Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Saturday, May 19, 2007

In a powerful demonstration of the way the Internet has opened up the mainstream media to intensive second-guessing, a group of primarily right-wing blogs are charging that news outlets have ignored the rape and murder of a young Knoxville, Tenn., couple because of the racial implications of the story.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

OPINIONATOR

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

I posted a similar story "why isn't anyone talking about these murders?" a few weeks back so I'm glad to see its back again and on the front page this time.

You'd think with all involved here, its tailor made for the tabloids and yet ...
nothing.

No one seems to care very much about what happened to this young couple and it's wrong.

Entirely too gruesome and too close to home. The MSM won't touch this one.

The MSM won't touch this one.

That is precisely who's reporting on it.

I'm having a hard time trying to understand what the controversy is about. The alleged perpetrators have been caught and set for trial so what is the story? That a heinous murder was committed by blacks and the victims were white? Just what is more media coverage going to accomplish?

Heinous murders are committed everyday in America and the majority of us don't hear about them outside our own communities or regions unless there is a noteworthy hook to the story. It appears that justice is well on its way to being served, so what is the issue here?

YEAH!

Poor little crackers!

Anyway, sounds like the same tired shit the evangelicals keep cryin' about ---- that they are being left out, but still have a church on every corner!

In my opinion --- if some cracker can't get their story told then its their fault!


YEAH!

Poor little crackers!

Anyway, sounds like the same tired shit the evangelicals keep cryin' about ---- that they are being left out, but still have a church on every corner!

In my opinion --- if some cracker can't get their story told then its their fault!

Posted by Redneckville at 2007-05-19 02:29 PM

Lemme guess. You're somewhere off white, or with you were?

with=wish

Yeah, just like when a blonde haired white girl goes missing and the MSM just ignores it!!!

Perhaps the anonymity of bloggers is what is necessary to take on the MSM.

Instapundit is right the media did back off this story but to state that publicizing this atrocity would have "inflamed things" is falling into a common MSM perpetrated trap.br />

Most of the MSM live in a self defined, selfimposed and self embellished ultra politically correct world that consistently recycles the tale of "whitey" keeping down black or brown skinned people - thus minorities continue to be mostly portrayed as victims. Bill Cosby was publicly pilloried, by the press, for suggesting blacks stop playing the victim role.

As this grotesque murder story goes against the MSM regular spin it received less coverage than had the race of the victims been reversed ie: Duke Lacrosse Players case.

I realize that these unPC comments will likely be misunderstood and the racist bomb will likely be hurled. But the point being made is that white people CAN be victims and clearly this couple was victimized in the most horrific manner. Did they not deserve a respectful equal promenance in the MSM even if their deaths were "politically incorrect"?

If five Whites had done this to two Blacks (by the way, the news story cited here left out certain unsavory yet decidedly salient aspects of the story, such as the fact that the male victim was subjected to homosexual rape and had his penis amputated while he was still alive, and that the female victim had her breasts sliced off while she was still alive), it'd rival the ongoing Iraq War coverage as the biggest story of 2007. Five Blacks do it to two Whites, and the media couldn't care less. Who's interests do the media serve? We're told the media is a capitalist institution, driven by profit, but it clearly is not, or it would have covered this story. And it certainly doesn't strive to advance the interests of the American people. So who does it strive to advance the interests of? I'd really like to know. Whoever they are, they must be most pretty loathsome characters.

"(by the way, the news story cited here left out certain unsavory yet decidedly salient aspects of the story, such as the fact that the male victim was subjected to homosexual rape and had his penis amputated while he was still alive, and that the female victim had her breasts sliced off while she was still alive)"


Actually Spud remembers the first time this story was posted here. Think it was CChris who posted it but Spud could be wrong. Anyhoo the gruesome details including the penis severing and breast mutilation got Spud so pissed off Spud sed he wished the folk who did this this were killed by the state.

Now we learn that that was an added internet embellishment perhaps?...

"Similarly, claims made over the Internet that the couple were sexually mutilated are "absolutely not true," John Gill, special assistant to District Attorney Randy Nichols, said Friday."

The "if these were white folks who did this to black folks it would be treated as a hate crime" argument has little resonance for Spud. All rape is ugly. All murder is ugly. All torture is ugly.

Making the rape, murder and torture or another person subject to a sliding scale of race or gender is a dangerous slippery slope that obscures the fact that it is all loathsome and to be worked against.

Actively preaching violence against an identifiable minority and then acting on it is real hate crime.

I mean seriously if yer talking about somebody who's already a rapist, torturer, and murderer, do you really wanna waste time finding out if they're also a racist or a sexist or religiously intolerant or if they kick puppies .

We've already established that they are bad enuff to do serious time fer their RTK antics establishing a racist motive for a crime is useful for the record but not so much in the sentencing.

Spud reads in the rightwing bloggers attempts to have this deemed a hate crime more evidence of the backlash against the hypocritical "black man sing 'n' word make a million, white man say 'n' word get fired" society we inhabit. Spud actually thinks it really was a hateful, vicious and disgusting crime but it wasn't a hate crime. Spud also thinks that the right are actually playing the victim card and betraying some racist tendencies of their own. Particularily those who deliberatelly made an already gruesome enuff scenario even more inflamatory with additional details which turned out to be false.

There's under-reporting and then there's over sensationalising.

Be Well.

That a heinous murder was committed by blacks and the victims were white? Just what is more media coverage going to accomplish?... It appears that justice is well on its way to being served, so what is the issue here?

Posted by tonyroma at 2007-05-19 02:15 PM | Reply


THE issue is the fact that the Blacks were not charged with a hate crime but if it were reversed, the MSM would be screaming "It was a HATE CRIME" from every headline and demanding that the additional time for a hate crime be added on to their sentence.

I agree with Tater:

The "if these were white folks who did this to black folks it would be treated as a hate crime" argument has little resonance for Spud. All rape is ugly. All murder is ugly. All torture is ugly....

BUT the fact and reality is that our current judicial system (and the recent proposed 'hate crime' legislation) only adds credibility to the many who feel that as far as justice is concerned -- "only straight whites ever commit hate crimes."

You are now seeing the backlash against that attitude.

...Diadiun [the Cleveland newspaper representative] said that based on the AP stories, it appeared that the crime was horrible but not substantially different from ones that "regrettably occur all over the country every day."

So the type of crime that happened below -- according to the Cleveland newspaper rep -- "occurs all over the country every day"????? Really?

No hate involved here, nah, just your usual run of the mill everyday double torture/rape/murders that occur every day around the country.

from GZ's userblog article on this same crime a couple weeks ago:

At some point during the trip, the couple was hijacked, bound and blindfolded and taken back to Davidson's apartment. Due to a virtual media blackout, what happened next is not yet clear.

Some media reports suggest that prior to the murders Christopher's penis was cut off and Channon's breasts were removed, however the police department refuses to comment on these alleged aspects of the crimes. The few details we can piece together are taken from various media reports and the official indictments.

Once back at Davidson's apartment, several people allegedly raped Christopher in front of his girlfriend. Afterwards, he was shot multiple times. His body was then set on fire, in an apparent attempt to cover up evidence, and dumped near the railroad tracks.

When the perpetrators were finished with Christopher, they allegedly turned their attention to Channon. For two days, she was beaten, gang raped and at times urinated upon. When her killers finally had their fill of her, they poured bleach down her throat, in an attempt to cover up evidence, and shot her multiple times.

As with Christopher, they set her body on fire; however, for unknown reasons, they did not dump her body but instead placed it in a trashcan inside the apartment....



Christian's father, Gary Christian, wore a Confederate flag T-shirt to the first hearing for one of the defendants and then pointed at the man as if firing a gun....

Right away the MSM tries to make it like this couple deserved what they got because they couldn't wait to make a dig on the father of the guy who was tortured and killed. They made SURE to point out that the father of the dead boy was wearing a CONFEDERATE T-SHIRT when he attended the trial.

Well, hey, any guy who wears a Confederate t-shirt -- according to the liberal MSM -- obviously DESERVES to have his son and his son's girlfriend tortured/raped/murdered and must be a racist himself. Why mention the father's t-shirt at all? Is the MSM saying that the confederate t-shirt makes the murders null and void and any charges of racism should be thrown out the window. I rest my case.

What really makes this Knoxville story incredible is the fact the crimes were perpetrated by a group of neighbors. If a friend and I abducted a couple, irrespective of their race, and informed my neighbors that they could take turns raping, beating, and otherwise torturing them, before we planned on murdering and disposing of them in a few days, they'd all dial 9-1-1 ASAP! The fact that there are ghettoized neighborhoods in America today where one's neighbors can be counted upon to readily join in on an orgy of gang rape, torture, mutilation, and murder says something pretty awful about the social realities innate to certain types of neighborhoods in America today. And that, my friends, is a little thing we used to call "news."

Caractacus

What really makes this Knoxville story incredible is the fact the crimes were perpetrated by a group of neighbors....

You're kidding! I didn't know that. Of course I never would have heard anything about this if GZ hadn't posted it on a userblog a couple weeks ago and I read the news everyday but I had never heard of this crime.

Can you believe this story?

Knoxville Blacks celebrate carjacking rapists in party

I was checking out some blogs on this story to see what they had to say (which was where someone had linked the above story) and there were Blacks who posted that they thought this crime was just horrible so this crime committed -- as it is with all members of ALL races who commit murder --done by the scum at the bottom of the barrel.

the comment below about this same story that was posted along with others on KNOXNEWS BLOG summed it up rather well:


Comments

I'm sorry I can't agree with that.

The reason people are upset about the lack of national coverage is because we know if the races of the victims and perpetrators were reversed and it was a clean cut black college couple on a date viciously raped and murdered by a group of whites there would have been massive national coverage, the NCAAP would have weighed in, politicians all around the country would have decried this terrible 'hate crime' the police would certainly have added hate crime charges, the Knoxville black community would have held marches, demanded justice and from coast to coast the case would have been seen as an example of latent white racism.

In this case, with white victims and black perpetrators, narry a peep from the New York Times or any other national news organization. It is a truly sickening example of political correctness and sanitizing the news to conform to the idea that reporting black on white violence is racist in and of itself.

Posted by: Anon at May 18, 2007 11:23 AM

Only white blue eye devil's can be racist! It's impossible for blacks to practice racism on whites. Racism is the sum total of prejudice and power and blacks don't have power in our society. America is a racist society in which blacks can only be victims and whites only oppressors. Anti-white feelings ... are not unusual among some segments of the black community, blacks who have such feelings against whites may feel justified, and because during slavery and segregation, a collection of whites kept them down.

CHECK:

I just checked the temperature in Beaverton, Oregon and apparently it's still too cold for some of the reptiles who live there. (hint, hint)

CHRIS:

Hint, hint BIG TIME!

"Similarly, claims made over the Internet that the couple were sexually mutilated are "absolutely not true," John Gill, special assistant to District Attorney Randy Nichols, said Friday."

ya mean like the claims made by nifong?

According to Wikipedia: Racism is bigotry, prejudice, violence, oppression, stereotyping, discrimination or any other socially divisive practice whose primary basis is the concept of race.

This definition of racism does NOT confine racism to whites. Note that Jesse Jackson, a prime player in the Duke case, did not appear in Knoxville. Apparently WHITE is not a color promoted in his so-called Rainbow Coalition.

When this event occurred, I was living in St. Louis and did see it on local news shows. It was not ignored. I remember it because of its horrible nature. Much later did I recieve a right-wing email screaming about the MSM ignoring this event. The problem is, as has been pointed out, that the right-wing hate mongers couldn't argue based on the facts of the case but just had to add false claims about torture and humiliation to make it even worse so that the attack on the MSM could be more effective. This is their method in all things - it really rouses the right-wing nutjobs but irritates the rest of us who prefer real facts.

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable