I'm sure it hurts Biden to be proven irrelevant once again, even by Bush.

heh

I would make Senator Biden Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State
if it were my Administration to choose.

He's the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mato. That makes him one of the most powerful politicians in Washington.

He's the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mato. That makes him one of the most powerful politicians in Washington.

Posted by rcade


People like mato just utter these little cutesy sayings, including, in this case, his own laugh track. Like the guy who Chris MAtthews emasculated last night, they don't know what they are talking about.

Just because a bird can talk, doesn't mean it knows what it's talking about.

Maybe more of the Democrats will find their cajones and start talking back to the neocon lunatics. For too long the Dems have been too civil in a tug of war about the future of the country. REally what could be said to or about George Bush that would honestly be inappropriate??? The man is beneath contempt and deserving of even the vilest of insutlts.

I sincerely doubt Biden can smell bullshit, as he's buried in it....Is he saying that appeasing the Nazis was the right thing to do? Why else would you object to that speech?

as an American, i think it's time to stop appeasing our government. let's start putting people in jail. one the big difference between Hitler and "w" is that at least Hitler had the balls to openly admit that he was going to get rid of democracy, but bush hides his true intentions behind flags and bibles. but there are a lot of idiots out there who will blindly fallow those two things, and think that questions are unpatriotic. just like early nazi Germany.

JustMike,

Hmmm....putting people in jail is a government function, last I checked.....

Me thinks Biden doth protest too much!

"Me thinks"

Naught, really

YEAH!

Bush's "speech" was simply another glimpse into his adolescent and immature mind!


He's like the guy at the office party who is always talking down about his kids and his wife!

It's just so fucking inappropriate not to mention Incredibly un-manly!


Because of this I really think this time he has now more than ever alienated himself from most of Americans regardless of their political leanings and cemented his legacy as one of the most incapable leaders of modern times.

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded.
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed.
Everybody knows the war is over.
Everybody knows the good guys lost.
Everybody knows the fight was fixed.
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich.
That's how it goes. Everybody knows.
~~Leonard Cohen

Sure, what Bush said is bullshit but who cares? There is a serious movement in this country to forget Bush exists, even though he's still around (most people in this movement are republicans).
If I were in the republican leadership, I would go to the White House, sit Georgie on his little bicycle, and point him in the direction of Texas.

....not to mention collapsed the dollar and sent oil prices through the roof. Bush is a rich idiot born into a family of International Criminals. Criminals who invaded Iraq illegally (Shrub), traded missiles for hostages behind Carter's back (#41), planned a failed military Coup to overthrow the Roosevelt White House after he signed Social Security into law (Prescott).

Redneck,

I couldn't agree more. It is also refreshing to hear a member of the 'we are always consious of our public opinion' club call something for what it is, 'Bullshit'. Sadly, there are many americans are too stupid to know the difference.

You know what else Biden said:

"in Delaware, the largest growth in population is Indian Americans, moving from India. You cannot go to a 7/11 (a chain store) or a Dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.I'm not joking."

That Biden, what a kidder...

Biden is of the opinion that if he screams loud enough, somebody will listen to him...

Only war works! Rarrr!

I sincerely doubt Biden can smell bullshit, as he's buried in it....Is he saying that appeasing the Nazis was the right thing to do? Why else would you object to that speech? Posted by jonryker at 2008-05-16 08:56 AM | Reply

Here's why genius. This drawing comparisons to Nazis to an audience of Israelis, some no doubt progeny of Holocaust survivors, was a clear attempt to stoke the fears of the Israelis for a cheap political trick on the US election homefront, but also really victimizes the Israelis too with, with baseless fear mongering, as both US political parties have always staunchly defended Israelis right to exist and defend herself. Can your brain unravel that, sad sack?

Scrumplet,

You have to admit, war's been a pretty effective, but double-edged, tool throughout history. It's been particularly efficient for the US, because we don't often lose. At least that was generally true before Dems all decided to become sissies.

He's the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mato. That makes him one of the most powerful politicians in Washington.

Posted by rcade

That dosen't make him smart, all that makes him is a smart politician that has been in DC too long.

Leonard Cohen completely rocks. And he's on tour again -- at 73!

Speaking before the Knesset, Bush said that "some people" believe the United States "should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along."

What is untrue about that?

Look at what Carter negoiated during the hostage deal when he was president. The man in charge in Iran now was one of the leaders of that assult on our embasy. Go figure JOE.

Speaking before the Knesset, Bush said that "some people" believe the United States "should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along."

So I axe ya, Sniper, when's Dubbya gonna fire his Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State?

"What is untrue about that? Posted by Sniper"


"We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage with the Iranians and then sit down and talk with them," he said in a talk at the American Academy of Diplomacy, referring to general US relations with Tehran.

"If there is going to be a discussion then they need something, too," he said. "We can't go to a discussion and be completely the 'demandeur' with them not feeling they do not need anything from us."

-Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense

Leonard Cohen completely rocks. And he's on tour again -- at 73!

Agreed. I just started listening to Cohen about six months ago, and I really like his music.

san, you never answered the question.

Looks to me like Gates should be the one that is mad, not Joe.

Give em glass baby.

It's not boy dunder's speech that's bullshit, it's his whole tenure. This is just another not so surprising falsehood and cheap shot. Can't someone rendition his stupid ass before his term is up? Round up the eternal apologists while you're at it.

"san, you never answered the question."

But I did. The President is out there trying to score some cheap political points, all the while his own Administration is advocating exactly the same course of action as Obama has previously espoused.

If that isn't classic "bullshit", I don't know what is.

"I just started listening to Cohen about six months ago"

OK, Gal, fine, no problema. Just don't do it in tandem with a rainy day sunset, Jacques Brel and Edith Piaff recordings, and a bottle of Pernod. Suicidal. Absolutley suicidal.

Aye, aye, Doc. :-)

"""Jacques Brel and Edith Piaff recordings,"""

Add a few from nick cave and you've got the perfect cocktail.

Would have been more inpressed if he has called the President of the Republician Party, A FUCKING ASSHOLE!!! Bullshit comment just doesn't do it for me...

The study determined the following IQs of each president, accurate to within five percentage points. In order by presidential term:

Franklin Delano Roosevelt [D] 142
Harry S Truman [D] 132
Dwight David Eisenhower [R] 122
John Fitzgerald Kennedy [D] 174
Lyndon Baines Johnson [D] 126
Richard Milhous Nixon [R] 155
Gerald R. Ford [R] 121
James Earle Carter [D] 175
Ronald Wilson Reagan [R] 105
George Herbert Walker Bush [R] 98
William Jefferson Clinton [D] 182
George Walker Bush [R] 91

In order of IQ rating:
182 . William Jefferson Clinton [D]
175 . James Earle Carter [D]
174 . John Fitzgerald Kennedy [D]
155 . Richard Milhous Nixon [R]
147 . Franklin Delano Roosevelt [D]
132 . Harry S Truman [D]
126 . Lyndon Baines Johnson [D]
122 . Dwight David Eisenhower [R]
121 . Gerald R. Ford [R]
105 . Ronald Wilson Reagan [R]
098 . George Herbert Walker Bush [R]
091 . George Walker Bush [R]

The six Republican presidents of the past 50 years had an average IQ of 115.5, with President Nixon having the highest at 155. President George W. Bush rated the lowest of all the Republicans with an IQ of 91.

The six Democratic presidents of the past 50 years had an average IQ of 156, with President Clinton having the highest IQ, at 182. President Lyndon B. Johnson was rated the lowest of all the Democrats with an IQ of 126. No president other than Carter [D] has released his actual IQ (176).

Among comments made concerning the specific testing of President G.W. Bush, his low ratings are due to his apparently difficult command of the English language in public statements, his limited use of vocabulary 6,500 words for Bush versus an average of 11,000 words for other presidents], his lack of scholarly achievements other than a basic MBA, and an absence of any body of work which could be studied on an intellectual basis.

The complete report documents the methods and procedures used to arrive at these ratings, including depth of sentence structure and voice stress confidence analysis.


"All the Presidents prior to George W. Bush had a least one book under their belt, and most had written several white papers during their education or early careers. Not so with President Bush," Dr. Lovenstein said. "He has no published works or writings, which made it more difficult to arrive at an assessment. We relied more heavily on transcripts of his unscripted public speaking."

..........what can we expect from a semi-retarded sock-puppet........
..........whithout Rove and Cheney to do his thinking for him, there is no thinking involved......
..........I doubt he even has the capacity to understand what he did wrong.......
..........the only people slower than him are the 28% who still support him, these rejects from the JayWalk All-Stars, like JonRyker and Johnson who look up to his intelligence because theirs is even lower......

Didn't Neil Kinnock of the British Labour Party call something "Bullshit" once?

The Dems' faux outrage over Bush's little speech in Israel would have more effect, were they not running on the platform of surrendering to Al Queda in Iraq, and of sitting idly by while Iran becomes a nuclear power.

RIR

...you know damn well they are not running on a surrender platform.........
.....but you know too that there was no AlQaida in Iraq until Bush let them in......

......why do you keep lying for, and defending these idiots who attacked the wrong country on purpose ??.......

OUCH
jonryker OWNED by newyawker

Skizziks:
Because he is a great representative of the Republic party: yell crap loud enough and some sheep will follow the loudest voice.

HA! Go ahead Joe, tell it like it is.

The Shrub walks into the one place on the planet where he can do his old yee-haw cowboy act and won't get shit thrown at him, and uses it to make reach-around political attacks. Why is it OK to negotiate with Kim Jong-Il? Is he being "appeased"? Oh wait, he's nowhere near our favorite lapdog of a country.

Hard nosed diplomacy is NOT the same thing as appeasement. It's how grown-ups who run countries get things accomplished. The father of the shrub knew this, too bad his idiot should have been a blow-job fuckwit crotchspawn is entrenched in his "with us or against us" mentality.

...you know damn well they are not running on a surrender platform.........
.....but you know too that there was no AlQaida in Iraq until Bush let them in......

* * * *
What Bush did, inadvertently, was bring Al Queda to Iraq, where our Army just happened to be.

So remind me again--what is Obama's plan for dealing with Al Queda, if he's going to be disengaging them in Iraq? Just curious. Because if we're at war with Al Queda, seems to me you fight them where you find them.

Of course, if we're NOT at war with Al Queda and should just pack our bags and go home, then just why, exactly, do the Dems find Bush's speech objectionable?

Because he is a great representative of the Republic party: yell crap loud enough and some sheep will follow the loudest voice.

Posted by SamBarber
* * * * *

Interesting. I didn't know there was a "Republic party". And if you think I'm a sheep, you don't pay attention. The Republicans will get demolished in this election year for one simple reason: they deserve to.

Appeasement. Appeasement My Ass.

A. Prescott Bush G W's Grandfather helped to finance the Nazi's.

B. G H W Bush made a deal with the Iranians to keep the Hostages until the Election. Maybe the repubs heard of Iran-Contra.

C. Ronald Reagan dispatched Rumsfeld to give Sadaam Weapons of Mass Destruction.

D. Ronald Reagan armed the Taliban and Al-Queda against the Russians.

E. Ronald Reagan funded the Mujhadeen and the Madrasas in Pakistan.

G W is allowing Iran to build Nukes and threaten Israel. Oooh now we're going to sanction you. And not buy Persian Rugs from you if you don't stop building nukes. Nice Job President Bush.

****What Bush did, inadvertently, was bring Al Queda to Iraq, where our Army just happened to be.

So remind me again--what is Obama's plan for dealing with Al Queda, if he's going to be disengaging them in Iraq? Just curious. Because if we're at war with Al Queda, seems to me you fight them where you find them.******

.......they were in Afghanistan and Pakistan, we went in with too few to Afg. and did not get the Pakis on side to deal with their side of the border, thats two failures in one, a military failure in Afg. and a diplomatic failure in Pak. .......

.......Al Qaida does not have a set number of official recruits, the unjust attack on Iraq was a recruiting bonanza for AlQaida, courtesy of Bush....they are composed of Saudi, Syrian and Iraqi Muslims, who propably would have never joined AlQaida without the attack on Iraq......

........this retarded sock-puppet has created more enemies for America than Bin Laden ever could......

.......but Rir......you already know all that......

rightiswrong...

That's a cunning little plan there, luring Al-Queda into Iraq like that. I hear that if we fight them "there" we wont have to fight them "here"

Tell me something, if the shrub walked into your living room and took a steaming dump on your coffee table, would you make justifications for it after the fact?

OK. This thread has officially turned into "Generic DR 'You Suck, No You Suck' Thread #34,127".

Heading back over to the Internet Mom thread to see if Obama has been linked to the girl's suicide yet...

"sitting idly by while Iran becomes a nuclear power.

Posted by rightisright at 2008-05-16 12:31 PM"

Whose policy is this exactly, Rightis? It's your beloved administration who has empowered Iran you dumbfuck.

McSame the Appeaser:
But given his own position on Hamas, McCain is the last politician who should be attacking Obama. Two years ago, just after Hamas won the Palestinian parliamentary elections, I interviewed McCain for the British network Sky News's "World News Tonight" program. Here is the crucial part of our exchange:

I asked: "Do you think that American diplomats should be operating the way they have in the past, working with the Palestinian government if Hamas is now in charge?"

McCain answered: "They're the government; sooner or later we are going to have to deal with them, one way or another, and I understand why this administration and previous administrations had such antipathy towards Hamas because of their dedication to violence and the things that they not only espouse but practice, so . . . but it's a new reality in the Middle East. I think the lesson is people want security and a decent life and decent future, that they want democracy. Fatah was not giving them that."

"And if you think I'm a sheep, you don't pay attention. The Republicans will get demolished in this election year for one simple reason: they deserve to."
Posted by rightisright at 2008-05-16 12:53 PM |


YEAH!

The Epitome of "Personal Responsibility" of today's "republican"!!

Note how its "They" who "deserve it" with no mention of your own participation in it, your own contribution to the destruction of the Republican Brand!

Perhaps this is a good time to reflect risr, on how your blind advocacy in the face of what was going on IS exactly why your hopes and dreams of One Party Dominance has been demolished!
You are a Sheep! And you were lead to slaughter by the very ones you so adamantly defended!

A Fitting end for you in my opinion! Why not just Man Up to it and give us a demonstration of this "personal responsibility" we have heard so much of instead of this chicken shit you just offered --------- before its too late to redeem yourself!

If you were smart, if the republican leadership was smart, you'd lead the charge for criminal investigations into the very folks who are humiliating you and your beliefs before they are totally destroyed by Bush and Co!

You are a Sheep! And you were lead to slaughter by the very ones you so adamantly defended!

lead to slaughter? I'll bet RIR could buy you with what he has in his front pocket. He simply admits that republicans deserve what they have coming and you attempt to stretch that into how "guilty" he is.

What a fucking tool. You are buffalo bob are one in the same.

I sincerely doubt Biden can smell bullshit, as he's buried in it....Is he saying that appeasing the Nazis was the right thing to do? Why else would you object to that speech?

Posted by jonryker at 2008-05-16 08:56 AM | Reply | Flag:

Do ANY of you righties even know the meaning of word 'appeasement'?

'Appeasement' IS NOT TALKING TO THE ENEMY!

ONCE AGAIN, GEORGE BUSH HAS PROVEN HIMSELF TO BE AN IDIOT AND HAD DUMBED HIS BASE DOWN EVEN MORE.

nice try common......but we all know EXACTLY WHAT he was saying and WHO he was ACTUALLY talking about. ALl you have to do is listen to newt on hannity talking to colmnes when colmns tried to bullshit the same old line from liberal fucks all over the country.
he was talking about JIMMY FUCKIN CARTER when he hugged this MURDERING TERRORIST.......

and as always, when you put the mirror in the face of these liberal fucks, this is the kind of uproar that you hear from obama and the rest of the liberal fucks of the democrat party.


and now......


Maybe more of the Democrats will find their cajones and start talking back to the neocon lunatics. For too long the Dems have been too civil in a tug of war about the future of the country. REally what could be said to or about George Bush that would honestly be inappropriate??? The man is beneath contempt and deserving of even the vilest of insutlts.

Posted by danni at 2008


I used yours danni because you are so out of touch here......bush's ABSOLUTELY TRUE COMMENTS were an answer to the liberal fucks of the country...not the other way around as you are so delusional to believe.

You have to admit, war's been a pretty effective, but double-edged, tool throughout history. It's been particularly efficient for the US, because we don't often lose. At least that was generally true before Dems all decided to become sissies.

Posted by jonryker at 2008-05-16 10:41 AM | Reply | Flag:


Ahem........'Cut-N-Run' Nixon was a republicunt, Just like you.

That's two mistakes today....Care to go for the triple crown?

I'll bet RIR could buy you with what he has in his front pocket.
Posted by eberly at 2008-05-16 01:30 PM

YEAH!

Says the "Limousine Liberal"!

HAHAHA!

Even if true though, how does that in anyway defend himself, and your for that matter, as having played an integral part in the demise of what was billed for years as a "conservative revolution"?

See Scarlett, that's all on YOU!

And Al Capone had lots of money too! So does 50cent! But their wealth doesn't make either one any more appealing or right --- to me!

Bush's speech had nothing to do with Obama. For Oabam and his lap-dog media to think that every news item centers on what Obama had for breakfast is the ultimate elitist hubris. Bush was referring to the whole loosely-organized but ineffective left made up of Pelosi and Reid and Clinton and Kennedy and (yes) even the Junior Senator neophyte from Illinois. But for Obama to think he's representative of any movement outside of his own capaign to get elected is laughable.

Hey, Barrack. The guy in front of me ordered his coffee "black" this morning. "Black" ! Did you hear that? Obviously he has made his mind up for the November election...

John McCain on Hamas: "They're the government; sooner or later we are going to have to deal with them, one way or another, and I understand why this administration and previous administrations had such antipathy toward Hamas because of their dedication to violence and the things that they not only espouse but practice, so ... But it's a new reality in the Middle East. I think the lesson is people want security and a decent life and decent future, that they want democracy. Fatah was not giving them that."

I'm John McCain, and I approve this hypocracy.

and here is something else that newt said that every republican candidate in the country ought to memorize.
AND something I hinted at in the original thread.
p
obama had a chance here to show us that he might not be just another liberal fuck.
he could have said something along the lines of YES, appeasement should not be our policy and go from there.....but no he showed that he could be just another liberal poster on the ole retort.

and pelosi today was heard saying that this was an afront to the dignity of the POTUS......oh please...did she say that when billy boy was getting his DICK SUCKED IN THE OVal office.
NO SHE DID NOT......

and did she talk about how dispicable it was for her to talk to the MUDRERER OF SYRIA and try to UNDERCUT The policy of the USA.......OF COURSE FUCKIN NOT..........

so you see danni......its the liberal fucks who are now getting some of thier own medicine and as we see when that DOES happen.......liberal fucks can dish it out but THEY CANT TAKE IT........

Even if true though, how does that in anyway defend himself, and your for that matter, as having played an integral part in the demise of what was billed for years as a "conservative revolution"?

How did I do that? "Integral Role"?

Please explain if you think you can.

Please tell us who Bush was talking about then, Se4n.

I used yours danni because you are so out of touch here......bush's ABSOLUTELY TRUE COMMENTS were an answer to the liberal fucks of the country...not the other way around as you are so delusional to believe.

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 01:41 PM | Reply | Flag:


ABSOLUTELY TRUE???


I guess you AND Bush don't know the definition of the word 'appeasement'.


HERE'S MY QUESTION TO ALL YOU RIGHTIES ON HERE:

What would have been the problem of at least trying to talk to him? We know we have the Military strength on standby if necessary (as it was in WW2), but I still don't see how trying something to avoid the deaths of 416,000 our of troops would have been a bad thing.

BTW, why do you think Kim Jong Il has stopped rattling his sabre? Because he was a nuke power and BUSH APPEASED HIM! Imagine that! Part of the AXIS OF EVIL and BUSH lapped the little Korean's nutsack.

well ....COMMON...I dont know about YOUR triple crown but 'big brown' is morning line of 1/2.....want to risk a hundred dollar bet to win 120?
I dont think so...and I believe I read where in vegas he is already up for like a 5 /2 bet to win the triple crown...heres' hopin........

AND NOW BACK TO THE FUED.........

C. Ronald Reagan dispatched Rumsfeld to give Sadaam Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Posted by denvgray

Make up your mind. All you libs say there were no WMD in Iraq. Can't have it both ways.

"Bush's speech had nothing to do with Obama." Posted by SE4NY6969

I guess that would make the REAL mystery here why Bush Administration officials told reporters on background that it WAS a reference to Obama.

Reading is fundamental.

Let me help you out, Shortbus. WMD's in Iraq are like your daughter's virginity. Both existed in the 80's and early 90's, and both were gone by the late 90's. Can you wrap that little mind around that analogy?

hey common......would you do me a favor, please.
email your wonderkund messiah that there are only FIFTY STATES IN THIS COUNTRY.....

and again....if it were bush you would be leading the crowd on screaming how stupid he was.......I am sure you were equally as obnoxious on this one...and I say obnoxious with respect....it takes one to know one and all that.....LOL

"On the occasion of Israel's 60th anniversary, President George W. Bush gave one of the greatest speeches of his career."


YEAH!

Oh My God! Did someone actually write that shit?

I'm sure everyone who blows off the same tired phrases coming out of Bush's cakehole is at blame here.
I'm sure when Bush speaks and people question his sincerity, it's not because Bush has himself cast his own words into doubt over the years --- but is simply everyone else's fault!

Poor little Bush has just been a victim all along!

He in no way has made the bed he now lays in! It's everyone else's fault! He is just misunderstood and as the Leader of the Free World ---- incapable of exerting his own authority over the all powerful global "liberal" conspiracy!

I'm starting to feel sad for these guys! Their carnival is in its finale!

the REAL mystery here why Bush Administration officials told reporters on background that it WAS a reference to Obama.

Link, Sanan? Because I can't find anything like what you say in the stories i have read here or elsewhere. al l I see are references to Dems doing the linking to Obama.

If you have proof, then I will stand corrected....

Hey, Barrack. The guy in front of me ordered his coffee "black" this morning. "Black" ! Did you hear that? Obviously he has made his mind up for the November election...

Posted by SE4NY6969 at


and you SIR are right on target, you have hit the head on the nail, you are right as rain, and you are spot on
...so get ready...our liberal bros here cant let that mirror get too cose to theier face. they dont like what they see and they will come after you..

and as rush as said more than once......this is all the buildup to the general campaign when ANYHTING AT ALL is said about obama and its noit rihg tdone the leftists agendal line....whoever said it will be attacked with this and even stronger vile and demeaning nonsense.
and its up to US......conservative bloggers hrere IN THE LIONS DEN....here in the devils's workshop, here in the midst of liberal abyss....ITS up to us to keep the truth in the forefront rather than just let the liberals stay in the OLD playbook.

right on bro....(he said with his fist pumped in the air.)

noit rihg tdone the + not right down.....

whoa.....toyboat
toyboat toyboat

BLT looks up to a semi-retarded sock-puppet.

And the Israelis he was speaking to gave him a standing ovation...

Biden, Obama, the rest of the Dems... all doth protest too much...

If Rove or Cheney did not have their arm up his ass to the elbow...he would'nt even know which lie to say.

damn.who hit THAT key when I wasnt looking

well as long as we are discussing errata.NO COMMMMON...I didnt mean erotica......but errata.......
lets see....

obama says 57 states and its just a boo boo because he's tired.....I mistype words because of being in a hurry and I M stupid.....

pelosi sucks asaads dick and SHE then jumps on bush for telling the truth

obama is QUOTED AS being an appeaser in the debate in austin texas and bush talks about the worst case of appeasment...( the worlds appeasment of hitler) and this whole thing is exploding with sanctimony and fained digust.
you JUST HAVE TO LOVE THIS SHIT........

Ahmed Yousef (HAMAS): "We like Mr. Obama. We hope he will (win) the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community but not with domination and arrogance."

Hamas is looking forward to appeasement in 2009.

"Clinton had a 180+ IQ? LOL.

Posted by Kuma at 2008-05-16 02:04 PM"

Let's see... rose up from poverty and a broken family to be a Rhodes Scholar and President of the most powerful country in the world. I'd say it's more likely that Clinton was over 180 than Kuma having an IQ in triple digits.

How did I do that? "Integral Role"?

Please explain if you think you can.
Posted by eberly at 2008-05-16 01:48 PM


YEAH!

So Angry Today Scarlett!

In your capitulation to "party" leaders, in your surrender of common sense, in your silence while Conservative Principle was rendered asunder by charlatans who grew government oversight to its largest ever, who pillage the national trust under the guise of "security", who escalated federal spending to unthinkable levels, who raked up the biggest deficit in history ---- You Defended them as "conservatives"!

And while doing all this, when anyone dared object --- you assailed them with name calling, questioned their patriotism and mocked their observations (and still do)!

"C. Ronald Reagan dispatched Rumsfeld to give Sadaam Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Posted by denvgray

Make up your mind. All you libs say there were no WMD in Iraq. Can't have it both ways.
Posted by Sniper at 2008-05-16 01:51 PM


YEAH!

Just what kind of "mustard" do you think Saddam Used on the Kurds? Grey Poupon?

I'd say it's more likely that Clinton was over 180 than Kuma having an IQ in triple digits.

that statement would prove that your's isn't even high enough to measure.

who raked up the biggest deficit in history ---- You Defended them as "conservatives"!

I forgot that cockville can't argue with anyone without FIRST accusing them of something that is a lie. I have never done that and you are fucking liar for even suggesting it.

And while doing all this, when anyone dared object --- you assailed them with name calling, questioned their patriotism and mocked their observations (and still do)!

100% lies. the only thing I "still do" is call you the same fucking liar you always have been 100% of the time.

Biden's opinions are about as relevant as liberals and Bush haters opinions. They are long on lies and conjecture and lack any semblance of facts. They can't debate because they have no facts so they instead tell lies and call names. How immature and hypocritical you people are.

"How immature and hypocritical you people are.

Posted by Ozark_Sunshine"

Hey! Who are you calling "you people"? You people are "you people".

Sheesh.

Sarge,

Proof of what, exactly?

Generic democrats in one poll taken 6 months before the election. The response will be different to the specific dem candidates and their specific positions at a time approaching an actual election.

Sarge,

So, the election now tilts on the projected jewish vote? Don't they always vote democrat? If he doesn't get a big majority of them, my guess is that he's in more trouble than I thought...But, polls don't mean anything at this point...

I guess if the election were now, that'd be pertinent, right? Otherwise, if initial polls matter, shouldn't we be having a Billary/Guliani election by now?

This is outrageous, for the president of the United States to go to a foreign country, to sit in the Knesset ... and make this kind of ridiculous statement."

Such as Clinton? Carter? How about Rockefeller(Ranking memeber of the Senate Intel Com)going to the ME and telling them we are attacking Iraq three months prior to our invasion?

BTW Joe, What have you fucking done as ranking member or Chairman? Do you take blame for any of our failed foreign policies? You have had 35 years on the peoples payroll, what have you done???

Crispee,

"Don't forget, Biden is very powerful, but responsible for none of this"

-The Appeasers-

"Listen to me! I'm important, but I had nothing to do with any of this. But I'm important, so Listen to Me!"

-Joe Biden-

A rational unbiased opinion would acknowledge that what the President said, in regards to modern history and Obama's willingness to negotiate with this type of enemy, is predominantly accurate given the particular type of enemy in question. Is it the religious nature/character of this enemy, in particular their intensity of will to attack and destroy us, that precludes peaceful reconciliation.

"A rational unbiased opinion would acknowledge that what the President said, in regards to modern history and Obama's willingness to negotiate with this type of enemy, is predominantly accurate given the particular type of enemy in question. Is it the religious nature/character of this enemy, in particular their intensity of will to attack and destroy us, that precludes peaceful reconciliation.

Posted by dap244"

Odd then, that Bush's own SecDef is recommending just that, doncha think?

So if you accept Bush's statement as essentially accurate, then it must be concluded that he is a hypocrite, right?

nice try common......but we all know EXACTLY WHAT he was saying and WHO he was ACTUALLY talking about. ALl you have to do is listen to newt on hannity talking to colmnes when colmns tried to bullshit the same old line from liberal fucks all over the country.
he was talking about JIMMY FUCKIN CARTER when he hugged this MURDERING TERRORIST.......

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 01:41 PM | Reply | Flag:


Bush was talking about Jimmy Carter?

Hmmmm....that's strange becuse I don't remember German tanks rolling into Poland when Carter was president. If you do, then we're done here!

he was talking about JIMMY FUCKIN CARTER when he hugged this MURDERING TERRORIST.......

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 01:41 PM | Reply | Flag:


You mean he wasn't talking about Donny Rumfilled embracing Saddam Hussein?

Bush's speech had nothing to do with Obama. For Oabam and his lap-dog media to think that every news item centers on what Obama had for breakfast is the ultimate elitist hubris. Bush was referring to the whole loosely-organized but ineffective left made up of Pelosi and Reid and Clinton and Kennedy and (yes) even the Junior Senator neophyte from Illinois. But for Obama to think he's representative of any movement outside of his own capaign to get elected is laughable.

Hey, Barrack. The guy in front of me ordered his coffee "black" this morning. "Black" ! Did you hear that? Obviously he has made his mind up for the November election...

Posted by SE4NY6969 at 2008-05-16 01:45 PM | Reply | Flag:


You go from this: "Bush's speech had nothing to do with Obama."

TO THIS: Bush was referring to the whole.....and (yes) even the Junior Senator neophyte from Illinois.



Which is it?


FLIP FLOP

FLIP FLOP

FLIP FLOP

Sarge,

So, the election now tilts on the projected jewish vote? Don't they always vote democrat? If he doesn't get a big majority of them, my guess is that he's in more trouble than I thought...But, polls don't mean anything at this point...

Posted by jonryker at 2008-05-16 03:03 PM

The Issue Is The "Pulse" Of The Specific Demographics, I Brought The Jewish Vote In Response To The Stand Ovation Statement.

McCain Is Behind In The Jewish Demographic To A Black Guy Named Obama, When McCain Is Best Buddies With Joe Lieberman The Most Prominent Jew In Congress.

The GOP Is In Huge Trouble Across The Board If You Can't See Or Understand It, It Could Only Be Because Of Denial.

-Sarge

hey common......would you do me a favor, please.
email your wonderkund messiah that there are only FIFTY STATES IN THIS COUNTRY.....

and again....if it were bush you would be leading the crowd on screaming how stupid he was.......I am sure you were equally as obnoxious on this one...and I say obnoxious with respect....it takes one to know one and all that.....LOL

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 01:54 PM | Reply | Flag:


What are you talking about? I read this (ugh) twice and I still seem to be missing what is it your referring to. If you'll explain, it will help me to respond.

Are they ALL just complete morons and/or lunatics????

Huckabee jokes about Obama ducking a gunman:

(CNN) During a speech before the National Rifle Association convention Friday afternoon in Louisville, Kentucky, former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee -- who has endorsed presumptive GOP nominee John McCain -- joked that an unexpected offstage noise was Democrat Barack Obama looking to avoid a gunman.

"That was Barack Obama, he just tripped off a chair, he's getting ready to speak," said the former Arkansas governor, to audience laughter. "Somebody aimed a gun at him and he dove for the floor."

he was talking about JIMMY FUCKIN CARTER when he hugged this MURDERING TERRORIST.......

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 01:41

I tend to agree. It's interesting how many other dems, including Barry, felt that the shoe fit them as well.

"I tend to agree. It's interesting how many other dems, including Barry, felt that the shoe fit them as well.

Posted by Mato"

I find it extremely interesting that all of you can't seem to get your arms around the fact that the press has reported that Bush staffers told them on background that the reference WAS aimed at Obama.

It's been posted and linked a dozen times on at least 2 threads.

he could have said something along the lines of YES, appeasement should not be our policy and go from there.....but no he showed that he could be just another liberal poster on the ole retort.

and pelosi today was heard saying that this was an afront to the dignity of the POTUS......oh please...did she say that when billy boy was getting his DICK SUCKED IN THE OVal office.
NO SHE DID NOT......

and did she talk about how dispicable it was for her to talk to the MUDRERER OF SYRIA and try to UNDERCUT The policy of the USA.......OF COURSE FUCKIN NOT..........

so you see danni......its the liberal fucks who are now getting some of thier own medicine and as we see when that DOES happen.......liberal fucks can dish it out but THEY CANT TAKE IT........

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 01:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

Once again, to all these out there who cheered for Bush when he made his comments at the Knessel and turned Israels 60th b-day into a political partisan bullshit fest, let me ask you this:

DO ANY OF YOU KNOW WHAT 'APPEASEMENT' MEANS??

Appeasement has to do with giving something, NOT TALKING to someone.

I realize the idea of at least attempting to talk to Hitler before the war is a sin in your eyes, but it could have saved over 400,000 US Soldiers lives and the lives of more then 6 million jews that Bush and the right pretend to care about. I'm not saying it wouldn't have turned out exactly the way it did, but I see no harm in trying.

ONCE AGAIN: What Bush said, is NOT the definition of APPEASEMENT, not by a long shot. This is from the president who brought you "Our childrens do learn"

How about "IRONIC"? Let's see how many can give correct examples of irony?

Psssst...It's not a black fly in your Chardonnay

For all you lefties, here is what was not reported in the U.S.:
Media Disgrace America, Israel and Themselves
newsbusters.org

Posted by KBM at 2008-05-16 01:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

That rag is nothing but right-wing propaganda. It even says so in the tagline.

Dixie Hicks go to a foreign country and talk negatively about the Govt = BAD!!!!

President goes to a foreign country and talks negatively about elements of the govt = Good!!!!

I'm sure the rightards (TM) will be smashing his CD's and boycotting his speeches soon....right?

"Subjects
Among the subjects in Terman's five-volume study Genetic Studies of Genius (1925-1959), 26 scored 180 IQ or above (7 women and 19 men)."

This doesn't make any sense. Kuma (IQ 67) says there are only three people in the world with this IQ, but somehow they found 26 of them to study.

RisR:
I disagree with you strongly on one point. None of the three candidates still in the race deserve to be elected.

"This doesn't make any sense. Kuma (IQ 67)..."

You mean Kuma "It was a DEMOCRAT who said he could have stopped the war single handily if he had met with Hitler before they invaded Europe."

(Senator William Borah was a REPUBLICAN from Idaho.)

And Kuma "You democrats ARE the appeasers of the enemies of the USA. Thats your role. Thats what you do, and you have been doing it for 60+ years."

(A huge surprise to FDR, Truman, and JFK, I'm sure)

Do you REALLY think he could manage a 67????

common.........it wont do you any good to keep up your version of a senior english teacher or a librarian....we know how the word is used by both sides. you are wasting your time on it when you should use more time on current affairs.
in a speech in oregon obama talked about how much he had traveled.....he said....57 states.....
and again, an honest mistake, but one that a republican would be villified for.

Biden should have spoken to Bush in language he could understand.

Let's put it though the Dick Cheney translation device and see how it sounds!

If I put "Bullshit" in ....here it comes now....

"Go Fuck Yourself!"

yep, now Bush would have understood that!

"I'd say it's more likely that Clinton was over 180 than Kuma having an IQ in triple digits."

"that statement would prove that your's isn't even high enough to measure.

Posted by eberly at 2008-05-16 02:20 PM"

You do realize that Clinton was a Rhodes scholar, no?

Regardless of what you think about it, it is a very prestigious accomplishment. I think they give two per year.

common.........it wont do you any good to keep up your version of a senior english teacher or a librarian....we know how the word is used by both sides. you are wasting your time on it when you should use more time on current affairs.
in a speech in oregon obama talked about how much he had traveled.....he said....57 states.....
and again, an honest mistake, but one that a republican would be villified for.

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 04:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

So, in your mind , using the correct definition of a word is somehow wrong and makes me a 'librarian'??

This isn't some made-up word like 'FLIP FLOPPER'! This is a real word and the fact that you choose to deny that your president was wrong in both it's definition and usage at all is a testament to who you are. The very context of the word is wrong and Bush is counting on the stupidity of his base not to know the difference. Be honest, did you know the difference before today?


As for the '57 states', you go on to say that a republican would be 'vilified' for it and yet here you are doing the very thing you try to accuse the dems of.

he was talking about JIMMY FUCKIN CARTER when he hugged this MURDERING TERRORIST.......

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 01:41

I tend to agree. It's interesting how many other dems, including Barry, felt that the shoe fit them as well.

Posted by Mato at 2008-05-16 03:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

Jimmy Carter was president when German tanks rolled into Poland? Who knew!?!

My history books seem to differ from yours.

common.........it wont do you any good to keep up your version of a senior english teacher or a librarian....we know how the word is used by both sides. you are wasting your time on it when you should use more time on current affairs.

Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-05-16 04:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

BL2....Ummmm....this happened yesterday! Are you telling me that you don't know the definition of 'current' either?

I've heard Texas had the lowest literacy rates, but DAMN!

People like mato just utter these little cutesy sayings, including, in this case, his own laugh track. Like the guy who Chris MAtthews emasculated last night, they don't know what they are talking about.

Just because a bird can talk, doesn't mean it knows what it's talking about.

Posted by midiman at 2008-05-16 08:03 AM

Your an idiot. The only reason Biden reacted as he did is because he knows damn well he sat on his hands while Carter met with Hamas. Just like he did when Carter let the Shah go down as a young Senator. The Wilmington City Councilman that has been in the senate for the last 35 years has done nothing between presidential runs.


He knows it and Bush's comments just made him realize what a waste his career has been.

Now as the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee he realizes Bush's comments point out this failure.

How many terrorist attacks under Carter?

How many Americans killed under Carter?

How many Americans killed under Carter?

hundreds of thousands. Or did you think all deaths stopped under St. Carter?

Then of course there were those he sent off to die in an ill fated attempt at hostage rescue in Iran. As to those who died indirectly from high interest rates and stagflation, hard to quantitize.