Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

The manner that the Democrats have allocated Michigan's delegates outraged Clinton supporters, prompting Clinton to tell her point man on the panel, Harold Ickes, that she reserved the right to take a challenge to the decision to the party's credentials committee later this summer and perhaps to the Democratic National Convention in Denver in August. "I am astonished that we have the gall and the chutzpah to substitute our judgment for 600,000 voters," Ickes said.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

OzarkAggie

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Links

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

"The committee sold out to Obama," Lynn Forester de Rothschild of New York told an Obama supporter. "Obama gamed the system. That's the Obama game. He talks about new politics but he plays dishonest politics."

Sounds like Corky McBeggintrip de Changegirl von Seaton Beggs.

Seems the clinton fans have as much class as their heroes.

I wonder if any of them heckled hillary for saying Michigan and florida wouldn't count at all? Of course not...

They only boo when hillary doesn't gain an obvious advantage.

Sounds like Corky McBeggintrip de Changegirl von Seaton Beggs.

Posted by Doc_Sarvis



Funny shit.

Because it bears repeating---If the Democratic Party implodes this November no one middle-aqed posting on this blog will live to see another serious Black or female candidate for president.


Because it bears repeating---If the Democratic Party implodes this November no one middle-aqed posting on this blog will live to see another serious Black or female candidate for president.


And they will have only one campaign and candidate to blame that on. Who would have thought that Hillary would do the work of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy without ever being on the payroll?

Unbelievable.

Not only are they checking the teeth they want a whole new horse.

People do not show up and vote uncommitted unless they are against the candidate on the ballot. It is self-delusion to believe otherwise and unethical to demand otherwise.

She was *given* 17 more delegates than Obama yesterday for two states that both of them agreed not to "campaign or participate" in whatsoever. Simply *GIVEN*.

If she wants to make a fuss about it, they can go back to zero, like the rules said they should have been.

People do not show up and vote uncommitted unless they are against the candidate on the ballot. It is self-delusion to believe otherwise and unethical to demand otherwise. -- Tiger

First, there were several other Dems still in the race on Jan 15, the date of the Michigan primary. These included John Edwards.

It is self-delusional to think that all of the uncommitted delegates would have gone to Obama.

Second, the Rules Ctee gave Obama 4 of the delegates Hillary Clinton won.

Hillary is showing an extreme lack of judgment that does not reflect well on someone who wants to sit in the Oval Office. I'm not impressed by the petty destructiveness.

Obama is just pulling another Alice Palmer on Hillary.


Operation Chaos indeed...

So Obama "hijacked" four delegates, and Clinton "hijacked" seventeen delegates and Harold Ickes doesn't like it?

He voted to disallow Florida and Michigan delegates to be seated in the first place.

Oh, but then he was acting just as a Democrat, not as an advocate for one candidate. Oh my.

This man is such a loser. Why in hell did she have him on her campaign in the first place? Bad judgment and retro-thinking, again. A Hillary administration would be just like this load of argumentative "told-you-so" people, plus Bill. Enough Bush. Enough Clinton.

And in the now famous words of Hillary's main fan caught on video -- ranting Harriet from Manhattan:

"I'm not gonna to keep my mouth shut anymore!"

"If the Democratic Party implodes this November no one middle-aqed posting on this blog will live to see another serious Black or female candidate for president."

What do I care what sex or race a candidate is? This is the first time the Democrats have produced a major candidate that is either and as a result, they've become racists and sexists during the selection process.

I'll gleefully take four years of McCain if it means killing one of the two corrupt political organizations that have a stranglehold over us. Granted, the Democrats' recent failures are not as great as the Republicans'. But the Dems don't act like an opposition party and the fact that they are now talking about seating these delegates at all shows a complete lack of integrity. Good riddance. I can only hope the Republicans are next but after what they've got away with recently, its hard to say what would make people stop supporting them.

The Demcorats have already sabotaged themselves to the point where McCain is going to win anyway.

First, there were several other Dems still in the race on Jan 15, the date of the Michigan primary. These included John Edwards.

Edwards has endorsed Sen Obama.

If Sen. Obama's name had been on the ballot you and I know he would have had more turnout than the die-hards who showed up to vote uncommitted as a protest.

The rules have been twisted in Hillary's favor and the Harriet's are puling nonetheless.

Harriet's=Harriets

She could still step aside and be the frontrunner in 2012 or 2016 but she seems bound and determined to become nuttier than Lyndon LaRousch only with less votes.

If she has any desire to run again in 2012 or 2016, she needs to shut Ickes up and bow out after tuesday. Her diehard fans may think she's doing the right thing here, but I think the rest of the Dem. party will remember this as selfish, divisive, and counterproductive. If the situation was reversed and Obama was making this stand, I'd feel the same way about him.

The pledged delegate math has been unalterably against Hillary for at least three months. Nobody can blame her for soldiering on until the final figures are in even those of us who didn't think that it made any sense. Once the math has its final say she should accept it as final and concede. Nothing else makes any sense.

With 86 pledged delegates left the fewest that Obama could now possibly get is about 30 of them and it will probably be nearer 40. That will leave him needing at most 34 of the remaining 204 superdelegates or 17% of them. The pledged delegate math was settled March 11 after Obama had won 15 of 17 primaries. The remaining superdelegates will finish it off by June 5th.

"If the Democratic Party implodes this November no one middle-aqed posting on this blog will live to see another serious Black or female candidate for president."

What concerns me isn't the color of Obama's skin but how thin it is.

Because it bears repeating---If the Democratic Party implodes this November no one middle-aqed posting on this blog will live to see another serious Black or female candidate for president.

----

Ironically that at the beginning the Dems were drolling over their potential two starts. They were so happy to have two great candidates to choose from.

Fast forward six months and those two candidates and their followers hate each other passionately.

These included John Edwards.

----

John Edwards thinks that all the uncommitted should be Obama's.

You can't accurately count a contest that was supposed to never count to begin with.

That's like trying to make preseason games suddenly try to count when you're at the end of the season.

* potential two stars.

"The Democrats are throwing the election away. For what? An inadequate black male," shouted a woman who identified herself as Harriet Christian of New
York.


A classy lassie, like her heroine !

We'll see what the heroine's take is after Tuesday.

I don't have a dog In this hunt but, as I see it Clinton and Obama agreed in the beginning and now that she is losing she wants to renege and include states that they both agreed upon to not seat. Obama conceded to her to seat both states with half of their votes as punishment for defying the DNC. Don't know much about it but if that's the way the DNC or RNC want to run their shit , so be it.

Why is she still not happy? Does she want all votes to her in a guaranteed win?
As I said I don't have a dog in this hunt but she appears to be acting like a spoiled child similar to my 16 yo daughter.

As a Maryland "unaffiliated" voter this is not attractive. It's not even about Obama anymore, just this behavior is very telling.

And please, don't get me started about her supporters. I watched the rules committee Saturday on TV and thought that the Obama contingent was very generous, even altruistic, but not foolish.

Acted that way because the ruling was in his favor,
but not of/by the voters in either state. This mess
is not close to resolution, maybe by the committee
but not the by courts pending.

I'm glad to see she's still fighting. She's the strongest dem candidate and has the best chance of winning in November.

It is a close race and Obama hasn't won enough of the votes in the states to seal it. It is up to the Super delegates. If they have any sense they will put forth the strongest candidate, and not the choice of the "dems" in red states.

BBob

I'm glad to see she's still fighting.

At first I didn't care -- still don't for any of the ones running -- but now the battle has gotten interesting. Hillary's been counted down and out by the media and the Obamafans about 15 times but she keeps gets right back up and comes out swinging. Makes it more fun to watch the campaign. Every week all you hear is "It's all over for Hillary, she's got no chance now" but she just tells them to politely stfu and keeps right on going. How many primaries are left now? I'm dizzy trying to keep track.

Califchris

How many primaries are left now? I'm dizzy trying to keep track.

Posted by CalifChris at 2008-06-02 02:24 AM | Reply | Flag

Two. South Dakota and Wyoming. Both red states--guess who will win. Guess who won't carry them in November.

If Gore or Kerry had shown this much heart in 2000 or 2004, thousands of American lives could have been saved from Iraq.

BBob

Thanks. I knew you'd know the answer. Dos mas? Ahhh, then this insane primary campaign is almost finito. It just started getting really fun to watch this last month or so. Hey, is it just me or has this presidential campaign felt like it's being going on for three years!

G'night, BBob. Give me a trip to the Moon thread soon, okay?
My brain has turned into a political burrito with all this primary election crap. I need a fun thread -- kinda like "Art Bell meet space aliens" or something. I'll leave it up to you.

G'night, Truthseeker (grin)

The Demcorats have already sabotaged themselves to the point where McCain is going to win anyway.



Posted by Sully


yeah, right...


"I belong to no organized party. I am a Democrat."

"I never expected to see the day when girls would get sunburned in the places they do today."

Will Rogers

She was *given* 17 more delegates than Obama yesterday for two states that both of them agreed not to "campaign or participate" in whatsoever. Simply *GIVEN*.

If she wants to make a fuss about it, they can go back to zero, like the rules said they should have been.


This. This a million times.

If Gore or Kerry had shown this much heart in 2000 or 2004, thousands of American lives could have been saved from Iraq.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob

I agree on Gore, not so sure about Kerry.

Two. South Dakota and Wyoming. Both red states--guess who will win. Guess who won't carry them in November.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Gee, BBob, maybe the two political parties should only hold primaries in the states they think they can win in the general....moron!

"Two. South Dakota and Wyoming. Both red states--guess who will win."

Incorrect. It is South Dakota and Montana. And mark my words, Montana will be very much in play in November. They have a Dem. Governor and both Dem. Senators. The political scene has shifted quite a bit there in the last 3-4 years.

South Dakota is no lock either.

"Acted that way because the ruling was in his favor,
but not of/by the voters in either state. This mess
is not close to resolution, maybe by the committee
but not the by courts pending.

Posted by realplus5"

Its already been thrown out of court a couple of times. An Appellate Court may hear it, but highly unlikely now since both MI and FL proposals were submitted by the states themselves and backed by the state parties.

Additionally, courts have held numerous times in the past that political parties have the right to establish and enforce their own rule re: primary elections.

The political scene has shifted quite a bit there in the last 3-4 years.
Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Hopefully the racist scene has changed there too. Bozeman wasn't too bad... but they didn't have any black people in Bozo so there wasn't any way to really determine how they felt about them.

Granted, there are not a lot of minorities in Montana, except Native Americans. Most of the Blacks tended to be athletes at the Universities, or military personnel.

However, having grown up there and still visiting often, I find there to be far less racism in Montana than in many larger, more diverse places I have lived.

My soul really is from Montana/Wyoming but there isn't a racism problem anywhere you don't have diversity of races. If you never have to think about them, deal with them, no problem. Lived there for 6 years and one of the reasons I left was the uniformity of the population.

"...but there isn't a racism problem anywhere you don't have diversity of races. If you never have to think about them, deal with them, no problem."

I tend to agree with that, but then I'm curious as to why you would say...

"Hopefully the racist scene has changed there too."

...seeming to imply that Montanans are racists.

...seeming to imply that Montanans are racists.

Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Fair point to ask about...

Coming from a big city with lots of different people, while I lived there (MT), I used to inject race into conversations to see how people responded. Sometimes I'd say I heard a black family moved into a house a couple of blocks away, or ask people if their children told them about the new black children in their school. These were all lies of course. But you could see the discomfort in their faces as they tried to show casual disinterest, i.e. try to hide their racism.

Bozeman and Missoula were the two places where the responses were at least a bit more controlled, if not PC. But a majority of the populations there come from different places and there is the University factor you mentioned before.

I guess my implication was not to say all Montanan's are racist, only that they keep it better hidden due to the fact that there aren't too many races there. I never had a "states rights" conversation before I moved there either, but had it at least once a month while I did. We both know what that is usually code for.

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort
RSS Spec