First earthquake that happens, the religious nutcases (Hagee, etc.) will be falling all over themselves - neglecting the destruction of swaths of Oklahomo.

Damnit, Danforth! You beat me by a matter of minutes.

Whoo Hoo...Me and my husband are Finally Legally Married!!! Whooo Hooooo! Uh...naysayers...Told You So!

"They said 'Californy is the place you oughtta be!' so they packed up all their stools and they moved to Beverly..."

Sorry, it had to be done.

California where the Constitution still means something. Freedom means something in this State, thats why we want you all to come here an see what you are missing, don't stay but come to visit. This is an open invitation to everyone except those RACIST fuck in TEXAS, you know who you are!!!!

"I am so happy, I will go to California right now and marry my gay lover." -- Republican Senator Larry Craig

Shouldn't this be in 54 pt. font at the top of the front page?

Wake up RCade, it's past noon.

I could care less whether people are married or not. In fact, I think we should get to legal contracts (for when you split up) and only get married if you want to, but the legal contract not the "marriage" are what have standing.

That being said, when the people vote on something like this and then the court over-rules their decision, is it any wonder why people are concerned about who we are putting into the courts?

Shouldn't this be in 54 pt. font at the top of the front page?

Wake up RCade, it's past noon.

Posted by ness_gadol


No, it's not as big as the New Kids on the Block getting back together, lol!

PEOPLE CANNOT VOTE ON DENYING CIVIL RIGHTS FROM OTHER PEOPLE - THAT IS THE VERY DEFINITION OF MOB RULE.

AND IF YOU DIDN'T NOTICE - THE CONSTITUTION PREVENTS THAT!

MORON.

"That being said, when the people vote on something like this and then the court over-rules their decision, is it any wonder why people are concerned about who we are putting into the courts?"

From what I heard on TV the court said marriage is a NATURAL RIGHT, like thinking, or freedom of speech, or the right to own a gun.

How about we put free speech or gun ownership or privacy to a vote? No, NATURAL RIGHTS are not negotiable. The faux conservatives who bitch about activist courts don't really understand the Constitution and the concept of NATURAL RIGHTS.

(Here comes B_Boob to explain to us how rights come from govt, lol!)

"That being said, when the people vote on something like this and then the court over-rules their decision, is it any wonder why people are concerned about who we are putting into the courts?"

Yes, I'm sure you're nostalgic for that whole "separate but equal" thing.

Right on DUMPLING1! The United States is a Republica, not a Democracy. No tyranny of the majority here.

That being said, when the people vote on something like this and then the court over-rules their decision, is it any wonder why people are concerned about who we are putting into the courts?




Posted by sawdust


That shows a lack of understanding of a fundamental principle of the American system. Courts have a duty to protect the rights of minorities AGAINST the will of the majority sometimes. The majority doesn't always rule - that's what "inalienable rights" means, and is an essential part of the guarantee of freedom for ALL, and not just the majority.

I hope this means all 'partnership' benefits go away for the state employees, etc. Now, they have to get married like the rest of us to get the financial benefits like healthcare, etc. Now that the roadblock is removed for gay marriage, straights should be forced to marry or lose the benefits as well.

Yay, California. I know this is going to hurt the institution of straight marriage all over the state and send faithful men into the arms of syphilitic hookers, but gay couples should have as much legal right to marry as Pamela Anderson.

DoubtingThomas will be along soon to remind us that he's not gay.

Good Lord. This story's Google ad is seriously gay.

And there you have the difference between California and Texas in a nutshell.

California is determined to build a fast lane for humans to love and cherish each other whereas Texas is more intent on building a fast lane to get humans (mostly blacks) to the death chamber...

poor Texans... I feel so bad for them.. they have to live in Texas!

Careful there with them guns Texans... don't shoot yerself in the back while you are running running away from them scary gays!

(ain't I a stinker?)

Lib judges make their own laws.

Who cares -- especially enough to headline the story?!

That being said, when the people vote on something like this and then the court over-rules their decision, is it any wonder why people are concerned about who we are putting into the courts?


If you want to live in a society that actively discriminates against homosexuals, I hear that Iran is nice and warm.

Those 4 judges (like Dumperling) are going to burn in hell! The lord giveth and the lord taketh away!

May you be struck down by our almighty savior you activist judges! You are a pox on our noble and just society!

The apocolypse is upon us.

That shows a lack of understanding of a fundamental principle of the American system.

That has never stopped the right from opening their collective mouths before.

I lived out there when that friggin' Prop 22 was on the ballot. The born-agains are gonna leave the state.

The born-agains are gonna leave the state.


And the downside to that is........?

Good for Cali! 2 down, 48 to go.

"The born-agains are gonna leave the state."

Please don't send them to Florida.

I always knew California would into the stink hole.
Just because it is legal doesn't mean its right. Next they will be going for adoption. It was a capitol offense to be gay when the constitution was written...they must have just assumed it was common sense to not allow moral degradation.

Hey Ewendel, do they let you out of the house without your helmet?

Oh shut up.

(sorry, that was to Ewing-dale)

"Hey Ewendel, do they let you out of the house without your helmet?"

Posted by evashogouki

Are you jealous?

"I always knew California would into the stink hole."

A verb, please.

"Just because it is legal doesn't mean its right. Next they will be going for adoption."

Adoption? OH NO!!!!

"It was a capitol offense to be gay when the constitution was written...they must have just assumed it was common sense to not allow moral degradation."

Hrmmm... don't remember hearing about that law. Perhaps you're making this up?


My advice. Go to school, learn proper english, keep your own house in order and quit sticking your nose in other people's business.

Thank You California State Supreme Court. The loons who sued in San Francisco just gave the GOP a great campaign issue for November. " God, Gays, and Guns". Obama will have to put up or shut up on this one.

I love wedge issues.

It was a capitol offense to be gay when the constitution was written...they must have just assumed it was common sense to not allow moral degradation."

Hrmmm... don't remember hearing about that law. Perhaps you're making this up?


I think the retard was confusing sodomy laws with laws against homosexuality.

I will never be able to understand how a man cannot like breasts. I mean really. Can someone explain that to me? Maybe it has to do with breastfeeding and some weird association with their mother?

"I will never be able to understand how a man cannot like breasts. I mean really. Can someone explain that to me?"

Posted by ELCIDCE90

You're in luck; some men DO have breasts.

I cannot understand it either, but it is none of my business.

I love wedgies.

Posted by timbci

If homosexuality was detectable during pregnancy, how would you feel towards someone aborting that child for this reason alone?

"The born-agains are gonna leave the state."

I don't know about that, considering many of them are closet homos, they might get out of the closet and get married and settle down.

Ahhhh Yes...one more notch in the belt for pro-sodomites.

Ain't America great? Soon we will be legitimizing your particular brand of deviancy too! You're oppressed...your civil rights have been attacked...you're a victim in need of sympathy and court approval.

Yes, I can't wait to see when America will be placing the stamp of approval on pedophilia and beastiality too.

Aint it grand living in this Carnival called America? Screw whatever you want and we will bless and call it good!

"...when the people vote on something like this and then the court over-rules their decision, is it any wonder why people are concerned about who we are putting into the courts?"

What Sawdust must realize is that there are some things over which voters have no control, some things over which courts, legislatures and dictators have no control. In theory, anyway. They're personal things: Whom I marry, what substances I ingest, whether I have a vasectomy or carry a pregnancy to term. Good for the court ... herm

Madonna songs for everybody!

"Yes, I can't wait to see when America will be placing the stamp of approval on pedophilia and beastiality too."

Posted by DoubtingThomas

For reasons unknown...

"The born-agains are gonna leave the state."

From your lips, Eva, to Hagee's ears. herm

I don't think the government should recognize marriage at all. Separation of church and state.

If homosexuality was detectable during pregnancy, how would you feel towards someone aborting that child for this reason alone?

Geez. Talk about a trick question for the lefties!

It's funny how the same type of people make the points through out the ages. They had the points when it came to interracial marriage or women's and blacks right to vote. Conservative bigotry has not changed in 200 years.

This comment won't make me popular on here but I don't care.

The initiative the majority of Californians voted in ("Marriage is between a man and a woman") and for which I too voted only got overturned by the Supreme Court because gay marriage was banned by an initiative measure and the Supreme Court said in order not to be overturned it has to be enshrined in the California Constitution.

In November a ban against gay marriages will be on the ballot to have a ban on gay marriage included in the California Constitution and the Supreme Court won't be able to overturn it if it gets voted it -- and it will be voted in too. Most Californians do not believe in gay marriage.

I voted against gay marriage the first time it was put on the California ballot and I will vote to have gay marriage banned by including it in the California Constitution and so will most Californians. We are not as liberal out here as most of you think.

Since blogging on here and hearing different points of view I have become more "liberal" -- or let's say more "understanding" -- about issues more so than before. I didn't even agree with civil unions for gays before but I now agree gay people should be able to have a civil union if they want it. But leave the Sacrament of Marriage alone.

What's next -- multiple wives, multiple husbands, three men and five women can have a marriage, a man and his penquin, men and very young girls? We all know once the sanctity of marriage is overruled everybody will want to change the marriage structure into some absurd form to suit their own purpose and the ACLU will make sure they get it.

If a gay couple has a Will, a health directive, joint tenancies for their home and financial accounts, a Trust, etc. then there is nothing they can't have that married people have except, I guess. filing as a married couple on the IRS tax forms. I don't know all about the tax end of it. But Californians will never let gay marriage stand.

I do, however, believe in a responsible gay couple being allowed to adopt a child as I believe a loving home is better for a child than any foster home would ever be.

AP Special Bulletin:

.......PRESCOTT BUSH MARRIES HITLER IN CALIFORNIA.......

Reclusive millionaire Prescott Bush, grandfather of President George Bush, held a small press conference to announce that he will wed long-time gay lover Adolf Hitler. "Finally, we proud Republicans can come out of the closet" said jolly old Prescott. When his lover was asked if he was related to Germany's ex-dictator, Mr. Hitler said that the name, face, accent, and date of birth, were just "a funny coincidence".

Reporting: Jeff Gannon.

"I think the retard was confusing sodomy laws with laws against homosexuality."

No, he said it was a "capitol offense"--(i figure he meant capital offense) which is a crime punishable by death. There may have been bigots and whatnot who killed gays, but it wasn't sanctioned by the state, as far as i know.

"But leave the Sacrament of Marriage alone."

Chris churches perform Sacrraments, governments allow contracts. In this case marriage contracts not the Sacrament of Marriage.

If homosexuality was detectable during pregnancy, how would you feel towards someone aborting that child for this reason alone?

Abort them??? Shoot, I'd just bypass grade school for them and send them straight to Flight Attendant school, or Nursing School...or maybe just raise them in a Hair Salon where they could be a play toy to Benny and Lonnie!

Also Chris, if they did legalize civil unions with the same legal rights as marriage I'd be fine with that. What difference what we call it.

"If a gay couple has a Will, a health directive, joint tenancies for their home and financial accounts, a Trust, etc. then there is nothing they can't have that married people have except, I guess. filing as a married couple on the IRS tax forms. I don't know all about the tax end of it."


The tax end of it is the most important. Gift taxes make a same-sex household IMPOSSIBLE.

"If homosexuality was detectable during pregnancy, how would you feel towards someone aborting that child for this reason alone?"

Herm would be stumbling over himself, trying to decide whether to escort the fetus to the abortion clinic or down the aisle.

Gay marriage and abortion... two issues that lately always dominate politics, but I won't ever have either...

so my thoughts on this story are... who gives a shit?

Dear Guest:

We invite you to join us in witnessing the union in marriage of Bennie Bendover and Tommy Tirdknocker.

Come join us downtown as we celebrate together at the First Church of Sodom and Gemorrah. Bennie and Tommy ask all of you to come in your favorite leather suits. Strap-ons will be allowed at the reception following. Join us in the hot tub!

Butt kisses to all!

Bennie and Tommy

"so my thoughts on this story are... who gives a shit?"

Those who actually care about civil rights finally being granted to those who deserve it.


Nah, you're right, we should only care about ourselves. That's what this country needs, more selfishness.

DoubtingThomas, if only you had the balls to say something like that to someone IN PERSON instead of hiding behind a computer.

You're absolutely right _B_ our country is so well off right now that our focus absolutely should be on one man being able to make an honest woman out of his boyfriend.

Nothing else going on.

Next in line.... Polygamists and beastiality.... Don't laugh, really who can deny their CIVIL RIGHTS??? No wait, their HUMAN RIGHTS??

"We invite you to join us in witnessing the union in marriage of Bennie Bendover and Tommy Tirdknocker.

Posted by DoubtingThomas

So that's your real name...

Conservative bigotry has not changed in 200 years.

Posted by Species8472


And it won't change for another 200 years as long as you have shitheads like Falwell, Robertson and Hagee dictating their official positions.

Some great quotes for the archivers:

"Butt kisses to all!"
Posted by DoubtingThomas at 2008-05-15 02:48 PM


"Yes, I can't wait to see when America will be placing the stamp of approval on pedophilia and beastiality too.
Posted by DoubtingThomas at 2008-05-15 02:32 PM



Courtesy of DoubtingTommyTirdknocker.

That's what this country needs, more selfishness.

Posted by __b__ at 2008-05-15 02:49 PM


Let's see who is selfish??? On one side you have those who want their own status and seperate rights. The other by an overwhemlming majority say no. Gays, lesbians, transgenders and bi-sexuals. Notice the last two on the list? Does anyone think they should be in the same category as the true gay and lesbians????

Party going on right now over at NAMBLA.....

Next up??? 10 year old's Civil Right to be an adult.

Next up??? 10 year old's Civil Right to be an adult.

Posted by CoCoBeware


Then you won't face prosecution.

Next up??? 10 year old's Civil Right to be an adult.

Posted by CoCoBeware

Don't get your hopes up.

I will never be able to understand how a man cannot like breasts. I mean really.Maybe it has to do with breastfeeding and some weird association with their mother? -ELCID

Have you considered that LIKING breasts may also have something to do with breastfeeding and some weird association with your mother?

If bigotry was detectable during pregnancy, how would you feel towards someone aborting that child for this reason alone?

"Next in line.... Polygamists and beastiality."

Posted by CocoChannel

Hmmm. No on bestiality since one of the parties is not able to give consent or enter into a contract. Yes on polygamy as long as no one is coerced, is of legal age, and enters into the agreement freely - IMO.

You cannot Deny me my rights. Thanks for opening the Legal door for me and the rest of the NAMBLA crew.

"Debauchery! Debauchery! Raaaawk!"

DoubtingThomas TM

If bigotry was detectable during pregnancy, how would you feel towards someone aborting that child for this reason alone?

Posted by ZOT at 2008-05-15 03:02 PM | Reply


I'd hate it! Who would I have married? Who would have been my pastor? How would I have written a book without my own bigotry?
Sincerely,
Hussein Obama

I find it astonishing that people still associate pedophila and bestiality (hell, why not add mother-raping and father-killing) with being gay. How do you figure?? Oh, wait, you don't. Never mind.

"You're absolutely right _B_ our country is so well off right now that our focus absolutely should be on one man being able to make an honest woman out of his boyfriend."

I can't speak as to the urgency of this particular court case--but this case made its way through the docket and here we are. Just because this issue isn't of the highest importance for you doesn't mean the Cali Sup. Ct. shouldn't rule on the matter. The courts are filled with countless actions that mean a lot for the individual parties involved but very little to the public at large.

That being said, i believe civil rights are of paramount interest to the public--especially when we're using civil rights of others as justification for bombing the crap out of other countries.


"Let's see who is selfish??? On one side you have those who want their own status and seperate rights. The other by an overwhemlming majority say no. Gays, lesbians, transgenders and bi-sexuals. Notice the last two on the list? Does anyone think they should be in the same category as the true gay and lesbians????"

It is selfish to only care about things that impact yourself--which was the reasoning for Rob not caring. That is selfish, pure and simple. There is nothing wrong with fighting for your rights and the right of other similarly situated individuals. You're assuming these people ONLY care about themselves. I'm willing to bet these people care about EVERYONE affected by this country treating gays like second class citizens. Rob on the other hand, made it clear that he doesn't care because it doesn't affect him. That, as i said above, is selfish.

Have you considered that LIKING breasts may also have something to do with breastfeeding and some weird association with your mother?

Posted by sitdown at 2008-05-15 03:01 PM | Reply


My love of breasts has everything to do with his mother!

Dear Guest:

As follow up to our wedding invitation, Bennie and Tommy ask each of you to bring a fun gift to the reception following the wedding debauchery.

Some of the fun games we will be playing: Naked Twister, Guess Who Farted (hot tub game...yeah!), Pin The Sphincter on the Butt Pirate, and many many more flesh games.

Won't you come have fun with us down at the Y ? Bring all your boy toy friends along and we'll break in this marriage the right way!

Your loving Hershey Highway friends,

Bennie and Tommy

Party going on right now over at NAMBLA.....

Next up??? 10 year old's Civil Right to be an adult.

Posted by CoCoBeware at 2008-05-15 02:56 PM

how sad for you that you would equate the equal rights of two loving souls of legal age to that of child molesters. Exactly what are you trying to achieve? Perhaps you need to cut down on the faux news channel a bit and tune into reality?

Stick to the "Debauchery Raaaawwwk" there, Timmy -er- I mean Tommy.

"You cannot Deny me my rights. Thanks for opening the Legal door for me and the rest of the NAMBLA crew."

Posted by CoCoBeware

Should've stayed in the closet.

Your loving Hershey Highway friends,

Bennie and Tommy


Posted by DoubtingThomas at 2008-05-15 03:08 PM


"Debauchery! Debauchery! Raaaawk!"

DoubtingThomas (TM)

Posted by ZOT

We appreciate the wedding invite, DoubtingTommyTirdknocker, but I'm going to have to respectfully decline.

We all know once the sanctity of marriage is overruled...

In a sense I do agree; though, the "sanctity of marriage" has nothing to do with a court ruling, it has to do with attitudes towards marriage.

I believe marriage is a very important, fundamental part of our society (that's why I support gay marriage). But I think the deterioration of it as an institution has a heck of a lot to do with the normalization of divorce. People like John McCain, Rudy Guilliani, Newt Gingrich, and many others have done more damage to the sanctity of marriage than any other factor. Does anyone really think these guys value the institution of marriage or think their divorces had anything to do with gay marriage? With such prominent people getting divorces (and committing adultery), not only do they not value the sanctity of their own marriages, they help foster the impression that marriage and adultery is a normal part of adulthood.

It drives me crazy when I hear the "pro-marriage" crowd discuss how fundamental heterosexual marriage is to our society, yet completely focus on gay marriage, and totally ignore divorce (the number one cause of marriages ending). The only thing worse is hearing a divorce (or adulterer) give marital advice or discussing the "sanctity of marriage".

Oh, I forgot to add, congrats on your marriage to Bennie!

CalifChris, this is quite the statement you made in your post
....
I didn't even agree with civil unions for gays before but I now agree gay people should be able to have a civil union if they want it. But leave the Sacrament of Marriage alone.
....

I believe I have heard this argument before. It used to be called Separate But Equal. I am sure all the homosexuals in California are thrilled that you are willing to have them use their very own drinking fountains and bathrooms.

As far as the Sacrament of Marriage goes, I find it interesting that the Religious Right focuses so heavily on banning Gay Marriage. Last time I checked, while being a homosexual is not in any way condoned in the bible, it didn't make the top Ten laws that God gave to man (if you believe such things). If it was such an abomination unto God, don't you think He might have mentioned it there? He did, however, mention adultery. Why don't they propose a constitutional amendment banning that?

Chris churches perform Sacrraments, governments allow contracts. In this case marriage contracts not the Sacrament of Marriage.

Posted by danni at 2008-05-15 02:40 PM | Reply

I agree with that reasoning. I think government ought to get completely out of the "marriage" business. Consenting adults (including gays and polygamists, in my opinion) ought to be able to enter into civil unions.

"We are not as liberal out here as most of you think."
--CALIFCHRIS

He pretends we all didn't see the bubble bath post...

The Judges on the California Supreme Court is dominated by Republician appointees, just how do you think the Right Wing Religious zealots will spin this decision.

Listen hear you Right Wing Hacks, the Court said that California law was un-constitutional, It never said that you had to marry a Gay person, so don't take leave of your senses.

Now all you Right Wings Hacks can go back to the public toilets an await your Gay sexual experience, even though you condemn it you know you love it, come on "101CHAIRBOURNE", leave the blog go an meet your main man well be here when you get back......

I now pronounce you man and manhole......

I didn't even agree with civil unions for gays before but I now agree gay people should be able to have a civil union if they want it. But leave the Sacrament of Marriage alone.

What about just replacing marriage with civil unions for both gays and straights? If a couple wants a religious marriage, they can get their civil union at the courthouse and then can go to their church which can perform whatever ceremony they want. If a couple wants a secular civil union they can go to the courthouse and get one.

This is pretty much how it's done already... When I got married, we went to the County Clerk's office and filled out the paperwork (there was no mention of anything religious it). We then had the ceremony at our church a few weeks later.

[God] did, however, mention adultery. Why don't they propose a constitutional amendment banning that?

Posted by IrishInUSA at 2008-05-15 03:14 PM | Reply

If the Bible is a point of reference, God doesn't like gluttons much either. Have you ever noticed how many vociferously anti-gay ministers (a la Hagee, Falwell, etc.) are verrrrry fat.

How many anti-gluttony sermons have you heard from T.V. preachers lately?

Why don't we amend the Constitution to require the death penalty for lardasses?

If it was such an abomination unto God, don't you think He might have mentioned it there? He did, however, mention adultery. Why don't they propose a constitutional amendment banning that?

I've often wondered the same thing. You'd think fundamentalists would be all for an amendment banning adultery.

I've often wondered the same thing. You'd think fundamentalists would be all for an amendment banning adultery.

Posted by katieberry at 2008-05-15 03:24 PM | Reply

What about an amendment banning divorce? How popular do you think that would be?

Hell, half of the Bible-belt is divorced.

The sad truth is gays and polygamists can't "destroy" marriage anymore than Christians already have. Give me a break.

(I'm a Christian by the way.)

First we destroy Califonia's Marriages, then we turn all the boys gay and the young girls lesbians....ahahahahahaha the gay agenda is destroying America....hahahahahahaha....y
ou can't stop us.....God can't stop us.....hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados.....we're still debauching......ahahahahaha

I didn't even agree with civil unions for gays before but I now agree gay people should be able to have a civil union if they want it. But leave the Sacrament of Marriage alone.

I'd be happy to see the government get out of marriage entirely, and just have uniform treatment under the law of civil unions and all other romantic partnerships between consenting adults.

But if the "sacrament of marriage" is something that secular institutions like the government must honor, why are gay couples the only ones who get left out?

Sacraments are something for churches to decide, not government.

Sacraments are something for churches to decide, not government.

Posted by rcade at 2008-05-15 03:30 PM

What is stopping the churches from performing the marriages? Could it be the parishoners? How is that different from the voters will regarding State law???

how sad for you that you would equate the equal rights of two loving souls of legal age to that of child molesters. Exactly what are you trying to achieve? Perhaps you need to cut down on the faux news channel a bit and tune into reality


Because Human Rights are Human Rights. The door is open now. Marriage is NOT just about a man an a woman. Open your mind.

Now now Katie...that just strikes a little bit too close to home for many of the fundamentalists. They love telling people how to live their lives, however, watch what happens when you start telling them they can't do things they quite possibly would do. They will start quoting the Bill of Right verbatim (with an abridged version of the first ammendment to be sure)!

"Open your mind."

Posted by CoCoBeware

And your butt.

Sincerely,
CoCoStuffer

CoCoBeware is trying for the award for fucking dumbest post of the day. Let's wish her luck!

"Open your mind."

On second thought, Coke, umm...keep yours shut.

Please.

Why don't we amend the Constitution to require the death penalty for lardasses?


Posted by anton


Denny Hasturd would be the first one put to death.

Most interesting how the gay marriage opponents here seem to focus almost exclusively on male gay marriage and the anal sex thing, but lesbians are hardly discussed and seemingly get a pass.

Hmmmmm...

Allowing same sex marriage is just another attempt by the Right Wing religious nuts to end Gay sex in America!!!

What is stopping the churches from performing the marriages? Could it be the parishoners? How is that different from the voters will regarding State law???


Because a government is required to govern under the Constitution.

It is sad to see apologists arguing on behalf of discrimination solely because the mob wants to discriminate.

"It is sad to see apologists arguing on behalf of discrimination solely because the mob wants to discriminate."

Yes if they had their way we would still be in the 1960s when half the states banned interracial marriages.

califchris:

You belong in some Third World country with a nice dictator, not America.

The whole fucking idea behind America is that we do not subject peoples' rights to political process. They are inalienable, which means that we consider them something that belong to everyone, automatically - no votes, referendums, court cases, or other bullshit.

I promise you, if someone took it into their giddy gay head to abrogate your rights by means of a popular vote, you'd quickly be talking out the other side of your ignorant, truthiness-laden, overprivileged mouth.

This is indeed a sad day for our country when the Supreme Court of California overrules the stated will of the people.

Anyone who equates legitimizing homosexual marriage with the rights of blacks, women and whatnot is either a homosexual of a pathetically open-minded friggin' liberal moron. Overturning the most basic of laws that a society needs to function is the surest route to moral decay of a society and the eventual decline of that said society. If the people of California do not approve the Constitutional measure afforded to them in November to negate this ruling our own nations internal terrorists (the PC) have won.

I live in California.... This SUCKS... Pandering to everyone....... What's next, providing schools, medical care, housing, welfare to illegals at taxpayer expense? Wait, we already do that. No wonder the state is fucking broke. If the weather wasn't so fucking good I would move.

Heating bills will be a bitch in the near future.

I am so glad that rosie and the rest of her fucking gay nazi friends can now get married. Beware of what you wish for.

Get out of my state old man.

You'd think fundamentalists would be all for an amendment banning adultery.

Posted by katieberry



Yeah, right!!! They are usually the worst adulterers, and many times they cheat on their wives with handsome young men!

This is indeed a sad day for our country when the Supreme Court of California overrules the stated will of the people.



What if the will of the people was that anyone with over $10 million in assets could be killed and have their assets redistributed to the masses?

What if the will of the people was that anyone that did not have blue eyes could not vote?

What if the will of the people was that men could not own property?

Lets take the gloves off this argument, shall we? This is the issue.

The democrats want Gay marriage legal, so that in schools that can teach your kids how to fuck each other up the ass properly, and that a gay person is equal 100% to a straight person in raising kids.

So, all you democrats, why don't you come out and say it.

You want it publicly taught how to fuck people up the ass.

I seriously, hope you fucking democrats can handle what you want so bad. I hope your kids grow up and you catch them taking it up the ass in your own beds. IF your own kids get aids, because of your political agenda, you have nobody to blame but yourselves.

you sew what you reap.

Kuma

Kuma, Have you always been a complete fucking retard or is this a new development?

"This is indeed a sad day for our country when the Supreme Court of California overrules the stated will of the people.

Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch"

PS: That Brown v. Board of Education, Loving v. Virginia, 19th Amendment, and Emancipation Proclamation really sucked too.

Love, Scotchie

"This is the issue."

Yer stupidity is appalling.

You have absolutely no concept of "the issue".

"you sew what you reap.

Kuma"

I think it would have to be either "you sew what you rip", or "you sow what you reap", Kumquat.

I notice that there is a correlation between homophobia and stupidity. Therefore homophobia is probably an inheritable trait.

This is a very big win for the Democrats...
I wonder if they will flood to the "Meet The Depressed" this sunday to express their victory.
Wow...Democrats are really getting things done..
Congratulation democrats...little did you think this is going to be played everywhere on the news and will send those undecided evangelical right back to McCain..
Democraps are stupid...

The democrats want Gay marriage legal, so that in schools that can teach your kids how to fuck each other up the ass properly, and that a gay person is equal 100% to a straight person in raising kids.

So, all you democrats, why don't you come out and say it.

You want it publicly taught how to fuck people up the ass.


Kuma

With everything that's been going on in congress lately, I would think that this is what the republicans want.

The democrats want Gay marriage legal, so that in schools that can teach your kids how to fuck each other up the ass properly, and that a gay person is equal 100% to a straight person in raising kids.

So, all you democrats, why don't you come out and say it.

You want it publicly taught how to fuck people up the ass.


Kuma

With everything that's been going on in congress lately, I would think that this is what the republicans want.

Gives a whole new meaning to the term cock ring!

sorry about the double!!

"So, all you democrats, why don't you come out and say it.

You want it publicly taught how to fuck people up the ass."

Kuma:

Only if they insist upon voting to restrict gays' rights. In that case, I think they should be fucked up the ass as voter education. I do not want anyone voting without adequate knowledge of the issues.

May all your kids grow up to be gay, and fuck many other men up the ass. Thats what you wall want right?

I mean 2 men parents is the same as man and a woman right?

Shall you educate your own kids on gay sex, or should NAMBLA?

Which one?

You point out my bad grammer as if that takes anything away from the argument.

your the fucking morons. Me and you are at war. We will never agree, I will never go along with any democrats ever, and youll have to kill me and 10's of millions of other people like me to impose your bullshit on me/us.

Kuma

With everything that's been going on in congress lately, I would think that this is what the republicans want.

Posted by geezer1 at 2008-05-15 04:25 PM | Reply

On the heels of this big coup in California, I'm sure the Republicans in Congress will push forward with their much desired "Free Anonymous Hummers in Public Toilets" Amendment to the U.S. Constiution.

"The tax end of it is the most important. Gift taxes make a same-sex household IMPOSSIBLE."


This is a really interesting point. Has the Federal Gov't gone after same-sex couples who failed to report "gifts" from their significant other? B? Taxman? Danforth?

CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT RULING:

"Send out your men, so that we might marry them!"



SODOM and GOMORRAH RULING:

"Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we might know them."



Ahhh yessss! Ain't America Grand?

Me and you are at war.

Cool. Sledgehammers at 10 paces.

And I predict that dozens and dozens will be rushing to the altar.

Call it . . . 300 people. Tops.

However, by overturning the law that defined marriage as between 'A' man and 'A' woman, they've thrown the door open to plural marriage and polygamy. And there are a LOT of people who would be signing up for that.

your the fucking morons.

Is this guy for real?

"Me and you are at war. We will never agree, I will never go along with any democrats ever, and youll have to kill me and 10's of millions of other people like me to impose your bullshit on me/us.

Kuma"

What a frickin' DRAMA Queen!

And there are a LOT of people who would be signing up for that.

Oh yeah? Name some.

"You point out my bad grammer as if that takes anything away from the argument."

You don't have an argument, shit-fer-brains.

DoubtingThomas, what are you, like fifteen years old? You sound like you have a high school level of paranoia about sexuality.

and youll have to kill me and 10's of millions of other people like me to impose your bullshit on me/us.

Or we can just wait. I mean, it can't take that long to get peritonitis when you eat so much shit on a daily basis.

You sound like you have a high school level of paranoia about sexuality.

He's just still a little geeked out from the time his dad taught him where to hide the salami.

Kuma....

So if your girlfriend or wife told you that you could "play her back nine" you would turn her down? No? Oh right, because you aren't gay it is different.

The sheer stupidity of your argument is eclipsed only by your colossal ignorance.

You are exactly right about one thing. Most democrats (myself included) absolutely believe that two homosexual people can raise kids as well as two "straight parents." No argument there at all.

"Hmmm. No on bestiality since one of the parties is not able to give consent or enter into a contract." - SanAntonioRogue

What is your stand on abortion then? Adoption of an infant, or any other act where an individual is unable to give consent?