Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, September 19, 2008

A new study finds a biological link to liberal and conservative political beliefs. After being shown a series of fright-inducing images, people with strongly conservative views were three times more fearful than staunch liberals after the effects of gender, age, income and education were factored out.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Snark_Needleton

MORE STORIES

Special Features

World Readable

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Oh, really?

Sure, liberals are not afraid to insult God and kill unborn babies. Liberals are more concerned with protecting the rights of terrorists than protecting the rights of innocent citizens.

Way to go, liberals!

This is good to know. Since one of the sacrements of liberism is abortion then they will become extinct in a few generations.

Wow...didn't take long for this to become a white trash level discussion.

It's OK to admit you're afraid, Takitez. Come on over here and let Blog God give you a hug.

If one of the them was a fright-inducing image of Barry as President, I'm quilty as charged.

FF for the Hugging God

If they are born that way, they cannot be cured, so should they be quarantined?

So its true, libs are born to function on emotion and not logic. WOW!

I've always known conservatives were chickenshits.

Cheney's the perfect example of how afraid these people really are. Made quite certain his ass wouldn't be in danger, but has the gall to think he can protect the rest of us.


I guess we do need both, scaredy cats and facilitators, But what we don't need is a population that is 1/2 and 1/2 of each, so that they cancel each other out and the "swing" vote decides things based on whether they have been sufficiently frightened or not.

Any doubt that Takitez burrows under the ground Cheney-style at the first whiff of trouble?

Did they factor in desensitization?

So its true, libs are born to function on emotion and not logic. WOW!

Again the intelligence isn't present here.

Emotion is fear based, which by the article says that is a conservative trait.

Guess you lack logic reasoning skills, that would explain all of your posts.

Go see RCADE, and get your hug too!

All your language military housing are belong to us.

Evidence indicates that liberals are more frightened and panic easily --- just see what silly things they are saying about Palin.

Michelle Obama using sexist line: don't vote [for Sarah] because she is 'cute'.

No reps have said: don't vote for Obama because he is Black.

Liberal game....

Liberals born dysfunctional?

Absolutely! Then they get into politics to protect, promote and institutionalize dysfunction!

"Kevin B. Smith, a political science professor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and a study author, said conservatives were more vigilant to environmental threats, and he speculated that this innate tendency led them to support policies that protect the social order."

Perceived social order that is, more accurately, status quo.

Conservative pussies, holding back the progress of the species.

No reps have said: don't vote for Obama because he is Black.
#16 | POSTED BY TAKITEZ

See JOHNSON

The frightened conservatives would still be subjects of the British Crown were it not for liberals who had the GUTS to start a revolution.
You're welcome you bunch of frightened pussies.

#14 | Posted by danni

If you think that describes today's lib, you are nukin futs.

The lib of today wants the security of a big government and also wants us to be just like europe.

Please feel free to correct thoes statements.

The frightened conservatives would still be subjects of the British Crown were it not for liberals who had the GUTS to start a revolution.
You're welcome you bunch of frightened pussies.

#14 | Posted by danni

Liberals as liberators? Danni once more you prove what a retard you really are...

What a ridiculous study--I hope we didn't pay for this!


They tested 46 people--well right there THAT is a significant number!


They counted eye blinks as a measure of whatever--these guys are on dope.


What about folks who are liberal for most of their youth and then turn out conservative? Or the other way around?

If we talk about the regular conservative and regular liberal (not the hard left or hard right) most will agree that the goals are pretty much the same--national security for the country, life liberty and the pursuit of happiness--

It is the road, the way, the policies employed on how to get there that brings the discussions.

Your TAX dollars at work.

Liberals as liberators?
Posted by Libssuck

Liberating wallets and purses of tax dollars.

a "biological link" does NOT mean "born that way".

IN this case it refers to a biological response to a stimulus. The biological response being attributable to a value system learned and taught.

No different than someone who is taught to be fearful of dogs having a more fearful reaction to a strange dog, than someone who was raised in a house with a pet dog. The person taught that dogs are scary will sweat, cry, experience elevated heart rate, etc. Nothing "born that way" about it.

You really are some simple minded folk.

What about folks who are liberal for most of their youth and then turn out conservative?

Murphy I suspect that is you.

I am "the other way round" having been brought up "Conservative" and gradually seeing the hypocrisy and selfishness of so-called "family values" all around me, and then thinking for myself "Wait a minute- these people are nuts".

My first take is that this is a complete waste of tax payer money. However, it seems to me that it is normal human behavior for people to be fearful in certain situations so the fight or flight survival hormone response can kick in. When you are in a combat situation for exanple all your senses are highly tuned. People who don't feel fear must have something wrong with their human response system. The libs in this study should be thrown up on the examination table for further study.

The frightened conservatives would still be subjects of the British Crown were it not for liberals who had the GUTS to start a revolution.
You're welcome you bunch of frightened pussies.


#14 | Posted by danni


Danni, you ignorance is staggering
The Democratic party didn't even begin until 1836 and this was their platform.

1. Looked backward to the past.
2. Spoke to the fears of Americans
3. Opposed banks and corporations as. state- legislated economic privilege.
4. Opposed state-legislated reforms and preferred individual freedom of choice.
5. Were Jeffersonian agrarians who favored farms and rural independence and the right to own slaves.
6. Favored rapid territorial expansion over space by purchase or war.
7. Believed in progress through external growth.
8. Democratic ideology of agrarianism, slavery, states rights, territorial expansion was favored in the South.
9. The party of tradition.

www.mury.k12.ut.us

In the late 1700's there were only two parties the Federlists and the Republicans. The Federlists wanted closer ties with Britian and it was the Republicans that led the fight against the British and formed the constitution.

Oh, by the way it was the Republicans that freed the slaves as well against the bitter objections of the Democrats.

"The libs in this study should be thrown up on the examination table for further study" -FWTHOM

Please FWTHOM, stay away from my
"fight or flight survival hormone response"

Now THAT is scary.

Now, THIS is the real story:

Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the Summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the Winter.The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups, Liberals and Conservatives. Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement. Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing, fetching and hair dressing. This was the beginning ofthe Liberal movement. Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girliemen. Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy and group hugs and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided. Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest,most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolizedby the jackass. Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers,personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat. Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys,lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living. Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.
End of lesson for today.

Mutt, your ignorance is staggering.

Nowhere in Danni's #14 post:

The frightened conservatives would still be subjects of the British Crown were it not for liberals who had the GUTS to start a revolution.
You're welcome you bunch of frightened pussies.

#14 | Posted by danni

...does she once mention Democrats, Republicans, or any other political party. That means your entire strawman argument is fallacious.

On a side note, I find it most illuminating that you chose a K-12 school site (www.mury.k12.ut.us) from which to bolster your "argument."

On a side note, I find it most illuminating that you chose a K-12 school site (www.mury.k12.ut.us) from which to bolster your "argument."

#30 | Posted by truthsetyoufree at 2008-09-19


Well I had to keep it simple for the Libs.

Most conservatives believe that fear should motivate your actions (see 9/11, domestic spying, torture etc). Liberals believe there is nothing to fear but fear itself. This is why liberals should be in charge.

Holy Crap when I read this "story" pun intended may scare conservatives I thought oh no ole joe is switching parties and plans to help McCain. He is already helping McCain by exposing Obama' s patriotic tax till it hurts plan. That's enough help we certainly don't want the gaff master on out side...

Truth,

You can play you stupid games if you want but you know as well as I do that to Danni's simple mind Liberal=democrat, conservative=republican.

I was only trying to answer her question as simply as possible. IF you want to have a philosophical debate on US History, bring it on.

"The Democratic party didn't even begin until 1836"

Whoops:

When the Republican Party was created, the two major parties in the United States were the Democratic Party and the Whig Party. The Republican Party was created in 1854...

en.wikipedia.org

So much for using a K-12 history project for argumentation.

only two parties the Federlists and the Republicans

You're grasp of history is a skewed by your partisanship.

The two seminal parties you are referring to were the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans.

The Federalist were the party of Alexander Hamilton.

The D-Rs were the Jeffersonian Democrats under a new name. They were the party of Jefferson and Madison and were the liberal party, as that word was conceived back then.

The modern GOP dates from 1854 and was an outgrowth of the Whig party. They supported laissez-faire capitalism and were the party of Wall Street and the rich bankers of the Northeast.

"conservative=republican."

Whoops:


This is a good column. Allison makes clear the difference between Conservatives and Republicans. Too many feeble (read Liberal) minds around here think they are the same thing. They are not.

#15 | Posted by vernon at 2008-09-18 12:03 AM


"I was only trying to answer her question as simply as possible."

The frightened conservatives would still be subjects of the British Crown were it not for liberals who had the GUTS to start a revolution.
You're welcome you bunch of frightened pussies.

#14 | Posted by danni


What "question"?

You're=your

"You're grasp of history is a skewed by your partisanship."

His grasp of history, such as it is, is skewed by a K-12 history project mentality. LOL!

Holy Crap when I read this "story" pun intended may scare conservatives I thought oh no ole joe is switching parties and plans to help McCain. He is already helping McCain by exposing Obama' s patriotic tax till it hurts plan. That's enough help we certainly don't want the gaff master on out side...

#33 | Posted by GibberishGenerator

Conservative=Hitler/Stalin/Mao
Liberal=Bell/Edison/Einstein.

Carry on.

Junk Science, but genes are the root of many behavioral characteristics. It may determine homosexual tendencies, but so does overcrowding.

Few of our characteristics have a single cause. Most are a combination of several genetic and environmental conditions. This makes them very difficult to study.

I have to disagree with the story.

I think most peoples political views are simply a product of upbringing. There may be other factors, such as life experiences, but for the most part, many are influenced by their family and community.

News flash.

The democratic party of JFK does exist today. Now it is called republican. Just go back and look at what he stood for, and at the time I thought he was a lib. JFK would be called a conservative today.

The democratic party of JFK does exist today. Now it is called republican. Just go back and look at what he stood for, and at the time I thought he was a lib. JFK would be called a conservative today.

#44 | Posted by Sniper at 2008-09-19 11:36 AM | Reply | Flag:

???

Peace Corps......so very republican!

Nice try, revisionist.

"I think most people's political views are simply a matter of upbringing." COMMONSENSE
Actually it is possible to tell if a child is a liberal or a conservative.
If a liberal child wakes up at night, believing that there is a monster in the closet, he will get out of bed, walk to the closet and open the door. If a conservative child wakes up at night, believing that there is a monster in the closet, he will scream, "Mommy, daddy, there's a monster in the closet." If the conservative child's parents are also conservatives then mommy will call 911 and daddy will get his shotgun. When the police show up and ask why someone called 911 over a monster in the closet, the conservative daddy will say, "It's your job. That's why I pay taxes (even though I don't want to)".
The liberal child learns that there is nothing to fear but fear itself. The conservative child learns to always be afraid.

The liberal child will go to the closet, open the door, push his father aside, and suck the mosters dick.
The republican child will assume it's Larry Craig and hope nobody notices he's a republican.

"JFK would be called a conservative today."

Marx was a conservative next to the current administration.

There are no conservatives today.

This appears to be an intelligent, professionally run scientific study. The results mirror the impression most people already instinctively have. Unfortunately, certain people take umbrage with the reflection this shines upon them. All I can say (once again) is that reality/truth sucks for those of a certain partisan persuasion.

The democratic party of JFK does exist today. Now it is called republican. Just go back and look at what he stood for, and at the time I thought he was a lib. JFK would be called a conservative today.

#44 | Posted by Sniper at 2008-09-19 11:36 AM | Reply |

I expect, Sniper, that what has actually happened is that YOU are "suddenly" 50 years older.

I find that the ideals of JFK are just as admirable in theory as they always were, and that we still have to reach for them. It's not about labels. Labels change. Idealism doesn't.

The right's doctrinaire haters are out in full force today, but indicate one thing with their frothings at the mouth: they lack even a clue as to what liberalism is about. Liberals of history have included Washington, Lincoln, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and surely Jesus. herm

There are no conservatives today.

#48 | Posted by Sully at 2008-09-19 11:58 AM

True Very True

-Sarge

let Blog God give you a hug.


I don't know why, but picture of Giant Fat-Laughing-Buddha flashed into my mind.

This guy here:

www.lotussculpture.com

More Fat-Buddha:

lh5.ggpht.com

aphs.worldnomads.com


lh4.ggpht.com


I bet he liked hugging people.

igm, I think you are confused. The lib will call 911 (the athorities) and hide under the covers. The conservative will go get his gun and take care of the problem.

I hope the authorities protect me even more from the conservative solving his problem with his gun. Now THAT is scary. herm

jgAlong,

Except it is a well documented fact that the BLUE States (Liberal) are subsidizing the RED States (Conservative).

Once again putting the lie to your otherwise cute little story.

-Rcade you really are the worst kind of queer.

That must be the kind that keeps turning that poster down......

"liberals are not afraid to insult God"

Your "God" insults himself.


igm, I think you are confused.

I am pretty sure WE all know who si confused here ...Sniper!


let Blog God give you a hug.


I don't know why, but picture of Giant Fat-Laughing-Buddha flashed into my mind.

#54 | Posted by Tosser at 2008-09-19 12:35 PM

Global Warming is just God (or maybe Buddha) giving us all a big warm hug!

So if this is "genetic" in nature I guess "praying" for the Rethugs to wake up and realize the error of their selfish ways is out of the question.

Guess it is back to the old fashion way of convincing them by getting in their face and arguing about the issues again!

gatewaypundit.blogspot.com


Difficult to insult a myth.

There are no conservatives today.

#48 | Posted by Sully

You got that right.

Some problems do solve best with a gun. Friend of mine ( a teacher in a penal institution, what can I say, he really does belive in the potential of rehabiliataion and repentance) had an inmate threaten to kill him when he got out.

My friend, a smart guy, decided he should respect this person's threat and made certain he was ready should something ever occur. Late one evening, he heard his doorglass break, followed by the door opening and someone running up his steps towards his bedroom. (Took maybe 3-5 seconds).

By the time the authorities arrived (about 4 minutes after his wife dialed 911)the intruder was filled with 45 cal rounds. He won't be breaking into any one elses homes or threatening to kill any one.

I'll take the gun to kill the monster, thank you.

Interesting to see how liberals jump on phoney science and believe in the safety of their own Kool-aid.

I am no liberal.. I am not even American... and I still think you're a ninny.

Doesn't that tell you that you are the proverbial frog in a well, happy listening to the sound of your own voice?

"phoney(sic) science"

Posted by takitez

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

moron flag

Another F in elementary reality.

Except it is a well documented fact that the BLUE States (Liberal) are subsidizing the RED States (Conservative).


Once again putting the lie to your otherwise cute little story.

#57 | Posted by nutcase


Don't be a moron.

Michigan is a "blue state", yet it has an awful lot of registered Republicans. Oakland county is one of the wealthiest counties in the country, and it is overwhelmingly Republican. Detroit, is a cesspool of poverty and is overwhelmingly Democratic. The fact is, the wealthy subsidize the poor. It's that simple. Which party considers the wealthy to be it's base?


Apply a modicum of critical thought and you'll see how stupid the blue-state vs. red-state argument really is.

TOSSER should go back to his regular hobby of exposing himself to the old ladies in Trafalgar Square and then tossing off in the ladies bathroom of the Britsh Museum.

I'm curious as to just how you can factor out gender, age, income, and education. But here's a quick list of all the things I'm not fearful of, while libs tend to be: global warming, Social Security insolvency, globalization, free trade, offshore drilling, nuclear power, the National Security Agency, being self-employed, FISA, deregulation, Dick Cheney, and wiretaps of non-US citizens.

I realize I'm speaking for myself, though. I'm sure that many liberals aren't really afraid of those things, either, they just use the rhetoric to get their base riled up.


"phoney(sic) science"


Posted by takitez


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


moron flag

#65 | Posted by Zatoichi
* * * *

Either "phony" or "phoney" is correct. Or is the moron flag flying over your house?

Nope, did not scare me!

But Jon Krosnick, a political science professor at Stanford University, said it was impossible to draw any conclusions from a study with so few people, all from a small Midwestern town.

Just more proof, that the only things liberals should do with the LA Times is use it to wipe their ass.

being self employed only sucks if you find yourself unable to purchase insurance for yourself do to preexisting health conditions. Deregulation seems to be having some pretty severe consequences. I think some checks and balances are needed to protect the balance. You obviously don't want your money stolen do you? When you go to the doctor you want strict guidelines as to who can practice medicine don't you? See RIR you need to think about what you say.

"The fact is, the wealthy subsidize the poor. It's that simple. Which party considers the wealthy to be it's base?"

Actually the middle class subsidizes both in addition to all sorts of overseas entities.

I personally don't want to subsidize anyone. But if I HAD to choose between the poor or corporations and their investors, I'd choose the poor in a heartbeat every time. They just blow their money immediately and it goes back into the economy anyway. Stats show that the rich are getting better and better at hoarding.


...and wiretaps of non-US citizens.

#69 | Posted by rightisright

what about wiretaps on US citizens?

I am "the other way round" having been brought up "Conservative" and gradually seeing the hypocrisy and selfishness of so-called "family values" all around me, and then thinking for myself "Wait a minute- these people are nuts".

#24 | Posted by sitdown at 2008-09-19 10:21 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

What sitdown is really saying is that he likes dicks.

TOSSER should go back to his regular hobby of exposing himself to the old ladies in Trafalgar Square and then tossing off in the ladies bathroom of the Britsh Museum.


I am NOT British you twit.

Never been there.

Thank you.

what about wiretaps on US citizens?

#74 | Posted by geezer1
* * * *
That's what warrants and courts are for. And nobody's proven that the administration has wiretapped on US citizens without a warrant.

And, if so, why hasn't the new Dem Congress done anything about it?

what about wiretaps on US citizens?

#74 | Posted by geezer1

What about them, see the RICO act.

"Either "phony" or "phoney" is correct. Or is the moron flag flying over your house?"

Posted by rightisright

1. Talk to the Firefox spellchecker.
2. The science is correct.


phony
4 dictionary results for: phony
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
phony /ˈfoʊni/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[foh-nee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation adjective, -nier, -niest, noun, plural -nies, verb, -nied, -nying.
adjective
1. not real or genuine; fake; counterfeit: a phony diamond.
2. false or deceiving; not truthful; concocted: a phony explanation.
3. insincere or deceitful; affected or pretentious: a phony sales representative.
noun
4. something that is phony; a counterfeit or fake.
5. an insincere, pretentious, or deceitful person: He thought my friends were a bunch of phonies.
verb (used with object)
6. to falsify; counterfeit; fabricate (often fol. by up): to phony up a document.

Nice laughing at you.

I have never read the word "phony" correctly spelled "phoney". Snarkiness aside, is there a context in which the word correctly may be spelled with an "e"?
(And please, no: "John dressed up as a telephone for halloween. He looked so phoney. He got best costume award.")


"Either "phony" or "phoney" is correct. Or is the moron flag flying over your house?"


Posted by rightisright


1. Talk to the Firefox spellchecker.
2. The science is correct.

#79 | Posted by Zatoichi at 2008-09-19 03:19 PM | Reply | Flag


Thanks for the spellcheck, now bring everybody some coffee!

phony /ˈfoʊni/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[foh-nee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation adjective, -nier, -niest, noun, plural -nies, verb, -nied, -nying.
adjective 1. not real or genuine; fake; counterfeit: a phony diamond.
2. false or deceiving; not truthful; concocted: a phony explanation.
3. insincere or deceitful; affected or pretentious: a phony sales representative.
noun 4. something that is phony; a counterfeit or fake.
5. an insincere, pretentious, or deceitful person: He thought my friends were a bunch of phonies.
verb (used with object) 6. to falsify; counterfeit; fabricate (often fol. by up): to phony up a document.

Also, phoney.
dictionary.reference.com

phoney
4 dictionary results for: phoney
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
phoney /ˈfoʊni/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[foh-nee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation adjective, -nier, -niest, noun, plural -neys, verb (used with object), -neyed, -neying.
phony.

Related forms
phoneyness, noun
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, Random House, Inc. 2006.
CITE THIS SOURCE|PRINT
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This phoney (fō'nē) Pronunciation Key
adj. & n.
Variant of phony.

dictionary.reference.com

1. Talk to the Firefox spellchecker.
2. The science is correct.

#79 | Posted by Zatoichi

* * * *

Why don't you? You're the one whose confidence in Firefox spellchecker is greater than that of the Random House Dictionary, and 4 others at Dictionary.com.

Besides, last I checked, "Barack Obama" doesn't make it past the Firefox spellchecker. That should give one pause, methinks.

From American Heritage:

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This phony also phoney (fō'nē) Pronunciation Key
adj. phonier, phoniest


Not genuine or real; counterfeit: a phony credit card.
False; spurious: a phony name.
Insincere or hypocritical.
Giving a false impression of truth or authenticity; specious.
Not honest or truthful; deceptive: a phony excuse.

Insincere or hypocritical.
Giving a false impression of truth or authenticity; specious.
* * * *

No need to apologize Zat. It was refreshing to see three posts in a row from you that doesn't link to Arhenius, or your peer-reviewed swimming pool thermometer.

I have never read the word "phony" correctly spelled "phoney". Snarkiness aside, is there a context in which the word correctly may be spelled with an "e"?

* * * *

Sure.

"Moder8 dressed up as an edudite person for Halloween. He looked so phoney. He won the best costume award."

What does "edudite" mean? Or does your dictionary also indicate that "edudite" is an alternative spelling for "erudite"?

(Thanks for making me laugh.)

Oops.

Let's see. Conservatives are alert to threats and more responsive to the environment. Liberals are like turkeys, acting as though there are no dangers, complacent and vulnerable to destruction.

Makes sense to me.

Here is an article titled "Anatomy of a Biased Headline". It starts out with:

"Let's start with a recent study funded by the National Science Foundation, in which researchers lay claim to this finding:
"Some Political Views May be Related to Physiology"
Science Magazine's actual headline was similarly non-insulting:
"Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits"

Then the headlines are replaced with their liberal bias. Eventually you even get this one:

"This Story May Scare Conservatives"

It is funny to look at each. Here is the link:
newsbusters.org

Here are a couple of the more comical ones:

"Conservatives Scare More Easily Than Liberals, Say Scientists"

"Voting Republican may be a survival response"

Enjoy!

I conducted my own experiment.

Here are my conclusions:
100% of conservatives are very intelligent and can use big words, while only 53% of liberals possess even a modicum of intelligence....they also have poor grooming habits.

Conservatives are more like to start out as cry babies.

Conservative used to mean "adhering to the tried and true ways of prudence and pragmatism"

How did it become about abortion and gay marriage while abandoning all pretense of conservatism fiscally?

The GOP did an 'AOL' on that. Used to be good, not any more.

Of course fear is basic to conservatism. The bottom line essential motivating factor of the rigid right is the overwhelming fear that some avenging army of blacks or Hispanics will march up from their ghettos and barrios and pee in the rich's gated community swimming pools. herm

Of course fear is basic to conservatism.

Once again, sheeple herm doesn't acknowledge that fear is employed by both sides of the political spectrum

I hope you break free of your flock one day, herm, and become a free thinker.

Good to have moments of fun at seeing liberals holding on to PHONY or PHONEY science and inflating their narcissistic egos. hehehehe.....

100! (hahaha!)

TOSSER is well known in the Land Down Under where he learned to "bend down under" far enough to suck his own c#ck. He also learned to do things with kiwi's that are too gross to talk about.


What is this nonsense?

I think everyone knows where I'm from.

Since our written language was created by us and continues to be modified by us all the time, there is no set in stone way of spelling any word.

Thus from now on, I will spell phony likr this: PHONEY. It is more phonetic and it reminds me of the modern day Phoneys who are on their cell phone all the time talking drivel.

No conservatives anymore? Actually, compared to virtually all other nations, the US hasn't got a political left. Republicans take a hard right approach, and Dem's just take a weak right approach. A true political hard left would be a communist party, with a weak left of a socialist party.

Of course, I'm only talking about what they claim to be - actually our "conservatives" lately have been incredibly on the tax-and-spend side of things fiscally ever since the neo-cons took over the republican party. The trouble is that all the spending is on third-world nation type concerns that benefit only those already rich or those who like serving in the military at wartime. At least some liberal spending would be economically beneficial to the country instead of a few rich bastards, saudi arabia, and china, as the current administration has made it.

The funny part of it all is that our "liberal" side is now the more protectionist, our conservative side more guilty of flagrant deficit spending. Meanwhile, true to the part of siding with the rich, republicans policies are breaking our economy because they fear regulation, which is simply a set of rules to play by. Apparently conservatives also fear history books, where it warns about fat cat economics, and what happens when you don't have firm anti-trust laws and such.

Here's another thing to look at - ever wonder why our prison population and recividism rate are so vastly higher than other westernised nations? It really started to break the camel's back when we started hard-line republican "tough-on-crime" legislation that just said, "we're scared of criminals, lock them up and give them nothing more to live for. Make it harder for them to get jobs, lose the stigma or anything else, and maybe it will make less crimes happen." Yet had we taken a less terrified "liberal" approach, we could have been looking at canadian or european crime levels, by simply paying attention to consequences of such legislation - ie when it's tough to get a job and prison doesn't care about rehabilitation or teaching skills, going back to crime is just a whole lot easier.

That's where conservative fear is the problem - conservatism as pragmatism is useful, it keeps some common sense in among the idealism, but when it becomes a knee-jerk fear reaction with no attention to consequences, you get exactly the negative impact we've been seeing all along with the bush admin.

Comments are closed for this entry.
Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2008 World Readable