Yes... for fucks sake we all have seen the Daily Show...

Good God, you liberal assclowns must really think nobody else gets Comedy Central...

Aren't all parties guilty of hypocrisy?

Aren't all parties guilty of hypocrisy?

#2 | Posted by 51773 at 2008-09-04 01:23 PM | Reply

link?

If you look at the link-wobbles-you'll note that it has nothing to do with the Daily show-I linked to an article at Buzzflash.

You can go back to pleasuring yourself with a cattle prod now...

link to what? It wasn't a declaration. It was a question. (check out the punctuation)

Aren't all parties guilty of hypocrisy?

----

Yes.

Don't forget to watch Obama tonight (Thursday) on FOX's "The "O'Reilly Factor."

Should be interesting to see if O'Reilly takes a tough stance or conducts a civil interview. Smart move on Obama's part as O'Reilly kept hinting Obama was too intimidated to go on his show. Also, it gives some of the far right who are terrified to read or watch any media that isn't "GOP-approved" to actually hear what Obama has to say.

Note in last night's Republican speeches NOT ONE of the issues (millions of jobs outsourced, the real estate loan debacle, millions of Americans without health insurance, etc.) concerning Americans was ever brought up once. Only war and a a subtle promise of a continuation of the Neocon war agenda.

Obama hit all the issues in his speech in Denver. I had been waiting for specifics from him and I got them in his speech last week. Let's hear what McCain has to say tonight about all the issues concerning Americans -- or will it be more war, 9-11, and the endless Republican playing of the "terror card."

Should be interesting to see if O'Reilly takes a tough stance or conducts a civil interview.

Well he should be civil... that's without question.

But if he doesn't ask him tough questions I think his viewers will be really pissed. I don't mean questions about being a Muslim or Wright, but about taxes, experience, policies....

what time is the interview??

It starts at 10 pm Eastern

shiiiiite!
i'll be on an airplane going home :(

i'll have to youtube it.

(I cant do this.)
I have no idea what time it comes on. I was being deceitful.

Aren't all parties guilty of hypocrisy?

Yes.

#6 | Posted by Pirate at 2008-09-04 01:59 PM | Reply

link

link to what? It wasn't a declaration. It was a question. (check out the punctuation)

#5 | Posted by 51773 at 2008-09-04 01:51 PM | Reply

If it was a question, it would have read--Are all parties guilty of hypocrisy?

Your statement of--Are not all parties guilty of hypocrisy?--is a rhetorical question on your part,meaning you already know the answer--or so you think.

So.

Link?

link

----

Wait, let me create a YouTube video.

What time is the [Obama/O'Reilly] interview??

#9 | Posted by klifferd at 2008-09-04 03:19 PM

5:00 p.m. and repeated again at 8:00 p.m. (PST)

If you're not in PST then I don't know what time it's on where you live -- probably the same time everywhere. Google O'Reilly's show, maybe his website will provide you with a schedule.

Your statement of--Are not all parties guilty of hypocrisy?--is a rhetorical question on your part,meaning you already know the answer--or so you think.

wow. I had no idea I was So wrong. thanks for setting me straight.
Ok. I am going to try and do this again, but slowly:
Are.......all........parties.
.....guilty........of........
....hypocrisy?

(How's that, teach?)

Your statement of--Are not all parties guilty of hypocrisy?--is a rhetorical question on your part, meaning you already know the answer--or so you think.
I just re-read the banter. Statements, are not questions. Questions end in a question mark. Statements don't. Are you sure you want to try and teach? Or is this just another example of why we have to get the Libs out of the schools?

Aren't all parties guilty of hypocrisy?
#2 | Posted by 51773 at 2008-09-04 01:23 PM | Reply

link?

#3 | POSTED BY BUFFALO_BOB

In all seriousness, you want a link Bob?

Would it be appropriate for Obama to call Bill out on his documented hatred for teenage moms?

"Bill, after hearing what you have said regarding teen pregnencies in the past, I can understand your resentment towards me and my family."

wow. I had no idea I was So wrong. thanks for setting me straight.
Ok. I am going to try and do this again, but slowly:
Are.......all........parties.
.....guilty........of........
....hypocrisy?

(How's that, teach?)

link?

Does the question mark after the word link denote a statement, or question? what are your punctuation rules again?

Do you know what the word "hypo9crisy" means? Your link doesn't show any hypocrisy on Obamas part. It shows Obama saying the Surge was a success. Where do you think the hypocrisy is in that statement?

Does the question mark after the word link denote a statement, or question? what are your punctuation rules again?

#24 | Posted by 51773 at 2008-09-04 06:49 PM

You read, but you didn't comprehend. Here's some free education.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
American Heritage Dictionary
rhetorical question

n. A question to which no answer is expected, often used for rhetorical effect.

American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
rhetorical question

A question posed without expectation of an answer but merely as a way of making a point: You don't expect me to go along with that crazy scheme, do you?--

WordNet
rhetorical question

noun
a statement that is formulated as a question but that is not supposed to be answered;
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You can thank me for your boost in knowledge any time it is convenient.

;-)

uh, I wrote it, and news flash, I wanted it to be the type you answer. So, if you read carefully, (put on your glasses, or have someone read it to you), I formed it the second time, as a regular question. You've chosen not to answer it, because you are afraid of answering it truthfully, which would mean you condemn your party as well, and yet you don't wish to appear to be a hypocrite either. So youve chosen to remain silent on an answer. Which shows your true character.

Upon review, I actually wrote it exactly as you did when you proudly showed me how to form a question.
Can't even answer your own questions huh?
(#14 is where you taught me)
(#17 is where I copied what you wrote)
So you see Buffalo Betty, the only thing you have taught me, to which I am truly grateful, is I should not argue with stubborn ______s.
Good night.
(or should that be oink oink?)

I thought O'Reilly sunk as low as he could when he said that he wouldn't trust or support Bush anymore if there were no WMDs in Iraq and then went back on it when it was found out that there were no WMDs in Iraq.

You see, he was trying to have convictions and say that sending us into a war for reasons that weren't true would be a huge betrayal or at least a tremendous blunder. But when faced with the reailty that this is exactly what "his side" had done, he threw away that small scrap of integrity and decided to become an emptyheaded shill instead.

Sully,

I hear that all the time on the radio, pinheads promising to move out of the US if a certain candidate wins. Then when it is time to put up or shut up they say "I was just kidding".

Bloviating is not just limited to politicians.

Did watch Obama on O'Rielly last night. O'Rielly attacked him for taking a hard stance against Pakistan, going so far to say "No administration is going to put troops on the ground in Pakistan."

Memo to Bill O.... check today's news.

Hey guys and gals check out this video. Damn funny and Jon Stewart Rocks!

'O'Rielly attacked him for taking a hard stance against Pakistan, going so far to say "No administration is going to put troops on the ground in Pakistan."

Memo to Bill O.... check today's news.'

You'd figure guys who are wrong this often would stop making grand pronouncements but being wrong all the time doesn't faze them.

Now let me be clear folks, Olbermann can be just as crazy from time to time as Billo. Anyone who saw his face when he had Mikey Moore on the other day can agree. Moore had some off the wall answer and Olbermann's jaw practically hit the floor and he was speechless for a few seconds before moving on. Moore seems to be so far left I think he fell off the wagon.

You've chosen not to answer it, because you are afraid of answering it truthfully,

#27 | Posted by 51773 at 2008-09-05 12:11 AM | Reply | Flag

As stated--you seem to already know the answer. It was a rhetorical question. If you think I don't answer because to answer truthfully would damage the party or my stance--that proves the point. Yep--seems you think you know the answer.

My answer is no--the democrats are not hypocrites on their platform. If you disagree---

Link?

Moore seems to be so far left I think he fell off the wagon.

#33 | Posted by mdloftroad at 2008-09-05 09:26 AM | Reply |

Got a point? What position of Moore is Too Far Left for you?

Bill O'Reilly was pushy and rude in last night's interview with Obama and kept trying to put words in Obama's mouth about the surge "being a winner" in Iraq. O'Reilly also didn't want to let Obama (who was polite throughout the interview) even finish an answer. No wonder no one wants to show up on O'Reilly -- what an arrogant sob.

I hope when Part 2 airs next week that Obama is as aggressive back to O'Reilly as O'Reilly had been confrontational towards Obama.

O'Reilly (whom I do enjoy watching at times, btw) = pompous sob in Obama interview.

My answer is no--the democrats are not hypocrites on their platform. If you disagree---

----

It's easy Bob. Politicians include the Dems complain about other parties using half truths or misleading. Yet they do the same thing. That makes them hypocrites.

Pirate

Show me a "for instance" that is a grievous as those shown on the Daily Show.

Hillary Clinton campaign manager Terry McAuliffe also attacked McCain's speech, which pitted Obama's proposed policies against his own. McCullough said that McCain distorted Obama's record and that many of the statements he made were "patently false."

An Obama ad running in Michigan claims McCain didn't support loan guarantees for the auto industry. In fact, he does support them.
Summary

A new Obama ad targeted to Michigan voters says McCain "refused to support loan guarantees for the auto industry."

That was true, but it's not now and it wasn't when this ad was made. Yet the ad doesn't mention McCain's changed position on government support for the carmakers.

Pirate
Have you seen the Daily Show clip? Your links are nothing close to the hypocrisy shown by Rove, Oreilly, and company.

Your links do not show hypocrisy.

Bob's been brainwashed and doesn't see the dot.

----
hypocrite
One entry found.

hypocrite

Main Entry:
hypocrite Listen to the pronunciation of hypocrite
Pronunciation:
ˈhi-pə-ˌkrit
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin hypocrita, from Greek hypokritēs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
Date:
13th century

1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion 2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
hypocrite adjective

Pirate

Where do you see the "distortions about others"?

Can you read English? Number two says a person makes a statement, and then makes a contradictory statement. Nothing about "distortions" at all. Distortions have nothing to do with hypocrisy. Distortions are not metnioned in the definition you provided. Maybe you should read it.

Bob,

Do you read? Let me repeat the definition.

2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

- Members of Dem party condemn distortions.
- Condemn means to declare to be reprehensible, wrong, or evil usually after weighing evidence and without reservation (taken from websters online).
- Members of Dem party then distort. See www.factcheck.org for those distortions.

They do what they condemn.

They act in contraction to stated belief.

Do you see the flash?

Pirate

Post a link.

Can you figure out how to do it? Try to post a link after you figure out what hypocrisy means.

P O S T

A

L I N K

I already did...you're just too partisan to see it.

An Obama ad running in Michigan claims McCain didn't support loan guarantees for the auto industry. In fact, he does support them.
Summary

A new Obama ad targeted to Michigan voters says McCain "refused to support loan guarantees for the auto industry."

That was true, but it's not now and it wasn't when this ad was made. Yet the ad doesn't mention McCain's changed position on government support for the carmakers.

Pirate

That would be a simple lie--not hypocrisy.

You see--rove makes a direct contradictory statement as to what was said about choosing a VP.

OReilly made a direct contradictory statement about pregnant teens and their parents.

The two fat clowns made ditect contrdictory statements about women in politics being held to male standards.

Pftaneouar made direct contradictory statements about women running for politics and feminism.

Lies or distortions are not examples of hypocrisy. Flip flopping is not hypocrisy either. Saying one pregnant teens parents are Pinheads and another pregnant teens parents deserve respect and privacy--that's hypocrisy.

That would be a simple lie--not hypocrisy.

----

So are the Dems ok with lying?

Yes, and they are liars.
No, and they are hypocrites.

You choose.

Besides...

The Obama ad hammers McCain for the spot, saying the Arizona Senator is "shameful" for "makin' stuff up,"

Lies or distortions are not examples of hypocrisy

-----

You've proved me wrong, Bob.

I didn't think anybody could be so blinded by partisanship and devoid of any logic and reasoning.

But you've proved me wrong because you have shown that you are.

Pirate

No one bitches about the lies politicians tell about each others record. That is standard operating procedures. Facts are lies are not hypocrisy, and distortions are not hypocrisy. That's why theyhave different names--there is a different meaning to the words.

That you don't know the difference is your problem.

I guess that's why you can't provide a link--only call names. Typical republican ploy when having your ass handed to you.

I guess that's why you can't provide a link--only call names. Typical republican ploy when having your ass handed to you.

----

Ha!

You're the one who doesn't know the meaning of hypocrisy.

Condemning an action and then doing said action is hypocrisy.

Condemning lying and then lying is hypocrisy.

hypocrisy (h-pkr-s)
n. pl. hypocrisies
1. The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.
Obama campaign professes belief that lies and distortions are wrong yet lies and distorts
2. An act or instance of such falseness.

No one bitches about the lies politicians tell about each others record. That is standard operating procedures

----

And the other thing that you fail to realize is Obama is running on a CHANGE platform. CHANGE does not following the standard operating procedures.

So either Obama's not following his own platform or it's BS and he's a typical politician using the standard operating procedures.

While you two argue about definitions, how bout we discuss the Repubs refusal to let their VP choice sit down and take part in the oldest tradition of modern American politics...the Sunday morning news/interview programs.
You know, Face the Nation, Meet the Press etc.
O'riley was cryin cause he claimed Obama was duckin his show.
Hell, Saray the Abstainator wont talk with anybody.

You can smell the fear.

Moosekiller is scared of questions.

"Moosekiller is scared of questions."

Ah, but is OldWhiskeySour and the press afraid of Moosekiller?

NO ONLY REPUBLICANS!