Adios.
Now the conspiracy nuts have free rein.

The conspiracy nuts already won. They sold the single bullet theory to the sheeple and they bought it. Much easier that way.

Oh great. Another thread for the conspiracy nuts to run amok in. Let me clue you in, Bob. JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald. Period. End of story.

I understand how this brings all this talk up but she was also a part of history on that day.........

and she and her husband were also directly responsible with ann richards(ugh!) for texas getting pari mutual gambling.....horses......and my pocketbook hasnt been the same since....

she seemed like a real nice lady and that sometimes is enough.......

Bill- your faith in authority is touching.

I don't have faith in authority. I just have a brain. There isn't a shred of evidence that anyone other than Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK.

Bill O'Reilly


There isn't a shred of evidence that anyone other than Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK.

Posted by bill_oreilly at 2006-09-03 04:58 PM


That gets a funny flag.

"Bill O'Reilly


There isn't a shred of evidence that anyone other than Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK.

Posted by bill_oreilly at 2006-09-03 04:58 PM


That gets a funny flag.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2006-09-03 05:29 PM"

No

THAT gets a funny flag.

"A dedicated marine and his rifle."

"A dedicated marine and his rifle."

Posted by DATA at 2006-09-03 05:35 PM


Lee Harvey Oswald was an American hero who died defending his country and was used as a patsy to cover the assassination of John Kennedy.

Must be some of that Afghan smack in town.

I saw Lee Harvey Oswald die.

I saw Lee Harvey Oswald die.

Posted by DATA at 2006-09-03 05:47 PM


Killed by the "Super Patriot" Jack Ruby. Who's only motivation for killing Oswald and ruining his life was a love of JFK and America.

"Must be some of that Afghan smack in town."

Hahahaha. Funny flag for Data.

"Lee Harvey Oswald was an American hero who died defending his country and was used as a patsy to cover the assassination of John Kennedy."

You're nuts.

Bill O'Reilly---Same old rebuttal. Get some new material---or some facts might help out also.

You're allergic to facts, Bob.

Bill O'Reilly

What "facts" are you talking about? The Fact that Ruby had no motivation for killing Oswald? The fact that Gov and Nellie Connally both dispute the bullet that hit him? The fact that the Zapruder film backs up their claim?The fact that the governments magic bullet made more turns than a cruise missile, going through two bodies and bone with no deformation and never tested for blood? The fact that there is a picture of the man on the grassy knoll firing the fucking gun and another man who saw him shoot? Exactly what facts are you talking about?

Those aren't facts, Bob. Try again.

These are the facts---the pictures--everything I said is factual and have been proven and can be proven again today.

Nope. There is no picture of a man on the grassy knoll firing a gun. Try again.

"Bill O'Reilly--now why would I say such a thing if it weren't absolutely true"

Because you're a conspiracy crackpot.

Your link doesn't prove shit. It shows a blob, Buffalo Blob. The picture of a plane flying into the Pentagon is more believable than that.

Bill O'Reilly---click on the link--see the man on the grassy knoll.

Bill O'Reilly---You are correct. That picture is open to interpretation---however when added to all the other facts listed in my previous posts it starts to lean towards a man on the knoll. I never did think that last head shot came from the rear. It has been proven the autopsy photos were doctored also----need a link to that too? Kennedy arrived in DC with no brain matter left in his head. No way to trace a bullet path. I guess his brain just fell out and nobody noticed. At every turn things just don't add up.

"Bill O'Reilly---click on the link--see the man on the grassy knoll."

I did that, Blob. It doesn't show anything.

"It has been proven the autopsy photos were doctored also"

Nonsense. Prove it.

PWZ007---Aliens talk to you? That explains quite a lot.

I looked at it. Doesn't prove shit.

"this photo is a foul and gruesome medical fraud which was surgically composed and designed to stifle your thinking, stunt your reason and paralyze you with fear."

Hahahahahahahahahaha.

Like you'd look. Anyway.

www.jfkresearch.com

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2006-09-03 08:02 PM

I looked at it. Doesn't prove shit.

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 08:03 PM | Reply



Nice examination--all the way from 8:02-8:03. A whole minute. LOL. But it proves one thing. You are a liar.

"You are a liar."

Typical.

You're a conspiracy whacko.

Bill O'Reilly

The whackos believe the single bullet theory.

That doesn't change the fact that you are a liar.

What am I lying about, Blob?

Lee Harvey Oswald was an American hero who died defending his country and was used as a patsy to cover the assassination of John Kennedy.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2006-09-03 05:43 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e



the only thing missing in the 'discussion' with bob and bill...is 'I know you are but what am I'
and the reason for stating that is that this issue will probably be with us and hotly debated until the end of the country which might not be that much longer if dems win and we cut and run in iraq........

but it is nice to see these two 'feeding' on each other for a change. LOL


but bob.....so lets see here.....he died getting 'wacked' by a mob linked nobody on tv.....how does that mean he was a hero........or are you saying he was a hero for killing jfk?
you remember jfk dont you...he was the democrat who was hailed for economic growth....THROUGH TAX CUTS!!!!!!!!!!! just like the present president.

Bill O'Reilly

What are you lying about? Gee I guess you are stupid as well as being a liar. Well liar---I posted an indepth site about the faked photos in the JFK assassination that would take at least half an hour to evaluate. Yet you come back in less than a minute saying you've "looked" at the site. Now I suppose a stupid person might surmise that you could weasel out of your statement by saying that it is obvious you were at the site for a few seconds and that qualifies as "looking" and therefore you were not lying.

However you said---"It doesn't prove shit"---which implies you "looked" long enough to make such an evaluation. Obviously such an evaluation is impossible for such a complex site in less than a minute. That makes you a liar. Actually it makes you a stupid liar since you weren't even bright enough to know you were caught lying by my previous post that pointed out you had spent less than a minute in reading my post--going to the site--evaluating the site--and posting your response.

You lied about spending enough time on the site to evaluate whether it "proved" anything or not.

"posted an indepth site about the faked photos in the JFK assassination that would take at least half an hour to evaluate."

No, Bob. They take 30 seconds to show that they don't prove shit. Try again.

Bill O'Reilly---Why should I waste my time with a stupid liar like yourself? Any idea? Me neither. C'ya liar.

No, Bob. They take 30 seconds to show that they don't prove shit. Try again.

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 09:25 PM


Then show it liar. Take that 30 seconds and show us it "don't prove shit". Show yourself to be a liar AGAIN. LOL

The burden of proof isn't on me. It's on you, dumbass.

BBOB turn on Discovery Channel.They have a show on the plane hitting the Pentagon.

The burden of proof isn't on me. It's on you, dumbass.

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 11:05 PM


It's hard to prove anything to a stupid liar who won't look at links or read or think.

Marine1--Just turned it on---let's see if they show a picture of the plane hitting the building.

"It's hard to prove anything to a stupid liar who won't look at links or read or think."

I looked at your stupid links, Bob. Gunmen on grassy knolls.....Hahahahahaha.

The burden of proof isn't on me. It's on you, dumbass.

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 11:05 PM | Reply


Dumbass--you are the one who said you could do it. Take that thirty seconds and prove it. If you can't do then don't say you can






"They take 30 seconds to show that they don't prove shit. Try again."

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 09:25 PM

Then do it dumbass.

I don't have to prove anything, Dumbass.

It was a plane. Missiles dont use jet fuel.

Marine1,

The plane disappeared into the Bermuda Triangle. Hahahahaha.

I don't have to prove anything, Dumbass.

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 11:21 PM



Then don't say you can then dumbass.

They take 30 seconds to show that they don't prove shit. Try again."

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 09:25 PM

"They take 30 seconds to show that they don't prove shit. Try again."


It's not up to me to prove anything, Blob. The burden of proof is on you.

It's not up to me to prove anything, Blob. The burden of proof is on you.

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 11:46 PM |


It's up to you when you say you can do it dumbass. Do it. Or don't say you can do it.


"They take 30 seconds to show that they don't prove shit". Try again."

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 09:25

Go ahead--I'll even give you the whole minute dumbass.

I didn't say they could prove anything. Your reading comprehension sucks. The burden of proof is on you, Blob. Either prove something or shut up.

Prove there were crab people behind the grassy knoll, Blob.

Bill O'Reilly

You said you could disprove the site I posted in thirty seconds dumbass. I said do it.

That was YOUR statement and that is what you said you could do. Do it.




I looked at it. Doesn't prove shit.

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 08:03 PM | Reply



Nice examination--all the way from 8:02-8:03. A whole minute. LOL. But it proves one thing. You are a liar.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2006-09-03 08:46 PM | Reply


You lied about spending enough time on the site to evaluate whether it "proved" anything or not.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2006-09-03 09:21 PM | Reply


"posted an indepth site about the faked photos in the JFK assassination that would take at least half an hour to evaluate."

No, Bob. They take 30 seconds to show that they don't prove shit. Try again.

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-03 09:25 PM



If they only take thirty seconds to prove they don't prove shit---take the thirty seconds and do it. It's your statement---it's yours to back up. Do it.

If you can't do it I understand. You are just a stupid liar as has been proven TWICE. LOL

Bob I said it took 30 seconds to see that that site didn't prove anything. You're really obtuse. You're wasting my time. If you can prove something, do it or STFU.

Bob, prove that there weren't crab people behind the grassy knoll. Hahahahaha.

HAVING FUN YET, BB?:>)lol

Bill O'Reilly

And I said show what you saw in thirty seconds that proved the site didn't prove anything.

Do it or STFU liar.

Bani---Not much of a challenge but there's nobody else around to poke with a stick. I'll just have to play with Bill O'Leilly till he stops wiggling

PWZOOO OUT OF A CRAB ZOO OR CANCER SIGN?...RONALD REAGAN WANTS TO KNOW!

LOL

This just in:

Crab people killed JFK! Bob has pictures!

BILL WAS ONE OF THEM, TOO:>)

Crab people killed JFK! Bob has pictures!

Posted by Bill_OReilly at 2006-09-04 12:25 AM


But Bill O'Lielly never saw them---he was too busy lying about his super powers to click on the link. Says he can debunk those pictures in 30 seconds---do it the crowd chants!!! DO IT!!!---UUUUHHHHHHH O'Lielly retorts.