YOU stop bein' such a retarded tool.
#106 | Posted by frankf55 at 2008-10-10 11:35 PM | Reply | Flag:
You asked where it was. By quoting a post of mine wherein I asked you if you "even read articles and the reports available inside of them". I then made it clear by my saying "read articles and the reports available inside of them" I, in fact, meant that this article had a report contained inside of it. It was so clearly implied by my original statement that you were too angry to pay attention or just eager to try and make other people look bad. Seriously, frothing at the mouth or not you have to admit you screwed up there.
Congratulations on getting around to reading enough of it to figure out they discussed the moose, in addition to his admitting that he was given a suspension for his actions.
Since you couldn't even be bothered to click into the article we're actually discussing until it was pointed out to you TWICE, I'll go ahead and do the footwork for you on what, exactly, he was copping to.
www.adn.com
/
"The record clearly indicates a serious and concentrated pattern of unacceptable and at times, illegal activity occurring over a lengthy period, which establishes a course of conduct totally at odds with the ethics of our profession," Col. Julia Grimes, then head of Alaska State Troopers, wrote in March 1, 2006, letter suspending Wooten for 10 days. After the union protested it, the suspension was reduced to five days.
/
It seems to me that Palin, quite rightfully, felt that Wooten was under-punished for his heinous activities. Wooten felt that he was punished enough. Sarah disagreed. So do I. A _five day suspension_? Woo. A week off of work. We don't even know if it was a paid or unpaid suspension.
Betelg:
No idea how I missed that line, I read it pretty thoroughly. However, I did make a mistake in misunderstanding the headline.
Now, given that, I continue with my confusion, because the headline, while TECHNICALLY accurate, still remains incredibly disingenuous. I would also like to point out a line in the very next paragraph in the same report, which pretty much says "who cares?" in legalese:
"In Spite of that, Governor Palin's firing of Commissioner Monegan was a PROPER AND LAWFUL exercise (emphasis Fox's) of her constitutional and statutory authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads."
I'm not so blinded by person's party affiliation that I hold them to different standards because of it.