% of which don't pay any income tax.

Now we are down to 40% instead of the 50% you righties posted yesterday.

Like I said, if they don't pay income tax they don't file and that doesn't require a brain child.

My daughter made 12000 dollars last year while going to college and yet she filed and pays income tax.

You morons need to come up with a new schtick because your current is so moronic that it make anything you post just idiotic.


My neibors son, who has been on welfare for several years, files every year and get a return. Earned income tax credits. If your daughter did not get a full refund, the she missed the boat.

My neighbors son, my friend of a friend of a friend said their friends' friend doesn't pay income tax and so by that logical conclusion 40% don't pay income taxes.

Yep, I get your facts and how you get them.


After all this you assume it is logical to make sound decision based upon such great information. It is no longer shocking how the republican party can fool so many. Now all one has to do is look at our economy and see how these republicans make decisions.

Also, you are missing the point, if they filed it means they paid taxes.

The neibors son was an example. Oh BTW, I'm not a Republican. Check the Earned Income Tax rules for eligibility,you'll be amazed. A little research is sometimes eye opening.Paying taxes and getting it all back is a whole lot different that getting some or none or paying more. Maybe paying is the wrong word. I think the Dems refer to it as contributing. Or is it spreading the wealth. And if Obama gets in, with a daughter in college I suspect that your in a pretty fair tax bracket, you'll get a chance to spred some of your around.

Led,

Now we are getting some where, you beginning to move away from the bull shit and actually converse in real terms. By the way, I have 2 daughters in college and believe me, it is taking every ounce of money I make and more but I am taking on the debt instead of them. I want them to start with a clean break.

I like how you refer to spreading the wealth being a democrat thing. Well, the facts show over the last 8 years the republicans have spread the wealth, from the middle and lower class to the rich upper elite class. If you are not part of that rich elite class than one has to wonder why you support such a thing.

And don't give me fair type of bull shit because any prudent man can walk across this great country of our and see it is not fair.

I am far from the rich elite class. I guess someone is going to have to explain to me exactly what was taken away from me and given to the wealthy. I have worked my whole life, so far, but I have never risked any of my money on any type of business venture.

I am not envious of anyone who has done and succeeded. I do strongly object to predatory CEO's who profit at the expense of their employees. Fortunatly they are a small minority.

If they get a tax break and if it allows them to employ more people, then good for them. We all make out.

Even in good old Soviet Russia, there was a ruling elite who wanted for nothing and saw to it that the lower class got nothing. They beleived in sharing the wealth, as Obama said he is going to do. The peasants worked and the elite shared their wealth. Fair only happens in a perfect world!

Next, in the absence of George Burns, the guy is going to file against Morgan Freeman.

this would be funny EXCEPT that these are adults and this crap costs money and ties up money.

The idea that an idiotic lawsuit like this doesn't get someone held in contempt for filing it isn't good..

And we're about to elect a lawyer president.. HELP

And we're about to elect a lawyer president.. HELP

#30 | Posted by nmg_no at 2008-10-16 11:32 AM | Reply

I understand your fear of a lawyer in the White House since the Harvard M.B.A. currently living there has done such a bang up job.

The bad news for Ernie Chambers and many more is that God's law suit against them won't be dismissed and He is the Judge.

Hmmm so God will not take responsibility for her actions?

While God in mercy looks down on him and offers patience and compassion.... knowing the litigant is headed for hell if he does not repent....

Takeitsleazy - your vision of God is just plain weird. Do you even realize that if there is a God he is "not looking down" as you keep trying to say?

There is no "down" in the Universe. There is no up. There is Space and there is time.

Space and time is vast and we are but a speck of dust floating in it. We are not the center nor are we "down" except in that we are in a gravity hole.

There is no Heaven in the sky. But there IS a Big Universe out there and there ARE things that are bigger than us.

antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov

But, regardless, there is no God that is in the sky "looking down" on us. If there is a God as you imagine it then HE or SHE or IT or THEY are everywhere! Not up not down but even inside you looking "out".

Your Religulousness is getting tiring...Try to adjust your perspective from the Dark Ages to the 21th century.

We have learned a quite a lot since then. Your Religion really needs to catch up to REALITY.

"knowing the litigant is headed for hell if he does not repent...."

Now I thought that the SAVED don't need to perform any WORKS like REPENTANCE....but I could be wrong.
On a related note, if those to be saved are known before their birth, and salvation can't be lost, why should anyone care about what they do while they're on Earth? If they're saved, they'll stay saved, and if not, it's Hell anyways.

I mostly just lurk here but the this bullshit "40% don't pay taxes" lie is getting on my nerves.

The "half of Americans pay no income tax" fraud
www.ajc.com

Carry on.

Good one ant.

'The asswipe should sue all doctors who violate their Hypocratic oath by performing abortions.' -rightnutter

That's right, cellicide is a terrible crime.

You can't sue someone/something that doesn't exist.

People may believe he does, but at once time they believed the world was flat

So THAT'S why we haven't heard from him in 2000 years....he's afraid he'd get served.

#1 | Posted by Snark_Needleton

Not the case at all. They say that he made the judge and had a ringer.

Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2008 World Readable