Don't forget the New York Times.

News flash. Neil Boorz and Rush Limbaugh have been making a mockery out of all things American for decades.

News flash. Neil Boorz and Rush Limbaugh have been making a mockery out of all things American for decades.
Posted by LetUsPrey at 2008-05-07 01:30 PM


YEAH!

That goes without saying! However, I don't ever recall a more blatant crime against America and the Processes ---- WHILE AMERICAN SERVICE MEN ARE DYING TO PROTECT those very tenants they seek to undermine for "fun"!

What's all the hubbub about?

What's all the hubbub about?

Posted by Pirate at 2008-05-07 01:52 PM


YEAH!

It's about a Group who Cry's "Support the Troops and Their Sacrifice for Your Freedom" at every opportune moment ---- that then Shits all over the "Troops" who have "Sacrificed their Lives for Your Freedom" by gaming the very System they Died Protecting!

But I know ---- its no Big Deal to You! Its just words after all ---- Not Something Like "Principle" and stuff like that!

And I intend to be part of and active in their final undoing! What about You?

Posted by Redneckville

Well Redneck, considering how angry and depressed you sound I think a hobby like this might be good for you. But don't you think you need to start with something a little less complicated, Like finger-painting.

Sorry I can't get worked up over it when the Democratic primary itself is designed where 800 some people have 20% of the say and have the ability to trump the voters.

I do think it's classless on Rush's and Neil's part. But it's no more un-American or disrepecting votes than the SDs.

"Well Redneck, considering how angry and depressed you sound"

YEAH!

Except what does my mood have to do with the blatant disrespect for the process of which many Americans have sacrificed their lives to preserve by the likes of a draft dodging drug addict pedophile named Limbaugh?

And whats less complecated than a Presentation of Black and White "Principle"?

Ironically, one of the complaints about the Democratic primary is that it's not democratic.

If you are really for democracy, then your rage should be directed at the Democratic party to fix their flawed system first to allow a 100% democratic primary.

As Clinton has pointed out, even the pledged delegates have the option to vote for whomever they wish regardless of how their constituents voted.

"If you are really for democracy, then your rage should be directed at the Democratic party to fix their flawed system first"

YEAH!

Now that's an Example Bush World "Responsibility" Personified!

Who is it again who is destroying American and its Principles?

And Boy Does it Speak Volumes to Their Sincerity!

Now, care to explain away how Limbaugh's behavior pays tribute to those who died defending your right to Free and Fair Election Processes? Or are you going to blame that on someone else too?

I already said Neil and Rush were classless by doing it but by all means, go on with your fake outrage.

Care to explain how an undemocratic Democratic primary pays tribute to those who died defending your right to "Free and Fair Election Processes"? Or are you going to blame that on Neil and Rush too?

I've give you a hint.

When you don't have a primary that is democratic, you don't have a free and fair election process.

But I'm sure you'll ignore that and then blame Republicans for all the world's ills per your MO.

A primary should be for registered party voters only. Period. You wanna vote, register for the party.

"A primary should be for registered party voters only."

And you should have been registered with that party at least thirty days before the primary election.

But the imperfectness of the Democratic Primary system in no way reduces the insult to American democracy that Rush and Boortz advocate. They have for years led many Americans to believe that any tactic on the right is acceptable if it helps further their agenda. This is not the first nor worst example of their disdain for democracy. A few months ago I was not a supporter of the Fairness Doctrine, I have since changed my mind. I am convinced that America will not ever regain its balance and move forward again until the electronic news media is ripped from the clutches of a few corporate owners and sold to a diverse group of owners who can present a diverse spectrum of opinion of which Limbaugh could be one but would not likely continue his dominance. Without a diverse variety of opinions and news this nation is too easily led to war, led to ignore huge problems, led to believe that accumulated wealth for a few is prosperity for all. We need to break up monopolies starting first with the media.

There is a great deal of discussion about when it is appropriate to display(and how) the flag of another nation.

This sounds more like a small minded red-neck genius. If he was serious about how to or not to display the Mexican flag, he would have found a way within the school policy's. The possession and displaying of your former national flag is common to virtually all nationalities. As long as the US flag is not being "shut out" or denigrated and that the display was for a holiday the do it.

When a foreign country's flag is flown to demonstrate an attitude negative to the US then it should be removed if needed by force.

Of course, an interesting question to pose:

Let's say you could go back to 2000 and do the same thing and "sabotage" the Republican primary in the same manner as Rush and Boortz advocate, and in doing so prevent, Bush from winning.

Would you?

* and in doing so, prevent Bush from winning.

Dang comma.

"A primary should be for registered party voters only."

I disagree. That would limit me from making the most informed choice.

Sorry I can't get worked up over it when the Democratic primary itself is designed where 800 some people have 20% of the say and have the ability to trump the voters.

I do think it's classless on Rush's and Neil's part. But it's no more un-American or disrepecting votes than the SDs.

Posted by Pirate at 2008-05-07 03:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nicely stated.

The Super communistic democratic party Delegates program is the most unpatriotic election process against the voice of the people I have ever seen. Talk about the elitests, the democratic party clearly shows they are case in point.

The simple fact though, is we are not a democracy, we are a republic, just like russia and china.

Americans have a right to step into that booth to vote for whomever they goddamn well please---with whatever motive they goddamn well please.

Little faggots like "Redneckville" had a specific title in the kind of society he wishes to create for the country he feels so alientated from.

Nomenklatura.

They had to subscribe to the Party line before they could "vote".

He is even doing this WHILE Americans die for your right to vote!

we are a republic, just like russia and china.

How is it that you're so fucking ignorant?

Or are you just faking it to be inflammatory?

"A primary should be for registered party voters only."

I disagree as well. I rather like not having to register for either party and instead vote on a per candidate basis.

What's the matter mao, did I take you spoon fed mantra?

I guess all you criers and whiners forgot about all those democrats that crossed over and gave John McCain the nod in the republican primary.

Bee Swell

did I take you spoon fed mantra?

Comparing the concepts of Russian and Chinese "Republic" to that of the United States is indicative of a fairly stupid motherfucker with very little understanding of civic processes or history.

I can assure you, it transcends any contemporary "left vs. right" horseshit one might participate in on some half-assed, left-wing blog on any given Thursday night.

LOL!

LOL!

Yes.

"LOL"

I'm glad you're "laughing out loud" and can communicate that fact to me with a couple of letters.

But, frankly, I'm more interested in your development as a well-rounded and informed human being.

A step in that direction is understanding in the differences between a republic and a "Peoples' Republic."

Hopefully, you're just playing the part of an inflammatory dumbshit who's just trolling for a reaction.

Certainly hooked a big fish didn't I.

It is strikingly humorous that you are all aflamed over such a small indication when your posts are constantly trudging half the system through the dirt.

It is strikingly humorous that you are all aflamed over such a small indication when your posts are constantly trudging half the system through the dirt.

Yes, but the substanative indicator is most often pronounced when the writer foists comparisons of falseness disguised as factual reality in a manner that basic human sense that is common is discarded away from windows.

the differences between a republic and a "Peoples' Republic."

In a true Republic, or even Plato's Fantasy, the Nation is led by a meritocracy in which those who are qualified to make the decision are given the authority to do so by the citizens.

So would you agree that the better educated and well informed should be the ones who make the decisions?

Would support among that group indicate a recognition of integrity, judgment, and leadership?


I have no clue as to what a "People's" Republic is unless it is a reference to Chinese Communism, which is pretty absurd if there's truly a belief that anyone advocates that for America.

Don't give me that shit Mao, you constantly pass off false disguised political support sided mantra as basic human sense, dismissing any opinion contrary to your out the window political standings.

I find your defending the democratic party of super delegates ominous though.

the differences between a republic and a "Peoples' Republic."

Wot, no luff fer Plato's Republic?

Tuff crowd!

Be Well.

I'm glad you're "laughing out loud" and can communicate that fact to me with a couple of letters.


"LOL" is three letters. A couple is two.

"LOL" is three letters.

No dipshit.

LOL is two letters:

"L" and "O".

The "L" gets used twice, but the sequence consists of only 2 letters.

To your credit though, that might be the most sound and reason-based "argument" you've ever made on this website.

Duly noted.

LOL has two letters of the english alphabet, yes.

To make it however, one needs to use three letters, the fact that one of them repeats is irrelevant.(all depends on how you look at it) Especially since I was just busting your tiny balls out of total boredom.

Been a long time since you were here more than once a week. Horse jacking season over?

LOL is two letters:

"L" and "O".

The "L" gets used twice, but the sequence consists of only 2 letters.


One of the four-letter words banned by the FCC was "piss" but by pinch d'Moo Moo it was really a three-letter word!

Sounds like Esperanto...better known as White Ebonics.

LMAO - another four-letter word by anyone's count.

In any party's primary, the intent is to elect that party's candidate. Could someone please explain why someone who is _not_ a member of that party should have a say in the matter? This is obviously not the same as voting in a general election, so why should the same conditions be applied to it?

I am a Vietnam Vet and a 10 year veteran of the US Army and will tell all you white and blue collar workers that Rush Limbauh is about as anti-american as you can find. Get behind Barack Obama's vision for no more influence pedling in Washington DC and true change for the better.

I am a Vietnam Vet and a 10 year veteran of the US Army and will tell all you white and blue collar workers that Rush Limbauh is about as anti-american as you can find. Get behind Barack Obama's vision for no more influence pedling in Washington DC and true change for the better.

Rush Limbaugh isn't so much anti-American as pro-Limbaugh. But, if giving advantage to his very personal charity means the country suffers, that's the way he plays it.