Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, February 06, 2012

THE CASE FOR the Department of Education could rest on one or more of three legs: its constitutional appropriateness, the existence of serious problems in education that could be solved only at the federal level, and/or its track record since it came into being. Let us consider these in order.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

glasshouse

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.


Do We Need the Department of Education?

The American Enterprise Institute believes we should get rid of the Department of Education? That sounds like an excellent reason to keep it.

Do We Need the Department of Education?
Posted by glasshouse

In your case? Boy, howdy.

Rwingers must figure that if Education in this country has to be re-invented by each state, it'll die of it's own volition and we can sell the states off to China at a cut rate.

Why else would they want to undermine the future of the country?

The American Enterprise Institute believes we should get rid of the Department of Education? That sounds like an excellent reason to keep it.
#1 | Posted by DARTHCHENEY at 2012-02-06 10:26 AM

Simply check out the results of their policies since the mid 70's when they became a department.

Childhood obesity has tripled since 1980. Less than 60% graduate HS, we lack skilled workers, 2/3rd's couldn't even pass the military's basic training. We have fallen in every category among developed nations statistically...

Of course darthy and a host of other libs here were a product as well...

And just how is getting rid of Department of Education going to hurt our future? Seems to me we did fine before it existed.

An educated populace is a Democratic populace.

An educated populace is a Democratic populace.

#6 | POSTED BY AXE AT 2012-02-06 10:41 AM | REPLY

So what you are saying is that America was not educated prior to 1980?

GasHouse thinks Americans went to the polls for the first time thirty-two years ago.

www.mndaily.com

-GasHouse thinks

You are an optimist, aren't you.

An educated populace is a Democratic populace.

#6 | Posted by axe at 2012-02-06 10:41 AM

The information found here:
link

...suggests otherwise.

You pathetic gutter slime have been trying to get rid of the DOE for ages. What do you think it will accomplish? You haven't a fucking clue, do you? You just parrot shit to hear your tiny little brains rattling around in that empty skull of yours.

Go play in traffic or go door to door telling people how wonderful Mitt Romney is and explaining the message Joseph Smith got from that Angel Moron (er. Moroni).

An educated populace is a Democratic populace.
#6 | Posted by axe

That is true at face value. But a government education is a dumbed down education. A dumbed down populace is easy to manipulate by the ruling authorities. I see it on this site every day.

You pathetic gutter slime have been trying to get rid of the DOE for ages. What do you think it will accomplish? You haven't a fucking clue, do you? You just parrot shit to hear your tiny little brains rattling around in that empty skull of yours.

For example. Look at this dummy defend his servitude to the State.

The dept of education - countless dollars spent on union kickbacks and shitty results for students. Of course we need it. It makes leftards feel good about themselves. Those fucking states can't possibly handle education themselves.

"The American Enterprise Institute believes we should get rid of the Department of Education? That sounds like an excellent reason to keep it."
#1 | Posted by DARTHCHENEY

If it were only as simple as your analysis. And in keeping it simple you ignore cost vs performance and cost to the taxpayers this gargantuan agency requires. Just so you don't get confused please don't look at this chart brianjnoggle.com .

We don't need the ATF either, but we still have it. The DOE spends most of it's money lobbying Washington.

It sad to say these agencies never go away.

It sad to say these agencies never go away.

You may recall 'Hope and Change'.
Obummer still has a few months left to change Washington.
Perhaps he's been saving himself for a 4th quarter comeback.

Makes me wonder who these assholes think are going to be taking their temperature, dosing their meds and running the show a generation or two down the road with all their hating on most of Americas children? One gets the impression these people are under the assumption that they are immortal and exempt from circumstance.

Public education is killing your wallet? Really? Sounds more like an admission of failure on your own part than it does an admonishment of the department.

One idiot here even goes so far as quoting some bullshit "think tank", even thought the past decade has shown people who are paying attention that there is no "thinking" going on at these establishments but rather nothing but political slogan laundering.

If you ask me, we should probably create a new agency just to educate these adults who do nothing but have tantrums like the spoiled children they still are.

Glasshouse: do we need education?

The gravy train for overpaid bureaucrats must continue, until bankruptcy.

The gravy train for overpaid bureaucrats must continue, until bankruptcy.
#21 | Posted by rightisright

From local to federal, after all these decades of beating on the private economy that supports them, these bullies are going to get a hard lesson in economics. It's one of the few positive developments to look forward to.


#22 | Posted by Ray at 2012-02-06 02:03 PM

I wouldn't worry about the DoE if I were you. I'd worry about the black helicopters coming at night to steal your gold.

"Seems to me we did fine before it existed."

The national education office or "bureau" was first established in 1838.

Once again we get to see a demonstration on how an internet tool pines away for a time they neither saw nor experienced first hand.

Im sure and Im sure without looking at a single post that the left here will do little more than to make comments about how right wingers are stupid and need dept of education because of that...etc etc etc and the MUSIC GOEs ROUND AND ROUND AND ROUND

but thats because most of them usually have nothing more to offer..AND BESIDEs>..that not 'alinsky approved'...

but all one needs to read is something called the constitution of the USA and move to the tenth amemdment...

good point chief...but even though Im not sure, I would suspect that the entity you bring up wasnt able to tell every school in every state what they can do, what they cant do, what they should do, and all of the rest....or lose money...

AND NOW scanning the thread....I was right...tsk tsk tsk...

from doc to axe we see the same old boring tired out attacks...

nice work glass...you have exposed our psuedo intellectuals here once again..

nice work glass...you have exposed our psuedo intellectuals here once again..
#27 | Posted by afkabl2

A note penned on perfumed paper from Aflak to GasHouse about "pseudo-itellectuals"?
Please, my sides are killing me!

I wouldn't worry about the DoE if I were you. I'd worry about the black helicopters coming at night to steal your gold.
#23 | Posted by DARTHCHENEY

No doubt, you are among the finest dummies government education has ever produced.

"psuedo(sic) intellectuals"

LOL!!

Thanks for reminding us once again why public education in Texas is shit.
They hired you.

No DOE would mean some states mainly the red ones wouldn't be taught science but a pack of lies involving an invisible space man. What the right really would love to get rid of is free public education. Having uneducated slave labor is their ultimate fantasy.

We can get rid of the DOE right after we get rid of the FBI, CIA, NSA, the Army, half the Air Force and ALL of the military bases in Red states and on other foreign soil.

Do We Need the Department of Education?

Do We Need the Drug Enforcement Agency? FTFY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It has been so effective since it's founding under Carter in 1980, has it not. Why would anyone consider doing away with a federal department with such a sterling record? After all, it seems to have been exactly as successful as the DOE has been with it's mission - right?

Do We Need the Department of Education?

....if you ask this question, then the answer is yes, desperately.....

We can get rid of the DOE right after we get rid of the FBI, CIA, NSA, the Army, half the Air Force and ALL of the military bases in Red states and on other foreign soil.

#32 | POSTED BY AXE AT 2012-02-06 04:12 PM

You want to get rid of the Department of Energy?

Department of Education is the ED.

Dork

Fuck no we don't need no education (pink floyd), especially at the FEDERAL FUCKUP levels of NCLB and RTTT.

I hear NY has over 800 "competency criteria" for a kindergarten teacher to assess for each student. hmmmm lets seee 30 students for abut 150 days or 800 x30 x150 = 3.6M questions to answer about teaching BEFORE teaching.

Too much fucking paperwork and the class monitor is 'teaching' them how to be babysat and sing songs - CONFORM. Its fucking crewel INDOCTRINATION NOT EDUCATION. Like what a fucking pathetic excuse for education that "full brain" crap is. Like check this video - complete with the jungle-bunny-drums and flouride mouth-rinsing.
Whole Brain Teaching: 3rd Grade: Classroom Management

When I lived in NC, (recently), I had to help a teacher buy supplies for her classroom. I asked her why I needed to supplement her, she said there wasnt enough money in the budget. I asked her what the name of the N.C. Lottery was. She said, the N.C. Education Lottery. So, you mean to tell me that with local, national taxes and a fucking lottery bringing in millions of dollars I still have to give a teacher $40 to buy dry erasers?

Education in America is failing. Just follow the money..

"She said, the N.C. Education Lottery."

You fell for that crap, too?

State after state has claimed lottery money would only go for education. And it does: if the state budget was $500 million for education, and the lottery brings in $100 million, that entire $100 million goes to education...

...along with $400 million more, making the total...$500 million.

"Department of Education is the ED."

Sez you.

Education in America is failing. Just follow the money..

#38 | Posted by boaz at 2012-02-06 11:16 PM | Reply | Flag:

Your socialist education was paid for by the US taxpayer. Your life is based on socialist programs. With no socialist programs, you would just be another bum on the street. You owe your life--your lifestyle---your existence---to socialism. Yet you fight against socialist programs for others. There is a word for that. Did your education inform you as to what that word might be?

""You owe your life--your lifestyle---your existence---to socialism.""

Oh here we go. We dont have a choice whether or not to participate in the system. We dont have the option to change it at the polls. Now we cant even criticize it. Jesus, the Founders would be rolling in their graves.

Just so you know, Bob, the prosperity, the strength, the peace that this country enjoys isnt due to socialism, government mandates or the Democratic party. Its because of freedom. Americans going out and working hard and building businesses and taking risks. Raising their families and doing the right thing. Mire yourself in delusions of socialist grandeur, but every single socialist victory in this country was built on the solid performance of Americans in the past. Indeed, the very foundation of this countries independence was based on the belief in self-determination, not government benefits.

"We dont have a choice whether or not to participate in the system. "

He was talking about Boaz's life in the army and the socialistic nature of defense forces. That, and the cognitive dissonance of a government employee getting free health care and free pension contributions while bitching about socialism.

""He was talking about Boaz's life in the army and the socialistic nature of defense forces.""

Socialism is a economic model. The military is not a socialist organization, its a self-contained one. Coincidentally, he isnt receiving free healthcare and pension, its a condition of his employment. He can bitch about socialism all he wants, it doesnt make him a hypocrite.

#45

He's being paid by my taxes right? Socialism.

"The military is not a socialist organization, its a self-contained one."

So what? It's for the communal good, paid for by the community. Need a dictionary?

"Coincidentally, he isnt receiving free healthcare and pension, its a condition of his employment."

It was a condition of employment for WI public school teachers too, but folks bitched to hell and back they were getting it for free.

"Socialism is a economic model."

And some aspects of our capitalistic society are socialistic. Fire, police, roads, and defense all come to mind. I'm sure you can think of more.

Socialism describes a model where the government takes a lead in shaping the countries progression. Just because a government provides services doesnt make it a socialist enterprise.

Stop to think, Danforth, how many of those teachers leave their profession (at a rate of about 15%) after 20-30 years in their field. Stop again to think how many teachers leave, in middle age, with bad backs, knees, ankles, shoulders, breathing problems, hearing issues.

How many teachers spend a year living in a mud hut in some third world shit-hole?

How many teachers pull 24 hour duty on a monthly basis?

Teaching is bullshit compared to 20+ years of active duty military service. On top of that, teachers make more and yes, put in less hours a week.

"Socialism describes a model where the government takes a lead in shaping the countries progression."

You mean like form armies, or build roads, or assemble fire and police protection? Libraries and clean water? Clean air and legal systems?

"Stop to think, Danforth, how many of those teachers leave their profession (at a rate of about 15%) after 20-30 years in their field. Stop again to think how many teachers leave, in middle age, with bad backs, knees, ankles, shoulders, breathing problems, hearing issues."

That has NOTHING to do with the fact the armed services are a socialistic portion of our capitalistic society.

"How many teachers pull 24 hour duty on a monthly basis?"

How many times are you going to move the goalposts?

You guys put me in a tough spot-agreeing with americanply.

I don't think Boaz is wrong in bitching about "socialism" (I think his views are a caricature like all the rest) because he's in the military.

That is unless you're willing to label ALL government employees socialists and therefore unable to bitch about it without being a hypocrite.

Im not moving the goalposts, just pointing out that most jobs in the military are strenuous enough to require medical and family support. Theres a reason people were upset that teachers werent paying into their own pension fund. There isnt an underlying justification for the public to pay the teachers pension for them. For the military, its a matter of compensation for hazards. If a teacher is hurt on the job, doesnt she get workmans compensation? I would think so. Its the same for the military, but its a given because we dont have recourse to sue our employer.

The military isnt socialist. Its self contained. Just because Microsoft has a cafeteria and car-pool program doesnt make it a socialist organization.

Or, it can be socialist. If you want to argue the point that it is socialist, I would argue that it wouldnt be able to support itself without a larger entity to leach off of. Ill let you take the lead on that one.

#49 | Posted by americanPLY

Nice steaming pile of irrelevancies.

I'm actually surprised more conservatives don't say members of the military should have worked harder if they wanted to not go through all of that (voluntarily).

"I don't think Boaz is wrong in bitching about "socialism" (I think his views are a caricature like all the rest) because he's in the military."

I don't either. But bitching about socialism without being aware you're part of the socialistic portion of our capitalist society is the height of cognitive dissonance.

#51 | Posted by jpw

Ive never been opposed to being payed a fair wage, or getting good benefits. I know my interests when it comes to middle class protections, but crediting everything good to socialism likes it some god-send is assenine. The military has always, throughout history in one degree or another in every place provided medical support to the soldiers. The benefits the military provides are benefits for military service. Service was rendered for those benefits. It wasnt some state program I applied for because I lost my job.

Im not moving the goalposts, just pointing out that most jobs in the military are strenuous enough to require medical and family support.

There are many jobs that are strenuous enough to require medical support. Are you saying health insurance should be mandated for all of them?

Theres a reason people were upset that teachers werent paying into their own pension fund.

Yup, there is. They're morons with a world view that only goes as far as their pocket book who likely benefited from that very system they now deride.

There isnt an underlying justification for the public to pay the teachers pension for them.

You don't think investing in our future generations (for the very least in literacy and basic math, writing ect) is worthwhile? You don't think that's an underlying justification?

For the military, its a matter of compensation for hazards. If a teacher is hurt on the job, doesnt she get workmans compensation? I would think so. Its the same for the military, but its a given because we dont have recourse to sue our employer.

Bad analogy. You get healthcare regardless of whether you're injured, no? Just stick with it being a condition of employment.

"Im not moving the goalposts, just pointing out that most jobs in the military are strenuous enough to require medical and family support"

Again, that has NOTHING to do with whether or not the armed forces are socialistic.

"The military isnt socialist. Its self contained. "

No it's not. It's paid for by outside taxes. And armed forces are for the communal good, paid for by the community. Again: need a dictionary?

"crediting everything good to socialism likes it some god-send is assenine."

Who did that, other than you just now?

I don't either. But bitching about socialism without being aware you're part of the socialistic portion of our capitalist society is the height of cognitive dissonance.

I understand what you're saying fine.

I just disagree with it.

IMO being a member of the military is no different than being any other kind of federal employee.

"IMO being a member of the military is no different than being any other kind of federal employee."

Isn't a federal government socialistic in nature?

but crediting everything good to socialism likes it some god-send is assenine.

I think you'll find few who do.

The military has always, throughout history in one degree or another in every place provided medical support to the soldiers. The benefits the military provides are benefits for military service. Service was rendered for those benefits. It wasnt some state program I applied for because I lost my job.

LOL I agree with you man. I get this and agree with it.

"The benefits the military provides are benefits for military service. Service was rendered for those benefits."

The benefits the teaching system provides are benefits for teaching. Service was rendered for those benefits.

#54 | Posted by Danforth

OK, this is where the density of your skull becomes a factor in the discussion. Ive already told you guy, the military is not a socialist organization, because it isnt a governing body. Its a military organization. It isnt made up of citizens with a vote who have leave to come and go. It is composed of a rank structure. It is subject to the constraints of funding by its parent organization (the Federal Government) and its rules and regulations are made by Congress. Congress is also where it gets its justification for existence.

In short, its an organization that exists independent of economic and social models. Its the military, not a political unit. It cant be socialist. But, you'll just keep saying the same shit over and over again. Maybe it will manifest itself into fact the seventh time you say it.

Isn't a federal government socialistic in nature?

Colloquially or technically?

Colloquially, yes in some ways it is.

Technically, I'd say no. Government isn't inherently socialist.

But unless you're willing to say any federal worker is a socialist because they're a federal employee, this smells suspiciously like a goalpost shift.

""You don't think investing in our future generations (for the very least in literacy and basic math, writing ect) is worthwhile? You don't think that's an underlying justification?""

Ponying up cash to teachers is not investing in the future of "the children". I know, I should "think of the children."

Thats just one of the sentimental tactics that teachers unions use our kids to beat taxpayers over the head. When they see thousands of teachers skipping school to flood the state capital, theyre going to get upset. Bottom line, teaching isnt so profound a job that its necessary to tax people into the dirt. Despite the hype, there isnt anything so difficult about teaching that we have to grant them a 5% pay increase on the start of every fiscal year and pay their retirement for them.

The "steaming pile" was a list of reasons why military members get the list of retirement benefits they do. I also forgot to mention that its a little hard to save a decent amount for retirement in 20 years. there is no such age cut-off for educators.

IMO being a member of the military is no different than being any other kind of federal employee.

#59 | Posted by jpw

What other branch of federal service arrests you for quitting?

What other branch of federal service specifically exempts you from the right to sue?

What other branch cuts your career off at 20-30 years? Even beyond that, what other branch will separate you before you are eligible for any benefits at all if you do not advance?

What other branch can fire you for failing a height and weight test?

There are many many differences between military and non-military service.

"Technically, I'd say no. Government isn't inherently socialist."

So the community doesn't pay for what is supposed to be for the communal good?

"Ive already told you guy, the military is not a socialist organization"

And you were full of shit then, too.

"because it isnt a governing body."

Huh? Something has to be a governing body to be socialistic???

Now you're just making shit up.

"There are many many differences between military and non-military service."

Which have NOTHING to do with whether or not armed services are socialistic.

And btw...socialistic and socialism are two different words.

""Huh? Something has to be a governing body to be socialistic???""

Yeah, socialism is a political system. The military isnt a political unit. It cant be governed according to political theory.

This is going to turn into another round of saying the same crazy shit over and over again. I'll disengage and save us both the trouble.

You, no doubt have an audience talk-back and some clients to meet with.

Ponying up cash to teachers is not investing in the future of "the children". I know, I should "think of the children."

So you see no value in education? Our country hasn't benefited at all from being literate and competent in math, science ect?

Thats just one of the sentimental tactics that teachers unions use our kids to beat taxpayers over the head.

No, that's just the truth that has to be reiterated for short sighted numbnuts (ironically, many of which undoubtedly benefited from said system but like everything else Republican, they've got theirs so fuck everyone else).

Bottom line, teaching isnt so profound a job that its necessary to tax people into the dirt.

Nice hyperbole. I would also disagree with you in that being a good teacher is a profound job.

Despite the hype, there isnt anything so difficult about teaching that we have to grant them a 5% pay increase on the start of every fiscal year and pay their retirement for them.

Automatic 5% increase I agree with. Paying retirement I disagree. Attracting good teachers should be a high priority, even more so now when low-skill jobs are scarce and not coming back.

The "steaming pile" was a list of reasons why military members get the list of retirement benefits they do. I also forgot to mention that its a little hard to save a decent amount for retirement in 20 years. there is no such age cut-off for educators.

All of which are known variables when one signs the dotted line. As I said, irrelevant.

Are you so lazy that you feel entitled to a cushy retirement after 20 years? You don't feel you've gained skills in the military to work for a good living?

(You're sounding awfully librul in that paragraph)

There are many many differences between military and non-military service.

As far as being socialist or not dipshit.

Christ. Not only will this horse not drink, but he goes and pisses in the trough.

So the community doesn't pay for what is supposed to be for the communal good?

There's a reason I gave two answers with a qualifier.

Swap the quotes and you'll find we agree.

But to sum the argument up, the military isnt socialist. If you wanted to compare its structure to a socio-political entity, you'd have to compare it to Communism. Every military post has a hospital, housing, public works, rekreation, kommissary, football team, etc etc.

So, you can take that and run with it. I would love to hear (preferably from Bob) how any member of the US military owes its existence to communism.

There's a reason I gave two answers with qualifiers.

Just in case any grammar police are perusing the thread.

"Yeah, socialism is a political system."

Let me repeat, and reread as often as it takes to sink in:

Socialism and socialistic are two different words.

"But to sum the argument up, the military isnt socialist. "

Okay, you're still full of shit.

""Nice hyperbole. I would also disagree with you in that being a good teacher is a profound job.""

I already associated a point of view with sentimentalisation. Turning around and using it so close to the original insertion is rather pedestrian. Just a critique.

""So you see no value in education?""

No.

""All of which are known variables when one signs the dotted line. As I said, irrelevant.""

A US Army Ranger knows the rigorous service he volunteers for. Doesnt mean that he does so without guarantees of just compensation and support.

""Are you so lazy that you feel entitled to a cushy retirement after 20 years? You don't feel you've gained skills in the military to work for a good living?""

At 20 years, you are eligible for 50% of base pay monthly. It goes up incrementally after that, and tops out at 100% at 40 years, which people dont make it to. Most enlisted guys get out at E7 or E8, so a retiree can expect $2200-$2500 a month. Thats decent, but you cant live off of that without getting a full time job. Imagine being 45 years old and having to start all over in a new career at the bottom floor.

"So you see no value in education?"

"No."

Why is it always the dumbshits who don't believe in education?

I already associated a point of view with sentimentalisation. Turning around and using it so close to the original insertion is rather pedestrian. Just a critique.

No, you expressed a retarded opinion that, like most of your postings, dripped ignorance.

I'm sorry I didn't spell that out clearer.

""So you see no value in education?""

No.

Then you're a bigger idiot than I ever imagined possible.

A US Army Ranger knows the rigorous service he volunteers for. Doesnt mean that he does so without guarantees of just compensation and support.

Which he does. What exactly is your point?

Again, they're conditions of employment, I've already agreed to that.

Thats decent, but you cant live off of that without getting a full time job. Imagine being 45 years old and having to start all over in a new career at the bottom floor.

Maybe you should have worked harder at that darned edjumucation thingy.

Then again, you see no value in it, which given this little tidbit is rather baffling.

"a retiree can expect $2200-$2500 a month."

Plus tax breaks:
Ten state -- Alabama, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New York and Pennsylvania -- exclude all federal, military and in-state government pensions from taxation.
www.militaryhub.com

So, all that being said, the military has the medical facilities, why would it not provide retirees with free health-care? Makes perfect sense, especially since military service is so rigorous. You know, stuff like jumping out of airplanes, running with 60 pounds of kit, hiking up mountains with another 60 pounds on top of that, exposure to noxious chemicals, disease (TB anyone?) etc etc. Its taxing, and it ages the body considerably. Thats why, yes, alot of the guys that do the 20 year haul do deserve to kick back after 20 years, they worked for it.

Now compare that with some fat-assed librarian getting paid $45k and full pension to restock shelves.

#81 | Posted by Danforth

Yup

Why is it always the dumbshits who don't believe in education?

12 years of mommy telling them they're special and Mrs. Smith telling them they're special?

""Maybe you should have worked harder at that darned edjumucation thingy.""

Sorry, maybe I should have told the commander to fuck off when he told me to stay late getting that vehicle off of deadline, or just blown PT formation at 0600 because I had to stay up late the night prior writing that damned essay on 16th century english literature.

Bottom floor? Hopefully you picked a decent MOS so you can get a decent civilian job. 11 bang bang wasn't my choice and hopefully most people see the lack of regular jobs from that.

Now compare that with some fat-assed librarian getting paid $45k and full pension to restock shelves.

Sounds like the smart one to me.

"why would it not provide retirees with free health-care? "

Because health care costs money.

So that's $2000-$2500 a month, plus free health care, plus no state tax. What's COBRA now...~$650 a month??? And you've got to make, what, $800 to clear $650?

All of a sudden, it's looking a lot cushier...and after only 20 years.

or just blown PT formation at 0600 because I had to stay up late the night prior writing that damned essay on 16th century english literature.

No wonder you see no value in education. You're getting a professional juggling degree.

""Again, they're conditions of employment, I've already agreed to that.""

Good, it works out then.

""So you see no value in education?""

No.

""Then you're a bigger idiot than I ever imagined possible.""

No, im not easily bamboozled. In states all over the country theyve done more and more to inflate the budget for education. Tax increases, lotteries, all sorts of measures and they STILL need more money. You can spout all the sentimental horseshit you want, but you are going to hookwink me into paying out more for some overcredentialed bureacrats to sit on their big asses for 9 months out of the year and fill kids heads with feel good-dumb down horseshit and talk about how good it is for them and how we need to pay teachers more than theyre worth.

Every year its the same. More money more money. Why should they pay teachers more? What makes them so valuable? Heres a question, what makes education important, the student, or the teacher? If its about the children, give the kids the money and pay the teachers a normal, rational salary.

The teachers unions are doing what any other group with a winning argument are doing, playing the angles for more cash. Dont stand up and talk about how screwed up education is and turn around and demand more money to fix the problem, ie do your job in the first place. If these educators loved their jobs so much, we would be getting optimal results without blowing their salaries through the roof.

Its a game of extortion, pure and simple. Fuck "public education." Its about the students in the system, not the system itself.

"Tax increases, lotteries, all sorts of measures and they STILL need more money."

Lotteries? You got hoodwinked.

Here's how states get lotteries passed: they promise all the money will go to education. And if the lottery brings in $100 million, all of that IS spent on education. Problem is, before that, if it was $500 million, they simply add $400 million and end up with $500 million. Or less.

"If its about the children, give the kids the money and pay the teachers a normal, rational salary."

Bwahahahahaha! Biggest laugh of the week.

No, im not easily bamboozled.

And have taken a position that's cynical to the point of being absurd.

I won't argue that the system has flaws (and many of them), I've been through it from top to bottom. But just as with so many issues, I see the Conservative/Republican view of throwing out the baby with the bathwater as being just as foolish as the position of throwing more money at it or not reforming it.

I certainly wouldn't take it to the absurd conclusion of finding no value in education, if not for the reason of taking education as a broader term not specific to our system now.

All of a sudden, it's looking a lot cushier...and after only 20 years.

#88 | Posted by Danforth

Then march down to your local recruiter and sign up. While you're at it, be sure to have airborn and ranger school added to your contract. You'll see just how quick and easy 20 years will go by.

If its about the children, give the kids the money and pay the teachers a normal, rational salary.

IIRC the average salary for a teacher is rational. By my standards at least.

I guess someone making less and finding themselves envious would find it irrational?

Americanply is just mad he picked a bad MOS and cannot get a decent job now. Lol!

""And have taken a position that's cynical to the point of being absurd.

I won't argue that the system has flaws (and many of them), I've been through it from top to bottom. But just as with so many issues, I see the Conservative/Republican view of throwing out the baby with the bathwater as being just as foolish as the position of throwing more money at it or not reforming it.""

Yeah ok, if reform didnt automatically translate into a 5% increase in teacher salary and even more protections for the tenured, you have a point. Heres a question, how do you teach an unwilling student?

You need to face the facts, some people are simply comfortable with failure. Let the kids that fucked off through high school take shitty jobs. Better yet, expel kids with attendance and disciplinary issues. Instead of making it mandatory for kids to attend class, simply take them off the rolls when they miss theyre 15th day of class.

Its sounds odd to say it, but we place too much emphasis on formal, classroom education. For many people, that isnt the way we learn. Let them drop out, stop filling their heads with a bunch of shit they will never use, and allow them to get a job.

Americanply is just mad he picked a bad MOS and cannot get a decent job now. Lol!

#96 | Posted by jackass

What MOS is that JACKASS?

" if reform didnt automatically translate into a 5% increase in teacher salary"

Why do you keep barfing that lie?

"Let the kids that fucked off through high school take shitty jobs."

You will, when you're 45.

"Let them drop out, stop filling their heads with a bunch of shit they will never use, and allow them to get a job."

Yeah...more dropouts. That's the road to success.

Yeah ok, if reform didnt automatically translate into a 5% increase in teacher salary and even more protections for the tenured, you have a point.

Like I said, cynical.

Heres a question, how do you teach an unwilling student?

You need to face the facts, some people are simply comfortable with failure. Let the kids that fucked off through high school take shitty jobs. Better yet, expel kids with attendance and disciplinary issues. Instead of making it mandatory for kids to attend class, simply take them off the rolls when they miss theyre 15th day of class.

Its sounds odd to say it, but we place too much emphasis on formal, classroom education. For many people, that isnt the way we learn. Let them drop out, stop filling their heads with a bunch of shit they will never use, and allow them to get a job.

I don't need to face any facts, I largely agree with you. Our education system caters to the mediocre at the expense of many gifted students are aren't quite high enough to be top. If you're a pretty bright kid pulling high 80's low 90's for grades the scholarship market is nil for you (at least that's how it was when I was in high school...and no, that wasn't me). However, there's plenty for the very top and a shit load of stuff for all sorts of various bottom (they call it "under privileged" and shit like that).

Move the discussion to college and it gets even worse. A significant portion of people I was around in college shouldn't have been there. They didn't know what they wanted to do, where they wanted to go or what to do in the meantime. But they were spending tens of thousands of dollars a year to do it.

Yeah...more dropouts. That's the road to success.

#99 | Posted by Danforth

Never in the history of this country has there been a correlation between good students and achievement. The most successful people in Americas history have been self-taught paupers. Dont mistake good students with industrious citizens.

"Never in the history of this country has there been a correlation between good students and achievement. "

Oh my. Now we've gone from the ridiculous to the pathetic.

11 bravo is my guess as to what you chose. Recruiter sucked you right in. I was lucky enough to qualify for being a 92s.

Never in the history of this country has there been a correlation between good students and achievement. The most successful people in Americas history have been self-taught paupers. Dont mistake good students with industrious citizens.

LOL

Shit I love these arguments.

If every kid coming out of the education system isn't a Rockefeller, Carnegie, Gates, Jobs ect IT'S A GIANT FUCKING FAILURE!

You realize how stupid that is, right?

No, sadly you don't.

The most successful people in Americas history have been self-taught paupers. Dont mistake good students with industrious citizens.

#101 | Posted by americanPLY at 2012-02-07 02:34 AM | Reply | Flag:

How about a list of today's millionaires that were self taught? Start with Romney---oh wait...I forgot you are an idiot. Never mind.

;-)

usmilitary.about.com

Jackass qualified as a "shower specialist"? Why doesn't that surprise me.

""I was lucky enough to qualify for being a 92s.""

I had to google that one. Laundry and Clothing repair specialist? Bwahahahahahhaha

"Jackass qualified as a "shower specialist"? "

He was preparing for life after the army.

#105 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Well, he is apart of the landed gentry. I suppose that does beat the shit out of my argument that good students dont make the most industrious citizens.

I had to google that one. Laundry and Clothing repair specialist? Bwahahahahahhaha

Out of curiosity, what are you in the Army/Marines/whatever?

"Well, he is apart of the landed gentry."

No, he's "a part" of the landed gentry. Your statement meant the opposite.

Maybe you could learn from a teacher.

Piss on you all. I not only did the laundry but performed repairs on the washers and dryers which helped me to get my job in equipment maintenance I have today.

No, sadly you don't.

#104 | Posted by jpw

No, Im just not narrow minded enough to belief that the meat-grinder we call the public education system is the basis for all that is good in this country. Half of the crap they teach is not applicable to day to day life, and the other half I may never ever use.

Im an Army Medic with an ASI. No after-Army job skills to speak of. None, whatsoever.

"Im just not narrow minded enough to belief that the meat-grinder we call the public education system is the basis for all that is good in this country."

None of us are, despite your pretense.

#111 | Posted by Danforth

Between having a rational thought process and a grasp of syntax, i'll take the former.

No, Im just not narrow minded enough to belief that the meat-grinder we call the public education system is the basis for all that is good in this country.

Do you actually understand what you read or does it just dribble out the back of your head?

Im an Army Medic with an ASI. No after-Army job skills to speak of. None, whatsoever.

And you developed all that all by yourself? No education to speak of? None, whatsoever?

"Im an Army Medic"

Couldn't that translate into an EMT or a Paramedic? (Of course, you might have to take a class or two....)

Between having a rational thought process and a grasp of syntax, i'll take the former.

Sure, you'll take it.

I think it's questionable if you have it.

"Between having a rational thought process and a grasp of syntax, i'll take the former."

Sadly, you have neither.

And a rational thought process is pretty worthless on a blog without the language skills to communicate said process.

And you developed all that all by yourself? No education to speak of? None, whatsoever?

#117 | Posted by jpw

No.

And a rational thought process is pretty worthless on a blog without the language skills to communicate said process.

#120 | Posted by Danforth

It doesnt matter. Most of you knuckleheads havent the humility or greater sense of perception to understand anything past you're skewed view of "the way things are".

I swear some of you guys think in "walleye".

Couldn't that translate into an EMT or a Paramedic? (Of course, you might have to take a class or two....)

#118 | Posted by Danforth

I am an EMT. Passing the National Registry exam is a requirement for graduating from 68W AIT.

No.

No education? Or you achieved those skills through education, ie not by yourself?

""past you(R) skewed view of "the way things are".""

FTFM

It doesnt matter. Most of you knuckleheads havent the humility or greater sense of perception to understand anything past you're skewed view of "the way things are".

Indeed.

That problem isn't monopolized by either party, unfortunately.

"I am an EMT."

So much for your claim of no post-army skills.

"It doesnt matter."

Posting something meaning the opposite of what you intended doesn't matter?

This gets funnier by the minute.

No education? Or you achieved those skills through education, ie not by yourself?

#124 | Posted by jpw

No.

So much for your claim of no post-army skills.

Sarcasm, danforth, sarcasm.

No.

Humility?

Don't bother. I know the answer. I was hoping you could man up.

You know the value of education. Lose the ridiculous views that damn near no one holds and stop expecting others to not receive the same benefits you have and will benefit from.

So much for your claim of no post-army skills.

#127 | Posted by Danforth

I was being sarcastic you nut.

How can I argue with a guy that thinks like that? I've gone round and round with you about whether or not setting up a NATIVITY scene on public property translates into public money. Then, he's going to tell me that the military is socialist. How can a non-political entity be governed with political theory?

Whats the point?
------------------------------
----------
I think it's questionable if you have it.

#119 | Posted by jpw

Then I have this fuck-ass taking potshots at the same time hes telling me he agrees with me.

Pointless.

"Then, he's going to tell me that the military is socialist. How can a non-political entity be governed with political theory? "

Socialistic, you raging dipshit.

Then I have this fuck-ass taking potshots at the same time hes telling me he agrees with me.

Pointless.

Only if you see things as all or nothing.

I agree with some of what you say.

Some of the rest I think is a little to simplified and unrealistic.

You know the value of education. Lose the ridiculous views that damn near no one holds and stop expecting others to not receive the same benefits you have and will benefit from.

#130 | Posted by jpw

No I know the value of education. What I do not recognize the value of, is the horseshit overpoliticized system of public education that people grovel to. I dont expect anything considering I havent made it half way to half way to 20 years, and probably wont stay for the long haul.

At the same time I recognize the fact that people that do a full 20 or more in the military have paid their dues and deserve a comfortable post military career. They did the hard stuff.

I was in the public education system, like many of the people here, and I had plenty of bad teachers. Theres plenty of bad soldiers out there too, but comparing the work that a bad soldier would do that a bad teacher would, Id say that the teachers need to sit down, which is where you'll normally find them. Teachers unions are built on exploiting people good nature. Servicemembers didnt walk off the job and flood the halls of congress when Obama was floating the idea of eliminating the current retirement pay structure, or making retirees pay for their health insurance.

I dont have to man up for shit. I dont even care about where you are coming from with that comment.

Socialistic, you raging dipshit.

#132 | Posted by Danforth

OK, socialistic,

of, advocating, or tending towards socialism.

Socialist in appearance.

What is socialistic about the United States Military.

Im all ears.

""Humility?

Don't bother. I know the answer. I was hoping you could man up.""

Oh, I got it. Yes I was trained. I went through a four month course at Fort Sam Houston to be awarded the MOS 68W.

It was a technical course, centered around job specific training and tasks.

No English.

No Social Studies.

No algebra.

No seks ed.

So, yeah I was educated. Sorry, it was such an off-key question I didnt recognize the validity, but now I understand.

No I know the value of education. What I do not recognize the value of, is the horseshit overpoliticized system of public education that people grovel to.

Again, I don't think people "grovel" to it. I think people bristle at the ridiculous notion of fixing the problem by simply doing away with everything. Identify problems and fix the fucking things, but that doesn't mean we should scrap the entire thing.

I dont expect anything considering I havent made it half way to half way to 20 years, and probably wont stay for the long haul.

My comments about working harder ect were mocking Repub talking points about how anyone making a low wage for a tough job clearly didn't work hard enough or isn't smart enough ect. They weren't serious.

At the same time I recognize the fact that people that do a full 20 or more in the military have paid their dues and deserve a comfortable post military career. They did the hard stuff.

I've agreed with you the entire time on this.

I was in the public education system, like many of the people here, and I had plenty of bad teachers. Theres plenty of bad soldiers out there too, but comparing the work that a bad soldier would do that a bad teacher would, Id say that the teachers need to sit down, which is where you'll normally find them. Teachers unions are built on exploiting people good nature. Servicemembers didnt walk off the job and flood the halls of congress when Obama was floating the idea of eliminating the current retirement pay structure, or making retirees pay for their health insurance.

One giant strawman.

I dont have to man up for shit. I dont even care about where you are coming from with that comment.

I was hoping you'd follow your own rhetoric, you know "humility or greater sense of perception" and all and admit that education isn't the problem and that the current system needs to be fixed.

You admitted to this halfassesdly I guess.

It was a technical course, centered around job specific training and tasks.

No English.

No Social Studies.

No algebra.

No seks ed.

Well you already had those presumably. Or at least if you hadn't I'd hope to God they wouldn't trust you with something like being a combat medic.

I went through a four month course at Fort Sam Houston

You have any free time to go toobin'?

""Well you already had those presumably. Or at least if you hadn't I'd hope to God they wouldn't trust you with something like being a combat medic""

Its been almost 100 hundred posts and I'm still waiting for something of substance. So far its only been trite commentary and worthless critique. Then again, this site is stocked with the boorish and pedestrian. Do you have something good, or are you going to suck on my ass all evening?

DANFORTH and DANFORTH only.

Please, for the love of sweet, baby Jesus tell me why the US military is socialistic.

It is my conjecture, that the military is self-contained. I argue that self-contained does not equal socialistic because socialistic (and therefore socialism) is itself not a self contained system. Its a political system. Please go from there. If you will. Or not.

Its been almost 100 hundred posts and I'm still waiting for something of substance. So far its only been trite commentary and worthless critique.

You've had a long time to leave and here you are.

You admitted education has value. I'd call that a step in the right direction.

Then again, this site is stocked with the boorish and pedestrian.

LOL your opinions as expressed here have been found simple and not at all reality-based.

Doesn't leave you much room to get all hoity toity.

Do you have something good, or are you going to suck on my ass all evening?

Your face is beyond saving. Just admit it and move on.

"It is my conjecture, that the military is self-contained."

But not even close to self-supporting.

"Its been almost 100 hundred posts and I'm still waiting for something of substance. So far its only been trite commentary and worthless critique. Then again, this site is stocked with the boorish and pedestrian. Do you have something good, or are you going to suck on my ass all evening?"

Irony flag. Post after post, you have shown you don't understand reality for the vast majority of teachers and the vast majority of students. Until you do, your arguments are simply piss-poor.

"The most successful people in Americas history have been self-taught paupers."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Thanks for my morning laugh.

Every year its the same. More money more money. Why should they pay the military more? What makes them so valuable? Heres a question, what makes military operations important, the military, or our security? If its about our secuity, have them defend our soil and not attack countries that pose no threat to us.
#90 | Posted by americanPLY

hmmm good point

"Self-taught paupers"?

Sounds like someone's been reading too much of Horatio Alger's moralistic drivel. (By the way, Alger quit his position as a minister after charges, which he did not deny, were leveled against him for pedophilia - neither here nor there, just a historical nugget.)

There's a reason Alger's rags-to-riches stories for boys were (a) written for credulous children and (b) lumped together as "The Horatio Alger Myth."

Every year its the same. More money more money. Why should they pay the military more? What makes them so valuable? Heres a question, what makes military operations important, the military, or our security? If its about our secuity, have them defend our soil and not attack countries that pose no threat to us.
#90 | Posted by americanPLY

hmmm good point

#145 | Posted by truthhurts

Suggest we rename America's behemoth war machine, forget this "Department of Defense" nonsense of a gloss; revert to the old, up-front "Department of War" and at least be honest about it.

Department of the Empire is even more apropos.

And just how is getting rid of Department of Education going to hurt our future? Seems to me we did fine before it existed.

#5 | Posted by glasshouse

speaking for our school system .. our teachers only have 5 to 8+ years of college education ..
~ we cannot expect our teachers to develop a curricula and simply teach stuff to our kids without input and direction from the folks in DC

~ the way we do it is to send our taxes to the DC folk .. they send a small portion back to our school, then inform (lecture) us that they need waaay more TAX so they can think up more smart stuff to make our schools better .. it is a slooow process and could take a long time ..

also, only THEY can see the progress, or lack of progress .. we are too close to see the big picture (plus, we are just regular folks, NOT DC folks)

The Dept. of Education has been as successful since its inception as the Dept. of Energy has been. Both were formed by President Jimmah....hmmmmm, do you suppose he was maybe a "big government progressive?" Why do you suppose those guys get limited to one term so much?

"The Dept. of Education..."

...was created in 1979, spun out of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare created by Eisenhower. There's even more history to it than that, but don't expect JestAlongForTheRide to be aware of it.

What other branch of federal service specifically exempts you from the right to sue?

wrong, and i know it first hand. so do many others, of course.

LE: I actually appreciate your stab at irony, but...

DC does not deliver curricula. That is designed by local teachers or by/with consultants hired by districts. In some states, curricula is created (or bought) at the state level. But the fed DoE does not create or deliver curricula. (Yes, there are some programs that are created and offered.)

I share your disdain for the idea that folks at the local level need oversight from hundreds of miles away, or are incapable of deciding what's best for their students, however... In education discussions, we keep comparing test results in other countries to test results here. Well, how is that valid (country to country) when tests are different from state to state or at the very least (as here in New England) from region to region? Under the current testing regime, three states in New England have the same test, then Texas has a different test, then California has a different test, etc. Meanwhile, all students in Finland take the same test. So it's valid to compare test results in Finland with test results in Texas and with those in the three New England states that have the same test. But how can we honestly compare nationwide results (without disaggregation) with nationwide results from a country that has unified testing and unified curricula? (I'm not saying we'd come out a whole lot better, but should we not be accurate and compare apples to apples.) This, however, can be and is being addressed without the DoE taking a central role. The Common Core (www.corestandards.org) is a states-led initiative, not a DoE construct, though the DoE has "agreed" to it. I'm sure they'll try to co-opt it.

I signed a W-2 when I was hired by the military. They hired me to do a job. Do we hire welfare applicants to do jobs? I havent seen it. I dont see it in the projects or trailer parks. You shitheads trying to equate the military to socialism is stupid and disingenous. You are just angry we get generous benefits for putting our lives on the line. My job is dangerous. Without my job, your socialism cannot exist. How else are you going to force someone to give you(the socialistic govt) their money? Without the threat of force, socialism doesnt exist..

"Please, for the love of sweet, baby Jesus tell me why the US military is socialistic. "

When the community binds together to form something the community pays for which benefits the community, that's socialistic.

Fire & police protection, roads, national defense, and other factors I've referenced are all socialistic aspects of our capitalistic society.

It's not a bad thing; it's just a fact of life: even in the most capitalistic of societies, there are some things which have to be done for the group, by the group...like national defense.

Now...please, for the love of sweet, baby Jesus, learn the definition of the words.

"Do We Need the Department of Education?"

Absolutely. The average American is so much better off educationally than they were before IT was created.

Of course, the president has to give speeches at an eigth grade comprehension level for people to be able to bob their heads in zombie like agreement... Progress is grand.

Keep this up and presidential speeches in another generation will be like WWE monologues.

"Of course, the president has to give speeches at an eigth grade comprehension level for people to be able to bob their heads in zombie like agreement... Progress is grand."

Actually, it's worse than that. A very large percentage of the adult population can't understand a newspaper editorial.

And politicians who speak in larger than 8-second sound bites can't get elected. (Obama was an exception, but he also boiled it all down to the marvelously meaningless and increasingly inapt "Hope and Change.")

And btw, "That's the schools' fault" is an amazing oversimplification.

#157 | Posted by pragmatist at 2012-02-07 10:45 AM | Reply | Flag:

I hold parents at fault to a large degree for not demanding better.

Of course, there are few alternatives to the public school monopoly. For preschool I can send my child to whichever institution I want. Starting with K, I can send my child to whichever institution I want, but still have to pay for the shitty one.

It's a good feeling.

"Of course, there are few alternatives to the public school monopoly. For preschool I can send my child to whichever institution I want."

That you pay for.

"Starting with K, I can send my child to whichever institution I want, but still have to pay for the shitty one."

Well, yes, it's public school, intended to exist for all, for the common good. Also, you're assuming that shitty is the right word. I'm sorry that's your only option. The public schools (well, my neighborhood elementary) is pretty good, at least so far. I don't agree with everything they do, but they are serving my 7-year-old well. As he grows, I may push my wife to consider other options, but the only private school is Very Religious, which is problematic for me. I'm not at all convinced that the same public school will serve my five-year-old well next year; he's a very different kid, with needs that I am concerned about (and certainly the religious school would not address those needs, from the research I've done).

Note: I don't have a problem with religious schools existing, nor do I assume anything about teaching 'cause a school is "religious." But this school has weekly mass and general religious practice as a requirement, and that does not fit our family. So I am loath to send my kid there. If it were that there were, say, Christian values embedded but no religious study, I wouldn't have the problem I have.

The schools have become INDOCTRINATION centers rather than Education.
Just like that experiment in 1967 Palo Alto Ca:
The Wave.

160: Dude, you're a broken record, and wrong, though that was a thought-provoking flick.

I would love someone to show me evidence of the widespread indoctrination agenda (no, the Barack Obama song does not count). The indoctrination accusation is largely silly; the school system is flawed in many ways, so let's (we, as a country) talk about those specific flaws rather than sweeping statements. Such comments undermine the very important discussion we need to have.

I'll start: Candidate Obama was right when he talked about parents fostering the idea that education is important and fostering habits to make that idea into reality. Too little of that happens in this country today; how do we combat that problem?

51% of N.C. lottery allocated to actual education goes toward teacher salaries..

www.nc-educationlottery.org

WTF? Now I know they are still taking my state taxes that I send to N.C. every year and still giving some of that to education. Why?

"WTF? Now I know they are still taking my state taxes that I send to N.C. every year and still giving some of that to education. Why?"

Because the lottery money is used to reduce the tax burden? If you're really concerned about budgets, take action with your local school board. Or if such things are handled on the state level in NC, approach the legislature or state DoE. From far away, you can write letters and e-mails, maybe even access video online. Maybe you can even Skype your way into a session. There may also be parent and citizen groups you can work with, even from afar.

It's America, man. When there's a problem, take action.

Oh, and the percentage and the fact that it goes to teacher salaries is meaningless. Did you mean it to be damning somehow? Or just noteworthy?

I think it's unfortunate that it's all tied to taxes. But I believe in the value and necessity of public ed. How else can we fund it?

Posted by pragmatist at 2012-02-07 02:55 PM | Reply

Want to know one of the stupidest things to happen in NC?

Wake County has year round schools, budgeted for year round schools.

Legislature increases the school year randomly and now, not only can Wake not afford the increased number of days, but it is almost impossible as the year round schedules use 100% of the time already available for the slightly shorter school year...

Just seems like a big game of who can make our lives better via pissing contests. When, in the end, its only us serfs that suffer.

#130 | Posted by jpw

You know the value of education. Lose the ridiculous views that damn near no one holds and stop expecting others to not receive the same benefits you have and will benefit from.
-------------

Just because you think it's fair doesn't make it so.

To me, the definition of fairness in America is summed up in the US Constitution: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

There is no operational definition of "fair" that equates with equal outcomes without creating an equal and opposite "unfairness" somewhere else.

When it comes to taxes we often confuse fairness with practicality. There's nothing fair about taxing someone at a higher rate because they worked harder or have special talents which earned them a higher income, but we have to collect from those who can pay. Graduated tax rates are practical but not fair.

I would love someone to show me evidence of the widespread indoctrination agenda (no, the Barack Obama song does not count). The indoctrination accusation is largely silly; the school system is flawed in many ways, so let's (we, as a country) talk about those specific flaws rather than sweeping statements. Such comments undermine the very important discussion we need to have.
I'll start: Candidate Obama was right when he talked about parents fostering the idea that education is important and fostering habits to make that idea into reality. Too little of that happens in this country today; how do we combat that problem?
#161 | Posted by pragmatist at 2012-02-07 01:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

Whether its an agenda or happenstance, there seems to be a commie-nazzie polarization in politics as compared to the people and when they "agree" its usually a problem. Like NCLB and RTTT...

I've heard there's 800 "competency criteria" for kindegarten students to be assessed on by testing and teachers scored, etc. THAT's the sorta bullshit that's replaced good teaching administered by good principles locally. Instead we've become a beurocratic tool - and the Obama song is just 1 demonstration of the abuses possible - Did I post that 3rd grade flouride wash with kids acting like animals for class? WTF man what do you want a military drill too?

So you blame political shifts on school? Hm. If that were so, wouldn't there be a whole lot more commie-nazzie adults running around? Most American adults have been through public ed, including most posters here, I dare say. I ask for evidence and you offer conjecture... The 3rd grade fluoride wash? Maybe you did; maybe you didn't; but again, that would be ONE example. One example does not an agenda make, just like the Obama song only says that some idiot in NJ perpetrated something stupid on one group of students.

Again, there are plenty of things for which to criticize public ed without going all indoctrinaire on us.

So you blame political shifts on school? #167 Prag

No I was suggesting the federalization politics of Bush wacking and Obamanation have userped local school authority and ability to teach.

And sure there are motives to do so - in order to entrench powers held, etc. Like in 1984 (online movie). Thats where federalized cariculum, text books, and methods have long been controvercial. Applied under local controls the sources can be helpful but applied by $-consequence paperwork bullshit is bullshit.

It results in an indoctrination system rather than education system. Kids are getting more reading on line anyway. And since the indoctrination's pretty transparant too - well now we have OWS. What do you expect? Do you really think the BNW/1984 scenarios would be utopian?

We do not need and ED. Our schools were fine before it came along.

Our schools were fine before it came along.
#169 | Posted by glasshouse

Not if you're any indicator.

"We do not need and ED."

Ya gotta love the self-retorting retort!

It is a typo you dork.

Nice try princess.

It is a typo you dork.
#172 | Posted by glasshouse

In your case, a typo would be an improvement.

"No I was suggesting the federalization politics of Bush wacking and Obamanation have userped local school authority and ability to teach."

Fair enough, but that wasn't what you appeared to say. And the DoE started way before them. What do you think the DoE actually does? See my note upthread to LE. For instance, that example of assessment criteria you keep bringing up? It is 99% certain that's a state mandate, not a fed mandate. Feds don't do licensing; feds do stuff like SPED law (as they probably should).

"And sure there are motives to do so - in order to entrench powers held, etc. Like in 1984 (online movie). Thats where federalized cariculum, text books, and methods have long been controvercial. Applied under local controls the sources can be helpful but applied by $-consequence paperwork bullshit is bullshit."

I hate NCLB and the big hammer (funding) too, but let's try to remember those books and stories are fiction.

"It results in an indoctrination system rather than education system."

Again, some examples of widespread indoctrination?

"Kids are getting more reading on line anyway."

What exactly do you mean by this? I would challenge that kids are reading at all. Other than manuals to videogames. : ) I'm sort of joking. But fewer and fewer kids read for fun. Certainly, those who do are known to complain about what they have to read in school (but do you think they'd find Brave New World and 1984 on their own?).

"And since the indoctrination's pretty transparant too - well now we have OWS."

What does that have to do with school? We also have the Tea Party. We also have DR and other sites where people think what they want and show both knowledge and ignorance.

" What do you expect? Do you really think the BNW/1984 scenarios would be utopian?"

Of course not; that's why they're called dystopian novels. Brave New World--we live some of it now, but it's not the school part, not yet, or not everywhere. Challenging and controversial books are still read in school, and full length, too.

Reitze, my friend, you're still talkin' fear rather than fact. Or at best, your claims are unsupported. I'm willing to talk; I'm willing to listen; I'm willing to admit that there's a big old world of school outside my experience. I hope you are willing to do the same, including recognizing that your awful experience is not what school is for everyone.

I recommend, Prag, that you consider this view;

That the world very rarely sees instances where the yolk of tyranny is lifted off of mens shoulders. The vast majority of time, men are subjects to their governments and ruling classes. We had an exception to that rule over 200 years ago in this country. While imperfect, the American revolution destroyed the concept of royalty. The same thing happened 2,000 years prior in Ancient Rome. In Rome, the two party system turned their Republic into a virtual dictatorship. Its clearly happening here today.

The Roman society spasmed and contracted, but eventually turned into the nightmare we call the middle ages in Europe. Torture, arbitraty execution, the concept of serfdom were all products of the late Roman culture.

There is clearly a side to the politics in this country that places the system itself over the people that it serves. The Education system in this country is the same. I've heard time and again the assertions by liberals of the importance of big beautiful schools, lots of well-paid teachers, etc. The emphasis appears to be on the system, not the students in that system. Our schools are a tool for acclimating childre, not educating them. They are being taught to work within a system. That kind of thing is happening all over this country. The TSA is doing it to travelers by getting them adjusted to having their 4th amendment rights violated. Same with the tax code. How can you argue people have the right to privacy when they are forced to disclose their personal incomes? The government has repeatedly violated the privacy of gold-holders since FDR issued an executive order making it illegal for citizens to hold gold as currency in 1933. Recently, gold has been singled out as a reportable commodity in trading.

Look at things from a historical perspective. Fear is a very legitimate emotion to hold when we talk about the role of government in our lives. Once Liberty is lost, it is virtually impossible to reclaim.

Interesting enough, AmPly. So how should we educate the majority of our populace? I'm ignoring the belief you have about what education in America is and just accepting that you think it's totally on the wrong track. What should we do instead?

And yes, fear is a legitimate emotion, but it's just that--an emotion. Without rational thought to back it up, it does nothing but stir up negativity. Read my last ¶ in 175 again. Now slow down, turn off your disdain, and look at what I'm saying. Now go back and look at what I'm asking Reitze to do in engaging on this very important issue.

Okay. With what would you replace the K-12 public education system, assuming you actually believe, as you seem to, that the people of America should be educated? I will accept, for the purpose of discussion, any ideas other than "let the parents take care of it"; they won't.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable