Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Thursday, February 16, 2012

A Chicago city alderman wants to forbid police from cutting electronic communication during the G-8 and NATO summits in May, stopping an anti-protest tactic employed by government authorities in Egypt and San Francisco. "We're putting down a marker and saying, this has happened in other places and we don't even want it considered here," said Alderman Ricardo Munoz. San Francisco's transit authority BART has been the first and only government agency in the U.S. to block such communications to quell social unrest.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

monstman

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Holding the G8 this year in Chicago is stupid enought but giving the protesters any support is even dumber. This is a blood bath in the making.

Blocking cell phone transmissions is illegal.

This Mike Sheilds is a real piece of work.

He previously demanded 37 million from the Federal Bureau of Homeland Security for planning and police training to prepare for the G8 summit.

All these police state tactics are considered justified because there was an outbreak at the G8 protests in Seattle years ago. I have heard the dollar amount damage from these protests estimated at 2 to 3 million dollars.

So this FOP leader feels 40 or 50 million dollars is justified prevention spending because 2 to 3 million dollars damage MIGHT happen.

Math is apparently not his strong point.

The government has no business cutting communication here in the City regardless of what happens.

There is no price too great to pay to protect our men in Blue!

Throw a few more millions at the problem what the hell.

They do realize there was protest before the New Social Media, right? Are they going to shut down all Kinkos so nobody can print fliers too? Cut all phone lines? What about people not in Chicago? Better shut it all down, right?

If they cut all the cell phones off how will Fox and Murdoch get the juicy news stories for the next day?

Blocking cell phone transmissions is illegal.

#2 | Posted by 2008

But.................... its for the greater good!!!!!!!!!!! So they will do it.

Blocking cell phone transmissions is illegal.

#2 | POSTED BY 2008

Link?

Never mind, Googled it myself.

It's interesting. Intentional jamming would seem to be illegal under an 87 year old law. On the other hand, if the police were to simply overwhelm that portion of the spectrum with their own higher-power transmissions...that might be classified as "unintentional interference".

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable