Shhhhhh. Don't point out the hypocrisy of the right. Their little heads might just explode.

Lol, it's just such stunning hypocrisy it has to make you laugh!

I like how Papa Bear calls out Spears sister getting pregnant as an utter failure of parenting, and that Palin's pregnant teen is 'a private matter'.

LOL!!!!!! No sir, if it's a failure for Spears, it's a failure for Palin. This is exactly why this story has legs.

It is sad in that the wingdings will line up to defend Palin after verbally attacking Spears and Clinton.

The Daily Show???????

Oooooh lets attack the messenger because we can't attack the message.

SOP of the GOP.

Does it make the message less true Eric?

The Daily Show???????

#4 | Posted by shirtsbyeric at 2008-09-04 12:10 PM | Reply

I think I saw Rove talking. I'm pretty sure that was O'Reilly talking. That sure looked like Fptadffenaur talking out of both sides of her mouth. Just because the Daily Show has the integrity to put this on when our major news outlets owned and operated by the right won't touch it--you think it is false? Deal with reality. These people are who YOU are. They are who and what YOU support. Now the hot librarian at the end could have been a hooker, so you may have a point there.

Redneckville

Your title sucks. It won't draw the attention this thread deserves. Get some imagination next time. I was going to post this under--

Rove on Palin

Microcephalics of the world unite. You too can have a voice denigrating a pregant girl and her family. You can bet the farm that this situation does not occur with much frequency in Saudi Arabia.

It's the fault of the society, the freedom we extend to youngsters to mingle unescorted during a period that their hormones are surging. Possibly some of you people never had much of a sex drive and so don't understand the irresistible attraction. Then again, you might just not have any compunctions regarding throwing stones.

We could use the Islamic burkha related method to prevent unmarried teen-age pregancy. You know, no young girl unescorted by a male family member, and live in a tent that provides no definition so that there is no particular attraction. Al;though an Arab friend of mine told me that burkhas provided a perfect cover for liaisons as a female participant in a tryst could not be as readily identified.

Or the more reasonable Latino method could be used, one that takes note of biological reality, and require girls of a certain age not be permitted to be in the presence of males without a duena present. It's quite romantic. A squeezed hand, a flickering eye. But those are the flirtations of yesteryear, not scoring.

I wonder that the left is so condemnatory when it espouses sexual freedom, and was in the forefront of the sexual freedom movement. This is what happens. Set the mark where you will. Just keep in mind that biology trumps ideology.

You can wonder where thre "n"s went. Pregnancy.

I have stated this on several threads, as have others, the conservatives here just don't seem to get it or refuse to hear it.

All this scrutiny of Palin and her Bun in the Oven daughter is of the republicans own making. They have over the last few elections made personal and family morals (sex) a huge fucking issue. They have claimed some imaginary high ground only to act like total hypocrites when the table is turned. So game on, I hope the media does not let this die, and next time any con with even the smallest skeleton in the closet will think twice before opening their big mouths.