Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, October 01, 2007

Thousands of protesters are dead and the bodies of hundreds of executed monks have been dumped in the jungle, a former intelligence officer for Burma's ruling junta has revealed. Reports from exiles along the frontier confirmed that hundreds of monks had simply "disappeared" as 20,000 troops swarmed around Rangoon yesterday to prevent further demonstrations by religious groups and civilians.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

The Oil? You mean el oilo, right?

transvestitedog, why did we go into Iraq? Was it the first reason WMD's or Oil or W's bad heart for the suffering of the people of Iraq?
LOL!!
LMAO...Baaahhhh...etc....

Word reaching dissidents hiding out on the border suggested that as well as executions, some 2,000 monks are being held in the notorious Insein Prison or in university rooms which have been turned into cells.

Maybe the monks were enemy combatants.

Yes, why isnt George bush jumping into the fray to spread democracy and freedom to depose the horrible tyranny in Myanmar?

After all SE Asia is a breeding ground for Terrists.

We need to fight them over there so we dont have to fight them here.

George is a war president, lets get to warring in SE Asia.

Why the double standard, why the Irony, why the lack of moral conviction, why

Oh yeah, the post above says it all

ITS ABOUT THE OIL

your soldiers are dying for some fucking oil

Borders are not being secured because of some fucking oil taking all our defesnse resources

Ou nation will owe Trillions of dollars of debt to the Chinese, because of some fucking oil.

Every person who ever supported George Bushs reign of Terror has there hands dirty because of some fucking oil!


" Peace--a peace that preserves freedom--remains America's first goal. In the coming years, as a mighty nation we will continue to pursue peace. But to be strong abroad we must be strong at home. And in order to be strong, we must continue to face up to the difficult issues that confront us as a nation today.

The crises in Iran and Afghanistan have dramatized a very important lesson: Our excessive dependence on foreign oil is a clear and present danger to our Nation's security. The need has never been more urgent. At long last, we must have a clear, comprehensive energy policy for the United States.

As you well know, I have been working with the Congress in a concentrated and persistent way over the past 3 years to meet this need. We have made progress together. But Congress must act promptly now to complete final action on this vital energy legislation. Our Nation will then have a major conservation effort, important initiatives to develop solar power, realistic pricing based on the true value of oil, strong incentives for the production of coal and other fossil fuels in the United States, and our Nation's most massive peacetime investment in the development of synthetic fuels." Jimmy Carter - 1980 State of the Union


The following year Ronald Reagan halted or dismantled most all of Jimmy Carters initiatives to turn our country into an energy independent resource.

You stupid Fucking Republican Sheep!

I think pissing off the muslims of the world is not enough for Georgie. Maybe he wants a gajillion buddhists to hate us too.

Bring it on!!!

HEADLINES WE WON'T SEE:

Lets not forget, almost a million Iraqis and thousands of US soldiers killed so Shrub doesn't have to admit he fucked up.

I coined the word BUSHUBRIS

Liberal math:

75,000 Iraqi deaths= "almost a million Iraqis...killed"

www.iraqbodycount.org

You stupid Fucking Republican Sheep!
Posted by Repugnant



... the ignorance amoung the Liberals.

How old are you, Repugnant?

Bowa,
Do you really want to start comparing the math skills of liberals and conservatives?
You'll lose....badly.


HEADLINES WE WON'T SEE:

Lets not forget, almost a million Iraqis and thousands of US soldiers killed so Shrub doesn't have to admit he fucked up.

Posted by nutcase


Did I miss something?

What does this story have to do with US and Iraq?

Is this blog dedicated to Bush?

Just curious.

(maybe the Libs on Retort are just a little obsessive?)

I can see you now, in a straight jacket...

"It's Bush's fault, it is. It's his fault. Mission Accomplished... Mission Accomplished... Heck of good job Brownie. No it isn't! Shut up! What? Me? I'm ok. Mission Accomplished. Mission Accomplished. IT IS his fault! Why can't anyone see it? Mission AccomplishedAllf&%kedup!!! I'll scream and then they'll understand. Why don't they listen to me!!! What?


Bowa,
Do you really want to start comparing the math skills of liberals and conservatives?
You'll lose....badly.

Posted by RastaCyborg


Then why do the conservatives have all the money?

President Bush and defense officials yesterday assailed an MIT-funded survey that estimated about 600,000 Iraqis have died in war-related violence since the US invasion in 2003, a figure many times greater than the number used by American officials.


However, researchers from Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, which conducted the study in conjunction with teams of Iraqi physicians, defended the methodology as the best yet in determining the war's total death toll.

``I don't consider it a credible report," Bush said at a White House news conference. The study's methodology, he added, ``is pretty well discredited." In December, the president said he believed that the number of Iraqis who have died since the war began was ``30,000, more or less."

Several specialists countered that the methodology used by the researchers was appropriate for such a study.



Wow, when I first read this I was amazed that Bush had used the term "methodology" but then I noticed that it's not part of the actual quote and whatever he said was "cleaned up" by the editor.

Any guesses on what he really said?

My guess is:
"I don't consider it a credible report. What I mean is that its credibility is discredited. They do their countin' in a non-credibilitating fashion. The numbers don't add up to a credible result."

Then why do the conservatives have all the money?

Posted by LastAmerican


Yeah, like you have to be smart to be rich.
Being a pushy asshole will make you rich a lot faster than studying math.

Then why do the conservatives have all the money?

Posted by LastAmerican

Shit Obama has raised more money then your field of misfits put together....

This massacre is horrible. I hope those responsible will one day stand trial for their evil deeds.

""75,000 Iraqi deaths= "almost a million Iraqis...killed"

Only the most Kool Aide addicted would even pretend that that number is realistic. You must have a Kool Aide I.V.

This really sucks. Unfortunately it looks like a repeat of the 1988 crackdown.

Then why do the conservatives have all the money? That is bullshit. It is only the nouveau riche that are conservative... the millionaires.

The Billionaires are liberal. They are so rich that taxes don't matter.

These people are fighting for freedom. I hope we can give them some guns are something.

Its got to be tough for Libs who think we are turning into a Dictatorship and Bush is a Nazi to read this...

Thousands of protesters are dead, hundreds of Buddhists monks have been executed and their remains hurled into the jungle for animals to eat... and you're crying cuz there is a 0.000003% chance that someone might be able to see your library rentals...

fucking 'mos...

Then why do the conservatives have all the money?

Posted by LastAmerican

Paris Hilton, PhD?

"More room for the Christians".
John "Iusedtobeacontender" McCain.

Why would Regressives care about this? They weren't white, christian, rich, and they don't have oil.

Why would Regressives care about this? They weren't white, christian, rich, and they don't have oil.

Posted by briwo

Snark alert.

Regressives(?) would probably not give a shit about the trouble in Myanmar. Americans, on the other hand, seem to be very interested and empathetic, regardless of political or religious affiliation. Why maufacture more division?

I didn't, the resgressives who posted above me did.

Briwo,"Why would Regressives care about this? They weren't white, christian, rich, and they don't have oil" Briwo, Laura Bush has been out front of this ever making the news. You have always been cordiale in the past. I just wonder why you would lump what you typically call "regressives" together?

Y'know, this story really doesn't have anything to do with Republicans or Democrats, Liberals, Conservatives, or whatever.

Any assholes who will kill Bhuddist monks can't be reasoned with. Sad to say it, but this as good as any example of why the 2nd Amendment was a good idea.



Liberal math:

75,000 Iraqi deaths= "almost a million Iraqis...killed"

www.iraqbodycount.org



Bowa?

You might actually want to read those links you post...

for example from their own review of their methodology compared to others:



Those who suggest that the IBC data-base is likely to contain only a tiny minority of actual deaths generally argue three things. First, they say that IBC only records deaths in areas where Western journalists are present; second they propose that there have been at least seven credible studies which suggest up to ten times as many deaths as we have recorded; and third they assert that an alternate media world exists containing a professional Arab-language press which continually reports far more deaths than the sources we monitor in English.



In other words, they are only a documentation and "memorial" (their words) of the absolutely irrefutable reports of deaths.

If Mohommad is buried out in the back 40 after being gunned down for carrying a hoe whilst crossing in front of lethal force, he's not on their database. They don't exhume bodies.

They say themselves that they only use the English translated Arabic news services, or those that are English exclusively.

Bizzarely they claim "If there are missed deaths, they are mainly deaths missed by all media. " yet acknowledge they monitor only the English media in an ARABIC part of the world.

On the subject of relying on only media reporting...

"any hospital in Iraq should be able to see, and to prove, that they have recorded far more violent deaths - and at every stage of the conflict - than the national figures would suggest. Yet none have noticed or come forward with this evidence sitting under their own noses.
"

Or, in other words, somebody prove us wrong - if you know we even exist (or, they even give a shit to correct us given they are dealing with an avalanche of dead bodies on a daily basis).

And finally, the IBC's biggest reason why only they are "right"?

"almost all Iraqi mortality estimates share is that they were carried out with very limited funds by small, sometimes pitifully small, sets of researchers.
"

The rest couldn't possibly do as good a job as we're doing.

Uh-huh. And just who pays your bills - just curious IBC.

Read your links Bowa. There's some Liberal advice for your "Liberal math". Seems to me your using that notorious calculator that gets passed around the math-challenged.

Regards,
etc.

Who cares?

Religious people suck. Very religious people suck very much.

Monks suck most of all. They take vows of celibacy. They wear funny looking outfits. They care about crap some sage is reported to have said centuries ago.

I'll bet they believe in superstitions.

The world is better off with several hundred less religious extremists living in it.

Nice try, Anton.

BTW, didn't hear about any Pastors or Reverends or Priests or Nuns on the firing line there, did you?

"Seems to me your using that notorious calculator that gets passed around the math-challenged."

AKA Vern's Calculator

Monks suck most of all.

Posted by anton at 2007-10-01 08:39 PM | Reply

Aren't they humans after all?

Lets recap...

Saddamm gassing Kurds = bad, must overthrow and kill him.

Myanman killing Monks = good, leave them alone.

Obviously the value of a life in your moral values book is based on the mineral rights under the land they are buried in.

Then why do the conservatives have all the money?

Posted by LastAmerican


Yep George Soros is bankrupt now right?

Monks suck most of all. They take vows of celibacy.

As did their fathers and their fathers before them.

Saddamm gassing Kurds = bad, must overthrow and kill him.

Myanman killing Monks = good, leave them alone.

Obviously the value of a life in your moral values book is based on the mineral rights under the land they are buried in.

Posted by JimmyWallback

You are way too obsessed with oil. Oil was likely the main reason for invading Iraq, but it was only 1 of about 8 major reasons.

Will Diane Fosse be there to protest this cruel treatment? OH.....you mean MONKS, not Monkees! I imagine Bush is the reason these monks are being killed right????

Many Westerners are confused. Buddhist monks don't have the same type of vocation that typifies the Western clergy. People make the transition between "monkhood" and "non-monkhood" merely by donning the robes.

It is probable that many of the dissident monks had undertaken to secure identification as monks as a tool in their political protest. Most of them probably adopted this guise to facilitate their political protest.

Parenthetically, it appears at least for the nonce that the crackdown was successful. Maybe we need to hire these "Myanmar Generals" as consultants to help us establish methods for successful pacification of Iraq. I'd bet that they could handle the job, and quickly. Opposition to our forces would then be quite isolated, quite sporadic, become more of a police responsibility than a conflict. But the U.S. does not want to bite the bullet and accept the reality of what is necssary to implement policies. It seems that we would rather fail than succeed. It's our election.

Oh shit. I wonder if any of these lefties realize that Burma is a communist country. I'm guessing no since they haven't been claimin that the Monks deserved it for being enemies of the people, revolution, whatever...

After all, how many did Che kill? Castro? Mao? What do the deaths of a few non-belivers matter on the road to a glorious workers paradise?

BTW, Che killed hundreds, Castro killed thousands, and Mao killed hundreds of thousands...we won't even get into how many comrade Stalin killed.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable