Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs

A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released Thursday indicates that 71 percent of the American public disapprove of how Bush is handling his job as president -- setting a new record low. "The previous all-time record in CNN or Gallup polling was set by Truman, 67 percent disapproval in January 1952," said Keating Holland, CNN's polling director.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Zap

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Links

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

It would mean a hell of a lot more to me if he ever acted like he gave a good Goddamn.

he cannot be "unpopular" if everyone keeps talking about him. "unpopular" means nobody cares enough to even mention your name. he's actually quite popular i'd say, perhaps even infamous?

A new poll suggests that President Bush is the most unpopular president
in modern American history.


Not the one any President would prefer but I guess you could consider it an
"accomplishment" of sorts.

Nanc

Obvious but what the hey...

unpopular
viewed or received unfavorably by the public

www.merriam-webster.com

Nanc, your little semantic point suggests a level of denial which is laughable.


Are you telling us that until we stop talking about how much America dislikes W, that he wont be considered, in your opinion, unpopular?


Would you prefer the phrase 'most broadly disliked?'

Point is, he has the distinction of being the most reviled president in the history of the nation.

Does that say it better?

Don't blame me, I voted for the better man--TWICE.

Ah ,the weekly worst President ever thread. I'm sure glad Rcade got the DR back up and running in time to sneak it in this week.

I'd like to take a moment to congratulate the people who made this possible -- the Supreme Court and the voters who chose Bush in 2000 and 2004. I didn't think it was possible to put someone in the White House who'd be worse than Nixon. I stand corrected.

"unpopular" means nobody cares enough to even mention your name.

Well, that's a new definition.
A poor one, but new.

SAM

Don't blame me, I voted for the better man--TWICE.

Me too. But then it turned out that I actually voted for whoever Diebold said I did.

......I wonder how he would fare in the "most incompetent" category.......

......sort of like a "Being There" come true.....

Imagine.

Al Gore. John Kerry.

Neither could defeat Bush - decisively.

So, here you have Bush, with the worst ratings that can be created - and what choices do we have this year?

John McCain who wasn't even thought of going into Iowa. All the contenders that started the battle are out (excluding Ron Paul, I think he's still at it.)

But, to present a better candidate than Gore and Kerry, we are presented Hillary and Obama.

If you had a choice between Gore/Kerry and Hillary/Obama - which would you choose?

Instead of a better candidate - did we go worse?
This was to be the year, 2008, that the D's take everything in the elections.

I think Hannity was wrong. He said the Republicans are their own worse enemy. They have the capacity to lose the election all by themselves. He doesn't lay that claim on Democrats.

These parties have found the capacity to defeat from within.

So what is wrong with the other 29%? Are they living under a rock?


So what is wrong with the other 29%? Are they living under a rock?

Posted by Unclesam

No you idiot. They are the top income earners.

Look; a very strong, viable candidate (who had a strong lead at the time) was completely dismissed by the American populous because of one, and only one incident:

They though the way he yelled "yeah" sounded funny.

If this is the sort of criteria that the majority of us use to select our leaders, then, uh, well.....

(sigh)

In 1999, my first thought was, "No way Americans would vote for this lamebrain"

My second thought was "They think they're supporting his father."

They heard him "speak" and still voted for him. Then reelected him.

And still 29% hold him blameless and say, "It's all Clinton's fault."


Jesus wept.

"They are the top income earners."

Translation: Maybe they don't support Bush, just their 60% tax rate slash on dividends.

Dear Hunting for Jesus

MOST UNPOPULAR CONGRESS EVER

........Thanks, Harry and Nancy !

Polling Data
RCP Average
Poll Date
04/07 - 04/29

Approve 22.0
Disapprove 68.7

They though the way he yelled "yeah" sounded funny.

It always blew my mind that Dean was shot down by such a random incident. The priorities of American voters are just about as FUBAR as they can possibly be.

MOST UNPOPULAR CONGRESS EVER

Ah, the congressional deflection. Nice.

"I didn't think it was possible to put someone in the White House who'd be worse than Nixon. I stand corrected."

Posted by rcade

Did you catch Lewis Black on Larry King?
He said pretty much the same thing.

"MOST UNPOPULAR CONGRESS EVER"

As if people consider things like that.

Quick: Which was the 3rd most unpopular Congress?




See?

Fredo

Since the Senate is pretty much a 50-50 tie, I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

Is it to let us know you're in the 29% on one side and in the 78% on the other?

"
They though the way he yelled "yeah" sounded funny.

Posted by HP "


"It always blew my mind that Dean was shot down by such a random incident. The priorities of American voters are just about as FUBAR as they can possibly be.

Posted by ness_gadol"



Ah yes another lovely liberal rewrite of history....

Because you seem so out of touch with what your own candidates think and feel, let me reimnd you how Howard Dean blew it....

He said that he "hates Republicans," that conservatives are "evil," that Republicans "never made an honest living in their lives," and that the GOP is "pretty much a white, Christian party." And then at a gathering of black Democrats Dean commented that the Republicans couldn't "get this many people of color in a single room" unless they included "the hotel staff."

Yeah, some piece of work, your hero Dean.

From Thomas Ward's 1688 poem "England's Reformation", Ward wrote, "Where to elect there is but one, / 'Tis Hobson's choice--take that, or none."

Looks like Nader again.

-sigh-

he cannot be "unpopular" if everyone keeps talking about him. "unpopular" means nobody cares enough to even mention your name. he's actually quite popular i'd say, perhaps even infamous?
Posted by nanc at 2008-05-02 12:58 AM


"unpopular" also is attributed to something commonly distasteful.. like leeches. Everyone has awareness of their medical uses, but they are not employed because they are a parasitic organism.

They though the way he yelled "yeah" sounded funny.

Posted by HP

It just shows how much slack Obammy is getting during this election.

This is big news??!!

Does this come as a surprise to anybody???

No.

The one getting the slack is McCain. For now. The media just can't get enough of the accidental hero.

"He said that he "hates Republicans," that conservatives are "evil," that Republicans "never made an honest living in their lives," and that the GOP is "pretty much a white, Christian party." And then at a gathering of black Democrats Dean commented that the Republicans couldn't "get this many people of color in a single room" unless they included "the hotel staff."

I like a man who tells it like it is. The only thing he left out is the stupid folks who vote Republican but who really don't benefit at all from Republican policies.

wiz
its weekly

because week by week bush makes himself look even worse

He said that he "hates Republicans," that conservatives are "evil," that Republicans "never made an honest living in their lives," and that the GOP is "pretty much a white, Christian party." And then at a gathering of black Democrats Dean commented that the Republicans couldn't "get this many people of color in a single room" unless they included "the hotel staff."

What's your point?

because week by week bush makes himself look even worse

Posted by klifferd

Not to mention it allows you lefties to focus on something other than the clowns running for the Democratic nomination

Why in the hell is this a main headline today?
In fact; why is it even being discussed again at all?
Is there really anything NEW to be said about this subject?
I think this is the 3rd. time in as many weeks this has been discussed.
Hell you can copy & paste the comments from this same topic from just a few days ago.

He said that he "hates Republicans," that conservatives are "evil," that Republicans "never made an honest living in their lives," and that the GOP is "pretty much a white, Christian party." And then at a gathering of black Democrats Dean commented that the Republicans couldn't "get this many people of color in a single room" unless they included "the hotel staff."

All of which he said AFTER 2004, Fredo. Try again.

It's a great thread because it drives righties nuts!
They voted for him, he's their president.
They should have their noses rubbed in it as much as possible. Every day would be good. They need to be reminded how their poor judgement has damaged this country. They should refrain from voting in the future.

he cannot be "unpopular" if everyone keeps talking about him. "unpopular" means nobody cares enough to even mention your name. he's actually quite popular i'd say, perhaps even infamous?
Posted by nanc at 2008-05-02 12:58 AM
YEAH!

And it hasn't Even Been Fifty Years Yet!

I wonder what, using your own definition, Makes Carter out to be in Bush World circles ------------ "Legendary"?

Stupidity from Howard Dean- Pre and during 2004
(thanks Wikiquote ):

"No doctor is going to do an abortion on a live fetus. That doesn't happen. Doctors don't do that. If they do, they'll get their license pulled, as well they should." -- Howard Dean during a teleconference with reporters on January 15, 2004

"I'm a Metrosexual" [1][2]

"I don't know. There are many theories about it. The most interesting theory that I've heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, I can't--think it can't be proved, is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis. Now, who knows what the real situation is, but the trouble is that by suppressing that kind of information, you lead to those kinds of theories, whether they have any truth to them or not, and then eventually they get repeated as fact. So I think the president is taking a great risk by suppressing the clear, the key information that needs to go to the Kean commission." -- Howard Dean describing a theory held by some that President George W. Bush knew about the 9-11 attack coming to America. [19]

"We don't know that yet. We don't know that yet, Wolf. We still have a country whose city is mostly without electricity. We have tumultuous occasions in the south where there is no clear governance. We have a major city without clear governance." -- Howard Dean's reply to CNN's Wolf Blitzer, when asked if Iraq was better off without Saddam Hussein, April 23, 2003.
In January 2004, Dean named the Book of Job as his favorite New Testament book.

"From a religious point of view, if God had thought homosexuality is a sin, he would not have created gay people." [20]

RCADE: You forgot kudos to the Naderites, especially those in Florida. But I an't believe "the surge is working" is the new "Mission Accomplished".


It's a great thread because it drives righties nuts!
They voted for him, he's their president.
They should have their noses rubbed in it as much as possible. Every day would be good. They need to be reminded how their poor judgement has damaged this country. They should refrain from voting in the future.

Posted by danni


Not me , dude. I am proud to be in the 29%.
Yep, that's right. WARTIME TERM LIMIT SUSPENSION!!! 3rd term! COME ON, LET'S DO IT! I gotta write Cheney and Rove a letter about this.

here's a direct cut and paste from Wikiquote.
funny as shit -
"Not only are we going to New Hampshire. We're going to South Carolina and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we're going to California and Texas and New York. And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we're going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House. BYAHHHHHHHHHH!"
Said after getting overly excited during the Iowa Caucus on January 19, 2004

news.bbc.co.uk

As soon as congress declares war, we can entertain your notion Fredo. But until then.... I mean really are you fuckin serious? No way anyone in their right mind would want 4 more years of this fuck. FFS please say your are jokin.

I didn't think it was possible to put someone in the White House who'd be worse than Nixon. I stand corrected.

Posted by rcade at 2008-05-02 08:36 AM | Reply

That begs the question: Is the country worse off with a lazy dunce in the White House than it was with a smart, paranoid crook? I don't think it is an easy answer. Nixon, for his part, wasn't incompetent. So, I suppose Bush is "worse."

It's a great thread because it drives righties nuts!
Posted by danni

I'm glad he was able to entertain you for the last 7 years and 3 months.

If FDR could do it, GWB most certainly should do it. ( hint: GWB is a better Prez than FDR was)



FOUR MORE YEARS !!!!!

Can't take much more of this entertainment.


You, however, are quite entertaining, Wisgod


As soon as congress declares war, we can entertain your notion Fredo.

Posted by Salaryman


Yes HELLOOO?!?! Congress- including most of the Dems- authorized the Iraq War, numbnuts.

You are too, Fredo.


Mentally ill, but entertaining.

"Yes HELLOOO?!?!"

Well, that isn't exactly true. They authorized the president to use force but he was supposed to return to Congress before invading Iraq. Also, the Congress voted based on the information they were provided which, we all know now, was a bunch of lies. Thus we get "Bush lied us into a war."

CARTER = WORST PRESIDENT EVER.

when you look at the track record, and not the "popularity" level.

GWB could not possibly stand a chance to look good based on a "popularity" vote as it has been a mainstay of liberal culture in this country to viciously and groundlessly personally despise him, from day 1, for the last 10 years

well I am sure that all of you have been sitting patiently but excitingly for my take on this, so here I am and here it goes.......

first of all this thread has it all and could be used as a liberals suck primer.

okay class, lets begin.......


It would mean a hell of a lot more to me if he ever acted like he gave a good Goddamn.

Posted by silver_ironist at 2008-05-01 10:14 PM


but you see, this is a texan thing. its not that we dont give a goddamn...its that we dont give a goddamn WHAT YOU AND LIBERALS THINK.....its a significant difference.

look through the thread and you will see pontificating, sanctamoney, FEAR, SORROW in not getting their way with media and bush v gore....and a mryiad of other related issues.
BUT it has to come to the real point behind all of the ranting with our gal pap MS DANNI will her post of 9:40 today......even after all of the obilgatory comments about IQ of conservatives she hits the liberal nail on the head with her and majority liberal opinion on how to solve their so called problem and it comes out pretty simply.....
conservatives should be denied their right to vote. its really simple...if we on the right dont agree to what ever the left says....just dont let them vote....
and there you have it class....and, now as always, lets see what we learned today and why its important.....

liberals suck and the irony.....democrats are the LEAST democratic people in the country.

wow this guy Danni can really spin ....

Well, that isn't exactly true. They authorized the president to use force but he was supposed to return to Congress before invading Iraq.

nice half-assed Clintonion "nuance" argument by the Dems, if that is truly what they think

Also, the Congress voted based on the information they were provided which, we all know now, was a bunch of lies. Thus we get "Bush lied us into a war
No lies. prove it. Prove that lies were told. you know what a "lie" is right? in fact , most of your Dem Congresspeople still say they made the best jusdegment based on the info at the time, same as GWB did. Congress did not have GWB as its only source of info to make this judgement.

anyhow, end of the day, Dems said "go to war" and I was responding to salaryman's claim that we were not at war. So dude, try not to just jump in and attempt to disagree and shoot down stuff out of context

even after all of the obilgatory comments about IQ of conservatives



BL2


Not so much as the IQ of Texans. Was that your nephew with the check?

and let me ask this question...

so 71% of the people hate him and that makes him the most unpopular pres ever...okay I get that.
but if you look at the precentage of people who do approve its 28% which is NOT THE LOWEST number among presidents........
so doesnt this mean that maybe in order to do all this once again that all people did is use the other number........
would one of you liberal brainiacs explain this to me.....please.since you know that its hard for us stupid rednecks bastards to think in any sort of coherent thoughts......you know.....stoopid sonsabitches from the south....

BL2,... whaddaya say?....wartime powers? third term? COME ON !

WHO'S COMIN WITH ME !!!!!! ??????

They authorized the president to use force but he was supposed to return to Congress before invading Iraq.
Posted by danni

Was the part about returning to Congress in fine print at the end of the Bill?

BLT,
Kindly STFU! You do not represent Texans you sorry little piece of shit.

Just wondering, has anybody actually read the Authorization?

Not so much as the IQ of Texans. Was that your nephew with the check?

Posted by TedBaxter at 2008


what are you talking about?

but since you are here....I thought this was a pretty funny way to end a post


And still 29% hold him blameless and say, "It's all Clinton's fault."

Jesus wept.

Posted by TedBaxter



but then I couldnt let this go without commenting on how pathetic it is....pretty disgracefull stuff


The one getting the slack is McCain. For now. The media just can't get enough of the accidental hero.

Posted by TedBaxter

How bad a president has Bush been? I think an argument could be seriously made that a monkey flipping a coin to make decisions would have done as well as he has.

And, you know what? At the end of eight years everyone would still love the monkey.

In 2007, my first thought was, "No way Americans would vote for this lamebrain"

My second thought was "They think they're supporting her husband."

They heard her "speak" and still voted for her. Then elected her.

And still they hold them blameless and say, "It's all Monica's fault."

Republicans wept.

Are Americans so stupid that it took them seven years to reach this conclusion or are our elections just rigged?

how many years did it take for the towelheads to plan out and set up 9-11?

would those have been the Clinton years?

how many deaths in the USA due to further terrorist activity since 9-11?

oh, zero?

mmm hmmm i see. yes.

CLINTON= MOST DEATHS TO UNSUSPECTING AMERICANS INFLICTED BY TERRORISTS.

CLINTON: " I want to go after this guy Bin Laden cuz he's a major threat to America"

..." okay, Clinton, we got him right here, want him? "

CLINTON: " Nah".

FREDO----You know, using that same trick you can blame the Marine Barracks Bombing on Lebanon on Carter and not Reagan. Go ahead, I bet you it works.

ZED:

...douchebagsayswhat?

"Douchbagsayswhat.....?"

I dunno, Fredo. Scroll up, All your remarks are still there.

.......what.....?"


Posted by Zed

Fredo you really are dumb as a box of rocks.

Why in the hell is this a main headline today?
In fact; why is it even being discussed again at all?
Is there really anything NEW to be said about this subject?
I think this is the 3rd. time in as many weeks this has been discussed.
Hell you can copy & paste the comments from this same topic from just a few days ago.

Posted by DrPepper at 2008-05-02 09:37 AM | Reply

Easy, this is for all the Lefty cranks to lap up ... again
-------
Proverbs 26:11 -- As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly.


Fredo you really are dumb as a box of rocks.

Posted by Salaryman

Fredo should kick your ass for insinuating he's a Democrat.

They need to be reminded how their poor judgement has damaged this country. They should refrain from voting in the future.

Posted by danni at 2008-05-02 09:40 AM | Reply

Danni,

You need to flip the page on your Word-of-the-Day calendar. You're still using the "poor judgement" line. Or maybe that's just your DNC/MoveOn/Kos talking point for today?

Wow, CheeseIdol sure is wound up this morning.

"Poor Judgment" is now only reserved for Obama.


Murphy

Fredo couldn't kick his way out of wet paper sack.

Anyone that blindly follow any party is mentally deficient.


Wow, CheeseIdol sure is wound up this morning.

Posted by Jomama

I'm all hopped up on Pancake syrup, Aunt Jomama.

V,

What part of energy gouging; deficits as far as the eye can see; NAFTA outsourcing; mass illegal immigration; unnecessary war; death, dismemberment forced dislocation of millions of innocents; and tax breaks for the rich do you like the most?

For what Shrub wasted every three days in Iraq we could provide health insurance to EVERYONE in this country that is uninsured. For what he has wasted in Iraq every year we could fund our Social Security shortfalls for 75 years.

But NO, its really just about losing wars while making tons of money for corrupt insiders. That's what our Government has digressed into. And things wouldn't change much under Clinton either.


BLT,
Kindly STFU! You do not represent Texans you sorry little piece of shit.

Posted by Salaryman


nicely put...I simply have no need to even respond with this exception. ..NO I will NOT shut the fuck up.....not now, not in the future...NOT EVER.......
the retort might be taken away from me and I will find someplace else. my computer might break but I will then write letters to editors..
my tv might break or cable might go out and I will turn on the radio.....all of those things might happen at the same time and I even then WILL NOT SHUT THE FUCK UP.......not now or EVER......
not when its my passion, my job, MY DUTY, to do my part to keep the liberal yoke of mediocroty from around my country's neck......


Just wondering, has anybody actually read the Authorization?

Posted by TedBaxter at


I have many many times

he was to confront the ongoing threat posed by iraq

he was required to enforce UN resolutions

no un resolution approved invasion

Iraq posed NO threat in March 2003, this was a documented fact.

Bush KNEW he was doing something that congress did not authorize

NO MATTER WHAT he would call for the vote on the second UN resolution authorizing the invasionof Iraq

he did not call for that vote

not when its my passion, my job, MY DUTY, to do my part to keep the liberal yoke of mediocroty from around my country's neck......


DAMN THATS GOOD....what a great line.....its such a shame that I didnt research the spelling of mediocrity.
ah but we are all guilty of having things missed in the throes of passion.......my stubby fingers were flying so fast I couldnt help it, but I can almost feel the attacks on their way......

As long as you acknowledge that you do not represent Texans. I will happily go back to ignoring your blather.

Also, I am glad that you recognize that you are in fact a sorry little piece of shit. Thanks for that.

liberal yoke of mediocrity

yeah

like the declaration of Independance
the Constitution
the billof Rights
the Gettysburg Address

yeah that yoke

dumbass

and truth....this question always comes afer a post like your last...
how many times were we supposed to go to the un....there had been HOW MANY resolutions and orders from the un for this and that?
and all the while, what else was going on in iraq? well we thought it as WMD but we are CERTAIN now that there was all sorts of back room deals BETWEEN IRAQ AND THIS SAME ORG that you wanted us to bend over backwards to and for.......
just how much were we to allow the un to say in something that at the time we thought to be a severe national security issue?

thank you for your reasoned response.

truth...those honored and cherished staples of our democratic republic have little to do with what liberals want to do with our taxes and our culture.

stupid sumbitch

stupid sumbitch


oh shit......once again I better explain this to people like salary.....

sumbitch....I was in no way questioning the legality or morality of truth's birth......its texian for dumbshit........

hey salary......ignore or not.....I really dont give a goddamn...

( wow....look at how I went right back to the original comment for my own comment here....and we are supposed to be so stupid and lack common sense....hee hee)

liberal yoke of mediocrity

individual liberty
extensive freedom of thought and speech
limitations on the power of governments
the rule of law
the free exchange of ideas
transparent government
rejected of Divine Right of King
Rejection of hereditary status
rejection of established religion
support the right to education
the right to health care
the right to freedom from poverty
social security
worker safety
environmental protection
civil rights
regulation of business
tolerance
stress the resolution of differences by peaceful means within the bounds of democratic or lawful processes
increase the involvement and participation of citizens in the democratic process
equality before the law
guarantee of an independent judiciary
presumption of innocence, no double jeopardy, and Habeas Corpus
not for the state to determine personal values


etc.

what a better way to head out to the course than to ask some deep thinking questions and then to 'bookend' the entire thread with reference to the very first comment of the thread.....there has to be some sort of journalistic process there in play....right rcade? LOL

and by the way......even from the 20 hole.......big brown....winner of the 08 derby...book it.....

how many times were we supposed to go to the un....



I know lets ask georgie peorgie puddin pie

Q.Thank you, Mr. President. As you said, the Security Council faces a vote next week on a resolution implicitly authorizing an attack on Iraq. Will you call for a vote on that resolution, even if you aren't sure you have the vote?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, first, I don't think -- it basically says that he's in defiance of 1441. That's what the resolution says. And it's hard to believe anybody is saying he isn't in defiance of 1441, because 1441 said he must disarm. And, yes, we'll call for a vote.

Q No matter what?

THE PRESIDENT: No matter what the whip count is, we're calling for the vote. We want to see people stand up and say what their opinion is about Saddam Hussein and the utility of the United Nations Security Council. And so, you bet. It's time for people to show their cards, to let the world know where they stand when it comes to Saddam.


clearly bush thought that at least one more vote,one more time to the UN to prevent a war of agression would be appropriate. NO MATTER WHAT

well a MATTER WHAT seems to have gotten in the way of his going to the UN.

you ask:
what else was going on in iraq?

answer, NOTHING. Inspectors told us so.

then you ask:

just how much were we to allow the un to say in something that at the time we thought to be a severe national security issue?


As much as the constitution, our treaty obligations and the congress require. cause all three of those required bush to go throughthe UN, which he KNEW he had to (he drafted that 2nd resolution authorizing force), he said NO MATTER WHAT he would call a vote on and guess what he didnt.

he is a liar

WELL SHIT>.......I almost forgot.....to wrap up my participation in this thread a thought for all of you liberals here..

just think about .......most unpopular pres ever...economy in the supposed tank.....republican candidate said to be carbon copy.

so a dem is a shoe in under these circumstances, right???????

NO>..they are going to fuck up even this apparent slam dunk.........and someone tell us what THIS means.....they fuck up EVERYTHING THEY TOUCH.....

thank you
thank you.......

come truth.....even you has to admit my last post was correct......even with all of this......dems are in REAL DANGER of not capturing the white house..what does THAT say about democrats.......
and I can predict the answer from some, if not you..
danni will tell us its the stupid electorate and others will tell you its the supreme court and none of you will lay blame to the DNC or dems in general......

As much as the constitution, our treaty obligations and the congress require. cause all three of those required bush to go throughthe UN, which he KNEW he had to (he drafted that 2nd resolution authorizing force), he said NO MATTER WHAT he would call a vote on and guess what he didnt.

he is a liar

Posted by truthhurts at 2008-05-0


and it didnt end this way but WHAT if it had...what if during all of this time of kissing the most anti american group this side of the aclu, something had actually happened.....
but those are issues for other times...


hasta laredo.......


BL2,... whaddaya say?....wartime powers? third term? COME ON !

WHO'S COMIN WITH ME !!!!!! ??????

Posted by Fredo_C

everyone in the ward except nurse Ratchet!

bush, I actually agree with you, dems should be better at standing by their principals, they dont and I blame the money in politics. Since dems and liberals represent the middle and lower class voter while the republicans represent the rich and the corporations (in general), dems and libs can no longer compete withouth catering to the wealthy. The wealthy have all the money and essentially have bought and sold our national political system.

If this country elects Cranky McSame, I swear I am moving to Costa Rica.

And I mean it this time!

something had actually happened.....
but those are issues for other times...


hasta laredo.......

Posted by bushlovertwo



nothing would have happened, he had no ability to do anything, bush knew and chose to invade anyway.

that makes it a war of agression.


what if pigs fly out your butt?

ah, the righties, dissemble, foam, and spew. Too bad.

Anyone read the excerpts from Lt. Col. Sanchez's new book?
Bushlover2?
Wisgod?
Slicksterwillie?
JJFJ?
VERNON?

Bueller...?

awesome geezer I was thinkin about macmurphy when I wrote that
;-)

All i need is the Chief, (and maybe Cheswick) backin' me up and we will kick ass all the way to Pennsylvania ave!!!!!!!

BTW i don't want Bush for a 3rd term...he has had his legs shot out from under him so bad by so many of his own countrymen that he cannot effectively be CIC of our Armed Forces anymore. Shame.

Fredo:
LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERALLIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL
There. Fixed that for you.

Vickithebiatch:
Your point?
oh, didn't have one, just wasting time at the high school computer?

That's what we thought.

BL2 wrote:
"its my passion, my job, MY DUTY, to do my part to keep the liberal yoke of mediocroty from around my country's neck......"

wow, a self-retorting retort!

he cannot effectively be CIC of our Armed Forces anymore. Shame.


The one thing this administration lacks is a sense of shame.

I think Bush had the ability to be 3+ GPA student but he was satisfied with a C because to him it didn't matter. He's never done his homework, and he's always had a sense of entitlement.

As it has been said, The Smile may be Phony, but the Smirk is for Real.

He's above all others, and I'm sure his response to the negative impression would echo the words of Dick Cheney: "Sooooo?"

All i need is the Chief, (and maybe Cheswick) backin' me up and we will kick ass all the way to Pennsylvania ave!!!!!!!

Posted by Fredo_

doesn't mean you're still not a retard!

"Liberal yoke".

Is that like a conservative noose?

So what is wrong with the other 29%? Are they living under a rock?

Posted by Unclesam


A deceptive percentage... something like 65% of Republicans are still cheering for their little hero.

The % of Repubs will continue to shrink, a lot of them hiding behind the "Independent" disguise.

bigpicture.typepad.com

www.usatoday.com

www.gallup.com

Is anyone surprised the CNN poll mentions nothing about the approval rating and gas prices? At least the Gallup suggests the trend. Not to mention it does not agree with this poll. I can't figure out why it became a thread, seeing as 70% of posts already point out they feel about Bush. If gas prices go down a buck in the next couple of months, there is no doubt these same fickle people polled would do a complete reverse.

Hey if Obama's pastor means that Obama is evil then what does it mean when Hillary's long time friend says stuff like this: www.youtube.com

She has known him for 30+ years. She "has" to know he held these views.

again?


doesn't mean you're still not a retard!

Posted by geezer1


Be careful, i actually AM developmentally impaired. Racist.

"Fredo:
LIBERAL......LIBERAL.....etc etc etc.....LIBERAL...
There. Fixed that for you.
Posted by vickithebrit"

Shouldn't that silly crap get dumped?

"If gas prices go down a buck in the next couple of months, there is no doubt these same fickle people polled would do a complete reverse."

Er Crispee.....do you know something the rest of us don't????
Does anyone really expect the fuel prices to drop $1 in the next couple of months???

Can You imagine what it's gonna be like in 20 30 40 Years for the sad fucks that voted for Dubya?? They are going to do their damnedest to try and forget all about Dubya. Trouble is they will still be scrubbing their filthy vile hands of that blood that they are responsible for. bwhahahahahahah serves them right.

Larry Mohr

"Shouldn't that silly crap get dumped?

Posted by Fredo_C at 2008-05-02 12:26 PM"

Don't be such a finger-sniffing pussy, Frodo.

HAHAHAHA Monte your life would not be the same without me posting here.

I am your sun that rises and sets and defines your day.

That's aight man, it's cool.

Better watch it, Frodo! www.stateschoolradio.com

Bush's Conspiracy to Create an American Police State: Part I, Police States Begin With False Flag Attacks

Nothing appears more surprising to those who consider human affairs with a philosophical eye than the easiness with which the many are governed by the few, and the implicit submission with which men resign their own sentiments and passions to those of their rulers.

www.opednews.com

I think Fredo is suffering from delusions of grandior and faux ego. Quite typical if You ask Me.

Larry Mohr

Bush's Conspiracy to Create an American Police State: Part I, Police States Begin With False Flag Attacks Posted by Bani

Bani I am going to assume you are not from the United States. Because, only one who is completely unfamiliar with living in true democratic society would postulate that Bush could employ Hitler methodology over here in the USA, and that this could get a foothold and turn our great free country into a fascist state.

Either you are THAT ignorant about the United States, for which you can be forgiven,

Or you are trying to be insulting, and in this case it takes more than a little man like you on a message board to bug me, for one.

Crispy and BLT. Two monickers reflecting an obsession with pigmeat. Or maybe that's pygmy. Their IQs. And now comes "Fredo," trying to put lipstick on the Bush pig. Let me second the posters who display amazement that ANYone can still stomach Bush. herm

Sperm-

you are not making cents.

what's with the pig theme.

taking creative writing in highschool?

All I ever said was:

FOUR MORE YEARS !!!!!

Er Crispee.....do you know something the rest of us don't????
Does anyone really expect the fuel prices to drop $1 in the next couple of months???

Posted by danni at 2008-05-02 12:29 PM |

Other than your inability to keep things in perspective? Pasting only half a post? Wouldn't it be simpler to ignore than try and create flaws in posts?


Crispy and BLT. Two monickers reflecting an obsession with pigmeat. Or maybe that's pygmy. Their IQs. And now comes "Fredo," trying to put lipstick on the Bush pig. Let me second the posters who display amazement that ANYone can still stomach Bush. herm

Posted by herm at 2008-05-02 01:39 PM


Not that BLT or Fredo need someone like me to defend themselves against the likes of you... But I find it ironic you post some crap about IQ and I post factual data from entities much smarter and with many times the recources as you. Where does that put you in the realm of things??? Other than a left wing sheeple of course.

Well,

He certainly won't get much of the Islamofascists' vote!

I find it difficult to believe that Bush is worse than that Nit Wit Carter. Something is flaud in this survey.

"Something is flaud(sic)"

Indeed.

Typical bird brain argument "well Congress rating is even lower," listen dickheads 97% of Congress will get re-elected in 2008, this fucking idiot that you on the right call President couldn't get elected DOG CATCHER, well maybe in Crawford, Texas.

"Wouldn't it be simpler to ignore than try and create flaws in posts?"

I was just commenting on the liklihood of the "fix" for Bush's popularity you were talking about....not that it would necessarily change things because he would still have the war and the economy to be blamed for.

What part of energy gouging; deficits as far as the eye can see; NAFTA outsourcing; mass illegal ....... blah, blah, blah

Posted by nutcase at 2008-05-02 11:01 AM | Reply

Pointing out that Danni is an idiot (or you for that matter) is not a defense of Bush. It's merely reminding her to flip her calendar and get a new word to put in every post.

Bush has certainly EARNED this ranking.

Celisary,

Only, he got elected as many times as is humanely possible over the Democrats best options.....Hmmmm.....Really, I think dog-catcher wouldn't be something he'd want....Gore might be interested in dog-cather, though, once this global warming myth blows over!

Don't worry Dems, the Islamofascist vote will carry Obomba to victory!

Don't worry Dems, the Islamofascist vote will carry Obomba to victory!

Who can forget Dubya swapping spit with one of those Islamofascists.

www.kawther.info

What is so ironical is that the Democrats have screwed up their nominees so bad that if Bush COULD run again he would probably beat either of them in the upcoming election.

" Bush COULD ... probably beat either of them in the upcoming election."

Giving whole new meaning to the "love it or leave it" that the righties here toss about with such abandon. Not so, of course, and the Dems WILL unite well before November ... but would anyone really want to stay and "live" in such a country? herm

"Not that BLT or Fredo need someone like me to defend themselves ... I post factual data from entities much smarter and with many times the recources as you. Where does that put you in the realm of things??? Other than a left wing sheeple of course."

I just love it when pretensions of intellectual superiority emanate from the Unwashed Right - totally illiterate, grammatic atrocities with never a fact to stand on... herm