I'm bored. I'll argue with for a bit.
"I said the Olmecs were black, not aliens. This is the link."
...sigh. I liked to an image of ALL of them, side by side, for a reason. Don't send us back to a page with a bunch of different angle shots of the same few. When you look at ALL of them, they're just a bunch of heads with helmets on. When you look at three or four of them, gosh they do look the people who always inhabited Brazil. Whom do, in fact, resemble the Africans that evolved in a similar climate. People from similar climates evolving to look the same? Nah, that's not what happened, there was one underlying civilization, right? The whole climate thing's just a coincidence.
However, if you look at ALL of the heads.. the similarities stop quickly. My booger link is better then your booger link, because mine shows all the boogers. Yours just shows the three or four that fit the conclusion you already arrived at.
As for the holes:
I can't believe I actually have to spell this out to you: The holes are all over the place, and proof of grave robbers as well. We are trying to dig without destroying. However, we ARE sure it was a burial ground. It's all linked out from the wikipedia article I sent you to. Let me go ahead and give you the relevant sentence which you can footnote from.
"Despite precautions such as covering the entrance hole with casing and the portcullises, thieves had bypassed all the barriers even before the Old Kingdom had ended"
Can you understand that? They dug through the soft limestone casing before the pyramid was sealed. I know that doesn't fit your vision of the pyramids being laser weapons, but it's what the actual evidence suggests when taken objectively. I realize I must also hold your hand and guide you directly to where it explains that we know how they were built.
en.wikipedia.org
While I'm doing that let's also hold your hand and guide you to Brazilians who were conquering most of the area at the time:
en.wikipedia.org
Instead of coming to a conclusion and seeing only what you want to see; try looking at all of it. Try watching that Nova special if you would like it summarized neatly. It's actually available on torrent (I got slapped on the wrist last time I linked to a torrent in cruel days.. so set sail for bays frequented by pirates, yarr!)
Realize this: it's not a giant conspiracy. Nova just plain tells the truth as it is known at the time, and admitting to ignorance where we don't yet know the truth. They always have. They're not telling the truth on everything except your one pet cause; they just report the facts. Please try to understand: the fine people at Nova (and also National Geographic) have no reason to lie. None. In fact, both organizations even openly admit when something is not yet understood. They're not afraid to look stupid. Watch one of their shows about subatomic particles sometime. They basically say "We don't have the slightest idea why these things work, and the science is in it's infancy. Everyone thinks everyone else is a crackpot."
Why would they be willing to admit that for other things, but not your one pet project? Be careful how you answer, unless you want me to quite legitimately paint you with the "unthinking zealot" brush again.
It's not insult. I am stating a plain fact: you quite openly suggest that everyone is lying about your hidden truth. You believe you possess forbidden knowledge.
That is one of the key definitions of "zealotry".