Before you losertarians start jumping on me personally for posting this, I like Uncle Ron. I have voted for him more times than I have voted for any other politician in my 40+ years as a voter. His views on some things are damned close to my own. In other things he's crazy as a bag or rocks.

But the dude should be a bit smarter about the scumbags he associates with.

Now bash away.......

Here is the raw link to the Anonymous announcement page.

Those dudes are fucking brutal. I hope they never get pissed at me.

There is a shit load of information downloaded from those hate websites. It is going to take someone a long time to go thru it.

I hope the links to Paul are one-way and mostly circumstantial and there really is no 'smoking gun'. We'll have to wait and see if any email from him to them or actual photographs of him paling around with kluxers emerge.

The site reporting this has a blatant anti-Paul bias but even they admit the verdict isn't in yet.

I ain't gonna apologize for by Fuck Snooze inspired headline, though. I think it kind of catchy in supermarket check-out line sort of way.

"If this is confirmed then that would the end of the Ron Paul phenomena among the Left."

I got a funny feeling it will be confirmed and he will be toast among the left there has just been a little to much of stuff appearing out there that shows he has been flirting with racist groups I my self have tried to over look it thinking it was just personal attacks but if this pans out and is shown to be true then FHK him

But he might gain more support from the great steaming pile of Republican base than he loses from the liberals....... it is a game of numbers after all.

I scanned through their email - it appears they are indeed following Rand Paul closely. I also see they are spammed with Cialis ads.

Love the supremacist spank image on the link.

Well its not surprising. What is surprising is that RP's positions seem more anti-racist than racist even if he does get the KKK support.

Like the MJ/prohibition legalization would result in freeing of more blacks than any of Obama's positions. Thus the Black and KKK minorities seem to have a lot in common lately as the USA has become oppressive and now has more slaves than ever in history.

There are over 1M mostly black prison-slaves now in the USA from the War On Drugs alone, POLITICAL PRISONERS. And it kills just as many white people via those Opium prescriptions from Dr Pushers too.

Anonymous just lost a lot of respect- I don't care if the site is a bunch of Nazi trash. Private citizens still have a right to privacy, speech, assembly, property, and to hold extremist views. Anon has no business attacking private websites and publishing private emails of citizens. Government is a different story. They should stick to that.

As for the Ron Paul thing, he can't be expected to know the prior-to-now secret affiliations of every supporter. This is just a slander story.

"especially now that it is confirmed Ron Paul hangs out with straight up racist hate groups."

???

"confirmed"?

Someone needs a dictionary.

This is the end
My racist friend,
The end
To hope or any chance
The end
You'll never be the President
Again

Maybe Anonymous will start deep-diving some of Obama's associates, too? Christ knows that most of the media is giving him a pass on his past...

Kanrei it might be true that the MSM can spin him into a hater but reality is there's more fast and furiousness racial hatred spewing from the sitting POTUS. Escallating drug-wars has turned Mexico to shit and its spilling over the borders now too.

I think 'racism' is suddenly growing up from a game of gotcha-retoric into the reality of the position and what they mean to the people effected. And that's why blacks seem to see RP as a white man with white-affiliation but not blake-hate and in fact someone who supports black-important positions (legalization/libertarian).

I wonder how many black people will be thrown in jail today for nonviolent drug crimes, while Anonymous is busy waging war on first amendment rights and trashing RP with this crap.

Ron Paul-- What Some Black People Think

#14 | Posted by reitze

Great link.

I wonder is that is the prevailing attitude amongst blacks across the US.

Ron Paul's Telling Speech At The John Birch Society's 50th Anniversary

Here's the youtube version of Paul's speech since JBS cleansed it off of their web site.

Third unsolicited Birch Society mention in one day!!

I repost (from Wikipedia, the source of all knowledge):

Let us take a foray into the all-knowing Wikipedia regarding JBS:
"an American political advocacy group that supports anti-communism, limited government, a Constitutional Republic and personal freedom"

"seeks to limit governmental powers, and opposes wealth redistribution, and economic interventionism. It not only opposes practices it terms collectivism, Totalitarianism, and communism, but socialism and fascism as well"

"has an immigration reduction view on immigration reform. It opposes the United Nations, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), and other free trade agreements."

"The Southern Poverty Law Center lists the society as a 'Patriot' Group"

believed that "both the U.S. and Soviet governments are controlled by the same furtive conspiratorial cabal of internationalists, greedy bankers, and corrupt politicians"

"It has issued calls to "Bring Our Troops Home" in every conflict since its founding, including Vietnam"

I personally can't find a helluva lot I don't like about JBS. They were understandably anti-communist in the 60's, but still opposed the Vietnam War. I particularly like the statement regarding greedy bankers and corrupt politicians.

-They were understandably anti-communist in the 60's

They were not understandably racists in the 60's, too. Mainstream consevatives would have nothing to do with them.

I hope you don't also believe all the nice things Stormfront says about themselves on their site.

Now bash away.......
#1 | Posted by axe at 2012-02-06 12:24 AM |

OK... How fucking stupid are you to think Ron Paul has a shot in hell to be nominated? Why do you stupid fucking libs continue to open threads about Ron Paul, Santorum, Gingrich... when you all know Romney has this wrapped up?

Go back to Palin and wondering what toilet paper she uses AXE, she has as much of a shot as those mentioned above, and knowing you are all about anything anal, that has to be your number one goal to find out...

Great link.
I wonder is that is the prevailing attitude amongst blacks across the US.
#16 | Posted by ZOT at 2012-02-06 09:54 AM | Reply | Flag:

My impression is there's a split between that "sensibility" vs the blindly following the Dem black man, as well as the Gop great white hope. Sadly I doubt it's even half - most vote for their own pocket, or favorite slogan, etc.

Re the John Birch Society. It spawned the maggots known as the Koch Brothers and thus the Tea Party and thus the Republican party as it has evolved today.

The mainstream Republicans may have spurned them in the '60s but it ha become them today.

I don't agree, Axe. I don't think the Tea Party is the Republican Party at all. I find the Tea Party's core beliefs to be much closer to the Libertarians, but too many of the local groups have allowed themselves to be co-opted by the religious right, which is unfortunate. Drawing a parallel between LBS and the Tea Party is sound and just, but people there aren't many 'small government' Republicans around right now. Sad to say, but true.

and for Corky, I knew the 'racist' card would get played, but in truth, based on what I'm reading, LBS's opposition to the Civil Rights Act had far less to do with race than their opposition to the federal government's intervention, which they believed to be apart from the Constitution. LBS has been vilified in the past for their acceptance of minorities, women, etc, by a wide variety of hate groups.

Well, I guess since the left, demorats, MSM, etal. gave the Obummer slack on the Rev. Wright issue; I guess they would certainly give RP some slack on this issue since they are very fair-minded, consistent and non-duplicitous.

Sorry, Mustang, but I don't have to read about the JBS and what they stood for in the late 60's, I and many others here lived through it and know that it was a hotbed of Southern redneck racists who were pissed by the Civil Rights laws and the Great Society legislation.

"the Rev. Wright issue"

You folks should actually listen to the whole sermon some time, and then research what Biblical writer and passages he was paralleling. Here's a hint: Matthew.

Anonymous just lost a lot of respect- I don't care if the site is a bunch of Nazi trash. Private citizens still have a right to privacy, speech, assembly, property, and to hold extremist views.

I wonder if you'd say the same thing if they hacked a "black supremacist" website and found close ties to Obama.

But he'll legalize pot, right? That excuses everything else, apparently.

Look, Ron Paul himself said, "Everyone wants to do it and not think about the bad feces pudding." And he also said, "White men criticize black people over pagers! And Mexicans will take shoes!"

Here's a hint: Matthew.

#27 | Posted by Danforth

Matthew said God Damn America?

From reading the actual leaked messages, it seems like they're trying to usurp Ron Paul support to their own ends, whether or not they do happen to support him themselves. The closest tie between them and Ron Paul himself that I can find from the leak is that they often show up to his speeches and conferences. It seems a bit of a stretch to make that out to mean that Ron Paul supports their efforts at all.

The leak can be found on pastebin, titled "Anonymous Ron Paul White supremecist Links"

"Matthew said God Damn America?"

Thanks for proving my point.

Thanks for proving my point.

#33 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2012-02-06 04:06 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

What was your point, anyway? That you didn't think anyone was going to read the entire Gospel of Matthew to try and divine what the fuck you're talking about?

Like the MJ/prohibition legalization would result in freeing of more blacks than any of Obama's positions

Reitze, have you ever actually read any of Ron Paul's positions? All he wants to do re: drugs is get the Feds out of drug policing. If any state, in Ronpaulland, wanted to execute people for possession, Paul won't mind.

A:. This war on drugs is totally out of control. If you want to regulate cigarettes and alcohol and drugs, it should be at the state level. That’s where I stand on it. The federal government has no prerogatives on this.

Q: But you would decriminalize it?

A: I would, at the federal level. I don’t have control over the states. And that’s why the Constitution’s there.

Posted by axe at 12:21 AM | 35 COMMENTS

Your link was pulled Axe.

Page Not Found

sorry--- I must have put that education post in the wrong thread --- here's this thread's reply:

Reitze, have you ever actually read any of Ron Paul's positions? All he wants to do re: drugs is get the Feds out of drug policing. If any state, in Ronpaulland, wanted to execute people for possession, Paul won't mind.
#35 | Posted by northguy3 at 2012-02-06 05:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

yea I would "legalize" everything. IMHO the legal status motivates Dr Pushers too. And Meth is terrible for the apartment-house-neighbors and family members. So controlled labs making it for the morons wanting to become statistics... fine there too.

As far as other Ron Paul writings - well I've seen some. My impression is he's a reformed Rep-NEO-Con/Fascist/Misoginist PIG that's become "libertarian". My hope is that's an inegrated "gristian libertarian" view where he may realize that freedom is necessary for expression of faith. Its especially in such things as abortion where he worries me. But compared to the other Reps and the Dems he's a breth of life in the system.

"Here's a hint: Matthew."

WRONG: it's from Luke. My mistake, and apologies.

"What was your point, anyway?"

Wright was paralleling Luke 19:37-44. Our resident Bible thumpers missed that completely.

#39 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2012-02-06 11:56 PM | REPLY | FLAG:
Matthew, Luke, who cares? They're both forgeries for fools.

SOrry but all I have to say about this is

Wiliam Ayers
Rev. Wright
Malik ZULU Shabazz
Cecilia Muñoz
ect
ect
ect.

If we are to judge ONE man by his company then we must judge ALL men by their company. I will not be holding my breath in anticipation of the Obama defendors claim this is TOTALLY different. I mean Wiliam Ayers only planted bombs in the nations capital and Rev Wright only believes that ALL Blacks are represed by the WHITE man,(thats no way a pariniod racist delusion), Cecilia Muñoz has apionted member of of a nationlist racialy based AND biased orginization "The Race" to his cabinent, and Shabazza, well lets just say that he is never short on funny things to say about the Jewish People......

BTW Romeny it the one with a "racial problem" that goes beyond who his friends are. His religion is as racist as they come because its written into their doctrine from long ago. The consider it the mark Cain! So basically if that's your religion you're either a racist or a hypocrite.

His religion is as racist as they come because its written into their doctrine from long ago. The consider it the mark Cain!

#42 | Posted by reitze

You're about 35 years out of date with that bullshite, reetzy.

Zot I know that the LDS reversed their position in 1978. But the people following the religion didn't change overnight and their doctrine still does have its racisim intact:

Alma 3: 6- 'And the skins of the Lamanites were dark, according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was a curse upon them because of their transgression and their rebellion against their brethren, who consisted of Nephi, Jacob and Joseph, and Sam, who were just and holy men.'

#44,

Not only that but the great God-to-be Romney shirked his US military obligation to be a missionary to France to spread the racist hatred of the LDS church.

Back then, the LDS Temple Endowment ceremonies had as part of their ceremonies a skit where Satan would give money to a 'Minister' to preach false doctrine (The Trinity, etc...).

Rmoney would later rise to the post of Stake President which is the equivalent of the Archbishop of an entire region of the country. He was actually HEAD OF THE CHURCH when racism was still being preached daily. They may have allowed blacks into the Temple a few years ago but the still preach that you can become 'white and delightsome' if you become a Mormon. The just conveniently change the word 'white' to 'pure' a few years ago for political correctness.

-Back then

Rmoney was in his early 30's when the LDS finally let blacks into the temple.

In other news, RP married a white woman, therefore he hates blacks.

#47 married thus disrespecting gays.