In order to expidite the confiscation of guns and bibles please bring both to the collection centers at the same time.

danni- see useful idiot

Useful idiot

In political jargon, useful idiot is a pejorative term used to describe people perceived as propagandists for a cause whose goals they do not understand, who are used cynically by the leaders of the cause.

In political jargon, useful idiot is a pejorative term used to describe people perceived as propagandists for a cause whose goals they do not understand, who are used cynically by the leaders of the cause.
en.wikipedia.org
#2 | Posted by paneocon at 2012-02-08 10:25 AM | Reply | Flag: USEFUL IDIOT

"Obama administration wants to ban guns"

How is the headline supported by the article?

In order to expidite the confiscation of guns and bibles please bring both to the collection centers at the same time.

#1 | Posted by danni

Might as well make the collections at the Catholic church. Then they can hand out rubbers and kill 3 birds with 1 stone.

#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

That's all you got? I thought you owned the lib snarky response franchise and that is all you got?

"Obama administration wants to ban guns"
How is the headline supported by the article?
#4 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine

You're asking Gashouse, who yesterday was asking me what it's like to have sex with a woman?

That's all you got?
#6 | Posted by paneocon

For you, it's more than adequate.

#5 | POSTED BY WISGOD AT 2012-02-08 10:30 AM

What the hell does the Catholic church have to do with this?

Not even a good deflection. IDIOT

You're asking Gashouse, who yesterday was asking me what it's like to have sex with a woman?

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

I hope you passed the buck to somone who would know.

What the hell does the Catholic church have to do with this?

Not even a good deflection. IDIOT

#9 | Posted by glasshouse

It was a response to Danni, you blind son of a bitch.

According to the article's author, this is the Big Threat D'Jour from Eric Holder, who says:

"This administration has consistently favored the reinstitution of the assault weapons ban. It is something that we think was useful in the past with regard to the reduction that we've seen in crime, and certainly would have a positive impact on our relationship and the crime situation in Mexico."

That would be the law Clinton signed and an extension of which Bush said when he ran for president he would sign.

This "news" is three years old, by the way.

You're asking Gashouse, who yesterday was asking me what it's like to have sex with a woman?
#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

I hope you passed the buck to somone who would know.
#10 | Posted by wisgod

I assumed he was too busy humming "Why Can't A Woman Be More Like A Man" to be bothered.

It was a response to Danni, you blind son of a bitch.

#11 | POSTED BY WISGOD AT 2012-02-08 10:34 AM

No, you tried to bring the Catholic church into this you stupid son of a bitch.

#13 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS AT 2012-02-08 10:36 AM

You must be really bothered by the fact you have never been with a woman. WOW

Pathetic child

"Obama administration wants to ban guns"
How is the headline supported by the article?

#4 | POSTED BY HAGBARD_CELINE AT 2012-02-08 10:29 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

Nothing. It is Gashouse.

#14 | POSTED BY GLASSHOUSE AT 2012-02-08 10:44 AM

Unless I totally misunderstood, if so, I apologize.

"Hurr Durr Obama's coming to git yer guns!!1!"

[notthisshiat again]

Easily dealt with.

Holder = vigilante fodder. I doubt anyone really believes he's innoscent of working against the constitution which was paid for by the blood of the people of this nation. You won't catch him at Target (pun).

Ok, well this is pretty funny.

Ass2Mouth posts her normal verbal diarrhea.

PantyCon jumps right into the idiot pool with her.

Wisgod makes a joke and gets attacked by Ass2Mouth, since I'm guessing she's blinded by the santorum on her eyes.

Looks a whole lot like the Republic primary season idiot festival.

President Bill Clinton's so-called "assault weapons" ban

The law that did stuff without accomplishing much.

#20 | POSTED BY REAGAN58 AT 2012-02-08 10:55 AM

So you enjoy being on the receiving end of ATM?

#15 | Posted by glasshouse

Boy, you're REALLY concerned about whether or not I've ever "been with" a woman.

Why is that?

So you enjoy being on the receiving end of ATM?

#22 | POSTED BY GLASSHOUSE AT 2012-02-08 10:58 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

Absolutely, every time I receive a withdrawal from my Automatic Teller Machine I enjoy it greatly.

Schmuck.

AssHouse needs to get back on his meds. When is the nurse going to come change him for his job at McDonald's? He better clean up his mom's basement before she gets home. Also, I hear he went to community college.

You're asking Gashouse...?
#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

I would have taken an answer from anybody that made sense, but I guess it really was a rhetorical question.

#25 | POSTED BY LIVE_OR_DIE AT 2012-02-08 11:06 AM | REPLY | FLAG: Didn't go to college.

Obama to gun control group in a private meeting - "They're doing a pretty good job...I just want you to know that we are working on it. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar...."
.

"Fast and Furious, the gun-walking operation that created an avalanche of traceable guns being shipped to Mexican drug cartels never made sense to me as a law enforcement operation. The cover story is that the program was designed to identify the cartel leaders. That's a ridiculous cover story. Everyone in Mexico knows who the cartel leaders are; many of the cops are already on the payroll.

The program was specifically designed to identify weapons purchased in American gun shops after they were used to murder Mexicans. The only thing that could be learned was the identity of the shop in which the gun was sold, and the US government already knew that because its agents authorized the sale."

Yet another lie by Glassforbrains.

There is NOTHING in the article that says "wants to ban guns" as is alleged in the title. Instead, there is discussion about wanting to ban assault weapons (which BTW, aren't strictly guns, except in the broadest sense of the word). So, why use that title? Because Glassforbrains wants to suggest that president Obama (better get used to saying that for a few more years, chump) wants to ban all guns.

Question: does Glassforbrains own an assault weapon? Why would it need one? We already outlaw mortars, nuclear weapons, and military ordinance ownership by private civilians. Isn't that against the Second Amendment? Think, McFly, think. There are some weapons which are too dangerous and destructive for the citizenry to own.

#25 | POSTED BY LIVE_OR_DIE AT 2012-02-08 11:06 AM | REPLY | FLAG: Didn't go to college.

#27 | Posted by glasshouse at 2012-02-08 11:21 AM

μολὼν λαβέ!

For as much as it pains me, I have to agree with Sambarber. Somebody needs to be a bit more honest when cooking up thread titles.

There are some weapons which are too dangerous and destructive for the citizenry to own.

#29 | Posted by SamBarber at 2012-02-08 11:29 AM

^^^ Thinks super concealable 10 round hand guns are safer than larger 15 round hand guns.

As long as it made you feel safer hiding under your afghan I guess.

I've always figured any move by the Obama administration to introduce gun regulations would only occur if he got a second term or it was obvious he wouldn't get a second term, ie he was a lame duck.

Unfortunately the repubs are running a parade of village idiots so I'll get to find out if my suspicions were correct.

#29. When I'm on a computer I'll try to track down a great video of a sheriffs deputy taking a legal weapon and turning it into an illegal "assault weapon" in something like three minutes. Funniest thing was that the changes were purely cosmetic and in no way changed the capabilities of the firearm.

I hear he will make every gun owning American male show up to a re-education center where each will turn in all of his guns in exchange for a mandatory, live-in gay boyfriend.

"Somebody needs to be a bit more honest when cooking up thread titles."
#32 | Posted by wisgod at 2012-02-08 11:54 AM | Reply

Seriously? You want HONESTY on a political blog?
Wouldn't that go against the entire concept of politics?

How is the headline supported by the article?

Err...From the article

Go ahead an reinstate the "assault" weapons ban. You know those evil assault weapons just don't shoot as well without a bayonet lug or a flash suppressor. I hope they close that "gun show loop-hole" too!! BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Libs are not just stupid...they're Sofa King stupid!

OK, is it just me or does Glasshouse seem a bit..er...well...Slow?

Before we can go any further, we have to establish whether or not any of us has the knowledge to be capable of having this discussion.

Instead, there is discussion about wanting to ban assault weapons

Please pick out the assault weapon from these pictures...

#41...Its the scary one

#41 | POSTED BY AXIOM AT 2012-02-08 03:40 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

I'm pretty sure you just linked to two images of the 10/22 there. One's just all modified to look "intimidating".

I'm pretty sure you just linked to two images of the 10/22 there. One's just all modified to look "intimidating".

If you know the answer, you're not supposed to say anything. Now I can't make a point and make the responder look ridiculous.

But he's right folks...an innocent old Ruger 10/22...America's most popular .22 rifle would be an assault weapon because it has a detachable magazine, a telescoping stock and a pistol grip

Drop the plastic stock, put it back in the factory furniture and even with the 25rnd magazine, it's a perfectly safe rifle...even though nothing about the action of the rifle has changed.

My favorite thing about the "assault Weapons" ban is my SKS.

I show it to folks, and say "This is not an assault weapon, under the law". Then I take off the bayonet "Now it is."

I tried selling my yugo sks to someone who lived in california and he wouldn't be allowed to buy it because it still had the grenade launcher which is really only good for launching tennis balls.

"My favorite thing about the "assault Weapons" ban is my SKS."

What you need an assault weapon for, to hike in national parks safe from Bambi and Yogi?

" ...does Glassforbrains own an assault weapon? Why would it need one?..."

We'll just rename it a defense weapon and then people can 'unwad' their panties.

"What you need an assault weapon for,"

Storage, ergonomics, performance, less reloading time, cheaper replacement parts, accuracy, durability, adjust-ability and the list goes on.

Now, the more pertinent question, why would you want to ban them?

Only have enough underpants for one pissing a day?

#47 do you honestly believe the 2nd amendment was so that people could only use guns for hunting?

What you need an assault weapon for, to hike in national parks safe from Bambi and Yogi?

#47 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN AT 2012-02-08 06:26 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

An SKS isn't even as powerful as a $150 Wal-mart deer rifle.

"What you need an assault weapon for,"

assaulting stuff?

Oh Laudie! Next dat darky he's a comin fer dem white women and da bibles too! You best git back under da bed now ya hear now Asshouse?

Really, let's make this extremely clear: if you want to kill people quickly and efficiently, your average bolt action deer deer rifle is going to do a far better job of it than most of what's called legally defined as an "assault rifle". An SKS is good for the coyotes and wolves that go after my livestock every once in a while. I'm not saying you couldn't take a deer in a pinch with it, but it's not really great for those ranges.

mmm I English much goodly. Still note "most of" There are exceptions for certain, but the definition of "assault weapon" is ridiculous.

An SKS isn't even as powerful as a $150 Wal-mart deer rifle.

#51 | POSTED BY SOHEIFOX AT 2012-02-08 06:54 PM

A Deer rifle for $150, i doubt it.

#55 | POSTED BY GLASSHOUSE AT 2012-02-08 07:16 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

Savage Arms Axis Synthetic .308, $149.99 right now at both Wal-Marts within a hundred miles of me.

America's most popular .22 rifle would be an assault weapon because it has a detachable magazine, a telescoping stock and a pistol grip

Drop the plastic stock, put it back in the factory furniture and even with the 25rnd magazine, it's a perfectly safe rifle...even though nothing about the action of the rifle has changed.

#44 | Posted by Axiom at 2012-02-08 05:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

No~! NO~! NO~!

A .22? Hell, that's barely over a BB.

Everyone knows that an assault rifle like the AR-15 fires a super, monster, armor-eating bullet! Probably packed with depleted uranium so it can lie around giving people leukemia for years.

Who the hell could be concerned about a .22?

Sorry Axiom, but nobody will fall for your bullshit.

Sorry Axiom, but nobody will fall for your bullshit.

It's not bullshit. Look at the law, dip shit.

Fast forward to 6:30, watch what happens with the mini14.

perfectly legal semi-automatic rifle to at-one-time-banned assault rifle in two minutes.

"If you know the answer, you're not supposed to say anything. Now I can't make a point and make the responder look ridiculous."

--------

It's not bullshit. Look at the law, dip shit.

Fast forward to 6:30, watch what happens with the mini14.

perfectly legal semi-automatic rifle to at-one-time-banned assault rifle in two minutes.

#58 | Posted by Axiom at 2012-02-09 07:00 AM | Reply | Flag:

OK, dipshit, my post was in agreement with you.

I was mocking those who have opinions about firearms but have no idea what they are talking about.

Fast forward to 6:30, watch what happens with the mini14.

Where's the link you're referring to here?

This link is by a guy from the National Rifle Association. It's his job to scare people that the government is coming to take their guns.

"This link is by a guy from the National Rifle Association. It's his job to scare people that the government is coming to take their guns."

This is a link from the group who paid Obama millions to spread their anti-gun agenda. I can imagine how all those millions were spent getting his black ass into politics. Guess it worked.

Sorry... Forgot to add who is still a board member of the Joyce Foundation:

Current members of the board of directors of the Joyce Foundation are: John T. Anderson, Chairman, Ellen S. Alberding, President, Robert G. Bottoms, Michael F. Brewer, Charles U. Daly, Anthony S. Earl, Roger R. Fross, Howard L. Fuller, Carlton L. Guthrie, Marion T. Hall, Valerie B. Jarrett, Daniel P. Kearney and Paula Wolff.

I was mocking those who have opinions about firearms but have no idea what they are talking about.

Doesn't read like that, but Okay. My apologies.

This link is by a guy from the National Rifle Association. It's his job to scare people that the government is coming to take their guns.

Officer Leroy Pyle isn't from the NRA.

@JPW -- I got so excited about calling Vernon a dipshit, I forgot to post it. I think this is the video you mentioned above.

Yes it is. Thank you for posting it.

What you need an assault weapon for, to hike in national parks safe from Bambi and Yogi?

#47 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

No, for when the MAN comes to take your weed..........

This link is by a guy from the National Rifle Association. It's his job to scare people that the government is coming to take their guns.

#61 | POSTED BY RCADE AT 2012-02-09 11:22 AM | REPLY | FLAG

isn't it the fact, however, that many many people and politicians would love to see guns taken away? shouldn't this be a legitimate concern?

isn't it the fact, however, that many many people and politicians would love to see guns taken away?

No. That's paranoia from the gun lobby.

"No. That's paranoia from the gun lobby."

Sorry but you do not even have to leave the DR to see that many people are just plain scared of them and want them to go away.

#68 I agree with #69. I've been to too many political events when people in the audience have called on the representatives to introduce legislation banning guns. While those representatives publicly (usually a mixed crowd) walks the tightrope (i.e., reasonable regulations on assault type weapons etc) they seem to talk with sympathy on the issue.

many here call for it as well. isn't this a site a fair representation of yellow dog political thought?

What you need an assault weapon for, to hike in national parks safe from Bambi and Yogi?
#47 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

What do you need a 70 inch flatscreen TV for?

What do you need a 70 inch flatscreen TV for?

Posted by 2008 at 2012-02-09 02:35 PM |

Porn. I'm getting old and am too proud for glasses.

"to hike in national parks safe from Bambi and Yogi?"

No. That's paranoia from the gun lobby.

I think we long ago established on a thread concerning magazine capacity and Jared Loughner that you're incapable of carrying on any kind of discussion about guns because you're only qualified to sit inside and write books on programming.

In order to expidite the confiscation of guns and bibles please bring both to the collection centers at the same time.

#1 | Posted by danni at 2012-02-08

OOOOOO SWEETY....liberal misguided retort friend of mine..
here is a EASY SETUP FOR YOU..

so when those are collected, is your radical buddies going to build a big fire...so of like the reichstag those years ago..

(CUE THE 'GODWIN' BULLSHIT COMMMENTS) :)