What!?

No Obama defense?

Indefensible, you say?

OK.

What, exactly, are you looking for here?

I oppose the bill and expressed my opposition to Pelosi on the House version last week, and to the Obama campaign on the Senate version this morning.

I don't agree with him on this issue and said so. That doesn't change my opinion on him being the best candidate for the office.

Oh no, trust me, you must agree with Obama on ALL issues. What you are saying here could cost your good standing with the local PC Police, not to mention your ration of Obamaide.

Please think it over before it is too late!

Thanks Corky! If we ever needed proof that the reason you post articles is not to discuss and debate the content, but to attack or smear Obama and his supporters, you just provided it.

Indefensible, you say?

It is indefensible.

OCDS = Obama come down syndrome.

Why, just trying to protect you, sweetie... and since you brought up his candidacy, I thought that's what you wanted to talk about, eh?

Its OK Cork. Just sit there with the truth all over your face like a nice raw egg.

He voted against it before he voted for it.

Do some of you think we should all make a post every day to remind Corky that Obama is the Democratic candidate for President now and that Hillary Clinton isn't?

It may be hard work but possibly Corky will get it at some point.

Sitdown,

I offered an olive branch to Corky but that seems now like nothing more than finger exercise. Corky's decided that McBush is his choice. I guess the AC must be out in the single wide and it's making Corky try to emulate Niceville.

I attempted a serious response to the article he posted, but we see all he was really interested in was attacking anyone who supports Obama.

Next up will be yet another pitiful attempt to portray himself as the victim.

But I think it is now obvious what gives him his jollies, and he has no interest in actually discussing the topics he posts.

Hey Corky,

Your Bitch Got Jacked MotherFucker!

How does it feel to be a loser?

How about that War that Your Bitch Clinton voted for?

Ha ha.....

Ahhhhh, po' babies!!!

Obama goes off the reservation and all the lil' Indians can do cry is about it. Tsk, tsk.

No defense even attempted for po' Obama's meandering, just more whining and more pathetic attacks.

San Annie says, "I don't agree with him on this issue and said so. That doesn't change my opinion on him being the best candidate for the office."

... and claims that is a "serious response" to Obama's FISA position.

Well, it may not be much, but it is certainly more than the rest of theses Bozos were able to muster.

And still nothing on topic from Crocky. Just additional whining about "attacks" that he started in the first place.

Worthless.

... and claims that is a "serious response" to Obama's FISA position.

Corky,

Do you support McCain and all that entails?

What option, what solution do you offer as remedy?

". and claims that is a "serious response" to Obama's FISA position."

What in the fuck do you want, anyway? Nobody here like's Obama's FISA position. Ok? Is that good enough?

Yes, it's time to move Corky into the correct and proper classification. Der Lieberman is now and for any foreseeable future to be lumped in with Johnson, Timbecile, Niceville and the rest of the rightards that infest this site.

I can see where labeling would be helpful to a guy with an IQ of 58. Makes the whole big wide complicated world much simpler for you, eh?

Barack Obackpeddle

"Meandering" - which candidate did Corky learn that from?

It would be a little hard for Corky to criticize Obama on this issue if he grew a backbone. Sorry, I've been an Obama supporter but he is causing the to seriously question my support for him. This bill is aimed at our Constitution, there is no excuse for a politician who supports it. Obama is so concerned he will be labeled soft on terrorism that he is willing to undermine the Bill of Rights. On this issue Corky is actually correct but does anyone know Hilary's position on it?