She's just a regular baby making machine.

Obama's Fault! might as well start now since it looks like has good chance to be President.

These people every hear of contraceptives? Morons.

Maybe they could call the next one Jughead.

Hey someone aught to send Her a diaper dispenser that She can wear on Her back so when they go shopping or whatever the old man just has to pull ot a diaper from behind Her and procede to changing it. Damned 18 Kids soon She will have enough for Dubya's future wars.

Larry Mohr

Her V's gotta be something like that sinkhole in Texas by now.

I'm obsessing over what the name will be, given the constraint that it must begin with a J and should either be Biblical or sound country.

My bet: Jeb if it's a boy, and Jeraldine if it's a girl.

As long as they are paying for it, who cares?

At least they are not welfare losers.

How about JollyRancher??

Larry

Her V's gotta be something like that sinkhole in Texas by now.

I believe the proper phrase is "like fucking a bowl of soup."

It's a crime against humanity. Not as bad as offing 4,000 of your own soldiers to line your pockets and inflate your ego, but considerably worse than a blowjob by an adult intern. herm

Can You imagine Her coochie in say 40 Years?? It will look like the mouth of the Grand Canyon Ya know.

Larry Mohrn

"As long as they are paying for it, who cares?

At least they are not welfare losers.

Posted by dean_buvia "

Hey dumbass, you think this couple will pay anywhere near the amount of taxes necessary to educate this brood?

Their neighbors will be one to pay for this couple's self-indulgent, narcissistic "hobby."

Dang that's a lot of babies--We have two and that's a handful!

Did you read the article Null?

They are homeschooled--and they have the right moral center and values--

Are you jealous?


Murphy

"All the children are home-schooled and participate in domestic chores, which the family call "jurisdictions."

Oh great Home Schooling. Just what We need. More dunderheads.

Larry Mohr

"They are homeschooled--and they have the right moral center and values--"

Translation: they're self-righteous bible thumpers who will brainwash their kids.

Hey dumbass, you think this couple will pay anywhere near the amount of taxes necessary to educate this brood?

Their neighbors will be one to pay for this couple's self-indulgent, narcissistic "hobby."

Posted by nullifidian


Maybe in null&voids world we should be like China and limit couples to two children.

Then they could drown the females as they come out.

What a clASSless act you are.


rwd

They are homeschooled--and they have the right moral center and values--"

Translation: they're self-righteous bible thumpers who will brainwash their kids.

Posted by nullifidian

Man, what a fucking loser you are.


rwd

"Man, what a fucking loser you are."

Uh huh. They ought to give you tax bill for all the public services their little brats will use.

The population bomb keeps on ticking.

"What a clASSless act you are... what a fucking loser you are."

The Don has a kind word for all. He will not speak to the points that only China's model can save the world OR that an 18-kid family will strain the trailer park's resources. herm

Look at the bright side. They could have been Muslims.

"They could have been Muslims."

Posted by Ray


Great.
Five wives and 90 kids.

Translation: they're self-righteous bible thumpers who will brainwash their kids.

Posted by nullifidian

I can imagine Nulli teaching his kids how to avoid work.

I can imagine Ray teaching his kids to be good little capitalist wage slaves for corporate America.

Hahaha. I have my kids buying all the gold and silver they can afford.

It is a source of wonderment how Nulli manages to maintain his freedom from work. Where would he be without "socialist tax slaves?"

"It is a source of wonderment how Nulli manages to maintain his freedom from work."

Hey Goofy, you don't know anything about me, whether I work, whether I'm retired, whatever.

You always tell me to judge you by what you post. I'm not ashamed to say I work for a living. You seem to be to the point of putting it down.

My kids are adults.
They make their own decisions.

My ex and I gave them a serious education, seed money, and the admonition to "write when you find work."

Personally I think they'll contribute more than any 18 home-schooled drones or 90 uselessly indoctrinated superstitious, suicidal morons.

Just about half of her entire life has been spent being pregnant.

Time for a tummy tuck.

"You always tell me to judge you by what you post. I'm not ashamed to say I work for a living. You seem to be to the point of putting it down."


Where do you come up with this bullshit? I'm always defending workers, unlike you, who is always defending corporatists. Why would I put workers down? No one should be ashamed to do an honest days work, regardless of occupation.

"Just about half of her entire life has been spent being pregnant."

So much more important than thinking about how the fuck you are going to feed these useless morons when you are engaged in overpopulating a planet.

Soon Africa will be the norm.

The mathematical inevitability was obvious in 1957.

What a waste.

Odd, I have an opening in my company for 90 uselessly indoctrinated superstitious, suicidal morons.

No one should be ashamed to do an honest days work, regardless of occupation.

Unless like you, they think of employment as slavery.

unlike you, who is always defending corporatists.

We just went through this the other night. I'm tired of going through this time after time with a flea brain.

Hey lady, it's a vagina, not a clown car.

This cock jockey needs to break a couple ankles to slow her down to a trot.

This cock jockey needs to break a couple ankles to slow her down to a trot.

More like she needs to tie her ankles together for a couple years and give it a break!.

'No way I am going to be a with slut that has a gut from drinking too much nut.'

Insane Clown Posse

Where the fuck is Peta? Jees battery hens have a better life than this!

Employment as a capitalist wage slave is a form of slavery.

So is being an American taxpayer. Indentured servitude. It's all just a game with a hundred sets of rules. The only real freedom we have is to choose which set you plan to play by.

Employment as a capitalist wage slave is a form of slavery

Marxist claptrap. It's a voluntary contract.

Secondly, real freedom cannot be realized as long as people engage in necessary but unwanted labor.

You have to produce to survive. That means work. Even primitive societies had to work.

the 20/80 society.

The doomsdayers have a perfect record of being wrong. Just as bad as the Christians. It goes back to your ignorance of the concept of wealth. What you fear is a successful capitalist society.

Then I ask, wouldn't that free people from what you call "unwanted labor" as it has been doing since the 19th century? And this bothers you?

"The doomsdayers have a perfect record of being wrong."

That's funny coming from a doomsayer who daily predicts the Apocalypse.

What you miss, of course, is that it is not doomsaying at all to envision a society where 20 percent of the population can do all the necessary labor. That's a human achievement. Using technology to displace unrewarding manual labor is a good thing in the long run. Reactionaries like you that are so locked into this 19th century industrial capitalist mentality can't see it.

"Marxist claptrap. It's a voluntary contract."

Bullshit. You have the freedom to choose between corporate tweedledee and corporate tweedledum. You're satisfied with that. You think choosing your corporate master makes you free. Your conception of freedom is narrow and reactionary.

The difference is that my pessimism on our economy of based on sound knowledge of theory, history and statistics. It's reality.

Using technology to displace unrewarding manual labor is a good thing in the long run.

Then what's the problem?

Reactionaries like you that are so locked into this 19th century industrial capitalist mentality can't see it.

It seems to me that it is Marxism that is based on 19th century mores. I see a future with unlimited supplies of energy. I see artificial intelligence close to matching human intelligence. An 20/80 society would be impossible without them. So I don't see what you are talking about with this 19th century mentality.

Would you like for me to engage Ray?

It's easy pickens with the uninformed, not so with the masters....


*******
I miss a good beat down, nair and a'gain...

You have the freedom to choose between corporate tweedledee and corporate tweedledum.

You can choose self-employment or starting your own business. You have the freedom to quit jobs you don't like. I've had good employers and bad employers.

Employers have to compete for employees as well as compete for customers. That's had a major impact on improving employment conditions.

So much more important than thinking about how the fuck you are going to feed these useless morons when you are engaged in overpopulating a planet.

Soon Africa will be the norm.

The mathematical inevitability was obvious in 1957.

What a waste.


Posted by Zatoichi


Do you actually think the poor Duggars give two shits what you say.
Explain how this family is causing all the world problems.
The Duggers,Africa,the Duggers,Africa,yeah thats it.
Do you suggest limiting familys to two children?
Two males maybe.....
What is the cost in human life on that one.
That idiot herm thinks China is doing the right thing.
Forget about the morality which you liberal losers preach all the time.
The more herm speaks, the more i think humanity took a step backwards with this turd.
Any little news story on this site brings out the most stupid in most of you.
The liberal mantra is hard at work, demonize someone and you get to sleep good at night.
What a fucking bunch of losers.
What a bunch of losers.
You should all die.
Most of you already are.
Fuck off.


rwd

"Using technology to displace unrewarding manual labor is a good thing in the long run."

Then what's the problem?

A different mode of distributing income will be necessary in a society where most workers are superfluous. Your model of busy little worker bees in industrial plants will be relegated to the dustbin of history.

"Do you actually think the poor Duggars give two shits what you say."

No, do you?

It's been too late for decades.
You're all fucked, except for 2%, deal with it.
Night, losers.

Your model of busy little worker bees in industrial plants will be relegated to the dustbin of history.

What an imagination! My engineering specialty is factory automation.

A different mode of distributing income will be necessary in a society where most workers are superfluous.

Hayek coined the term "spontaneous order" to describe distribution from the individual level. In other words a true free market without government interference. Central planning has proved over and over again to be incapable of managing a complex market society. The root cause of the coming depression has to do with the failure of central planning.

What's with all the hate?

Some of you people are warped.

Good Grief! That woman's vagina will soon have its own zip code!

"Central planning has proved over and over again to be incapable of managing a complex market society. The root cause of the coming depression has to do with the failure of central planning."

I'm not a fan of central planning. I would rather use market signals, when possible, to determine production targets. That being said, the modern corporation is nothing if not a bureaucratized, central planning institution on a large scale.

SamBarber it already has it's own inbox and outbox. Soon it will have it's own zip code and time zone. I'm thinking "Birth Valley"

Larry Mohr

rwd




Posted by rightwingdon at 2008-05-09 09:37 PM


big woo

Have you met Ray?
He's more stupid and useless than you are.

Silly doctrinaire theories which regard the state as a parasitic excrescence on society cannot explain its centuries-long persistence,

Nonsense. It's easy to explain. Politics is religion by another name. Like priests, politicians offer more than they can deliver. They use the same brainwashing techniques to keep the masses under control.

To demonize state authoritarianism while ignoring identical albeit contract-consecrated subservient arrangements in the large-scale corporations which control the world economy is fetishism at its worst.

With what military? The history books are replete with empires that deteriorated into bankruptcy and tyranny long before corporations existed. Whatever police power corporations derive, it is through the agency of State. The argument is silly.

Have you met Ray?
He's more stupid and useless than you are.

Posted by Zatoichi

Funny. He says that every time I embarrass him.

I would rather use market signals, when possible, to determine production targets. That being said, the modern corporation is nothing if not a bureaucratized, central planning institution on a large scale.

And they often fail. When corporations fail, their losses are compartmentalized. When governments fail, the whole nation suffers for it.

"Silly doctrinaire theories which regard the state as a parasitic excrescence on society cannot explain its centuries-long persistence,

"Nonsense. It's easy to explain."

Baloney.

That was easy.

On point, you haven't refuted that statement at all. The state and capital are symbiotic, and always have been. You're like someone that explains phenomena they dislike or can't explain as "aberrations" or "anomalies" that don't undermine the model.

"With what military? "

That's what's called a non sequitur. You didn't address the argument at all.

'He says that every time I embarrass him."

Posted by Ray at 2008-05-09 10:05 PM

[citation needed]

I wouldn't want that many children for myself ( I have 1) but if the father/mother can support & raise them without Government assistance it is none of my damn business how many kids they have.
And Larry Mohr...Why do you have such a hard on against Home schooled kids?
Would you believe a lot of Liberal Democrats were home schooled? Are they are all dunderheads too?
I have several Dem. friends that would challenge you on this issue.
Sometimes you are really a self righteous condescending prick.
I guess you would prefer they dropped out of school and got a G.E.D.?

"Silly doctrinaire theories which regard the state as a parasitic excrescence on society cannot explain its centuries-long persistence,

The masses look to the State for protection. Famous thinkers like Hobbes, Mill, Marx, Plato, Aristotle and Locke wrote on that theme.

Religion has persisted longer than the modern nation-state. That doesn't prove it delivers what it promises. Same for the State.

The State is parasitic in the sense that it doesn't produce anything. Beyond some basic services, it is a consumption expense. Our government now consumes more resources than are available to sustain it. That is another way to explain the coming economic collapse.

Both religion and statism will persist as long as the masses maintain faith in them.

"I would rather use market signals, when possible, to determine production targets. That being said, the modern corporation is nothing if not a bureaucratized, central planning institution on a large scale."

And they often fail.
...
Posted by Ray "

So you agree with me that modern corporations are bureaucratized, authoritarian, central planners. Excellent.

Hey Zat. Credentials mean nothing when you can't explain the jargon you post. You're too retarded to argue with. You need another cat.

"The State is parasitic in the sense that it doesn't produce anything."

Well, if you discount spending that creates value. Where did the Internet originate?

On the other hand, any kind of pre-State entity like a priesthood was not possible until an economic surplus could be produced. To call the State parasitical, rather than a co-partner in capitalist development, is absurd.

So you agree with me that modern corporations are bureaucratized, authoritarian, central planners. Excellent.

I've seen them evolve into mini-governments over the decades.

Still, central government is the parent corporation by means of its complete monopoly over its borders, a monopoly backed by police and military force.

The Corporations derive their cartel powers through the central government. This began as far back as, I think, Elizabethan England when the queen granted monopolies.

"The masses look to the State for protection. Famous thinkers like Hobbes, Mill, Marx, Plato, Aristotle and Locke wrote on that theme.


Posted by Ray at 2008-05-09 10:28 PM"

I've been telling you this for years. People demand economic security; which is why laissez-faire is impossible. It always, and rapidly becomes regulated whenever implemented. People actually like unemployment compensation and workmen's compensation and social security, etc. They want security even at the expense of sacrificing potential greater returns in a privatized social security system. They don't want to engage in casino capitalism.

The fact that libertarians can't recognize this reality about human behavior is why you will be forever irrelevant.

Well, if you discount spending that creates value. Where did the Internet originate?

It doesn't miss every time. But on the whole, when bureaucrats are spending other people's money, they are not as prudent as an entrepreneur risking his own money.

Then we have to remember that the State takes its money by force and it does not have to make a profit. That gives the state the license to waste money on misadventures that the corporations don't have.

On the other hand, any kind of pre-State entity like a priesthood was not possible until an economic surplus could be produced.

That gets at the heart of what creates wealth. Only voluntary trade can do that. Because of the coercive nature of government, all it can do is redistribute wealth which in effect, destroys wealth.

To call the State parasitical, rather than a co-partner in capitalist development, is absurd.

I was talking yesterday about the State and the corporations as partners in crime. It makes both parasitic. That partnership is at the root of the coming Depression.

People demand economic security; which is why laissez-faire is impossible.

As far as popular support goes, I agree. That doesn't discredit the theoretical model of a perfect voluntary society. The model serves as a reference for understanding why coercive (socialist) societies fail.

The fact that libertarians can't recognize this reality about human behavior is why you will be forever irrelevant.

I can't speak for other libertarians. For myself, I strive to understand how societies work as a mechanic would understand how cars work.

Good discussion. Gotta go.

"Good discussion. "

Yeah it was.

as she gets older i can almost bet she will have one with a defect

My bet: Jeb if it's a boy, and Jeraldine if it's a girl.

Posted by rcade at 2008-05-09 06:58 PM | Reply

I'm putting my money on Jehosaphat and Jezebel. Why not? And, I heard today they are actually expecting #19, because she's carrying TWINS!

I'm hoping, for their sakes, that this is just a rumor.

"as she gets older i can almost bet she will have one with a defect"

Like her momma did.

I've been telling you this for years. People demand economic security; which is why laissez-faire is impossible. It always, and rapidly becomes regulated whenever implemented. People actually like unemployment compensation and workmen's compensation and social security, etc. They want security even at the expense of sacrificing potential greater returns in a privatized social security system. They don't want to engage in casino capitalism.

The fact that libertarians can't recognize this reality about human behavior is why you will be forever irrelevant.

Posted by nullifidian

I disagree, people do not demand economic security. People demand to be left alone.

This family is a perfect example. They are demanding nothing but to be left alone to live there lives as they see fit.

Unemployment compensation and workmen's compensation and social security are imaginations the government holds in it's benevolence in a false image that the masses are too stupid to know enough to take care of themselves.

"Unemployment compensation and workmen's compensation and social security are imaginations the government holds in it's benevolence in a false image that the masses are too stupid to know enough to take care of themselves"

Uh huh.

Any translators around?

"Unemployment compensation and workmen's compensation and social security are imaginations the government holds in it's benevolence in a false image that the masses are too stupid to know enough to take care of themselves.

Posted by Mato "

I nominate this as the Worst Sentence of the Week,

Any translators around?

Posted by nullifidian

Let me help you.

It means I can take care of myself. I don't need you to tell me what I need.

I second.

I nominate this as the Worst Sentence of the Week,

Or perhaps the Worst Sentence of the Weak.

Nullifidian-
Mato is an island. There had to be another, after Gary Cooper. Surely you saw this in the prophetic books...

nullifidian

Your the kind of idiot that thinks you know what's best for the little people.

The truth is you don't know shit about people outside your world. So if it fits in your world you can deal with it, if not, your puzzled due to your ignorance.

Nullifidian-
The shorter Mato: Child labor wasn't so bad, and laissez-faire would have gotten around to it without unions - through market forces, of course.

eventually.

heh,

It's not that bad. ;-)

heh,

It's not that bad. ;-)

Mato-
They fought for a lot you take for granted.

Joshua, the eldest (he is 20), noted that the time seemed right. "I wasn't expecting that," he said. "But it's been nine months [since the birth of the last one], so yeah."

LOL!!!

Joshua, the eldest (he is 20), noted that the time seemed right. "I wasn't expecting that," he said. "But it's been nine months [since the birth of the last one], so yeah."

LOL!!!

Posted by BetelG

You find that funny?

Kinda sick, don't you think?

Proves my point that you that think it's funny.

You must be in Jr High?

Good luck.

Do Conservatives have no sense of humor?

I guess some do...hell, one of 'em just got knocked up with her 18th!

The population bomb keeps on ticking.

Posted by Zatoichi

what the fuck is wrong with people like this? Just because you can have 20 children doesn't mean you should. oh well more meat for the machine when the machine breaks down.

An outstanding demonstration of biological superiority. A fortuitious confluence of circumstances which enabled this fertile couple to accomplish this stupendous feat.

An outstanding demonstration of biological superiority. A fortuitious confluence of circumstances which enabled this fertile couple to accomplish this stupendous feat.
Posted by Johnson at 2008-05-10 11:37 AM

What "fortuitious confluence of circumstance"? You mean she gets pregnant each and every act of intercourse? That her va-jay-jay is permanently distended? She is unnaturally producing more children than she could possibly mother effectively. Fertility does NOT equate "biological superiority", not even in the quickly replicating world of insects and rodents.

Those kids.. how embarrassing.

Reproductive freedom works both ways. So why are the libs so pissy today?

They do breed like trailer inhabiting rabbits don't they.

Question, if the average family has a hard time stretching their hard earned dollar to buy all the things they need, then what is the deal with this family? Do they get "help" from "anyone". ? Are taxpayers in that state subsidizing these people?

This lady is just 41 years old?

Figuring she can still have kids to, say, 50 years of age, how many more children is she gonna have? Maybe 4 or 5 more?

Question, how much of a CARBON FOOTPRINT is this family causing?

Figuring she can still have kids to, say, 50 years of age, how many more children is she gonna have? Maybe 4 or 5 more?

Wait until she starts popping out Down Syndrome kids because of her age.

OMG Ness, I hadn't thought of that. This story gets worse the more you think of it.

Reproductive freedom works both ways. So why are the libs so pissy today?

Posted by rightisright

except the public as a whole ends up having to foot the bill 99% of the time when this shit happens

I dunno. They home-school their kids. So what's $6,000 a year times 18 kids? Seems to me the state of AR is already up $108k a year, just because they don't like public schools. Bet this family still pays plenty in property and sales taxes, though.

Just because the kids of a lot of liberals grow up to be wards of the state doesn't make it true for everyone.

The Johnsons and right-wing dons not withstanding, this is just not a "cute" item for the features page. I suspect that many women have screwed 18 times in their lives without grinding out 18 Precious Little Persons (PLPs). Down Syndrome, grist for the Repub war mill, using up precious oxygen. Nothing cute or funny about it. Please don't encourage 'em any further. herm

Wow. Herm's a sicko, ain't he?

It's a crime against humanity.

Posted by herm
* * * *

Used to be that killing a lot of children was a crime against humanity. Now, it's having them.

only if the parents raise them to be rethuglicans

'Wow. Herm's a sicko, ain't he?"

Gets right at the heart of the issue, don't it? (Er ... HE?)

"Used to be that killing a lot of children was a crime against humanity. Now, it's having them."

RisR won't come right out and say that to his deranged fascist mind, birth control is just one more reproductive right to be condemned; people opting NOT to have 18 children are guilty of the same heinous murder as people opting not to carry pregnancies to term. Come out and say it, RisR: we gotta extend suffrage to the unconceived. herm

'Wow. Herm's a sicko, ain't he?"

Gets right at the heart of the issue, don't it? (Er ... HE?)

"Used to be that killing a lot of children was a crime against humanity. Now, it's having them."

RisR won't come right out and say that to his deranged fascist mind, birth control is just one more reproductive right to be condemned; people opting NOT to have 18 children are guilty of the same heinous murder as people opting not to carry pregnancies to term. Come out and say it, RisR: we gotta extend suffrage to the unconceived. herm

I wonder how much these assclowns have collected over the years from the taxpayers in terms of child tax credits?

Ooh!! I'm a fascist now!!

No, I don't believe the "unconceived" deserve voting rights. Then again, I believe you should have to be a taxpayer to have suffrage. But since that would disenfranchise about 50 million Dems, I won't be holding my breath.

No Herm, I'm afraid your douchebaggery has gotten the best of you. I'm all for birth control, and believe that if you want to have children--or not--you should have the right to do so without totalitarian know-it-alls like yourself calling them crimes against humanity.

I wonder how much these assclowns have collected over the years from the taxpayers in terms of child tax credits?

Posted by nullifidian
* * * *

A lot less than you'd think. If you have 3 or more qualifying children, the additional child tax credits are capped at the difference between Social Security Which means that after 5 children, there are no more tax credits available to anybody, period. Which means that this family is no more a drain on the taxpayer than a family of 3 living on welfare.
Feel better now?

Oops.
Meant to say, the difference between Social Security taxes paid in, and Earned Income Credit payments received.

"Which means that after 5 children, there are no more tax credits available to anybody, period."

That's good, but better yet let's limit it to 2 children. In fact, get rid of it completely. There are already deductions for dependents.

Suits me. Up to me, we'd get rid of the silly "married filing jointly" tax status too. Over half of Americans are unmarried, subsidizing the lifestyle choices of everyone else.

"Suits me. Up to me, we'd get rid of the silly "married filing jointly" tax status too. Over half of Americans are unmarried, subsidizing the lifestyle choices of everyone else."

Agreed. And it sounds like you disagree with the claim that there is a "marriage penalty."

I do agree with the claim, as would anyone who has ever been married. But as far as the tax code is concerned, no way.

"I do agree with the claim, as would anyone who has ever been married. "

lol

words of wisdom from herm the turd.



Down Syndrome,...

Not a peep about this until Ness Gadol mentioned it you fucking loser

using up precious oxygen...

???????????????


grist for the Repub war mill,.....

??????????????????


Please don't encourage 'em any further....


I do not encourage,live and let live is my motto

Like i said they broke the mold when they cast you you turd.

Sick fucking turd.


rwd

When the reasonably (third grade level?) literate righties run out of steam, which is usually pretty early, we have the RisR and RWD cretins calling their betters turds, commie traitors, whimps, pussies, douchebags and totalitarians, if I remember them. I even think RisR spelled totalitarian correctly. What we DON'T get from these apostles of responsibility is an explanation on how it does the world good to have 18 children. Content really is too much to hope for from these people. herm

Seems like some people will begrudge families their children. But as odd as it may seem in the West to have large families (and it is odd in the West, because the average average family in Europe has only one child (or a fraction above that)), but take a look at the parts of humankind that are "less civilized" than the West and count their children. The least developed parts of the world and the Muslim majority parts of the world are averaging far more children than the rest of the world. In Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and the Gaza Strip, places where the population is doubling every 16 years because of the high birth rate, a woman of 41 years with 10 or more children is not as odd as a woman of 41 with just one child!!!

It's a difference perspective, and, if my math is right, if Europe's women don't start having MORE than 1 child per couple, Europeans will lose their continent to their guests of different cultures and backgrounds by the end of the 21st Century.

Dhiminitude of their own making.

In Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and the Gaza Strip, places where the population is doubling every 16 years because of the high birth rate, a woman of 41 years with 10 or more children is not as odd as a woman of 41 with just one child!!!

Who would have guessed that burkas were sexy?

"Who would have guessed that burkas were sexy?"

Posted by Ray at 2008-05-10 08:02 PM

It's the underwear.

Well, the burgeoning populations of lesser breeds without the law will outstrip the numbers of civilized folk who don't procreate, and transform the landscape so that everyone is operating at a third world level.

The idolatry to democratic modes will enable the more numerous third worlders to take over the governance of what was once the Western world.

First the West allows the third worlders to enter the West and settle there. Then the give them "rights." Then the Westerners blithely proceed without any sense of what is to come if the trends continue. Leave yourselves to the gentle ministrations of the thrid worlders once they obtain control of government apparatus.

Be thankful to this family doing its part in the name of civilization. There is nothing in the article to indicate anything other than an intelligent group operating in concert to advance their welfare.

This group has worked to offset the childless, and possibly sexless Westerners that cannot or who say they will not reproduce. This family is heroic in fighting the good fight in the name of truth, justice, and the American way. Every indication is that it is a family of well above average people.

We are an overpopulated world. But this family is not the problem. The increasing population of third worlders is the problem.

"lesser breeds"

Damn hominids.
-insects.

Posted by herm at 2008-05-10 03:02 PM

... 18 Precious Little Persons (PLPs). Down Syndrome, grist for the Repub war mill, using up precious oxygen. Nothing cute or funny about it. Please don't encourage 'em any further. herm

"How many of you commenting on the size of this family are yourselves childless? Oh! Ashamed to say because you are biological dead ends?"

Posted by Johnson

Two

College educated.
One Magna Cum Laude and in grad school.
The other has a BA in Art from Rhodes and her own studio.

And they have way more than enough seed money.

Barring massive nuclear war, there will be survivors. And the survivors will be educated and have assets; And luck.

Poo happens.
But, to a great extent, you make your own luck.

And my wife has two kids as well.
One's a "mom" with two kids (She's very smart and deadly serious about it) and the other's an archaeologist, just like his dad.

Our four will leave more than they take, or die trying.

Nobody gives a hamster praise for having 18 offspring so why should this pig (human) be treated any differently?

"This family is an illustration of eugenics in action, an improvement of the breed."

I always hate myself if I ask "Johnson" to explain something, but what the hell: J, explain!

Do I consider myself an elitist? Alongside you and the rest of the right-wing illiterates, without a doubt. Evolutionary processes will prove me right, although perhaps not in my lifefime.

The number of my children (2) and grandchildren (5) is utterly irrelevant to these views. herm

Posted by Johnson

"There are few things as pathetic and pitiful as those isolates who enter old age without having any children, any generation to succeed them, any sense of belonging."

Yikes!! That hurt, man! But I don't think I'm pathetic being that I have no bio-kids.

FTR, I was once married to woman with children, from a previous marriage; she was incapable of bearing more. Do I have regrets? Perhaps. She had issues, which is why I am single now.

"How many of you commenting on the size of this family are yourselves childless? Oh! Ashamed to say because you are biological dead ends?"

Ouch again!

But yeah, perhaps I am a "biological dead end." I don't stress over it. Some breed, some don't. Perhaps some shouldn't be allowed to breed.

If this is what this family has chosen to do, if they can handle it (and they obviously can), and raise decent human beings, more power to 'em.