Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Filmmaker Oliver Stone, known for his liberal political views, said he would vote for Ron Paul over President Barack Obama if Paul wins the Republican nomination. "There's no way that we can continue this spending spree," Stone said, predicting a coming economic collapse. "In fact, I think in many ways the most interesting candidate -- I'd even vote for him if he was running against Obama -- is Ron Paul. Because he's the only one of anybody who's saying anything intelligent about the future of the world."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

iraqibukkake

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Doesn't Stone think that W.C. Fields killed Kennedy?

nice...This should tell the democratic party something as well as the obama administration but they will simply dismiss this as stone being on the fringe.

LOL but the one thing they miss is "Filmmaker Oliver Stone, known for his liberal political views," and there is millions out there who are thinking the same.

The democratic party and obama are going down and they won't understand until we vote the lazy bastards out.

It has been apparent since March 2009 that Obama was not a liberal.

It has been apparent since March 2009 that Obama was not a liberal.
#3 | Posted by 2008

For the slower ones maybe.

It has been apparent since March 2009 that Obama was not a liberal.

#3 | POSTED BY 2008 AT 2012-01-24 03:58 PM | REPLY | FLAG

I noticed that the FIRST time he strengthened the patriot act.

Stone loves Paul. Two nuts in one shell.

BTW all of Stone's movies stink.

Aww, It must break your Marxist little hearts that a lefty Hollywood producer is not sucking Obama's ass. What a pathetic headline.

It has been apparent since March 2009 that Obama was not a liberal.

#3 | Posted by 2008

Is that the first time the TSA searched your diaper?

I wish Paul was campaigning in Florida. I'd like to hear him speak.

#9 | Posted by rcade

Get some audio of Cindy Sheehan and Pat Buchannan and you'll be fine.

It has been apparent since March 2009 that Obama was not a liberal.

Yeah, he's a Marxist. Geez, can't you guys make up your minds.

I'm not so sure Stone would be as thrilled with a Paul Presidency as he thinks, when he has to make 50 cuts of his movie to get approved by 50 state censors.

The democratic party and obama are going down and they won't understand until we vote the lazy bastards out.

You really think Newt and Boner can win in 2012? Only half America likes Obama but not even half the GOP like Newt, Rmoney or Boner. and Ron Paul? Forget about it. He's admitted he ain't even running for President anymore, just for an invite into the GOP backroom to make a few deals.

Get some audio of Cindy Sheehan and Pat Buchannan and you'll be fine.
#10 | Posted by RexZeitgeist

There's another spice in that gumbo that you haven't identified, but that's pretty close.

#2 | Posted by moneywar

Newsworthy from $War.

I agree with Stones conclusion but for very different reasons. Spending is a long term problem, jobs are the immediate problem. Economic growth (more jobs) will close the deficit faster than any other approach. Clinton already proved this.

Paul's approach to foriegn policy, bailouts, human rights and torture are correct ethically and constitutionally. Most Washington asswipes, including ALL the other Presidential candidates have abandoned the constitution, while pretending to love it.

I wish Paul was campaigning in Florida. I'd like to hear him speak.

Yeah, it's too bad that FLA's over-abundance of religion based voters made FLA toxic to Paul's campaign.

FLA is the first real delegate heavy state in the Primary.

To be clear, Spud likes Paul's humble foreign policy as much as the next guy but doubts his ability to work within the structure of government to ever achieve anything more than being an immediate lame duck status incapable of achieving any of his stated goals.

Of course, a 3rd party run by Paul would be fun to observe too but Spud simply can't see it happening despite Paul refusing to rule out the possibility in the last debate.

Be Well.

As a Ron Paul supporter I welcome Stone but heck I would welcome a certain Jew hating Georgian peanut farmer to the Ron Paul supporter fold too that is if he's not knocked off by killer rabbits first

Crazy people tend to run in groups.

If he really is in the Paul camp, this "support" does only harm.

Crisis

It has been apparent since March 2009 that Obama was not a liberal.

Oh, he's a liberal.
He's just a really really stupid one.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable