-spittle-drenched threats aside, come November the Hillarians will vote for Obama.

Just keep saying it, particularly in such a charming manner, and perhaps it will come true.

But just in case it doesn't, just in case it is not a blowout but a very close race, it will be those few percent of Clinton supporters who had to listen to tripe like yours that will sit on their hands instead.

And that's all it would take.

Get used to saying President Obama, then Mr Obama, then It's Obama's fault.

No bait?
No problem.
All you need is a hook and line.

"spittle-drenched threats aside"

How many nanoseconds did it take for you to recognize your own style of posting in that description?

Not many, that's for sure.

Keep whining, Corky. It's done you a lot of good so far, hasn't it?

Now, be a good little fellow and go sit over in the corner with Cookfish, Shirtsbyeric, and all your new-found pals. The nice lady with the milk and cookies will be by shortly.

Cock Starved still doesn't get it. You can keep your cookies, nice lady, considering the spoiled milk you serve them with.

Fortunately, Obama would never have a prick like you in his campaign, especially when he needs voters that you continue to revile, no matter how self-defeating and moronic that is.

IF he loses by a percent or two, it's people like you that will be to blame, not me.

"The nice lady with the milk and cookies will be by shortly."

Hmmm...how would ol' Doc know that lady? Must be the lady who gives him his daily enema.

IF he loses by a percent or two, it's people like you that will be to blame, not me.

Posted by Corky

Don't worry Cork, they'll still blame Nader.

I heard Roy Sekoff, of Huffington Post, insulting Hillary supporters even last week on Verdict with Dan Abrams. Is he part of the Obama Campaign?

Toss out line.
Wait nanosecond for snap on hook.
Reel 'em in.

Post something really stupid.
Wait to be called on it.
Then claim you were just trolling.

- Cock Starved

No evidence you read the article, Corky.

Odd, because I recall your pathetic whining throughout the primary season when people didn't "retort" about the substance of an anti-Obama piece you'd post, not discussing the "substance" of the article but merely (correctly) pointing out your role as a shill and a troll.

Toss out the line.
Instant snap on hook.
Reel 'em in.
Too bad they're only minnows.

Post something really stupid.
Wait to be called on it.
Then claim you were just trolling.
Then whine when caught.
Too bad you are thrown back into the shallow end of the gene pool from whence you oozed.

Still no "retort," Corky?
Just taking umbrage at instant recogniton of your posting style, i.e. "spittle-drenched threats"?

Hook
Line
Sinker

Claiming something that originated with you as someone else's is as cheap and lowbrow as we have come to expect from you.

So, nothing new, including the whining when caught, minnow.

"Claiming something that originated with you as someone else's is as cheap and lowbrow as we have come to expect from you."

Sorry, Corky, but you've slipped off the deep end and just aren't making sense any more.

But even in the deep end, it's no contest:
Hook
Line
Sinker

Ah, Cock Horace claiming victory in the midst of da feet.

Figures.

-spittle-drenched threats aside

Your words, no one else's, mah bitch.

Let me guess: You think I've done something mean and nasty because the tag for this story was written partly with Walter Shapiro's words and partly with my own? All you had to do was read the article and you'd know that. I seem to recall a bit of editorializing in tags from you as well.

"cheap and lowbrow"

Suits you to a "T," Dorky. Just like the little looser you are with you pathetic "spittle-drenched threats."

"spittle-drenched threats."

Ah, quoting one's self now?

How do you type and look in the mirror at the same time?

Take a good look sometime, and you will see an inanely arrogant Dennis Miller wannabe, too stupid to know when he is done.

Pricks like yourself claiming some allegiance owed your candidate by others while you are still ridiculing them and their candidate?

Priceless.

"mah bitch"

You can talk the talk, but you just can't walk the walk, can you, kiddo?

Clearly you're incapable of dealing with the actual subject of Shapiro's acrticle.

Come back for another thumping whenever you want.

Me? I'm off to interact with adults.

Cheerio, cupcake.

-Clearly you're incapable of dealing with the actual subject of Shapiro's acrticle.

Clearly you are incapable of dealing with your own nasty quotes.

-Come back for another thumping whenever you want.

Aha! It is you, Cock Horace!

Thought so.

John McCain is talking to Joe Lieberman about Joe's being McCain's VP. If you think about it, it could be a very interesting pick, leading to a possibility that California could be in play for McCain and virtually giving McCain a lock on Florida and Connecticut.

And since Hillary triangulated her way into losing the DEM nomination, a lot of the moderate DEMs could be persuaded that their interests are in line with a moderate White House. This is a potentional coup for McCain.

potential

Possibly yes on CT and FL. I don't see Lieberman having that much impact on CA. Plus I think Lieberman would do a lot of harm with the Republican base - already shaky enough.

"Plus I think Lieberman would do a lot of harm with the Republican base - already shaky enough."

The Republican "base" is NOT going to vote for McCain regardless of his VP selection. They are going to turn out enmass to vote AGAINST Obama, regardless of HIS VP selection.

"They are going to turn out enmass to vote AGAINST Obama, regardless of HIS VP selection."

No, unless McCain wins them over, many of them are just going to stay home. The VP pick will be extremely important in the GOP this year.

"in line with a moderate White House. This is a potentional coup for McCain."

"No, unless McCain wins them over, many of them are just going to stay home."

I think you're wrong. My friends and associates feel as I do. We are not "won over" by McCain but we are VERY energized by Obama. Rest assured...we'll be at the polls to vote against Obama. I'm sure the republican "base" will too.

"My friends and associates feel as I do."

Well, we can agree to disagree on that as I don't find what your and your friends are going to do a particularly compelling argument.

"He's in the tank for the neocons and believes Roe v. Wade "is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who" share that view (www.johnmccain.com)."

Roe v Wade IS a flawed decision.The federal government and the Supreme Court have no business addressing the abortion issue. It is a matter that should be left to the states.

Ah yes, I see that Corky teams up with Jestgettinbuttfucked as some sort of Rightard dream team. Corkinyourbutt, you've been re-classified. You're now one of the DR resident Rightards. I'm sure they're pleased to have you on board. Enjoy the ride bitch.

"Well, we can agree to disagree on that as I don't find what your and your friends are going to do a particularly compelling argument."

Refer to 2004...nobody went to the polls because they were so fired up over Bush. I think that was pretty widespread. This election is the same ol', same ol'...we'll be voting aginst a candidate rather than for a candidate.

Jest you and Corky sure do make a nice Rightard Brokeback combo. You're both too stupid to live and show up every day to confirm that. If you want to have a PERMANENT Renamblican minority, overturn Roe. It'll happen just that quickly.

"Ah yes, I see that Corky teams up with Jestgettinbuttfucked as some sort of Rightard dream team. Corkinyourbutt, you've been re-classified. You're now one of the DR resident Rightards. I'm sure they're pleased to have you on board. Enjoy the ride bitch."

Gee, Raygun...you seem to be obssessed with buttfuckin'. You're not lusting after any little boys now, are you? Besides, I think Corky tends a lot more left than I do. You don't know where I tend at all other than I'm not a leftist-socialist. I would bet I've voted for more REAL democrats than you have.

What is wholly unsurprising is that McCain cannot be described as what he is, a maverick Republican (re: conservative to moderate Dem or Indie), who crossed the aisle umpteen times to successfully work with the most liberal of Dem senators on many differing policy bills, but he must also be a damnable neocon rightwinger whose best assets are his liver spots.

I'll not vote for him as long as he is a Republican who thinks that the first way to go after spending is to cut programs for children.

But I also see no need to demonize him, except to satisfy the egos of those who think they are good at it, having whetted their self-perceived "wit" by demonizing a good Dem in the primary.

Oh, and Raygun... fuck off, twit.

Gee, Raygun

Posted by jestgettinalong at 2008-06-23 05:07 PM | Reply | Flag

Oh, and Raygun... fuck off, twit.

Posted by Corky at 2008-06-23 05:10 PM | Reply | Flag

Point, set, match = ME

Barely sentient, drooling Looneytoons reject = YOU

"If you want to have a PERMANENT Renamblican minority, overturn Roe."

I guarantee you that ONE day it will be overturned. I'll also bet that nothing will change much.Abortion will never be completely banned in any state. Granted, some will be strictwer than others.

"Jest you and Corky sure do make a nice Rightard Brokeback combo."

Brokeback? How many times did you watch that movie anyway? Someone told me you've worn out three DVD's already. Cheer up though, I understand they are making a sequel for your enjoyment called, "Sore in the Saddle."

Dorky,

You can back through hundreds of my comments and you'll find no evidence of my demonizing Hillary as you've done to Obama. You're transparent and you suck.

sit out or vote baghdadbob mccain, well that's sounds right up corky's alley.

"You're transparent and you suck."

Hey, Corky...it's pretty obvious that our little friend, Reagan, is a raging homo, but I can't decide whether he has an anal or an oral fixation, can you? Which is it, does he prefer to suck 'em or have 'em rammed?

IQ 58

Never have I demonized Obama. I have railed against his many shortcomings and spotlighted his inadequacies, but I never called him the equivalent to the cunt and whore shit that Hillary was called here on a daily basis, nor did I go after his religion or his wife.

Oddly enough, you nor anyone else will admit to doing that these days. It must have been another group of pants-pissers, eh?

Jest

Psychological projection on a blog is never a pretty sight, eh?

"What is wholly unsurprising is that McCain cannot be described as what he is, a maverick Republican (re: conservative to moderate Dem or Indie), who crossed the aisle umpteen times to successfully work with the most liberal of Dem senators on many differing policy bills.....

Posted by Corky at 2008-06-23 05:07 PM"

I think McAncient would have better luck with that image if he hadn't flip-flopped on just about every one of those issues in order to court the rightwingtards. He's not running as a maverick, nor is he using straight talk. He is barreling head first to the right, and the media is reporting his announced positions and what he says on the campaign trail. If he wants to be portrayed differently by the media, he has to reaffirm those "maverick" positions.

I guarantee you that ONE day it will be overturned.

LOL! Not in any life time of the next 10 generations.

It strikes me funny, people who are so convolutedly stuck on the abortion issue with such closed minded obsession and trying to tie it to voting issues rather than understanding it is a personal right issue.

As opposed to Obama, who just sanctioned the FISA bill and it's spying, and discredited both public financing and his own reputation?

Do you keep track of which side of your mouth you are talking out of?

Never have I demonized Obama.

Now corky is just trying to be funny because this outright lie is too blatant to be anything else.

nor did I go after his religion or his wife.

Some one needs to push the cork back into corky with all these lies corky is throwin out.

Another pants-pisser who called Hillary every name in the book, who made 90's Rethugs proud with his regurgitation of their specious propaganda is our Moneywhore. And his gal pal Montecunt.

"It strikes me funny, people who are so convolutedly stuck on the abortion issue with such closed minded obsession and trying to tie it to voting issues rather than understanding it is a personal right issue."

I won't argue that some are obsessed with the issue but would argue that it is NOT some "right" established by the Constitution. Bad law has a history of being overturned in time and I think the same will happen with Roe. As I said before, not much will change as individual states pass their own laws, much as they did when Prohibition was repealed.

"My friends and associates feel as I do. We are not "won over" by McCain but we are VERY energized by Obama.

Posted by jestgettinalong at 2008-06-23 04:54 PM"

Welp, that's three votes for McCain. Oh wait, Jest's "friend" Limpdick is only 13, so he can't vote, and his "associate" Jerko is a Czech and not an American citizen. Given Jest's felony status, I don't think Obama has to worry too much about these energized folks.

"My friends and associates"

If McCain picks Liebermann for VP, I wonder if that would increase the odds of Obama picking Hagel?

That would be a very circular contest. Hagel is very smart on military affairs, but considerably more conservative than Obama on social issues; but he might pull in a few Midwestern states. Lieberman might pull in some large pockets of wealth and potentially pockets of influence within California, Florida and Connecticut. It just doesn't seem as "natural" a friendly pairing for Obama and Hagel to join forces as it would for Joe and John.

Here's a question, Town: do you think Leibermann would help McCain with independents? I agree that Joe and John are a better fit than Barack and Chuck. I think Obama should consider Hagel for a position in his cabinet but not put him on the ticket.

One advantage in picking Liebermann is that McCain could have Joe around all the time to whisper corrections in his ear.

McCain will not pick a liberal independent.

He will pick a conservative.

What's up with Obama's half brother??

Malik Obama confirms his half-brother Barack grew up a Muslim
June 13, 2008

Apparently the Obamas of Kenya have been reading those scurrilous emails to which Barack likes to refer, because they have no doubt -- contrary to the claims of the Obama campaign, that the presidential candidate was raised a Moslem. They take that as a given.

As the Jerusalem Post reports, "Barack Obama's half brother Malik said Thursday that if elected his brother will be a good president for the Jewish people, despite his Muslim background. In an interview with Army Radio he expressed a special salutation from the Obamas of Kenya."

The Obama brothers' father, a senior economist for the Kenyan government who studied at Harvard University, died in car crash in 1982. He left six sons and a daughter. All of his children - except Malik -- live in Britain or the United States. Malik and Barack met in 1985.

In a remarkable denial issued last November that still stands on the official campaign website, Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs issued a statement explaining that "Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised as a Muslim, and is a committed Christian."

Apparently Malik Obama, himself a Muslim, had not read the press release.

Melanie Phillips is the most recent commentator to draw attention to the massive body of evidence that leaves no doubt that Barak Hussein Obama was born a Muslim (Islam is patrilineal) and raised a Muslim (so registered in school, acknowledging attending Islamic classes, reported accompanying his step-father to the mosque, and able to recite the Koran in the original Arabic).

If this is true what else is Obama hiding?

These HRC folks won't be coming back to the fold anytime soon--

Murphy

Either Obama was a member of a Christian church for 20 years or he wasn't. are you sayiong Obama was a Muslim--but attended Christian churches? Was he spying FOR ALLAH??

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Gal -- Interesting questions.

(1) "do you think Leibermann would help McCain with independents?"

A. I think Obama has to be careful not to paint himself too far from the center, or, if McCain picks a conservative DEM like Joe, or a blank slate with money, then McCain starts to gather moderate votes. (Someone said it here, McCain isn't loved by the right-wing GOPS, but they think they can work with him ahead of a so-called "liberal" DEM POTUS candidate. What I think Joe really brings aboard is the pro-Israel wing, and if he is selected, McCain has to calculate how many GOPS and right-wingers he will disaffect vs. how much more $$ he will bring in from AIPAC and the pro-Israel millionaires in the country.

(2) "I agree that Joe and John are a better fit than Barack and Chuck. I think Obama should consider Hagel for a position in his cabinet but not put him on the ticket."

A. Just like Bill Clinton quieted a lot of the GOP anti-Clinton crowd by selecting moderate he moderate GOP senator from Maine, Bill Cohen, to be his second SECDEF, the idea of putting a respected moderate GOP in the Obama cabinet makes some sense. Hagel could be a good pick for SECDEF, but if Obama gets elected, he'll be operating from a position of political strength right away, so he won't need to make that large a concession to bipartisanship. Instead, Agriculture and/or Energy policy might require a bipartisan hand, and Hagel could bridge either category of policy fairly well, since he's a moderate from an Ag (and biofuel/solar and wind power) state. So SEC AG or SEC Energy might work for Hagel. (Another idea might be to put Hagel in charge of reorganizing Homeland Defense, which is a pretty unwieldy FEMA + USCG + Immigration aggregation.) But if the bipartisanship of including GOPs in a DEM ticket is to carry any weight with potential voters, Obama needs to build a pre-election kitchen cabinet of visible and prominent advisers to campaign with him as soon as possible, otherwise the only ones influenced by a bi=partisan cabinet pick will be insiders who are already in Congress or lobbying close by.

correction:

(2) "I agree that Joe and John are a better fit than Barack and Chuck. I think Obama should consider Hagel for a position in his cabinet but not put him on the ticket."

A. Just like Bill Clinton quieted a lot of the GOP anti-Clinton crowd by selecting the moderate GOP Senator from Maine, Bill Cohen, to be his second SECDEF, the idea of putting a respected moderate GOP in the Obama cabinet makes some sense. Sure, Hagel *could* be a good pick for SECDEF, but if Obama gets elected, Obama'll be operating from a position of political strength, so he won't need to make that LARGE a concession to bipartisanship right away. Instead, Dept. of Agriculture or Dept. of Energy policy might require a bipartisan hand, and Hagel could bridge either category of policy fairly well, since he's a moderate from an Ag (and biofuel/solar and wind power) state. So SEC AG or SEC Energy might work for Hagel. (Another idea might be to put Hagel at Homeland Defense in charge of reorganizing the Dept., which is a pretty unwieldy FEMA + USCG + Immigration aggregation.)

But if the bipartisanship of including GOPs in a DEM ticket is to carry any weight with potential voters, Obama needs to build a pre-election kitchen cabinet of visible and prominent advisers to campaign with him as soon as possible, otherwise the only ones influenced by a bi-partisan cabinet pick will be insiders who are already in Congress or lobbying close by.

Gal: "do you think Leibermann would help McCain with independents?"

T&C: I think Obama has to be careful not to paint himself too far from the center, or, if McCain picks a conservative DEM like Joe, or a blank slate with money, then McCain starts to gather moderate votes. (Someone said it here, McCain isn't loved by the right-wing GOPS, but they think they can work with him ahead of a so-called "liberal" DEM POTUS candidate. What I think Joe really brings aboard is the pro-Israel wing, and if he is selected, McCain has to calculate how many GOPS and right-wingers he will disaffect vs. how much more $$ he will bring in from AIPAC and the pro-Israel millionaires in the country.

Fair assessment thinks Spud.

Agreed.

Sen Joe Loserman (I)

The "I" stands fer Israel.

Hagel? Yes. SecDef? No. SecAg? Maybe.

Be Well.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-06-23 09:47 PM

Just posting the article BB--I don't make them up.

The guy is the half brother and obviously parted at some time and space...

Obama is a fraud--but don't let that get in the way of kool-aid drinkers...

That's right Murphy. This man is a real fraud:

Check out that dishonest old fool at 0:42. Someone should make a loop out of that. It would be a good vid in itself.

I can't help your Obama is a liar and not to be trusted and too risky for the country with his inexperience and lack of character and awful associations and liberal Marxist' policies.

He needs a bigger bus..

You want really want to let this nut anywhere near the button, Murphy?

and awful associations and liberal Marxist' policies.

Yeah, because we all know how many liberal Marxists hang out at country clubs.

"Yeah, because we all know how many liberal Marxists hang out at country clubs."

Liberal Marxist martini drinking angry America-hating, terrorist-loving, Muslim Negro.

Obama is a naked Marxist--

Will John McCain do the principled thing and fire his dictator-loving chief campaign advisor? Or does McCain love dictators as much?

Town,

Good points about Liebermann and good points here:

(Another idea might be to put Hagel in charge of reorganizing Homeland Defense, which is a pretty unwieldy FEMA + USCG + Immigration aggregation.) But if the bipartisanship of including GOPs in a DEM ticket is to carry any weight with potential voters, Obama needs to build a pre-election kitchen cabinet of visible and prominent advisers to campaign with him as soon as possible, otherwise the only ones influenced by a bi=partisan cabinet pick will be insiders who are already in Congress or lobbying close by.

Liberal Marxist martini drinking angry America-hating, terrorist-loving, Muslim Negro.

By Jove, Null, I think you've got it. If you can work in the word "naked" as Murphy suggests, that sounds like the kitchen sink to me.

Trying to make this generic kitchen sink as inclusive as possible. Feel free to improve on it.

Forgot to add "cigarette-smoking." That dumbbell stinkfish was trying to make that an issue today.

Liberal Marxist martini drinking, cigarette smoking, angry America-hating, terrorist-loving, naked Negro Muslim.

I'm one of those Clinton supporters who will not vote for Obama, and this writer hasn't a clue why.

After a nomination fight without an overriding issue, there is absolutely no ideological reason -- beyond ruffled feelings -- for, say, college-educated feminist voters to vote Republican.

Ideology is irrelevant -- there is too little logical consistency to Obama's stated positions for him to claim any ideological position, and what little record he has doesn't indicate a commitment to anything but advancing his own career.

For me the issues are competence and the future of the Democratic Party. Obama is not yet qualified to be President, and consistently demonstrates a lack of respect for working-class people and women. I give McCain credit for taking tough positions on campaign finance and immigration. While I disagree with many of his other positions, he'll have a Dem Congress to keep him in check.

we dont need any thread from anywhere for us to know why they will vote for obama. he's a democrat and you cant go againt the machine....at least until you get in the voting booth or anywhere at the polling place.
I havent listened to any group called mccain supporters voting for obama but I have heard TWO seperate people talking about how they were clintonites who were voting for mccain.....

YELLOW DOGS EVERYWHERE.......even today

oops......two seperate people representing two seperate organizations.

McCain'll need both of them.