Watch the clip of the goddamn ad.

These bastards are despicable.

Images of 9/11 link to Iraq.

No wonder so many poorly informed, scared people believe the carnage in Iraq is intimately tied to the so-called "war on terror."

Pathetic.

Worse. The paws of these neocons are dripping with blood.

I wonder if ABC had anything to do with producing that ad?

OCU

That should fool the stupid ones. Damn shame their are so many here.

Isn't that just like them. Cheney the fuck did the same thing during the 2004 Presidential Elections. What utter slime these characters are. UTTER and COMPLETE Slime.

Larry

key markets that translates to "made by rednecks for rednecks"

I think they're playing a losing game. You can't fool all of the people all of the time. What I fear is what they'll do when cornered. Or what they'll do to keep from being cornered.

How long can America cower? Not much longer, from what I see, read, and hear. The wail against Bush is rising daily--and I'm hearing it from across the political spectrum. These are probably signs of desperation that we're seeing in ads like this.

Oh, and "hippies". Wanna change the world, but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad. (EC rom SP)

How long can America cower? Not much longer, from what I see, read, and hear. The wail against Bush is rising daily--and I'm hearing it from across the political spectrum. These are probably signs of desperation that we're seeing in ads like this.

Posted by Jimi_left at 2006-09-11 10:24 PM |


yeah, I'm sure youu travel in circle with real heavy hitters...... lmao

It's not blind. It's not rabid. It's not even hate.

It's a determination to get our country back--for all of us. To stop the lies, to stanch the fiscal hemmorhaging, to stop the pillaging of the treasury, to end the corruption, to stop the bloodletting and torture...I could go on.

Hey, go ahead and use those words in the ads--and watch sober, thoughtful people just rush to your side. Go ahead.

Shazam. And I thought voting Republican would starve old people and kill Grandma. I've got lots to learn.

Posted by OohRah at 2006-09-11 07:26 PM


Now that's funny. I don't give a shit who you are if you don't think that's funny you need to get out of here.

"And I thought voting Republican would starve old people and kill Grandma."

You forgot that black people would be enslaved again. Do try to keep up.

Actually, I travel in broad circles, Dirt, from millionaire Republicans to tattooed bikers and many in between. Jewish editors, fashion chicks, soccer moms, executives, musicians, computer geeks, and I'm hearing lots of complaining about Bush. Biggest complainers I've encountered lately are Republicans (some fairly high-profile ones) who want their party back. Go figure.

Cookfish, perhaps you could do your useless Thesaurus musing offline and get back to us when you want to puke up the whole thing for our edification. Thanx.

Actually, I travel in broad circles, Dirt, from millionaire Republicans to tattooed bikers and many in between. Jewish editors, fashion chicks, soccer moms, executives, musicians, computer geeks, and I'm hearing lots of complaining about Bush. Biggest complainers I've encountered lately are Republicans (some fairly high-profile ones) who want their party back. Go figure.

Posted by Jimi_left at 2006-09-11 10:49 PM |

All those parties and still time to blog here. Wow, I'm impressed!

No, not always parties, Dirt, real life. But yes, some great parties. And I'm only blogging here today to observe 9/11 and those who have been dishonored by so many of the things we've done since. Most of the time, I have neither the time nor the interest for the Drudge. Don't want to run out of pearls, you know.

Actually, I travel in broad circles, Dirt, from millionaire Republicans to tattooed bikers and many in between. Jewish editors, fashion chicks, soccer moms, executives, musicians, computer geeks, and I'm hearing lots of complaining about Bush. Biggest complainers I've encountered lately are Republicans (some fairly high-profile ones) who want their party back. Go figure.

Posted by Jimi_left at 2006-09-11 10:49 PM |

You really should hook up with Spud. If your ego can subdue his ego maybe he'll let you be on top.

Pathetic!
Leaving Iraq is a sign of weakness, while staying and providing convenient targets for the angry Iraqi hornet's nest is SMART?

These people defy logic, but then again...the American voting public ain't none too smart.

What a worthless comment, Dirt. You got no class?

Spud's got you outclassed by miles. I enjoy his posts and never saw any ego in them. And I'm not here for the ego, either, except in your mind.

And at least I'm not here to insult others and nothing else. That's what I'd call a banged-up ego.

I actually think our lives depend on the vote this year. So-in a sense I AGREE with them. ***GASP*** Although-I think-if you don't vote Dem-you're throwing your life away.
I understand the need for a third party-and wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment. But-first things first-okay? let's get our Country back from these hacks on the right-BEFORE they get us all killed! Only then-will we be able to set up a responsible third party in relative safety.

Cookfish:
"pussies"...as opposed to the Commander-in-Chief who never finished his military service? You know, the guy who was stoned most of his adult life until age 35?

Oh! You must mean the Vice-President, who had "other priorities" during Vietnam, but now has no problem insinuating that his critics are cowards.

Come on, Shotgun, don't give away Gannon's secret thrill package (top only, of course).

The conservatives may as well be completely honest and state if America doesn't start voting their way, Bush's Saudi terrorist lapdogs are going to make them regret it.

their lives literally depend on their votes in the upcoming midterm election

If it comes down to these incompetant boobs being our only hope it's because the ship sank 15 minutes ago.

The sixty-second spot argues that an exit from Iraq would be seen as a sign of weakness by America's enemies.

Um, no. I think our enemies took it as a sign of weakness when we let Osama live.
When we let the Taliban rebuild.
When we use our troops as human IED detectors.
When we resort to torture.
When we resort to spying on Americans.
When we say 'Stay the Course' for the thousandth time.


But I actually don't favor withdrawl from Iraq. We should send in 300,000 more troops. And if our lives truely do depend on victory in Iraq, why don't we?
What's stopping us?

Would somebody please give me an answer other than mean old democrats and the media are preventing Bush from sending more troops to Iraq and Afghanistan to actually fight the war?

Repubs only have terror to fall back on. Only problem is that I refuse to live in fear. If my office building gets a plane flown into it, then I guess it was my time.

Cookfish,
Are you Loki ?

You sound like him, really.

-Sarge

Spreading fear only get you so far.

The problem Bush-Cheney face is deeper than that - doubts about their performance and strategies.

Five years after 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden, despite a $50 million reward, is still free and posting threatening videos. The best chance to get Osama, at Tora Bora in late 2001, was botched. NATO now reports that the fighting in Afghanistan is worse than in Iraq and the Karzai regime is becoming more unpopular. A soon-to-be nuclear armed Iran basically dominates post-Saddam Iraq. The Iraqi Prime Minister pockets US aid and protection and praises Hezbollah. Pakistan just declared a truce with extremists in the tribal lands, basically handing them over to Al Qaeda. And the Marines report a key Sunni province in Iraq is basically a lost cause.

And yet, the rightnuts would have us believe the real problem is a lack of will. As if a John Wayne pose, complete with steely gaze and strong jutting chin, makes up for having a plan that works.

Results would have ten times the impact of any political ad. Because the rightnuts don't have any, they are left with "fear itself" as their last card play.

2002, 2004 and now 2006. They are hoping to run this con one more time. I don't think it will work.

Repubs only have terror to fall back on. Only problem is that I refuse to live in fear. If my office building gets a plane flown into it, then I guess it was my time.

Posted by byrdman at 2006-09-12 01:43 AM

I agree 100%, man. Better off dead than Red State.

So you Republifundies better send all the terrorists you can after us Democrats. We can no longer stomach you traitors running our country and destroying our cities.

Thank God some one is taking the time to get it right - Democuts and Demorunners want to bring down this country in their blind, rabid hate of all things Bush. I actually think the ad was very tame, as words like "pussies", "defeatists" and "commies" should have been bandied about some more in description of the opposition.

Posted by cookfish at 2006-09-11 10:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

Using more of that brilliant, Honky-Tonk bar stool logic, can you tell us how 'commie' fits in there again? I don't remember seeing a red star on the flag under any Democratic administration, or any admin for that matter.

Please, inform us all.



Preapre to blown away people. This is gonna be good.

Wow Cookfish. Kinda like Republicuts nad Republirunners?

Ronnie Raygun was a Repub wasn't he?

Vote Neo-Idiot. Feel Saferer.

Minutes ago I was watching Don Imus, registered Republican, who noted after watching Bush's speech last night, that "they are doing everything possible to win the November elections"

There is NO connection between Osama and Saddam...Osama and his organization was a threat to the governance of Iraq by Saddam...

There was no "insurgence" in Iraq until we lured them there...There is NO EVIDENCE that if we leave they will "Follow" us...

They consider us infidels on their holy ground...They want us OUT period...

They don't GIVE TWO SHITS about our FREEDOM...That's a nice sound bite and a great talking point, but it's ridiculous on it's face.

"Your job is to convince people it's 9/10/01 and all this Iraq & terror fighting is overkill."

Well, actually, no. That's not the Democrats "job."

All the Democrats have to do is point out that now there are incompetents running and managing both Iraq and the general fight against those who hate us.

Then we win the elections.

Hans

Thank God some one is taking the time to get it right - Democuts and Demorunners want to bring down this country in their blind, rabid hate of all things Bush. I actually think the ad was very tame, as words like "pussies", "defeatists" and "commies" should have been bandied about some more in description of the opposition.

If you feel the threat is so bad, there's plenty of outsourced recruiters dying to sign you up.

I can't decide if this is more cynical than megalomaniacal, or the other way around. In either case, it shows just how putrid the Republican Party, which I used to support, has become. If they can do this without Rove's influence, just wait and see what he's got in store for us.

"All the Democrats have to do is point out that now there are incompetents running and managing both Iraq and the general fight against those who hate us."

Good luck. Sounds like a comprehensive platform.

Fear and smear.

Fear and smear.

Fear and smear.

The same old same old from the Republitard party. No vision, no ideas, no plans.

Just fear and smear.

If I were a Republican I would be embarrassed with them.

Oh wait, I AM a registered Republican.

I AM embarrassed with them.

"neoconservative think tank"

Just like jumbo shrimp... an oxymoron.

And no, an Oxymoron is not Lush Rimbaugh.

Well the pants pisser vote got them elected in the past, so I can see their logic.

In dem world you simply, check every cargo container, place a people chain holding hands across the south and north borders, fly 2 planes to each destination, one for passengers and one for their luggage. Pay teachers more money so they'll do a better job with the kids. Cure AIDS, ASTHAMA, STroke, Cancer and a plethora of other ailments by funding stem cell research, etc. etc. etc..... Everyone knows money grows on trees except the ruling dems that know it actually grows by installing a 3 dollar a gallon gas tax. Not to worry though, they're raising minimum wage.

"Since Vietnam the Dem party has traditionally not been looked upon by the populace as the "national defense" party.
When we're "at war" you lose. If the country feels that we are truely in a war you guys will lose. Your job is to convince people it's 9/10/01 and all this Iraq & terror fighting is overkill. Then we lose the elections." Posted by OohRah

Nonsense. Conveniently, history begins during Vietnam, forgetting that it was Democrat Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt that led this nation to victory in two world wars, that Democrat President Truman authorized our firm and immediate response to Communist aggression in Korea, that, despite the ultimate verdict of history that it was a war that was a mistake, the main US military effort to defend South Vietnam was initiated under
Democrat Presidents Kennedy and Johnson. In fact, in both Korea and Vietnam, those wars were brought to an end under Republican Presidents.

Post-Vietnam, it was President Carter who not only shephered the most significant and lasting Middle East peace - between Egypt and Israel - but Carter also authorized what history will record as one of the most audacious albeit tragic military operations ever attemped - the US special forces rescue mission for US hostages in Iran. A mission that failed by a hairsbreath.

The US response to Soviet Communist aggression in Afghanistan also began not during Reagan, but during the waning months of the Carter Presidency as he and a Democrat majority Congress authorized aid to the Afghan freedom fighters.

Under Clinton, the US sent troops to try and hold together Somalia - a mission begun under President George H.W. Bush - and Clinton also brought to a successful conclusion the war in Kosovo - with negligible western military losses - through a combination of diplomacy and military pressure.

Democrats supported George W. Bush on the response to 9/11 and counter-attack into Afghanistan. Where the consensus broke down - on the dubious and increasingly disastrous Bush-Cheney policy of preemptive war against a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 - is has been on the basis not that Democrats fear war, but that we need to fight the right war, and fight smart. Iraq is a tremendous strategic blunder, not a litmus test for anyone's patriotism.

While there can be legitimate debate about the purposes, the strategies and the tactics in any of America's wars, there is no doubt that Democrats have shown time and again a willingness to step up and defend this country. It is a nasty lie, and an insult to the millions of American military veterans who are Democrats, to the hundreds of thousands whose graves dot cemetaries across America and overseas, to assert that a willingness to defense this country can be broken down on a partisan basis.

It's been stated and restated that the Republicans have only fear to fall back on. And that fear manifested itself in spades during their watch. PDB August 6, 2001 "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US." And what did the fearmongerer-in-chief do, responding to that warning? Run and cut.

I've yet to see a response to my question.
If it truly is vote neo-con or die, if the fight in Iraq is the fight of our lives,
Why aren't we sending enough troops?

Your propoganda is not backed up by Bush's actions.

"Your propoganda is not backed up by Bush's actions."

Excellent point, Norm.

nice post zark....how can you post that in the face of the road to 9/11 which at least focused us more on what the 9/11 commission said.......

and this headline is nonsense.......

the difference is very simple......

dems want to treat the terrorist as criminals and AFTER an attack will send out indictments and give them lawyers.
and republicans want to PREVENT the terrorists from killing even if it means killing them first in the face of the lawsuit from the american criminal liberties union........
you cant be a thinking person and not believe that we are at war with terrorists.....hating yes, thinking....I THINK not.......ha!

NORM.....I would agree with your premise anyway about iraq being the central battlefield...send more and do WHATEVER IT TAKES....would be okay with me......

OMG...too funny.

First, Rush speaks gospel, now that ficticious show is being taken as gospel by Bushlover.

How much "land" do you own?

Buy any good "bridges" lately?

"how can you post that in the face of the road to 9/11"

See, it's the presence of people like BLT in the population that makes the showing of "docu-dramas" so risky.

If it's on the screen, it must be true, is that it?

This film had so many holes in it, it's the NeoCon version of Oliver Stone's "JFK."

So, naturally, you swallowed it hook, line and stiking sinker. Just like a b ass.

Thanks, FDR, for your reasoned defense of the Democrats. Both sides - or should I say ALL sides - resort to demagoguery, to be sure, but the right has the particularly annoying habit of making its opponents out to be weak, clueless traitors. Just look at the words Cookfish uses. Childish insults all. I'm sick of it.

I'm not a traitor, I don't want weakness, I love my country and I want it defended. I just happen to think Bush and his gang aren't doing it right. They don't know when to use diplomacy, they don't know how to rally our allies, they don't have the sense to know Iraq was not linked to al Qaeda. They've only made things worse for America across the world.

So forgive us Bush critics for wanting to try a new direction. I'm not proposing "cutting and running." This country made a mess in Iraq, and now we have to clean it up. But let's put somebody else in charge.

CBOB -

I have no problem when right wingers argue that Democrat policies are wrong, foolish, misguided, etc. Vigorous debate is what America is all about. You stake out a position, marshal your facts, and defend it and see who prevails in the battle of ideas.

What really sets many Democrats off is the way right wingers, going back to Joe McCarthy, repeatedly accuse their domestic opponents of disloyalty, cowardice and sympathy for the enemy. This type of propaganda is the classic tool of tyrannies. It is the argument of people who are afraid to trust to the strength of defending their positions based on facts.

Not all right wingers do this. Despite my disagreement with people like William F. Buckley, you have to stand in awe of the man's intellect and his ability to confront those who disagree with him on the basis of ideas.

The present category of leading right wingers, led by charlatans and nutcases like Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, etc., are midgets compared to folks like Buckley. They cover their inadequacies and mental laziness by cheapshots and decibel level. They are tinpot wannabe McCarthies.

Barry Goldwater, before he passed away, lamented the direction conservatism was taking. He guessed, correctly, that it was not a healthy sign that ideologues and fanatics were taking control of the GOP.

The areas with the highest percentage of people who believe this type of shit happen to be rural areas that the terrorists would never bother to attack. What the fuck?

These goobers need to go back to worrying about UFO abductions and stop worrying about terrorists who could give a shit about them or their cow pastures.

FDR -

Funny, isn't it? Who would have thought Goldwater would become the wise, thoughtful and deliberate voice within the GOP?

Clearly, you're right - not all conservatives resort to name-calling. In fact, there's a conservative guy in my office who debates with me regularly. He is always civil, even when we disagree vehemently. And when we agree, it's a great feeling. He knows I support my cousin fighting in Baghdad; I know he has no tolerance for religious hatred in any guise.

I suppose it's a given that, in times of war, those in power feel a certain defensiveness that makes them want to lash out at skeptics. Yesterday I heard Rush Limbaugh say we're at war, not just with terrorists, but with the left. How sad that he is incapable of anything more meaningful than that.

Former Dem Congressman Martin Frost tries to represent a sane balance at Fox. From his recent OpEd, he writes:

"For Republicans to argue that Democrats won't keep us safe from Iranian and North Korean nuclear threats because Democrats don't want to stay in Iraq indefinitely is an exercise in demagoguery of the first order, and a cynical effort to divert attention from the incompetence that has plagued the Bush administration' strategy in Iraq. ... The conduct of the Bush Administration in attempting to equate a highly unpopular Iraq war with our Nation's fight against terrorism is an affront to decency and contrary to fact."

Martin -- Well put.

Posted by townncountry at 2006-09-12 09:40 AM |

What did Martin have to say about this?

Also in 1994, Clinton negotiated the Nuclear Accords with North Korea. At the time, North Korea agreed to give up aspirations of developing nuclear weapons in exchange for assistance with their energy needs.


Or this?

But perhaps his biggest gaffe was, because of Somalia, he, and other First World nations, declined to send troops into Rwanda to stop the genocide there in 1994. More than 1 million Tutsis and Hutus were slain in internecine fighting in about three months.

Or this?

In Iraq, Clinton continued the economic sanctions put in place by George H.W. Bush, but were seen as largely ineffectual and contributed to the deaths of more than 100,000 people. Clinton also cultivated the notion that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction" (WMD) and was likely to deploy them or make them available to terrorists, organized crime, or drug traffickers.


WWW.us-history.com

The numbers dwindle and dwindle and dwindle....

The spirit of the old hippie, Jim Morrison fills the room:

"...This si the end, my dearest friend, the end!"

Your fish has been cooked Loki and it's a long time coming. I'm not afraid of terrorists even if they slit my throat. They are still the cowardly ones. The ones who will sell their sense of selves to prevent something that may or may not occur, however, are the biggest cowards of all. If you vote out of fear you are not voting out of conscience. If we are the best country in the world, and I still say we are, Americans must set the example of conscience over cowardice.

I don't care who you vote for, but I care gravely about why you are voting who you vote for.

Of course, that meant to read "This IS the end".....too much mexican food, I guess.

Ever notice how the righties never speak on the merits of Bush's policies. On what he is doing right. They only attack and deflect and say well Clinton did this and din't do that. They are so weak. Dem landslide a comin'

If it truly is vote neo-con or die, if the fight in Iraq is the fight of our lives,
Why aren't we sending enough troops?

Your propoganda is not backed up by Bush's actions.

Posted by Norm_

I would add, why aren't those who support tihis idea signing up in droves? If I really thought that the very existence of our country and freedoms were in jeopardy, as the right constantly screams, it would take me all of 5 minutes to get my ass to Iraq. Millions of people all over America are bleating about this overwhelming threat, yet not willing to do anything about it.

You Libs are funny as usual- "righties" are "cowards" and "weak"?

Well if being scared to death of people like Pelosi, Clinton, and Kennedy gaining enough power to ruin the country makes me a "coward", then I guess that's what I am. As far as being "weak"- if we "righties" are "weak" then what does that make you "lefties"- crippled?

The more I hear from the Libs the more I'm convinced that their contempt for others comes entirely from their disdain for what they see in the mirror every day.

"Well if being scared to death of people like Pelosi, Clinton, and Kennedy"

So you are afraid of people that you have likely never met, yet this does not highlight that you are weak and a coward?

That is precious.

Actually, I travel in broad circles, Dirt, from millionaire Republicans to tattooed bikers and many in between. Jewish editors, fashion chicks, soccer moms, executives, musicians, computer geeks, and I'm hearing lots of complaining about Bush. Biggest complainers I've encountered lately are Republicans (some fairly high-profile ones) who want their party back. Go figure.

Posted by Jimi_left at 2006-09-11 10:49 PM | Reply


Those are called TV Characters. Turn off the TV you wingnut.

So you Republifundies better send all the terrorists you can after us Democrats. We can no longer stomach you traitors running our country and destroying our cities.

Posted by justsomeguy at 2006-09-12 02:26 AM | Reply


This clown really does think the republicans are after him. Boo! What a pant pisser.

Ever notice how the righties never speak on the merits of Bush's policies. On what he is doing right. They only attack and deflect and say well Clinton did this and din't do that. They are so weak. Dem landslide a comin'

Posted by Bang0Lang at 2006-09-12 12:28 PM |

Really Bang? Or is that liberal democrats don't want to engage in debate with Bush period?

Bush wants to address SS, Medicare, Tort reform, Education, Taxes, the WOT, and a host of other issues and all liberals want to do is stop BUSH. No debate. Just STOP BUSH.

Tell me Bang, why were all these issues major concerns for dems under Clinton but now that a republican is in office they aren't important or have by magic healed themselves and are no longer worthy of debate or reform?

How about we place the majority of blame where it belongs Bang. Or is it simply that you've never heard of congress?

No, I really would welcome a kool-aider saying. "You know, we are all safer because we're fighting the terrist' over ther instead of over hear" or some other BS like that. Dirtman - People like you make me sick. Congress has been in Repub hands for how long?

Congress has been in Repub hands for how long?

Posted by Bang0Lang at 2006-09-12 01:20 PM |

I wasn't aware that all congressman were republican. Thanks for clearing that.

ooops up

'"righties" are "cowards" and "weak"?'

Well the heads of the party sure are:

Bush: Prissy rich boy trantrum-throwing cheerleader who almost died eating a pretzel.

Cheney: 200 deferements, goes on canned hunts and still panics and shoots another hunter in the face, hides 100 miles underground and/or has heart attack anytime the threat level reaches yellow or he hears thunder, handles criticism like a baby - not exactly a man's man.

These two make Richard Simmons seem like a badass.

Majority rules dick-mouth. No further debate is necessary. Dirtman, Chairborne, BL2. You guys have a very nice day.

Did Barney Frank Steal your BF. Is that why your so mad all the time. Or Did Rush Limbaugh take a viagra and steel your 15 year old dominican girl friend.

Actually, rush was caught with viagra after coming back from an all male fishing trip.

I'm sure only one his poles was dipped into anything.

Majority rules dick-mouth.

Posted by Bang0Lang at 2006-09-12 02:36 PM | Reply

Did Barney Frank Steal your BF. Is that why your so mad all the time.

Posted by Bang0Lang at 2006-09-12 03:02 PM | Reply

www.towardequality.org


Posted by 101Chairborne at 2006-09-12 02:17 PM

You're cuter than I ever imagined, Chair. But Barney Frank?? Oh come on, girlfriend! I hear Karl Rove is free these days.

zark and lisa......if you had read all of my posts on the MOVIE....you would have read several disclaimers on its vailidity......even on an another thread I talk about IF only half is true....and have talked about what hollywood does with stuff a couple of times as well....but it is based on more than some liberal writers recollections, so it does have more than usual.....as far as I can tell.......(and look another disclaimer)


and we are concerned with national security and we are fear mongers.....well that is just another plank in the liberal platform now isnt it........wont work this time either......heres hoping......

Blow it out your a$$ Facistlover, you can put all the disclaimers you want in your posts, but you can't deny you speak as if that movie contained nothing but facts.

You're laughable.

This clown really does think the republicans are after him. Boo! What a pant pisser.

Posted by 101Chairborne at 2006-09-12 01:04 PM

Where did I say they are after me, 101wannabe? Try using a little something us liberals call "reading comprehension". I know you conservitards aren't really into all that readin riting and rithmatic (the "three R's"), but at least try and make an effort.

You conservatives are the biggest traitors to ever curse a nation. I say we take a poll, and see who supports the war in Iraq. Then we hand them a uniform and weapon, and ship them all there to help Bush out. Let them "stay the course" in the Republifundie "War Without End".

Then you could finally actually back up your claims of having been in the military! I guess you would just have to deal with your rich-kid wannabe at a different time.

No really, you have to vote Dem or the world is going end because of global warming.

It should have read , " Grow up , be responsible , tell the truth , BE A Man , VOTE NEOCON !!!

Any vote for Neocon is a vote for more dead American soldiers.

A vote for a conservative is a vote to pardon Osama.

Saw the ad.

It must be true 'cause the guy doing voiceover is so sincere.

Of course, he probably lives in a studio apt. in West Hollywood and was paid $325.

Lisa- didnt you used to be friends with bushlover? What happened?

"Lisa- didnt you used to be friends with bushlover?"

I still love him. Can't you tell? lol

I just get sick of his partisan parroting crap.

He's a very nice, intelligent man outside of politics... where he's brain dead.

He's also a very talented director and music teacher.

And let us not forget-a scratch golfer. Ask him sometime if he's ever had a hole in one. (Be sure you set aside some time for the answer.)

I just watched that ad and all I kept thinking was:
When did I wake up in the middle of a bad sci-fi novel?

"And let us not forget-a scratch golfer."

Scratching his balls while golfing does not count.

Typical Republicans.....