Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, October 06, 2008

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac play a dominant role in the housing market by buying up mortgages and reselling them to investors. With approximately 5 trillion dollars of investment portfolios, they owned or guaranteed about 70% of the U.S. mortgage market these banks simply became too large to fail.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

STIRSUMUP

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

The detailed time-line of events below demonstrates that the collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was preventable if Congress were more receptive and responsive to the warnings of expert analysis.

In 1938, Fannie Mae was established by an act of Congress to provide liquidity to the mortgage market during an economic crisis known as the Great Depression.

In 1970, over three decades later, Freddie Mac was established by an act of Congress to counteract Fannie Mae's growing monopoly of the secondary mortgage market.

In 1977, the Carter Administration passed the Community Reinvestment Act that required banks to offer an even disbursement of credit throughout the financial market in an attempt to curb past lending practices that targeted more desirable markets. At the time, republican critics charged that such an act would impose unnecessary regulatory burdens on lending institutions and distort credit markets by forcing banks to offer loans to under-qualified applicants.

In 1995, the Clinton Administration pushed even harder to increase the supply of affordable housing to low-income families by offering performance-based incentives. According to economist Stan Liebowitz, these developments led to a loosening of lending standards that required no verification of income or assets, little consideration of the applicant's ability to make payments, and no down payment payments. The net effect was an inevitable collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at the cost of its investors.

In April of 2001, the Bush Administration first red flagged Fannie and Freddie stating that "financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity."

ca.youtube.com

"A Flaw in Their Plan

The basic S & L flaw was that while the investments were in long-term mortgages, the deposits were in short-term instruments. This was never much of a problem until inflation began to play an ominous role in the economy. Interest rates went from 8% in 1978 to 20+% in 1980." (Iranian revolution) "Because of this, the Savings and Loan found itself in the unenviable position of having to pay out more to attract depositors than it earned from interest received on its portfolio of fixed rate mortgages. In the early 1970s, some of the larger lenders in California introduced Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs) and, by the early 1980's, this concept in lending was expanded across the country to solve this imbalance, ensuring that mortgages held in portfolio would always earn the Savings and Loan enough to pay its depositors and net a profit. It should be noted that ARMs were designed by lenders to solve the lenders' problems caused by inflation. This solution essentially transferred a sizeable portion of the risk related to inflation and increasing interest rates to homeowners. As a result, in the late 1970's and early 1980's, when inflation and interest rates grew to staggering levels, many saw their mortgage payments rise to levels they could no longer afford to pay."

"In 2003, the Federal Reserve initiated policies to combat the risk of deflation. As part of their policies, the Fed dramatically cut its federal-funds interest rate in order to temporarily encourage consumer spending and stimulate the housing market. The Fed did not begin to raise their key rate again for over a year. During this time, rates were so low that it was extremely easy for banks to market subprime mortgages with low introductory rates of which the large majority were structured as ARMs with a two-year introductory fixed-rate period (2/28 ARM). Many of the new homeowners were not aware of or were not concerned with the fact that their rate, and house payment, could have a dramatic increase once their interest rate started to adjust."

Source: www.armtofixed.com

You won't see this up front, that place is too crowded with SNL videos.

You won't see this up front, that place is too crowded with SNL videos.

#4 | Posted by member2586

Your right. What do you want to bet it's gone by tomorow.

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable