Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, September 22, 2008

Senator John McCain's campaign manager was paid more than $30,000 a month for five years as president of an advocacy group set up by the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to defend them against stricter regulations, current and former officials say.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

truthhurts

MORE STORIES

Special Features

World Readable

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

But this failure is all the fault of Obama.

Never mind the man behind the curtain.

Are you suggesting that McCain aides are less competent than the Democrats, who milked the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac "cash cow" so much more effectively. Remember Clinton Justice Department official Jamie Gorelick, who obtained some $26 million from Fannie Mae in a seemingly much more abbreviated period.

I concede. Democrats are more efficient in extracting benefits from what are essentially government funded and programs responsive to political influence. The Democrats are able to determine just how they work, indeed participate in their establihment of the programs and contrive the vulnerabilities, and then exploit them to their own advantage.

Again, Democrats are more efficient with these activities. Now if only they would operate in the public interest rather than furthering their agendas of personal enrichment, maybe they should be in charge. We hear what they say, but we see what they do, which inures to their own interest contrary to their bositerous declarations of concern for some groups as cover, while they instead are assiduously devoted to practices that advance their personal financial benefit.

"My friends, I spent the last 30 years in Washington ensuring that this crisis would not happen...oh, wait"

let's not forget THESE guys:

Top Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008

1. Dodd, Christopher J
D-CT
$133,900

2. Kerry, John
D-MA
$111,000

3. Obama, Barack
D-IL
$105,849

4. Clinton, Hillary
D-NY
$75,550

5. Kanjorski, Paul E
D-PA
$65,500

OR these:

6. Bennett, Robert F
R-UT
$61,499

7. Johnson, Tim
D-SD
$61,000

8. Conrad, Kent
D-ND
$58,991

9. Davis, Tom
R-VA
$55,499

10. Bond, Christopher S 'Kit'
R-MO
$55,400

and WHAT about these?:

11. Bachus, Spencer
R-AL
$55,300

12. Shelby, Richard C
R-AL
$55,000

13. Emanuel, Rahm
D-IL
$51,750

14. Reed, Jack
D-RI
$50,750

15. Carper, Tom
D-DE
$44,389

tell me when to stop:

16. Frank, Barney
D-MA
$40,100

17. Maloney, Carolyn B
D-NY
$38,750

18. Bean, Melissa
D-IL
$37,249

19. Blunt, Roy
R-MO
$36,500

20. Pryce, Deborah
R-OH
$34,750

okay, i'm done for now:

21. Miller, Gary
R-CA
$33,000

22. Pelosi, Nancy
D-CA
$32,750

23. Reynolds, Tom
R-NY
$32,700

24. Hoyer, Steny H
D-MD
$30,500

25. Hooley, Darlene
D-OR
$28,750

john mccains campaign manager
$2,000,000

HANG THEM ALL!

just trying to be fair and balanced, th...

fair enough fuck em all.

Is anyone surprised?

th - THAT'S THE SPIRIT!

Mcsame's campaign mananger denies taking the money-maybe Cindi handles his checkbook too.

NANC: Break down those figures into PAC donations and individual donations.

Shocker! - All politicians are corrupt.

Shocker! - All politicians are corrupt.

It all boils down to which party you think will screw you the least. After 8 yaers of Bush, that's a no-brainer.

Wow, a lobbyist who has been paid by the company that he's hired to lobby for? Wow, what earth-shattering news.

Obama was paid over $100,000 by Fannie/Freddy. Now what's HE going to do for the money? He'll have to ask his advisors - prior Fannie/Freddie executives about that. And you really wonder who's going to screw you more?

DINSEY

Obama received $100,000 in donations from employees of Fannie/Freddie. There's a huge difference between receiving campaign contributions from employees and earning $2,000,000 lobbying for deregulation that is THE cause of this economic disaster we're in.

McCain was behind the last debacle as well - The Savings & Loan bailout. Hundreds of billions, all thanks again to less regulation. Add Bush's call for an 'ownership society' - all created with credit - and you have all the proof you need that the chants over the years for 'less regulation' only give the foxes unbridled access to the chicken coop. We always end up paying for the fox's damage

$2 million = $30,000 per month
Snout, meet the trough
Did McCain ever meet a lobbyist he didn't like?

McCain Transition Head Made Quarter-Million Lobbying For Freddie Mac
www.huffingtonpost.com


And that was just this year.

I know each party wants to find some fault for this mess in the other party's candidate. I won't repeat all my findings but the bottom line is there are players in this on both sides. Democrats and Republicans alike were getting rich on the wheelings and dealings. And here they all are in charge of coming up with a solution.

Foxes in the hen house, folks. Foxes in the hen house.

Can you say Raines and Johnson? Both employees of Obama's campaign now that their piggy bank at Fannie Mae is broken. A total of $190 million between them in bonuses from Fannie Mae because they were doing such a good job there.

All Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008

Name Office State Party Grand Total Total from
PACs Total from
Individuals
Dodd, Christopher J S CT D $165,400 $48,500 $116,900
Obama, Barack S IL D $126,349 $6,000 $120,349
Kerry, John S MA D $111,000 $2,000 106,000
Sure looks bad the top three all Democrats !!!!!

john mccains campaign manager
$2,000,000


ATAXPAYER's top Dems
$165,400
$48,500
$116,900
$126,349
$6,000
$120,349
$111,000
$2,000
$106,000

T $802,498

john mccains campaign manager
$2,000,000

Sure does look bad...

UPDATE: Wasington Post says it's a stretch to make much of anything out of the Obama-Raines relationship:

I asked [the author of the Raines profile Anita] Huslin to provide the exact circumstances of that passage. She said that she was chatting with Raines during the photo shoot, and asked "if he was engaged at all with the Democrats' quest for the White House. He said that he had gotten a couple of calls from the Obama campaign. I asked him about what, and he said, 'Oh, general housing, economy issues.' ('Not mortgage/foreclosure meltdown or Fannie-specific?' I asked, and he said 'no.')"

The lack of a companion story on those in the Obama camp who were paid millions by these firms shows the New Times to be the rag it is. They have failed in their role as the 'forth estate' and instead become a partisan rag. Here is hoping the editors/publishers receive severe physical punishment in order to help adjust their attitude and help them regain their focus.

"Top McCain Aide Paid Millions by Fannie, Freddie...Senator John McCain's campaign manager was paid more than $30,000 a month for five years as president of an advocacy group set up by the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac"

Nice headline. McCain's guy made $1.9 million but you forgot Obama's guy that made $90 million. He was there about 5 years also so he made somewhere in the neighborhood of $1.5 million a month. Oh and guess who hired Davis? Why none other than Raines! ROFLMAO:

"Obama's Economic Adviser is a Recent Former CEO of Fannie Mae and Oversaw a $6.3 Billion Accounting Debacle, Was Paid $90 Million For His "Stewardship" iusbvision.wordpress.com

Midtown- you now cliaiming that the Washington Post is a liberal rag????

Also, Obama takes NO money from lobbiest, McCain does. Obama only takes money from individual doners.

Get a clue and then an education!!!

KBM - Please read #27 and stop making up things. RAINES IS NOT AN OBAMA ADVISOR!!!!

Then get a clue and then an education.

Sure does look bad...
Yes it does.

John McCains campaign manager was hired by the CEO of Fannie Mae to represent Fannie Mae's interest in and be advocate for the company.

Dodd, Obama, Kerry, Clinton were elected to represent the citizens of their state in Washington? Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac were attempting to buy their vote. So these representatives have a conflict of interest. Who do they really work for?

With the lobbyist, its very clear. With the above mentioned crooks, its not.

Remember its about change....changing the money you earn from your control to their control.

KBM - Please read #27 and stop making up things. RAINES IS NOT AN OBAMA ADVISOR!!!!
Sure he isn't/wasn't. Especially now.

The electoral college polls are trending toward Obama because of this current ecomomic crisis. I don't see anything possible to turn this around before the election. I'm bailing out.

I'm going for a lobbyist job with the Flop Ears Administration as an "Advocate for the poor". I should be able to clean up.

Thom the Lib (Advocate for the poor and oppressed)

MAlso, Obama takes NO money from lobbiest, McCain does. Obama only takes money from individual doners.

And your a completely naive person.

Sure does look bad...

#26 | Posted by Zap

But not as bad as all the facts intentionally LEFT out by the MSM. It sure is good to see the LEFT wing windmill is churning away full blast never mind all those Pesky little facts that always seem to be in the way of a true journalistic endeavor for the truth...

hi i'm nanc

i forget to mention
that all the top fnma and fdmc guys all work for my candidate

mccains economic team will be the bailout boys

Rick Davis got bucks but also see Bloomberg Press story on "McCain Transition Head Lobbied for Freddie Mac Before Takeover"
link:
www.bloomberg.com

who would McCain give the keys to the cookie jar

I'm going for a lobbyist job with the Flop Ears Administration as an "Advocate for the poor". I should be able to clean up.

Thom the Lib (Advocate for the poor and oppressed)

#34 | Posted by fwthom


The only way YOU will clean up is if you go for a job as streetcleaner. You actually have to have some kind of education to be an advocate

The two Fannie CEOs who did the most to corrupt the company, Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson, have close ties with Obama. Raines is one of Obama's ranking economic advisors. Jim Johnson was actually in charge of vetting Obama's potential running mates until Obama responded to public pressure and threw Johnson under the bus where he now resides comfortably with Tony Rezko.

Obama's dealings with Fannie and Freddie are consistent with his pattern. He talks a big game about change, and yet his actions say otherwise. Obama consistantly fails to live up to his reformer rhetoric, both in Chicago and in Washington, just more Chicago-style politics. Obama presents nothing new, except the ability to fool people into believing he's something he's not.

So bottom line who was #2 on the lobbyist money list? Obama with Dodd (Dem. Chairman of the Banking Committee, hello) #1 and Kerry #3 (With Reid/Pelosi up there trying to make the top 10 at the trough as well). Some change no wonder Obama/Reid/Pelosi don't want to do anything but adjourn until after the elections. After all, they're looking out for those who pay them, not the citizens.

Worldpress.com

Pesky little facts that always seem to be in the way of a true journalistic endeavor for the truth...

#36 | Posted by ATaxpayer


What was left out? How about you provide some links as to all the incriminating stuff that was left out. Meanwhile we have McCrash saying "no special interests and we're going to clean up the sleaze" and he hasn't cleaned up either one in his own campaign staff.

Worldpress.com

#40 | Posted by Mutt


and yet McCrash received many more dollars from FNMA and Frddie Mac than Obama did. How is this possible. Gee, maybe it was because McCrash was the head de-regulator and would keep things that way. Oh, I's sorry, McCrash was against regulating the mortgage giants before he was FOR regulating them. Seems to be a pattern.

What was left out?

#41 | Posted by geezer1

Start with the headline please correct me if I am wrong do you see the word Democrat ANYWHERE !!! Both had their hands in the cookie jar yet only one side of the story has been told.


KBM - Please read #27 and stop making up things. RAINES IS NOT AN OBAMA ADVISOR!!!!


Then get a clue and then an education.

#31 | Posted by Silence at 2008-09-23 09:12 AM


The Obama campaign does not like this ad:

And it's denying that Raines is an advisor. But then the Washington Post would have to be wrong. You can't bash McCain for basing the ad on the info in the Post and specifically identifying the Post as the source.

Here's what the Post has today: 9/19/2008

The McCain campaign cited a July Washington Post profile of Raines as the source for his connection to Obama. In that profile, it was reported that he had "taken calls from Barack Obama's presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters." In a statement issued by the Obama campaign late Thursday, Raines strongly denied having provided counsel to Obama, saying: "I am not an advisor to Barack Obama, nor have I provided his campaign with advice on housing or economic matters."

That's all, which I take to mean the WaPo stands behind its original reporting. If the original reporting is true, then RANES IS AN OBAMA ADVISOR AND A LIAR.

WOW, Raines took a couple of calls. MAJOR player, yes sir!

and yet McCrash received many more dollars from FNMA and Frddie Mac than Obama did. How is this possible


#42 | Posted by geezer1 at 2008-09-23 10:42 AM

What?? Seven of the top eight were Democrats McCain didn't even make the the top 25.

Here is the corrected list with the INDIVIDUAL doners from FNMA and Freddie Mac taken out.

1. Dodd, Christopher J
S
D-CT
$133,900

2. Kerry, John
S
D-MA
$111,000

3. Obama, Barack
S
D-IL
$105,849

4. Clinton, Hillary
S
D-NY
$75,550

5. Kanjorski, Paul E
H
D-PA
$65,500

6. Bennett, Robert F
S
R-UT
$61,499

7. Johnson, Tim
S
D-SD
$61,000

8. Conrad, Kent
S
D-ND
$58,991

www.opensecrets.org

Geezer1: Day after day you are getting your ass kicked it is hilarious to watch, check your depends you are so full of crap...

well mutt
obviously

the other 25 top fnma/fdmc guys can't donate to mccain cause they work for him

i think service from the bailout boys is worth more then money any day

the other 25 top fnma/fdmc guys can't donate to mccain cause they work for him

#48 | Posted by klifferd at 2008-09-23 11:03 AM


That was just pure desperation Kilfferd. Your candidate got caught so deep in FNMA/FDMC and Lehman Bros pockets that all you can see are his shoes. It will come out over the next few weeks and Obama will be shown for the crooked South Chicago politician he is.

1. Dodd, Christopher J
D-CT
$133,900


2. Kerry, John
D-MA
$111,000


3. Obama, Barack
D-IL
$105,849


4. Clinton, Hillary
D-NY
$75,550


5. Kanjorski, Paul E
D-PA
$65,500

#4 | Posted by nanc at 2008-09-22 11:35 AM


NICE WORK NANC

and yes to all the liberal fucks who are about to write,............I see the other names on her list with 'r' s around them but look at the top five and see who these "SAVIORS OF THE REPUBLIC" are and it still amazes me.....although I should be used to the double standard by now.........the name at the top of the list is the head of the senate committee looking out for us against these same people who have him in THEIR POCKET........

where is the outrage???????????

"NICE WORK NANC"

Except, of course, she missed the part where McCain's advisor got more than the top five combined.

killford,

and to continue, how can the other 25 SENATORS work for McCain. Are you 12 or what???

"That was just pure desperation Kilfferd"

pure desperation?

that was being nice
83 wall street lobbyists work for the mccain campaign

Among these 83 lobbyists are McCain's chief political adviser, Charlie Black (JP Morgan, Washington Mutual Bank, Freddie Mac, Mortgage Bankers Association of America); McCain's national finance co-chairman, Wayne Berman (AIG, Blackstone, Credit Suisse, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac); the campaign's congressional liaison, John Green (Carlyle Group, Citigroup, Icahn Associates, Fannie Mae); McCain's veep vetter, Arthur Culvahouse (Fannie Mae); and McCain's transition planning chief, William Timmons Sr. (Citigroup, Freddie Mac, Vanguard Group).

so desperation?
how bout looking in the mirror

"Are you 12 or what???"
apparently you are 12
being that you have been duped by the republicans 3 elections in a row

I really can't believe that you libs are stupid enough to even bring this subject up. The democrats are up to their arse in payoff and bribes and probably wish you idiots would shut up before you bring the whole democratic senate down.

This reminds me of the fake NG letter that the Dems pulled out of their hats two weeks before the 2004 election. That little stunt cost you the white house also, so keep flapping your mouths we love it.

"I really can't believe that you libs are stupid enough to even bring this subject up."

i can't believe you are stupid enough to close your eyes to the facts once again.

"I really can't believe that you libs are stupid enough to even bring this subject up. "

McCain's advisor made more than the top five Dems combined.

Except, of course, she missed the part where McCain's advisor got more than the top five combined.

#52 | Posted by Danforth


AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
RRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


are you people not LISTENING OR What..

so this mccain advisor

HOW MANY votes on banking issues has he had.......and what in the 'wide world of sports' does that have to do with chris dodd getting MILLIONS from a place that he is supposed to be regulating????????????

"HOW MANY votes on banking issues has he had"

he advises mccain
the important votes that mccain makes
are based on this advisor
so a lot

"so this mccain advisor...HOW MANY votes on banking issues has he had"

So are you saying advisors are off the table? Or only when they have (R)s after their name?

especially since mccain doesn't know shit about shit when it comes to the economy

this advisor by proxy is making the votes

"Or only when they have (R)s after their name?"

only when they have (r)'s after their name

double standard hypocrit game

to quote john mccain.

"deregulate. regulate. deregulate. regulate"

stop yo-yo'ing the issues

Bushlovertwo,

This is a skill used frequently by the Democrats. It's called baiting and they are masters at it.

(my apologies to Lenny Bruce)

But Seriously, The libs don't get it and never will. If a republican was head of the powerful Banking committee and let all these investment firms cook the books when his job was to oversee them then he would have been hanged on the front steps of Senate.

Particularly when he was the number one pig at the trough taking lobby money from these very firms.

"Particularly when he was the number one pig at the trough taking lobby money from these very firms."

you mean mccains entire campaign staff?

"This is a skill used frequently by the Democrats"

wanna know a skill used by republicans

falt out LYING
they are the world champions in this skill
and you got had

by the way mutt and blt
i'm not a lib or a democrat

i like guns
i think id's should be required for voting
i think english should be the official language
i think illegal immigration is a problem

but i think you guys are definatley republican
and thats the problem

cause your being had

Except, of course, she missed the part where McCain's advisor got more than the top five combined.
McCain's advisor was paid as an advocate of these firms. So he did his job. He worked for the firms and was paid by them.

Obama took contributions from the company to buy his vote. Instead of representing the interest of the taxpayers in his state, he had to represent the interest of the firms. Now that sounds like a conflict of interest.

"McCain's advisor was paid as an advocate of these firms."

Strange...he claimed he did no lobbying. Is he planning on returning the monies?

cause your being had

#68 | Posted by klifferd

I'm afraid you might be conning yourself as well, kliff.

Though I wonder if that's a distinction without a difference.

If a republican was head of the powerful Banking committee and let all these investment firms cook the books when his job was to oversee them then he would have been hanged on the front steps of Senate. - Mutt

That would be Senator Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa, until 2006.

So far as I know he is still there, not hanged on the steps but sitting inside as the Minority leader.

Strange...he claimed he did no lobbying. Is he planning on returning the monies?
Doesn't sound like he was a lobbyist, he ran a organization that 'promote(d) homeownership and minority homeownership'


Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recruited Mr. Davis to run the Homeownership Alliance in 2000.

the Homeownership Alliance included nonprofit organizations like Habitat for Humanity and the Urban League. "It's not controversial to promote homeownership and minority homeownership," Mr. Bounds said. More than a half-dozen current and former executives, however, said the Homeownership Alliance was set up mainly to defend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by promoting their role in the housing market, and the two companies paid almost the entire cost of the group's operations.

"They were financed largely, possibly exclusively, by Fannie and Freddie," said William R. Maloni, a Democrat who is a former head of industry relations for Fannie Mae. "We thought it would be helpful to have someone who was a broadly recognized Republican to be the face of the organization, and that person became Rick Davis." Mr. Maloni added, "Rick, for that purpose, turned out to be quite good." (Several executives said Mr. Davis's compensation was not unusual for the companies' well-connected consultants.)

i have two choices
hagbard

one is an unknown and talks a good talk

and the other is known and talks a bad talk

i know what i will get with the latter. more bad policies

i don't know what i'll get with the former

i know that the former however has made intelligent choices about stablity of government based on vp choice, and his stances on the issues

i know the latter doesn't care who takes care of america if he dies in office (age 72)

i am not being had
i am thinking with my mind not my party affiliation.

every reason someone gives me about voting mccain
is based on lies or exaggarations

if your only reason for mccain is prolife
then fine
thats your only thing

if its bomb bomb bomb iraq and iran
then mccain is your option

but if you aren't for more war
or you abortion isn't the most important issue to you

why mccain?

klifferd tell us about the change obama has produced in his short lived career. He has no accomplishments in the Senate or in his State. What makes you think he change anything?

What is the difference between Obama and an empty suit?

i am not being had
i am thinking with my mind not my party affiliation.

#74 | Posted by klifferd

I hope you're right, but I'm afraid that where he says he stands on the issues is precisely where he won't stand on the issues when the time comes.

Maybe I'm conditioned to not believe a word that comes out of a President's mouth at this point, but I'm even more afraid not to be.

But if and when the time comes, I'll be here to admit that you were right and I was wrong.

"He has no accomplishments in the Senate"

Whereas McCain has achieved the rare occurrence of voting against his own bill.

Whereas McCain has achieved the rare occurrence of voting against his own bill.
After the porkers loaded it down? Sounds like he did a good thing.

Whereas McCain has achieved the rare occurrence of voting against his own bill.
But what does this have to do with Obama having no bills that anyone cared about?

What is the difference between Obama and an empty suit?

just trying to be fair and balanced, th...

#11 | Posted by nanc at 2008-09-22 11:59 AM | Reply | Flag:

.....like FAUX News.

How does a campaign contribution somehow now equal a monthly salary?

Two different things.

Sorry. Try again.

What is the difference between Obama and an empty suit?

The empty suit doesn't need a teleprompter to prevent making an ass of itself.

If a republican was head of the powerful Banking committee and let all these investment firms cook the books when his job was to oversee them then he would have been hanged on the front steps of Senate. - Mutt
That would be Senator Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa, until 2006.
So far as I know he is still there, not hanged on the steps but sitting inside as the Minority leader.
#72 | POSTED BY SITDOWN AT 2008-09-23 12:36 PM | REPLY

Grassley took a total of $16,500 from FRED and FAN, Since you are going to bring it up McCain took a total of $21,550 for a grand total of $38,050.

BUT, Dodd took $165,400 and OBAMA took $126,349 for a grand total of (Ta, Da, Da, Daaaa) $291,749 nearly 8 times what Grassley and McCain took from Fan and Fred.

www.opensecrets.org

No wonder Obama said he didn't want to have a commission look into the investment bank failures, they would have found his fingerprints everywhere.

Here is Joe Biden's solution to the problem
*****

"When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the princes of greed," Biden told Couric. "He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"


www.politico.com

Uh, JOE the stock market crashed in 1929, the first regular TV transmission started in 1930 and that was in England. By 1936 there were only about 200 TVs in existance in the world. What is really sad is that you guys think this moron is better prepaired to be president than Sarah Palin. LOL

By 1936 there were only about 200 TVs in existance in the world

~Mudd

He meant "radio", obviously.

Spud is curious now. When you pick those nits do you eat them one at a time or do you save 'em up until you can get a real mouthful?

What is really sad is that you guys think this moron is better prepaired to be president than Sarah Palin. LOL

A Chia pet is better prepared to be POTUS than Scary Failin.

Be Well.

Spud, You calling Biden a Chia-pet?

Mutt is wondering now, do you ever get tired of making excuses for the idiot VP that Husame Obama picked or are you okay with by now.

Personally I think the Repubs should chip in and By Biden a faster plane so he can visit more cities and make more gaffs.

My personal favorite is when he turned Pentacostial and asked a man in a wheel chair to stand. This is too good to make up even if we tried.

peanuts compared to what white house access could
get him

What is the difference between Obama and an empty suit?

The empty suit doesn't need a teleprompter to prevent making an ass of itself.

#82 | Posted by Mutt at 2008-09-23 02:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

???

Is that your big critique?

Jowels McCain literally has to read off of cue-cards for roughly 95% of his yapping.

My personal favorite is when he turned Pentacostial and asked a man in a wheel chair to stand. This is too good to make up even if we tried.

#86 | Posted by Mutt at 2008-09-23 02:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

Definitely a gaffe of Joe's part, but the only Pentecostal around here is your 'Lipstick BullDyke....errr....Bulldog' and her Witch Doctor pastor.

Booogety Booogety Booo!

News today Davis has received $15,000 a month since 2005.

www.nytimes.com

Rick Davis latest news
His firm was paid 15,000 per month by Fannie Mae until last month! Full story in Newsweek Magazine!

Why haven't we heard anything in the MSM about this lady, Penny Pritzker, Obama's campaign finance chair?

Obama's Sub-Prime Conflict

By Dennis Bernstein
February 28, 2008

.........if you traced today's sub-prime crisis back to its origins, you would come upon the role of the Pritzkers and Superior Bank of Chicago.


As an owner and board chair of Superior, Penny Pritzker also was named in a RICO class action suit on behalf of the more than 1,400 depositors at Superior, who initially lost over $50 million of their life savings.

"This is a story of two Americas with two sets of laws, one for the rich and powerful and another for the rest of us," said Clint Krislov, the depositors' attorney, in a recent interview. "My clients will all be dead, before they get back their money, given the Supreme Court's recent decision to uphold the lower court, which put the predatory owners on the front of the line, if any money is recovered."

The Pritzkers arrayed a powerful and well-connected legal team including former President Bill Clinton's impeachment lawyer Lanny Davis, two ex-comptrollers of the currency, and two former General Counsels to the FDIC, the American Banker Magazine reported.

Given the political sensitivity of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, Anderson said he believes Penny Pritzker should resign her post as Obama's Finance Chair, the person who oversees the campaign's fundraising.

Otherwise, Anderson said, Pritzker's presence could undercut Obama's credibility on the issue of predatory lending and create a possible conflict of interest if Obama is elected President and tries to crack down on sub-prime abuses.

Obama campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor had no comment about the controversy surrounding Pritzker, but added: "Barack Obama has already made it very clear that he's going to crack down on fraudulent brokers and lenders."

One might wonder why Hillary Clinton's campaign hasn't jumped on this issue. Maybe it's because Penny's little brother, J.B. Pritzker, is a mover and shaker in the Clinton campaign.

In May of 2007, Jay Robert, aka, (J.B.) Pritzker, threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, representing a coup for her campaign by wresting the billionaire out of Obama's home town of Chicago, and better still, the brother of Obama's Campaign Finance Chair.

J.B. Pritzker announced he would head a new grassroots organization called Citizens for Hillary Clinton. Pritzker told reporters at the time, the new organization would go into states "where we haven't fully organized" and seek out campaign supporters as well as raise funds.

Apparently the Pritzkers will be sitting at the head table at the Inaugural Ball if either Democrat wins.

Now that the collapse has occurred, the roadblock built by Senate Democrats in 2005 is unforgivable. Many who opposed the bill doubtlessly did so for honorable reasons. Fannie and Freddie provided mounds of materials defending their practices. Perhaps some found their propaganda convincing.

But we now know that many of the senators who protected Fannie and Freddie, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd, have received mind-boggling levels of financial support from them over the years.

Throughout his political career, Obama has gotten more than $125,000 in campaign contributions from employees and political action committees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, second only to Dodd, the Senate Banking Committee chairman, who received more than $165,000.

Clinton, the 12th-ranked recipient of Fannie and Freddie PAC and employee contributions, has received more than $75,000 from the two enterprises and their employees. The private profit found its way back to the senators who killed the fix.

There has been a lot of talk about who is to blame for this crisis. A look back at the story of 2005 makes the answer pretty clear.

Oh, and there is one little footnote to the story that's worth keeping in mind while Democrats point fingers between now and Nov. 4: Senator John McCain was one of the three cosponsors of S.190, the bill that would have averted this mess.

Forgive me if this update has been posted:

The disclosure undercuts a statement by Mr. McCain on Sunday night that the campaign manager, Rick Davis, had had no involvement with the company for the last several years.

Mr. Davis's firm received the payments from the company, Freddie Mac, until it was taken over by the government this month along with Fannie Mae, the other big mortgage lender whose deteriorating finances helped precipitate the cascading problems on Wall Street, the people said.

They said they did not recall Mr. Davis's doing much substantive work for the company in return for the money, other than speak to a political action committee of high-ranking employees in October 2006 on the approaching midterm Congressional elections. They said Mr. Davis's firm, Davis & Manafort, had been kept on the payroll because of Mr. Davis's close ties to Mr. McCain, the Republican presidential nominee, who by 2006 was widely expected to run again for the White House.

www.nytimes.com

anamerican-
re: Senator John McCain was one of the three cosponsors of S.190, the bill that would have averted this mess.

He was a "co-sponsor" after the fact. After it died in Republican led committee, and after the report on Fannie/Freddie came out. He then did nothing.

Did Obama, Dodd, and Clinton support the bill? Enquiring minds want to know.

The disclosure undercuts a statement by Mr. McCain on Sunday night that the campaign manager, Rick Davis, had had no involvement with the company for the last several years.

Mr. Davis's firm received the payments from the company, Freddie Mac, until it was taken over by the government this month along with Fannie Mae, the other big mortgage lender whose deteriorating finances helped precipitate the cascading problems on Wall Street, the people said.

They said they did not recall Mr. Davis's doing much substantive work for the company in return for the money, other than speak to a political action committee of high-ranking employees in October 2006 on the approaching midterm Congressional elections. They said Mr. Davis's firm, Davis & Manafort, had been kept on the payroll because of Mr. Davis's close ties to Mr. McCain, the Republican presidential nominee, who by 2006 was widely expected to run again for the White House.

another lie from the McCain camp:

blogs.abcnews.com

Didn't you just post that about 4 posts above this one? BTW, do you have any comments on Obama's campaign finance chair?

And what about that bill? Did Obama, Clinton, Dodd and other Democrats scratching their heads and blaming the Republicans support it?

The disclosure undercuts a statement by Mr. McCain on Sunday night that the campaign manager, Rick Davis, had had no involvement with the company for the last several years.

Mr. Davis's firm received the payments from the company, Freddie Mac, until it was taken over by the government this month along with Fannie Mae, the other big mortgage lender whose deteriorating finances helped precipitate the cascading problems on Wall Street, the people said.

You seem to have a problem with that, but can't refute it, AnAmerican.

You would prefer to respond with the curious idea that I should find out if what you say is true, when it should really be the other way around. If you wish to state a fact, please do.

Anamerican-
It would also be cool if, when you cut-n-paste, you would provide a link and not pass it off as your own words.

Why bother, Betelg, you wouldn't link to it.

Would you agree that both candidates in this presidential race have skeletons, in the form of casual and not no casual advisors, in their closet on this financial mess? Or do you think your man is squeaky clean?

Anamerican-
I think that a campaign manager for one side lobbied against regulation until last week, and that the accusations from your side are incredibly weak.

But the facts don't matter.

Why bother, Betelg, you wouldn't link to it.

#102 | Posted by anamerican at 2008-09-24 12:09 AM | Reply | Flag:

It's the principle of the thing, which you and the McCain camp have proved fungible, along with facts and truthiness.

I see. So all the Democrats are squeaky clean in this entire mess. You'll never acknowledge otherwise.

You know--

Sarah hasn't received any money from those clowns.

And Raines was talking with Obama--despite the denials--

blogs.tnr.com


And it appears Davis gets a monthly stipend or something for work completed.


Why not talk about Jim Johnson? He was on the VP list and still an advisor..

How much did he make??

AnAmerican-
re: I see. So all the Democrats are squeaky clean in this entire mess.

You would be an idiot to conclude that I ever said anything like that. But at this point, being a willful idiot is probably a tack you should adhere to. It's probably your best option.

And it appears Davis gets a monthly stipend or something for work completed.

LOL.

Would you agree that both candidates in this presidential race have skeletons, in the form of casual and not no casual advisors, in their closet on this financial mess? Or do you think your man is squeaky clean?

- AnAmerican

I have a feeling the FBI investigation announced late today of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the top guys involved in running them, including some members of Congress just may end up dirtying both McCain and Obama. I know Obama received a lot of donations from them and I'm sure McCain was no angel either.

From what I heard Freddy and Fannie was one big piggy bank for the politicans. Since both Freddie and Fannie are quasi-public/private lending institutions more politicians would have been personally involved -- moreso than with the other private lenders of sub-prime loans.

Murphy-
re: Why not talk about Jim Johnson? He was on the VP list and still an advisor..

No. He was on the committee to vet a VP for Obama for about a week over four months ago. He was asked to step down by the Obama campaign when it came to light that he received a questionable loan. He was not on the "VP list", and he is not an "advisor".

By contrast, McCain's campaign manager was on the Fannie/Freddie lobbyist payroll until last week.

Here Bet--

campaignspot.nationalreview.co
m


CC--

That is why the congress is NOT going to have any hearings on themselves and why the FBI is involved.

No Johnson was on the committee with Caroline to pick the VP..

Here is Johnson--and he IS an INSIDER


www.youtube.com

Murphy-
And Johnson was "fired" four months ago. Regarding Raines, there is no connection but a phone call and a by chance meeting four years ago, though Raines is black.

McCain's campaign manager was on the lobbyist payroll of Freddie/Fannie until last week.

You people are pathetic.

Good night, Murphy.

"McCain: My Campaign Manager Had Nothing To Do With Freddie Mac Since 2005... "And I'll Be Glad To Have His Record Examined By Anybody Who Wants To Look At It""

At least Bush knew when to keep his mouth shut and get Karl to make it go away.

"Top McCain aide paid millions by Fannie and Freddie".
You forgot to add the biggest recipients were Sen. Dodd and Flop Ears. How Come?

Anyone who doubts that ALL politians are dishonest is part of the problem. Therefore it's makes no difference which party got more of the grease in this case.

What we can all hang our hat on is that the politicians and their cronies will continue to thrive while we taxpayers foot the bill.

This bailout reminds me of a guy trying to sell me a pig in a polk. Now the polk has some foul smelling liquid dripping from it and the guy is in a big hurry to sell it to me for $700,000,000,000 or the pig will spoil before I can eat it. Also the WORLD will come to an end if I don't act before opening the polk. BULL

Yet the crooks, cowards, and idiots in Washington will pass the bailout. This is JUST THE BEGINNING.

We talk about a McCain advisor picking up $2,000,000. What was the name of the Flop Ears advisor that picked up $90,000,000?

You liberal ASSHOLES are so intelligent, can any of you tell me why Flop Ears was called a "BILL JACKER" when he was in the IL senate?

Drudge, this is for you. You are now worse then the Hoffington Post. You have become a SOROS mouth piece. Or what do you call 23 subjects on your sheet and 9 were McCain negative. No negative for your buddy Obama. Drudge, you make me sick.

Mike Rogers, who has outed a great many gay Republicans who spend their time working against the interests of gay people, has outed another one: Mark Buse, John McCain's chief of staff. Buse is the latest winner of the aptly named Roy Cohn award "in recognition of his work against the gay and lesbian community while living as an out gay man himself."

It's false--seems to be a pattern with the NYT--

www.johnmccain.com


Wait to see the retraction.

The McCain campaign has put out a fairly aggressive repudiation of this article. Until the NYT stops becoming such an obvious cheerleader for the Obama camp, and the libtards on the DR stops lapping up everything they say without question--the big media organs are writing McCain's campaign ads for him. The right already has a persecution complex as far as major media are concerned, and this only feeds it.

Obama has been the recipient of more Fannie and Freddie money than nearly anyone. Obama is the one who refuses to take money from lobbyists, but has taken money from the wives of dozens of them, and asks lobbyists to organize fundraisers for him, without cutting checks personally. And the NYT should print a full-page retraction, immediately.

They won't, though. There's a bigger purpose at work here, and you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.

Drudge, you make me sick.

#122 | Posted by ozzieoswald

Then "drudge" is doing a good job.

The owner and moderator of this site is not "drudge" btw, not that it makes a hellofalotta difference to ya.

Why does the right bitch so much over a newspaper printing FACTS?

Davis received $15,000 a month until last month from Fannie/Freddie. That was after he REQUESTED they be kept on retainer in 2005. The deal was continued because of Davis' close association with McCain.

Thomas Jefferson said (ph), "I'd rather have newspapers and no government than a government with no newspapers".

The press is the only thing that keeps a democracy honest.