"no Joe.. they would say that was Torture too. Both are illegal."
Except Hitchens said "if waterboarding isn't torture, then there's no such thing as torture" - implying that waterboarding is the worst kind of torture.
And anyone who has had their fingernails ripped off or a lighter held to their eyeball would disagree with him. Hitchens just thinks he's a hardass for going through some of the easiest torture of all time. And he even knew the whole time that nobody would let him die.
Posted by JOE at 2008-07-02 02:39 PM
Wait. You are a lawyer? Precisely how does "worst kind of torture" apply to Hitchens statements? I may be slow, so help me understand you.
From the way that I "interpret" the English used he is stating that the "technique" of waterboarding is indisputably torture, no gradient or scale is mentioned. How do you come to such strange mistranslations? Where does electrocution fall along the scale, since the Tagubu report also mentions it's use? Oh, and raping children (in front of their parents no less) - I suppose that doesn't actually mean "torture" either?
Also, what actionable intelligence has been gathered? The Iranian nuclear weapons programs? The Syrian ones? Maybe the Jordanians? North Koreas?
I find the lack of credibility regarding the entire "intelligence" utilized for these conflicts and actions to be utterly dismissible nonsense. DOD have made the United States military appear to be gibbering idiots and tools without conscience.
Remember Richard Perles' words at an AEI interview just prior to the Iraqi invasion "The Pentagon is in good hands now". I wonder what he could ever mean by that? Perhaps it has something to do with neocons and Zionists?
Do you imagine that Anthrax investigation was stopped due to less than credible intelligence or are they not supposed to use water boarding on United States military when they hit an imposed dead end? I mean, since it's not officially "torture", it's simply interrogating. Whomever distributed this anthrax was capable of getting it into the highest levels of our elected officials. Doesn't that pose an incredible national security risk?
I'll try and check back here, but my internet is rather limited. Hopefully you or other smart guys can clear some of this up for me.