Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

Brian Beutler, a progressive blogger for the Media Consortium, was shot and seriously injured during a mugging last night in Washington, D.C.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Links

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Good headline RCADE, you got my attention. I thought the revolution had started. Now I have to put all my gear away, but it was a good readiness drill.

Poster FWTHOM, ready to kill the unarmed over political views.

NOW THAT'S A REAL MAN FOR YA!

Good headline RCADE, you got my attention. I thought the revolution had started. Now I have to put all my gear away, but it was a good readiness drill.

Posted by fwthom


fwthom's gear

"Now I have to put all my gear away, but it was a good readiness drill.

Posted by fwthom"

Fwthom's gear: www.juvenileclothing.com


I wonder if it the same people who attacked Rhandi Rhodes? Wasn't that in DC as well?

25/100,000. The murder capital of the country. Iraq is only 1/25.

HE SHOULD HAVE USED A CAR ANTENNEA LIKE BB...HE WOULD HAVE BEEN OK

Is this going to be the same as the "Rhandi Rhodes Mugged" thread?

If Thom were to go to war over a liberal blogger being shot, which side would he serve? herm

You know the old saying:

Live by the sword, die by the crackhead.

If Thom were to go to war over a liberal blogger being shot, which side would he serve? herm

He's got the 101/BLT out-he'd tell whether they asked or not.

If only he had a handgun. Oh yeah they are illegal in DC. Unless you plan to use it in a crime. Not sure there is a ban on that use.


If only he had a handgun. Oh yeah they are illegal in DC. Unless you plan to use it in a crime. Not sure there is a ban on that use.

Posted by crispee_oc at 2008-07-02 07:03 PM | Reply | Flag


This same problem will be around in 500 years, or 5000 years. You pants pissers have to give rights to criminals to carry guns.

The guy who shot the blogger has every right to own that gun--thanks to morons like you.

Morons who think a gun is protection. Frightened, little, people.

Why does someone rob another for their Cell phones?

Money--a watch--your shoes--certainly a wallet, but a cell phone?

Thankfully he is going to be ok.

THATS WHAT HAPPEN WHEN UNARMED PEOPLE ALLOW THE CRIMINAL WITH A ILLEGAL GUN TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION

No Joe Horns in DC???

If only Barack had allocated funds from the Joyce Foundation to DC. They are against gun violence you know.

Joe Horn = OJ

THOSE GODDAMNED ACTIVIST JUDGES!!!!

www.drudge.com

I am going to lend him my ninja car antennae so he will be safe in the future.

A gun where did the mugger get a gun in the safest city in the world with a total ban? Now maybe the victims can shoot back and stop this plague

"If only he had a handgun. Oh yeah they are illegal in DC."

Ahem! Why does no one set The Crisper straight? Say "Scalia." herm

Ok this story has to be made up!!!! I mean there hasnt been a GUN in DC in 30 years right!

Joe Horn = Hereo

I am sorry but can't you see that a CAR ANTENNAE would have stopped this from happening?????????

If only he had valued his cell phone over human life, he would have been able to kill.
Funny, didn't your hero Jesus value life over all? Wasn't he willing to give his life rather than stoop to the level of his oppressors?

The guy who shot the blogger has every right to own that gun--thanks to morons like you.

Yea,

If he knew it was illegal, he wouldnt have used a gun...opps, it is illegal in D.C. Did that stop him from shooting that man? So what makes you think banning my gun would have stopped this man?

If only he had a handgun. Oh yeah they are illegal in DC. Unless you plan to use it in a crime. Not sure there is a ban on that use.

Posted by crispee_oc at 2008-07-02 07:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

Handguns are only legal in DC if you plan to use them in a crime? Hmmmmmmmm.....I'll have to check on that, but I'll bet you're wrong.

Joe Horn = Hereo

Posted by GotTruth at 2008-07-02 07:36 PM | Reply | Flag

Hereo? Is than a Hero who eats too many Oreos?

If he knew it was illegal, he wouldnt have used a gun...opps, it is illegal in D.C. Did that stop him from shooting that man? So what makes you think banning my gun would have stopped this man?

Posted by boaz

Who says having gun would have helped you?

In 99% of the cities in America, you'd have to have a concealed weapons permit (which are hard to come by unless you carry large amounts of cash, precious gems, or are in law enforcement), be fast enough to pull it out of your shoulder holster with a gun in your face, and shoot the other guy first, then pray he doesn't shoot you because you have a gun.

Hope this blogga boi is gonna be okay.

Spleens are kinda neccessary.

As AU sez the problem with conceal carry is that in the scenario above the mugger had the drop on the guys.

Mugger: Give me yer cellphone.

Muggee: Careful, I have a gun.

Mugger: Okay, give me yer gun too.

That sed, Spud is cognizant of the fact that the DC gun ban has, over the last thirty years, only really affected the non criminal element and that really isn't fair.

Honest law abiding citizens deserve the choice to try and defend themselves legally with a gun. Concealed Carry laws need to be relaxed to allow folk who aren't toting diamonds or large whacks of cash around to qualify.

Deth is lefty Spud on most issues but pro-gun here.

Be Well.

/Yes, in case you were wondering that was dethspud, the DR's very own Tater o' Doom, entering the realm of the blog-god once again, as ya do,
stage left.

I have a Glock 9 right near the bed. However, I feel no need to carry it to Kroger

A leftist is a conservative that hasn't been mugged.

This dude will take a distinct shift to the right!

A conservative is a pants pisser who would let the actions of a street thug mold his beliefs about the world.

The guy who shot the blogger has every right to own that gun--thanks to morons like you.

Those morons were our founding fathers, bOoB. I'm proud to say I'm a moron like Thomas Jefferson.

I will feel a lot better once the car antenna ban is lifted in D.C.. None of this would have ever happened if reasonable, competent people were allowed to defend themselves with car antennae in a proper manner.

When car antennaes are outlawed, only outlaws will have car antennaes. The rest of us will have to sing to ourselves.

When car antennaes are outlawed, only outlaws will have car antennaes. The rest of us will have to sing to ourselves.

Posted by goatman

They'll have to pry my car antenna from my cold, dead, rear window.

NAA - National Antenna Association: Fighting for your right to clear, static free radio!

By the way, EVERYONE is in favor of gun control. It's a matter of degrees. The NRA would like you to believe that it's a 'yes or no' issue because an atmosphere of paranoia keeps their coffers filled.

fwthom, your side would loose as soon as you took 1 casualty, you'd be running home to your girlie boyfriend. Quit pretending to be a man.
Just the fact that you had to put your " gear " away let the cat out of the bag. Real men always have their gear at the ready.

You know what they say, " it's best to have a gun and not need it, than to need a gun and not have it ". As long as there are liberal politicians raping the American people with oppressive taxation to redistribute our wealth to those who don't belong here, we will uphold the right to own guns.
I think you worthless libs dodged the bullet last week, I believe there would have been some major unrest around this country, and real Americans would have taken this country back, once and for all.

The framers of our U.S. Constitution knew that human liberal debris existed, and would subvert our rights and our laws with a liberal brain fucked Suprme Court.


Save America, Shoot a Liberal!


A conservative is a pants pisser who would let the actions of a street thug mold his beliefs about the world.

Posted by RastaCyborg at 2008-07-02 08:34 PM | Reply


OMG! I just spewed my coffee over my keyboard when I read that.
Talk about someone who doesn't have his facts straight.
The #1 rule for liberals IS the knee jerk twist.


rwd

"OMG! I just spewed my coffee over my keyboard when I read that."

Sure you did. I guess when you can't think, cliches will have to do.


The NRA would like you to believe that it's a 'yes or no' issue because an atmosphere of paranoia keeps their coffers filled.

Posted by RastaCyborg at 2008-07-02 09:04 PM | Reply | Flag:


That is complete bullshit comming from an uninformed fool and a tool.
Fool.

rwd

But I am paranoid. Liberals are no goddam good. Frag the fuckers!

Holy shit. Nominate this for the biggest dipshit post award of the week.

"This same problem will be around in 500 years, or 5000 years. You pants pissers have to give rights to criminals to carry guns."

Who gives rights to criminals to carry guns? NO ONE. They carry them anyway asshole, hence the term "criminal."

"The guy who shot the blogger has every right to own that gun--thanks to morons like you."

No he doesn't fuck head. Chances are that gun is not legally bought or owned.

"Morons who think a gun is protection. Frightened, little, people."

Or cognisant little people who understand self defense to be a basic right. I'd take being shot with the option of returning fire to being shot and hoping he does'nt put one in my head while I'm down any day. The fact that there may be returned fire is enough to make any scumbag think twice. But hey, if you're cool hoping a mugger is content to leave you to die bleeding out on a sidewalk instead of finishing the job, well it's your right to die on your knees like a bitch just as it's my right to do society a favor and take the fucker with me.

makes me wounder if the stupid liberal was in the wrong place, or how come the liberals are not protecting the shooter? You know with phrases like he was a victem of his enviroment, not his fault he couldnt help himself, we should try and rehabe him. lets give him some counceling and try and correct his problem. Me im all for packing a 45 in the shoulder holster and a small one in the pocket with my hand on the trigger, shoot first ask questions later. RWD dont you know they dont understand the word fool, their to stupid to insult.

their to stupid to insult

~Gen Shroom-man

Bwa hahahahahahahahahaha!

Honestly, their self retorting retorts make making fun of folk like Sherm here, quite, quite redundant.

Be Well.

Spudnut is that the best you can muster?

Posted by RastaCyborg at 2008-07-02 08:34 PM

A conservative is a pants pisser who would let the actions of a street thug mold his beliefs about the world.

No Rasta, the conservative already had beliefs based on realistic appraisal of the world.

The mugging of the lefty might just provide him with data so that he could engage in a reality check. It might amplify his data base, and then he could make a more informed decision.

Maybe gun bans should be based on race since it appears that gun crimes are disproportionately committed by black people. Is it "racist" to note what is a fact? D.C., the black city. New Orleans, the Chocolate City. Detroit. St. Louis. Is there a geographical pattern? Is there a pattern by neighborhood? Is there a racial pattern?

...is that the best you can muster?

~General Charmin'

Ha! Spud was just gonna ask you the same thing.

Maybe gun bans should be based on race since it appears that gun crimes are disproportionately committed by black people. Is it "racist" to note what is a fact?

~Tiny Johnson

Gun crimes are disproportionally committed by poorer people.

There are many black folks who qualify as such and there are many other races as well.

It's not a race thing it's an economic thing.

There is a direct corelation between poverty and crime in case you hadn't figured out this fact.

Maybe America should take better care of it's citizenry and quit making the playing field tilt towards those that have and away from those that don't.

Become less socially Darwinistic and inequitable.

Become more progressive and fair.

And yes, in case you were wondering, you are a racist fuck.

Anybody with half a brain around here will verify this fact fer you, if ya like.

Be Well.

Most gun crimes are committed by criminals with Johnsons not vaginas.

What the fuck does this guy expect? DC is some of the worst crime in the USA, and its all because of VERY liberal democrat policies which have dominated it for decades.

He lost his spleen, and be probably still thinks he is doing the right thing being progressive.

That is the definition of insane. He still didn't learn.

KUma

So spud nut you would take from thouse whom have worked hard to get to where they are and give to the scum to dumb or lazy to earn it.

"So spud nut you would take from thouse whom have worked hard to get to where they are and give to the scum to dumb or lazy to earn it.

Posted by GenSherman"


Priceless. Simply priceless.

Posted by dethspud at 2008-07-03 12:40 AM

~Tiny Johnson

Gun crimes are disproportionally committed by poorer people.

There are many black folks who qualify as such and there are many other races as well.

It's not a race thing it's an economic thing.

There is a direct corelation between poverty and crime in case you hadn't figured out this fact.


Okay, Deth, but there is a disproportionate number of "poor blacks" as compared to "poor whites," committing crimes.

Er, ah.

Continue with your apologetics and avoid dealing with the reality by trying to deploy a smoke screen.

Maybe America should take better care of it's citizenry and quit making the playing field tilt towards those that have and away from those that don't.

Become less socially Darwinistic and inequitable.

Become more progressive and fair.


Why would there be as you claim, a disproportionate number of "poor blacks," people who eschew learning in schools and other preparation that would enable them to participate as productive members of society, and disparage those blacks who do try to acquire an education, as "acting white?" Can it be that it is a defense of a sense of self-worth by people who cannot master the curriculum?

Are you a socialist? Or is it Marxist communist thought that you embrace? "From each according to his abilities. To each according to his needs."

It turns out, Deth, that Marx's analysis of the human conditiion was off, and that following his line did not create a productive society but only a repressive one. Oh? Somehow "pure communism" was never achieved. Could it be that human nature is not in accord with Marxist theory.

And yes, in case you were wondering, you are a racist fuck.

I'm "a racist" because I suggest that there be an unbiased examination of data and reasonable conclusions drawn, and put to the prediction test, and rationale reality based solutions developed to deal with anomalies if they exist?

I have not suggested that black people be harmed, but rather that realistic programs be developed to maintain blacks, who may be distiguished as a social group. I think that black intelligence pretty well runs the gamut in relation to individuals acquiring abilities. What I have questioned is the distribution of such capabilities. For you, unless reality conforms to your ideological template, it is to be disputed.

You indicate you have an antipathy to "racism," whatever that is to you. And yet, you support Obama, who has a history as an active hate-monger, and an associate of hate-mongers advancing ideas of racial preference, alienated from mainstream society, and proclaiming "God damn America.".

Anybody with half a brain around here will verify this fact fer you, if ya like.

Was yes Deth, you've demonstrated the ideational ability of a person with half a brain, and that's the conclusion that you've reached. Others similarly situated and endowed may simulate your thought processes and arrive at the same conclusion.

In addition to your intellectual dysfunction, you seem to suffer from emotional distress that precludes your ability to view reality. Adopt an appropriate motto. How about for lefties, "Taboos 'R Us."


I just dont see why people freak out over THE GUN, not the criminal scum who use them to maliciously harm the innocent. Would you Blame the spoon for the persons weight? Would you blame the No.2 Pencil for only getting a 23 on your ACTs? Do you blame the Carpenters Hammer and saw for your lop-sided house? Come on people. You got a brain, use logic! The gun cant make a decision, can do risk analysis, cant "jones" for a fix! PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE. And just not with guns, we have been doing it for THOUSANDS of years with blades, bricks, ropes, shit our BARE HANDS, and if you think we are just gunna flip a switch and stop, I would like to smoke whatever you are cause its gotta be good.

Johnson is not racist for making an observation. But every Mc comment Spud makes is. Spud should go to a bar in South Boston and toss his McWhatever terms around and even a handgun wouldn't save him.

Johnson is not racist for making an observation. But every Mc comment Spud makes is

Well this is a yellow dog blog after all. Different rules for different teams.

which are hard to come by unless you carry large amounts of cash, precious gems, or are in law enforcement),

Funny, I didnt see those as prerequisits in my right to own a gun. And I wonder if this liberals was carrying any of those and he still got robbed.

Gottruth,

I bet NO liberal responds to that post, it's too logical..

I just dont see why people freak out over THE GUN, not the criminal scum who use them to maliciously harm the innocent. Would you Blame the spoon for the persons weight? Would you blame the No.2 Pencil for only getting a 23 on your ACTs? Do you blame the Carpenters Hammer and saw for your lop-sided house? Come on people. You got a brain, use logic!
GOTTRUTH

Americans and critical thinking skills have been going their separate ways for years now, thanks to dumbing down via the public school system and media censorship.

Funny, I didnt see those as prerequisits in my right to own a gun.

Maybe if you went back and read the entire post instead of what fits your talking point you will see how wrong your response is.

The Founding Fathers held different beliefs. Yet, they hammered out the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Considering how long it took them to put a country into place, it shows how far we've gone wrong.

Liberals and Conservatives put the country on its feet. They both fought in the Revolution. They were both patriots and eventually commmitted treason. All this for a country they mutually agreed to build.

Many say that the founders would 'turn in their graves' looking at what has happened because of one side or the other. I think they would 'turn in their graves' to see that negotiations and compromise have been lost. Our Congress is now just one side with majority and the other simply there to block.

Very sad.

Even the liberals and conservatives of the colonies knew that everyone defended the whole - all ablebodied men to bring their weapon to defend the town and eventually the country to be born. They worked together. Todays people couldn't write a Constitution nor build a nation.

We've forgotten.

Boob would have stabbed his eyes out with a car antenna.

Why, oh why can't we, as a species, evolve so that we may see Boob's genius for what it is?

I'm "a racist" because I suggest that there be an unbiased examination of data -- - Johnson

Actually, Johnson, youre a racist because you believe that realistic programs be developed to maintain blacks, who may be distiguished as a social group.--

there is a disproportionate number of "poor blacks" as compared to "poor whites," committing crimes.-- - Johnson

And your proof of this is what exactly?

What I have questioned is the distribution of such capabilities.-- - Johnson

Would I prefer, say, Neill deGrasse Tyson or Johnson? Sorry, Johnson, you lose. There is the core of your problem. Im sure you would readily admit that you are a half-brain compared to him. Yet, in your analysis, there is no separation of him (and others like him) in your proposed treatment of blacks. And, until such appears in your analysis--, said analysis is worthless.

Well this is a yellow dog blog after all. Different rules for different teams.-- - Goatman

And your definition of racist-- would be what, exactly? With Johnson, contrary to the shirts opinion, its not a statement thats at issue, its the follow-up proposals. Sounds like you agree with him - ?

Back when I used to debate people from the far-left in the 70s and 80s, the fringe was under 5% and very much on the left. It truly scares me, for this country, that it now seems to be closer to 25% and mostly on the right.

The truly sad thing is that, in quite a few aspects re the blacks situation, Johnson is correct. And blacks understand that as much as anyone. However, when a non-black points it out to them, their immediate repsonse is to point to people like Johnson and say that all whites are like him, so its a whitey-- problem, etc. The old mule digging in his legs-- approach. Which would just be an amusing aside, except that, in the USA of this time, we need to eliminate as many of our problems as possible, not seek to exacerbate them. Like Johnson and his motley crew of morons keep doing.

But Johnson (Richard) is a darkie.

Morons who think a gun is protection. Frightened, little, people.

well we will see, as DC begins to arm itself and the crime rate falls.

how many lives each year are saved because someone defended themselves with a firearm against an armed or unarmed attacker?

how many lives each year are saved because someone defended themselves with a firearm against an armed or unarmed attacker?

Posted by scooter28054 at 2008-07-03 01:20 PM

Over a million.

And how many in the US of A ?

How many criminals were shot by unarmed citizens compared to criminals that shot unarmed citizens?

The headline is written to give the perception that he was shot because he was a liberal. Ironicly enough he was shot by one of those who he defends with his liberal blogging.

Over a million.

Posted by crispee_oc

{citation needed}

{citation needed}


According to Morgan Reynolds of Texas A&M University, armed citizens deter one million crimes each year. "In 98 percent of the cases, simply brandishing the ...

www.fff.org/freedom/0794c.asp

"According to Morgan Reynolds of Texas A&M University, armed citizens deter one million crimes each year."

This from a school where sword-brandishing members of the Corps once chased a bunch of SMU cheerleaders off the football field.

This from a school where sword-brandishing members of the Corps once chased a bunch of SMU cheerleaders off the football field.

Posted by SanAntonioRogue at 2008-07-03 03:01 PM

Which has absolutely nothing to do with the statistic.

God, get over yourself Crisp.

Armed citizens... deterring crime. Its a joke, son.

God, get over yourself Crisp.

Just figured it was another smart ass response. I know how touchy some get when you paste something from sites or studies they don't agree with.

This would be the same Morgan Reynolds who, in 2005, gained public attention as the first prominent government official to publicly claim that 9/11 was an inside job?

What I found is that a study by economists John Lott and David Mustard of the University of Chicago, published in the January 1997 Journal of Legal Studies, examined the impact of concealed carry permits. Using data from all 3,054 U.S. counties between 1977 and 1992, the study found that, had right-to-carry prevailed throughout the country, 1,600 fewer murders, 4,200 fewer rapes and 60,000 fewer severe assaults would have occurred during those 15 years.

Posted by fyi at 2008-07-03 12:12 PM

Would I prefer, say, Neill deGrasse Tyson or Johnson? Sorry, Johnson, you lose. There is the core of your problem. Im sure you would readily admit that you are a half-brain compared to him.

You are making a statement on the basis of lack of pertinent information, fyi. No, I don't concede the relative intelligence of Tyson compared to mine puts me at a disadvantage. Statistically, the reverse is almost a certainty. Our relative intelligence as an issue, however, exists only in your own mind, and is irrelevant. Resort is made to ad hominen matters when your argument fails.

First of all, I indicated that the intelligence distribution among blacks ran the gamut. It does seem, however, that extraordinary intelligence is rarer among blacks that in some other groups. The intelligence of Tyson is irrelevant to my proposition. If you don't grasp this, then that indicates a problem with your reasoning. I indicated that it was the apparent distribution of intelligence that enabled people to participate in particular types of activity, that was at issue.

The lack of such innate ability would preclude sufficient numbers of people necessary to sustain certain activities, as complex societies require a certain level of capability from individuals to sustain the society. A technologically based society requires a higher level of technological and scientific skills.
Yet, in your analysis, there is no separation of him (and others like him) in your proposed treatment of blacks.

You seem to be guided by emotion and have added your "feelings" to what I have posted. How would what I propose deprive any black person of any benefits or opportunity? That is a figment of your imagination.
And, until such appears in your analysis--, said analysis is worthless.

Thank you for your evaluation. Your entire response is couched in muted hostility, such as your introduction of the unfounded declaration regarding the relative intelligence of Tyson and myself. It's an attempt to demean me and my opinion without posting expletives as the expression of your distress that such views could exist.

You don't respond to the "distribution" problem. The underperformance of blacks in schools is a case in point. I'm certain that you are aware of the data. Tests in sub-Saharan Africa have reflected the subperformance of groups in that region compared to that of groups elsewhere.

Our society is hampering itself by adhering to the postulate adopted by the Supreme Court that any evidence of unequal performance or presence of blacks in certain jobs is ipso facto a demonstration of prejudice and "discrimination." My observation is that it is probably due to different distribution of various capabilities. After all of these years, it's an Occam's Razor thing.

Often in comparisons, blacks excel, such as in prominence in activities requiring physical ability as for example, in some sports such as basketball, and in persons of East African black descent holding almost all of the distance running records and people of West African black descent holding all of the world's sprint records.

It's not a matter of superior or inferior, but realistic expectations based on evolutionarily developed differences of how a group can be expected to function in a society.. Oh, you deny evolutionary differences? Things can't be a certain way because it doesn't conform to your schema? Maybe you should change your ideas to better reflect the data.

(cont.)

(cont.)

I am concerned as to one matter regarding "race" in our society, and that is that race is used as a litmus test for the establishment of policies for the general population. The death penalty was opposed on the basis that it was administered disproportionately to blacks. This was not "factually" true. But I object to the effect of any policy applied generally to be accepted or rejected because of the way it affects blacks, particularly when it is based on behavior.

I object to disparate treatment. I support determination of differences so that reasonable expectations can be formulated. To the extent that a measured difference in capability exists, we should develop a rational policy to cope with the differences in enabling "less-abled" to participate in this society, and to confer benefits upon the "less-abled" with the least burden to society. Nowhere do I preclude advancement of blacks based on their abilities. But then fyi, you introduce that concept, a straw man issue, since you apparently can't formulate a response to my basic proposition.

Johnson,

Do you at all understand the concept of discernment? Of nuance? Your posts indicate otherwise. Hell, you havent even indicated exactly who this black-- group is. Would someone who is 50% black be a member? How about 10%? How about 1%. Is a German born in Africa black-- if he says so? If I put on a bureaucratic form that I am black--, does that make me one? Russians are a mixture of scandanavians, slavs, mongolians, germanics. What race are they? The Spanish are a mixture of moorish, black, european. What race are they?

Johnson, youre being deliberately obtuse. You postulated that blacks should be treated as a group-- and I responded that this means you are ignoring the variety in that group in order to treat them as a homogeneous unit. Lazy thinking, at best. I used Dr. Tyson as an example. Your reply was that extraordinary intelligence is rarer among blacks that in some other groups. (Yeah, and whites appear to have extraordinary intelligence-- less than orientals). Do you have proof? Im sure he could tell you otherwise. After all, you are setting yourself up against him. By your standards, he should be a second class citizen. My point is that Id prefer him as a first class one and you as a second class one, based on intelligence. No, this wasnt an ad hominen attack, merely an example of how your logic fails. The core issue I keep pounding at you is that you keep dealing with blacks as a homogeneous unit when that isnt the case. That you dont grasp this indicates your reasoning skills have much to be desired.

Yet you continue with The lack of such innate ability would preclude ..--. You have not demonstrated this, so what follows is vapor.

Re my distress that such views exist--, see my 12:30 post.

No, I dont respond to the distribution problem-- because that is an artificial construct. Taking individual situations out of their context is not proving things.

Again, your entire point is that you postulate that groups-- can be judged. Yes. But not the groups you postulate. Per your logic, Jews have a higher intelligence than other nationalities. Therefore, they should be the rulers. Sorry, dont buy the entire premise, much less the particular argument. Or maybe you should change your ideas to argue hat you should be a second class citizen.

Nowhere do I preclude advancement of blacks based on their abilities.-- No, you dont. You merely attempt to create a strawman of black inferiority-- (aka, less abled--), then propose treating them as such.

RCADE may I suggest an alternative headline....
Excuse for Bigots to Rant.

And how many in the US of A ?

Over 300m

If this Liberal Blogger carried a concealed hand gun maybe he could've defended himself....

Most criminals are the bully-type. They pick on others weaker than themselves. Which is why the best thing to do is to stand up strong and fast to such a person to prevent both him and his friends from picking on you.

A criminal sees a car parked in the driveway with a NRA sticker on the back bumper. The neighbor has a "World Peace" sticker. All other things being equal, which house do you think he's going to rob?

Weakness or the appearance of weakness invites attack. A projection of strength leads to more peace as it makes both sides fearful to attack. It's the old, "If you want peace, prepare for war" idea.

Weakness or the appearance of weakness invites attack. A projection of strength leads to more peace as it makes both sides fearful to attack. It's the old, "If you want peace, prepare for war" idea.

and in the same post this gem.

A criminal sees a car parked in the driveway with a NRA sticker on the back bumper. The neighbor has a "World Peace" sticker. All other things being equal, which house do you think he's going to rob?

I am sure that the house with the NRA sticker thinks peace was gained while ignoring his "world peace" neighbor.

A projection of strength leads to more peace? The ignorant still remain strong in this country.

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort
RSS Spec