I will admit to listening to talk radio.
I used to listen a lot to Hannity. He always had both sides on the radio. I like that, even if he stops any explanations with, "But, first you answer my question, it's my show.".
At least I hear left and right views during the show.
However, when he went from Hillary to Obama on his show, it drove me away. Not because the format changed - it hadn't. I still get to hear both sides at times, including guests.
What changed is his research for info. I hear about the minister and his church, I hear about the financial deals with that guy, the assocation with a person with a past.
Ever since Hillary lost, which I'm sure killed his research efforts, he has run with just those stories above. Nothing new. Nothing but the same garbage. Yes, it's garbage. I've heard it for months. It's like a soap - come back in three months and you really haven't missed anything.
Rezko - if there was an illegal deal, prosecute. Associates with a terrorist? Really, convicted terrorist or suspected terrorist? Where is this terrorist now? Teaching in a college as a respected individual of society. ok...
Wright - Wright spews what reminds me of 60's stuff and he never left the 60's. Still angry. I know quite a number of guys and gals that remember their parents being like this. It ain't the 60's anymore. Things have really changed.
Obama doesn't sound like any of the 60's people. Even Jackson comes across like Wright. Obama is different and if you can't see it, you're blind.
Talk issues that affect the country: non-intervention, spending money at home and not abroad, reduce taxes AND reduce spending. It has to be both. Prosecute illegal immigration and sell the convicts as slaves - resolves the immigration and the 'job sector that no one works' issue. Term limits. Risk means you may win or lose. Too much PC when it comes to losing. Sometimes you lose, sometimes it's everything.