Please explain how informed consent works among orangutans for Spud.
There is none, same as gay sex with animals it's done to show dominance over the other. But you and others claim that there are gay animals in nature so that's why people are gay they can't stop themselves. Well neither can this individual so where do you stand , where do you draw the line on what is normal?If gays can have the right to marriage, than he should have the right to the cheer like everyone else on the team.See how your so fast to discriminate when it's something you don't like. All I'm saying is be consistent with you beliefs,stop holding your finger up to the wind. Myself I'm consistent he should be taken out and shot for being the animal he is.
#21 | POSTED BY PATRON
You coulda just typed "derp" and been done with it.
Are you seriously suggesting that rape is the EXACT SAME thing as a consensual homosexual relationship?
Cos that's fucking crazy.
Particularly after you already acknowledged that there can be no real rape in the animal kingdom other than in man because of the lack of informed consent.
Even in the very few oddish cases of primates 'raping' humans one can't really say the dumb animal was capable of asking for consent therefore it wasn't real rape in the technical, legal sense.
Admittedly, the women who got 'raped' this way are prolly not quite as pedantic about it.
And you keep making the same mistake over and over.
Here, let Spud try again.
A) You fucking morons: Insist that being gay is "unnatural"
B) Sane people: Point out that gayness is found in nature and thus your argument is invalid.
C) You: Then double down on your derp and insist that if gayness is found in nature and something else you don't like is found in nature (in this case "rape") that's bad that therefore you feel you have somehow just proven that gayness is a bad thing.
D) Sane people: Point at you and laugh.
Just keep re-reading those 4 lines above until it sinks in.
K?
Be Well.