"the Company that he owns and got the grant IS MAKING MONEY. Thus putting it back into the economy, that would be a good thing and the reason for the stimulus. .... Did you notice how they tried to tie this to some kind of Solyndra type of thing which is all the product of Obamanomics."
Oh, so granting money to folks who become successful is okay, but if they're not successful, it's Obama's fault. Right?
#15 | Posted by Danforth
Well to answer your question bluntly ....yea, who else would you blame.
His administration gave the approval to set up the SOLYNDRA LOAN (Not grant like Neumann company got) they also set up the structure of the loan, all of which had to be approved by more people in his administration, which failed miserably just like EVERY other bone headed idea that his administration has come up with, every one.
What I'm saying is the small amount of money ($250,000 grant) that this company got was used successfully and was no where near the F--k story that Solyndra was. Another Libtart pipe dream.
The application of the money and what it was used for is the huge difference between pouring money in to Solyndra ($535 million)
to try and force a product in to a market the was easily under cut buy a competitor (China).
And Every body knew it, that's why the private sector did not expose itself to the risk as they are profit driven not emotionally driven like the Libtarts.
The difference between the two companies is $ $535,000,000.00 in total loss of tax payer money for Solyndra-Obama and not one job to show for it.
As apposed to $ 250,000.00 in a grant that started in Bush's administration and created 50 jobs.
$534,750,000.00 would be the difference between the money give to each company.
Do not this Danforth person every once in awhile tell us he is some kind of overseer of a Pension fund some where.....really.
.....NOPE IN NOVEMBER.....
