28 delegates are but a drop in the bucket.
Menu
Front Page News Weblog Comments Flagged Comments User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Edit Account RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Author Info
ness_gadol
Billy the Mountain (Picturesque and Postcard-y)
Private E-mailNo Home Page
Joined 2006/01/27Visited 2008/08/14
Status: user
MORE STORIES
( comments) ...
Special Features
Daily Nooner
Links
SportsFilter Jacksonville News Watching the Watchers Workbench Diculous Designs Meme13 RSS Spec Convert Celsius to Fahrenheit
Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.
She's got a hole in her bucket.
Posted by Jomama at 2008-05-13 02:48 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Yeah, losing by a 40-point margin in a demographic that he desperately needs to win over is nothing. Nothing at all. Keep on repeating that.
Posted by cookfish at 2008-05-13 05:08 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
The polarizing white vote may even indicate that Obama is vulnerable to a McCain candidacy. McCain, the candidate chosen as scapegoat to receive a drubbing this year, may make it a contest. So, the questions are, "Will there be a polarization of the white vote in West Virginia? What percentage of the vote going to Ms Hillary would be recognized as a polarization of the white vote? Would a 65%-35%, Hillary-Obama division scare the delegates? Would it be seen by delegates as a precursor of things to come, having a candidate with no coattails to help carry the other candidates?
Posted by Johnson at 2008-05-13 05:47 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
losing by a 40-point margin in a demographic that he desperately needs to win over is nothing. I didn't realize that WV was its own demographic. Who won Iowa again?
Posted by ness_gadol at 2008-05-13 06:29 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Shhhhh. Those aren't really "white" folks. Everyone knows that only the South (being handed note with "North Carolina" on it)....oops, nevermind.
Posted by Jomama at 2008-05-13 06:57 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
-Who won Iowa again? Old-school, pre-Rev Wright Bitter Clingergate thinking at it's best, lmfao!! He's lost what, 7 of the last 9? Lost WV, Lost PA, Lost Ohio, Lost FL...... If this keeps up, SDs will definitely stay put till after June 3rd, if only to see what happens with FL and MI. And it may become apparent by then that race should not be the consideration, but that electability should.
Posted by Corky at 2008-05-13 08:11 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Okay, am going to take a bubblebath now. ... Posted by CalifChris at 2008-05-08 11:31 PM
Posted by nullifidian at 2008-05-13 08:13 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Obama has lead in SD's. 282 to 273. Let's see if that widens in the next few days, or does Hill catch up?
Posted by bigjohn_1972 at 2008-05-13 09:50 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
If this keeps up, SDs will definitely stay put till after June 3rd Except for the 27 that have gone toward Obama this past week alone, of course. But don't let that bother you.
Posted by ness_gadol at 2008-05-13 11:08 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
She will win 19 of the 28 delegates and Obama will take 8. Figures from CNN with 98% reporting. So she gains 11 pledged delegates in the Wset Virginia primary. Next week she should win Kkentucky and he should win Oregon. Then on June 1 she should win Puerto Rico and on June 3 he should round it out with two vivtories in Montana and South Dakota. DNC meets May 31 to make some ruling on Flordia and Michigan which should drive the final nail in her coffin. Rules are rules Hill, you signed that agreement back last fall to abide by the decision of the DNC to strip Flordia's and Michigans delegates for moving there primaries ahead and now you are crying fowl because you are behind and want to use them. Tough break Hill.
Posted by JoeLabey at 2008-05-14 01:34 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
-you signed that agreement back last fall to abide by the decision of the DNC to strip Flordia's and Michigans delegate Not even close. The candidates were told that they needed to sign an agreement not to campaign in those states. Period. Nothing about whether they agreed with the DNC ruling. Since then the DNC approved re-votes in both states if the candidates would agree. Clinton did, Obama decided it was better to disenfranchise voters and lose the general than to lose them in the primary.
Posted by Corky at 2008-05-14 11:44 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
john stewart has this summed up very well.. www.thedailyshow.com enjoy. all the best
Posted by sense at 2008-05-15 10:18 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.