Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions


Subscribe to Drudge Retort with NewsGator Online
Subscribe via Bloglines

RSS feed of Drudge Retort

Special Features

Archives

Links

Deleted Comments

The Drudge Retort has a comment moderation policy. Comments that are excessively abusive to a member, completely off-topic, or written in ALL CAPS may be moved here. Commercial spam will be deleted and the IP address of the sender banned from the site. Dumps are in brown.

The following users are currently suspended from posting: axe, wisgod, vernon.

(CONT)

* "It's working. Their rating, their ratings are going through the roof." [PBS host Tavis Smiley, on NBC's Meet the Press; 10/25/09.]

* "[A]ttacking Fox just drives the 'fair and balanced' news network's ratings through the roof." [The Washington Examiner's Mark Tapscott]

* "It serves to help Fox, not punish it, by driving up ratings." [Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus]

* "By raising the network's profile, Obama has all but guaranteed higher ratings for his nemesis." [Arizona Republic editorial]

* "And the [Fox News] ratings will increase, and the White House will look petty in the short term." [CBN's David Brody]

* "The more Obama goes after Fox, the better the ratings." [Denver Post columnist Mike Littwin]

* "Fox will use this White House move to boost their ratings." [New York magazine's Daily Intel blog]

* "It's going to spike Fox's ratings." [Pundit David Gergen]

* "And the White House's public attack will no doubt give Fox 'stature' and boost its ratings." [Providence Journal's Edward Achorn]

This is what happens when claustrophobic uniformity takes over among the Beltway chattering class. This is what happened when the media elites agreed that it was nuts for the White House to fact-check Fox News, and they were sure that the administration's carping sent the cable channel's ratings "through the roof." With so little original thought involved in the robotic repetition of the anointed Beltway truth, nobody bothered to checks the facts.

The chattering class wanted to claim Fox News' ratings were going up, up, up. They wanted to suggest that the White House critique had massively backfired. But now we know that's fiction. So when are the pundits going to start posting their retractions?

We'll wait.

*For the record, the Nielsen ratings company never issued any findings regarding Fox News ratings in the wake of the White House dispute, according to company spokeswoman Alana Johnson, who responded to my email inquiry. Lots of third parties subscribe to the Nielsen data and can put together their own interpretations of the ratings and attribute that analysis to Nielsen numbers, which is what happened in this case. But in terms of Fox News, Nielsen itself never made any kind of official finding about the cable channel's recent ratings in regards to the public controversy.

*Michael Wolff writes from Newser, not TV Newser, as originally stated. I regret the error.

See link for nielson chart.

(CONT)

And by the way, in the world of cable news, a tiny 2 percent bump in viewership over a relatively short span of two weeks is utterly irrelevant and signifies nothing more than the normal up-and-down viewing patterns that are part of the business. For instance, on October 15, Fox News averaged 1.5 million viewers for the day. The next day, the total audience slipped to 1.3 million, a drop of more than 10 percent. Did that mean Fox News' ratings "plunged"? Hardly, which is why the channel's 2 percent gain in the two weeks following its battle with the White House didn't signify much of anything.

The same was true of the relatively modest 7 percent gain among the more targeted 25-54 demo. Because that audience group is much smaller (roughly 330,000 viewers each day as compared to the larger pool of 1.2 million), a 7 percent increase or decrease is unexceptional. Again, between October 1 and October 2, Fox News' total day 25-54 demo decreased from 415,000 to 320,000 viewers -- a drop of almost 25 percent. The smaller 25-54 demo often fluctuates like that.

And besides, if you listened to media elite pundits, Fox News ratings weren't inching up incrementally thanks to the White House. Pundits didn't cautiously claim that because of the White House critique, Fox News' ratings among the niche 25-54 demo were going to increase modestly.

Nope. The media chorus was unequivocal: Fox News' ratings were soaring [emphasis added]:

* "I sent Barack Obama, President Obama a fruit basket for all that comments because our ratings are up 20% since he made it." [Fox News' Bill O'Reilly]

* "[R]atings at Fox are through the roof." [Politico's Mike Allen]

* "Every time the president or one of his spokespeople mentions [Glenn] Beck or [Rush] Limbaugh, the latter two enjoy increased ratings and bucks." [Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker]

* "Beck and O'Reilly were nearly orgiastic. Every presidential harrumph sends their ratings through the roof." [*Newser's Michael Wolff]

From the article that the teacher assigned:

Quote:
According to Roughgarden, sexual selection can't explain the homosexuality that's been documented in over 450 different vertebrate species. This means that same-sex sexualitylong disparaged as a quirk of human cultureis a normal, and probably necessary, fact of life.

End Quote.

HOMOSEXUALITY IS NEVER "NECESSARY" FOR THE PROPAGATION OF A SPECIES!

It is crucial for the Homosexual to advance their agenda and part of that agenda is that homosexuals are "normal" and sucking excrement (theirs or somebody else's) off of sex organs is "normal" conduct, too. They are "just people" that do "normal" things and should allowed to get married and teach your kids how to do "normal" things or put ideas that such conduct is "normal and acceptable" into the kids' heads, when it clearly is not.

What is truly disgusting is the fact that AFTER this fag got caught advancing these dangerous ideas, people DEFENDED him and want him back to teach their kids MORE. It always amazed me that people would not let their kids play around an open septic tank for fear of death or disease would DEFEND people that hold beliefs about oral-anus ingestion of sewage and let their kids play around such people. Hell, when AIDS, Hepatitus, and Herpes and Genital Warts and all the other sexually transmitted diseases homosexuals are known to be infected with are taken into consideration, playing around the septic tank would be a whole lot SAFER!

Maybe the difference is that since the sewage is fresh, and towels are handy, it is somehow acceptable...

Just like you have links to 'prove' Bush's pedophilia from conspiracy.com, farleftwackjob.com, etc. LOL


As I said, it must suck being so gullible.


How many big bridges have you bought in your lifetime, anyway?

#43 | Posted by Punk Boy at 2009-10-26 07:18 PM | Reply | Flag

Actually, It is several books written.

www.amazon.com

www.amazon.com

www.amazon.com

http://mindprod.com/politics/ bushbookspedophilia.html

Victim and witness statements.

www.youtube.com

http://www.insider- magazine.com/Gannongate.htm

http://www.jesus-is- savior.com/Evils%20in% 20Government/ boys_town_abuse.htm

More evidence against HW Bush than any priest.

"World's Most Useless Facts"

the drudge RETORT is at drudge.com; the useless fuckface's website resides at drudgereport.com.

But you already knew that.

Windows 7 > Windows Vista...hmm ok...USELESS facts...

N.A.N.C. is a revoltingly tainted, syphilitic Marlboro 100-Red-smoking STD grab-bag...redneck whore!

Alright, couldn't possibly be more useless than that.

Unless Gimme is trolling for brides...lol...

Drudge Retort

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable