All worthy folk, who depart a bit from the norm of productive people who prefer to live in a stable community in peace and serenity with their neighbors, but what the heck. Diversity rules.
#27 | Posted by Johnson
You mean rich white people right?
Well if you think that all the people who work for a living and are not welfare recipients are "rich," I suppose that' it depends on your perspective.
I'm just referring to people who work for a living, and manage to make it rather than be transgenerationally supported by welfare.
And I'm referring to people, who aren't thrilled by high crime rates in their communities, murders, drive-by shootings, robberies, muggings, burglaries, rapes, drug dealing and drug houses, and the like, but who prefer a more stable milieu in which to live and raise their families.
Do you think that such behaviors and preferences are confined to "rich white people?"
I don't know how it is in your neighborhood, how folks who live there would be described, if you live in a community largely supported by welfare or criminality-drug dealing and the like, and what the people there want for surroundings. Maybe you can enlighten us from your observations.
I don't consider gardeners, handymen, checkout clerks and baggers in supermarkets, sales clerks in stores, assistants in doctors and dental offices, and the like to be "rich," but then from some perspectives, I suppose that anyone with a job and living above a welfare recipient's standard would be "rich." Yet, I think they share the preferences that I delineated.
I'm perplexed by your conclusion.