Occupy Wall Street "is an inchoate, leaderless manifestation of protest," but it will grow. It has "put on the agenda issues that the institutional left has failed to put on the agenda for a quarter of a century."

As anger rises, riots on the streets of American cities are inevitable. "Yes, yes, yes," he says, almost gleefully. The response to the unrest could be more damaging than the violence itself. "It will be an excuse for cracking down and using strong-arm tactics to maintain law and order, which, carried to an extreme, could bring about a repressive political system, a society where individual liberty is much more constrained, which would be a break with the tradition of the United States."

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

oh shit .. Soros would hate civil disorder:
~ who will ring the bell at NY Stock Exchange
~ resulting protests could prevent hedge-fund managers from getting to work
~ what happens if chefs, chauffeurs, butlers, & chambermaids riot?

~ ~ what if accountants also riot?

As anger rises, riots on the streets of American cities are inevitable

orange glow in the evening sky ..
~ metro areas .. rioting, burning, looting, foraging for food crumbs to survive

~~ "the hills" .. TeaParty-ers bonfire, a side-o-beef on the spit, kids laughing & playing, moonshine. home-brew, & music

... I almost forgot to mention the armed sentries w/50 Cal Barretts on the perimeter?

#4 | Posted by L_E_Light = Le Loon

To many, the idea of Soros lecturing the world on “evil” is, well, rich. Here, after all, is an investor who provedâ€"and profited hugely fromâ€"the now much-derided notion that the market, or in his case a single investor, is more powerful than sovereign governments. He broke the Bank of England, destroyed the Conservative Party’s reputation for economic competence, and reduced the value of the pound in British consumers’ pockets by one fifth in a single day. Soros the currency speculator has been condemned as “unnecessary, unproductive, immoral.” Mahathir Mohamad, former prime minister of Malaysia, once called him “criminal” and “a moron.

Interesting, Soros uses the term "evil" when it is shunned by so many. That's because elites and the pretenders of "elitism" know otherwise. They revel in the knowledge of man and feel that "evil" is passe and a relic of the past. But it lurks beneath the surface and laughs at the hubris of fallen and weak man. It waits for it's chances to express itself often through the law of unintended consequences and man's most well laid plans.

George Soros on the Coming U.S. Class War

Great article.

Not to worry...the Occupoopers will save us.

"God bless them..." Nancy Pelosi

I believe Soros is a very good predictor of future events.

Come the warmer weather you are going to see a protest movement that will make the upheavals of the 1960's look mild in comparison.

People are fed up and they are not going to take it anymore.

TOWARDS THE AMERICAN SPRING!!

See you in Chicago Third Week in March!

"People are fed up and they are not going to take it anymore."

They sure are!

"Since Zuccotti Park and New York City ended the overnight stays of the Occupy Wall Street crowds, the protesters have been sleeping anywhere they can. Some have been taken in by local supporters while others have been able to sleep in area churches. However, thanks to serious allegations of vandalism and desecration, the churches have begun to close their doors to the occupiers."

"Setting aside my feelings about the Occupy movement’s ideologies and philosophies, I’ve never quite understood their tactics. Political activism is about convincing people you’re right. It’s about winning people over to your side.

I’m not sure how blocking commerce, impeding transportation and generally behaving like petulant (and violent) children accomplishes those goals."

When asked further, he said "You provide the photos, I'll provide the war."

See you in Chicago Third Week in March!

#9 | Posted by Monstman at 2012-01-24 11:10 AM | Reply |

Going there for the Cub's opening game.

TOWARDS THE AMERICAN WINTER

#9 | POSTED BY MONSTMAN AT 2012-01-24 11:10 AM | REPLY | FLAG ftfy.

what a perfect headline to expose libfux for what they are.

soros on coming class war..

hee hee hee hee hee

SOROS! BOO!

As anger rises, riots on the streets of American cities are inevitable. "Yes, yes, yes," he says, almost gleefully.

Has anyone who worships Soros ever put a moment's thought into why he is constantly "championing" unrest? Two words: Currency Speculation.

That entire business is founded on uncertainty, and the more unrest, the better from his standpoint. The thing is, some people think he is some kind of visionary, when all he is trying to do is foment that unrest so that he can bet against the target currency.

Guys like Soros are amongst the worst kind of economic parasites, but he gets a pass from the Left because he donates heavily to radical liberal causes.

... I almost forgot to mention the armed sentries w/50 Cal Barretts on the perimeter?

Are you always such a tool? Fucking poseur.

More than likely it'd be a run of the mill Remington 12 gauge pump in the average person's hand.

Wonder how long it will take congress to ban insider trading?

Show us what you got republicans,backbone or greed...

Were watching you...

I believe Soros is a very good predictor of future events.

Come the warmer weather you are going to see a protest movement that will make the upheavals of the 1960's look mild in comparison.

People are fed up and they are not going to take it anymore.

TOWARDS THE AMERICAN SPRING!!

See you in Chicago Third Week in March!

#9 | Posted by Monstman at 2012-01-24 11:10 AM

The NATO and G8 meeting here in Chicago are going to be big. If they were at all smart, they would have done them in February, when it's mighty cold.

The police will be overwhelmed, and they know it too.

.

Billionaire financier George Soros believes the world faces one of the most dangerous periods of modern history.

If not, I've made a bad investment.- George Soros

@2
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

Explain how 'one man one vote' has failed. People are too easily hoodwinked?

There is a reason Soros is pushing this and it has nothing to do with the little people.

Pump and dump.

"Pump and dump."

Not your average rub and tug massage...

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

And that man is your president dik/dok

As anger rises, riots on the streets of American cities are inevitable

orange glow in the evening sky ..
~ metro areas .. rioting, burning, looting, foraging for food crumbs to survive

~~ "the hills" .. TeaParty-ers bonfire, a side-o-beef on the spit, kids laughing & playing, moonshine. home-brew, & music

Me and several of my friends already have a plan. Once society falls, kill anyone who approaches, leave the bodies as a warning. Looting and foraging are going to be big. Inmates will be in their element and you wont be able to trust anyone in the first 90 days. Everyone will be looking at you just to see what supplies or ammo you have..The weak will be die. Those unable to care for themselves (i.e. liberals) will be killed.

It's going to suck...

Matter of fact, everyone will be looking for what most liberals decry: Security. Liberals are always demonizing guns, the military, police. But those things will be in short supply with society falls. So women, metrosexual men and lesbians will go back to the way nature intended, looking for someone to protect them. And their liberal world will no longer exist, as I highly doubt anyone who is providing for them are going to accept a fenimist point of view in a strongest take all world. Survival will not be led by the passionate. Only by the decisive and smart. The weak will not have a vote, they will not be asked their opinion.

#26 | Posted by boaz

Yes, liberals will not be allowed into the commune, but their mindless rhetoric could provide entertainment from outside the fence of course.
Future generations will be taught about how liberal/socialist/communist stupidity caused the downfall of Hitler/Mao/Stalin/Europe and the US.

Wow boaz. You sound like a kid on Christmas eve. Can't wait for the utter destruction of the United States so you can take over? Seriously man, your commanders should be keeping an eyeball on you. You know...sedition isn't conducive for upward advancement even in the military.

Class War has been here for a while.

It's just that more and more people are noticing that they are on the losing side is all.

If the GOP win in 2012 it'll be Jan and Dean time for most of America.

/ie. "Serf City, Here we come"

Be Well.

Were watching you...

#18 | POSTED BY TRUTHTELLER101 AT 2012-01-25 10:40 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

We're watching you. you apparently were watching us, and based on your express words, are no longer watching us. so please, tell us why we should be concerned, and secondly, why do you assume that the insider trading is limited to Republicans?

Can't wait for the utter destruction of the United States so you can take over?

Only preparing for what may be coming. To not prepare is to invite destruction. The people have been lulled into a sense of "it cant happen". Extreme liberals will riot in an effort to bring down the ruling class. But they are too stupid to see what comes after. They are looking for a govt that will take care of them cradle to grave, but if you riot and bring down said govt, what's left? Only people like me who dont like liberalism and you wont have the govt guns to force taxation on us once society breaks down.

Seriously man, your commanders should be keeping an eyeball on you.

You would be surprised how many of my "commanders" share my opinion. Who do you think is more prepared? The military or OWS?

Class warfare coming???? It's been here since the first day Che'bama took office. Gotten worse by the day. Barry has only 2 cards in his hand. The race card and the envy card. Comrade Barry has never suggested any way to better oneself without taking from another. Because we all know that anyone who has more than you got it by stealing from those less fortunate. ALL liberals are caring and compassionate...as long as someonelse is paying. Ask a liberal to pitch in and the compassion ends. Obama...we must all suffer equally. Why can't we all share success based on our own self reliance?? Sorry libtards, I know the words "Self Reliance" cause you emotinal distress!!
Thats All.

It's going to suck...
#26 | Posted by boaz

Take that as a warning the military is just itching for martial law.

The class war will be society against the military. Petreus to be president.

#34 | POSTED BY GETBOO AT 2012-01-25 11:49 AM | REPLY | FLAG: Thinks "wanting the rich to pay their fair share as they have through most of America history" = "envy".

You really are not very bright, are you?

Be Well.

The class war will be society against the military.

Are you that dumb Ray? The military isnt going to exist. Without the military to enforce your liberal utopia, your society is going to fall. No one is going to force wealth redistribution anymore. Without someone else creating and enforcing your liberal utopia, it cant exist.

Dethspud,

I actually had an argument with a cousin during the debate last night. She stated the liberal mantra of the rich paying "their fair share". I asked her how much she paid in taxes last year. She stated 15%. I said no, the actual amount. She said $6K. I said Romney paid 2 million last year, he paid more than her, how is THAT not fair?

"No one is going to force wealth redistribution anymore."

Then there will be no one to prevent the taking of wealth from those who have much. There will be no court to enforce contracts. Money itself would become meaningless paper. Wealth itself will be a memory.

I actually had an argument with a cousin during the debate last night. She stated the liberal mantra of the rich paying "their fair share". I asked her how much she paid in taxes last year. She stated 15%. I said no, the actual amount. She said $6K. I said Romney paid 2 million last year, he paid more than her, how is THAT not fair?

Because, Boaz, you look at that 2 million dollar figure with stars in your eyes.

It's not fair that people who work the least and make the most should also pay the least in terms of rate of taxes.

This is a terrible trend started by Reagan and exacerbated by every Republican admin ever since.

And Romney wants to push it even further.

Already wealth discrepancy in the US is reaching levels you haven't seen since the Great Depression.

Allowing 1/4 billionaires like Romney to pay even less a rate than they do now will doom the America you grew up in.

Your grand children will be grow up to be virtual slaves.

You want THAT to be your legacy to them?

Think, man.

For the love of all things good.

Think.

Be Well.

" I said Romney paid 2 million last year, he paid more than her, how is THAT not fair?"

In your simplistic view it wouldn't be but in the view of great Americans like Dwight D. Eisenhower it would be Romney's duty to pay more because the country needs him to and he can afford to. Duty, something many of the wealthy today do not understand. Romney's own father would be ashamed of him.

Hey sis,
What happens when we take all of the 'rich' people's money and our deficit is only reduced by about ten or twenty percent. What then?

Seriously,
It's time to just admit that we've been sold a bill of goods. There's no way in hell govy can keep it's promises. There isn't enough (spare) money in the whole world. Literally.

Are you that dumb Ray? The military isnt going to exist. Without the military to enforce your liberal utopia, your society is going to fall.
#37 | Posted by boaz

First of all, I'm not a liberal in any sense of the word. I hate liberals as much as I hate neocons. Both ideologies are criminal in every sense of the word. War is one of the means by which government exerts authoritarian power over its people and you are one of its lackeys.

No one is going to force wealth redistribution anymore. Without someone else creating and enforcing your liberal utopia, it cant exist.

That's the only part where we agree. As for the military, it's just another pork barrel public works program and and a burden on society - soon to become a thread under NDAA.

.....how did we get here?

Because the hardest thing to tell someone is "No".

Ray,
If what you say is true then why do people elect authoritarian regimens to govern them? People don't want to be free?

"Because the hardest thing to tell someone is "No"."

Nah...because the hardest thing to tell ourselves is "No".

#9 | Posted by Monstman at 2012-01-24 11:10 AM | Reply | Flag:

When you can make a fortune by crashing a currency, it pays to be a good predictor of such things as "class wars".

Tell George we are coming for his money.

And George Soros is clapping for the results the whole time.

The OWS folks will escalate over the summer--more money coming to them from Soros and others.

It will be ugly.

"Because the hardest thing to tell someone is "No"."

Nah...because the hardest thing to tell ourselves is "No".

#47 | Posted by Danforth

Now that is a true statement.

I have to say No to folks all the time in handling claims.

The problem with congress is that they don't see it as their money--they view it as other people's money.--OPM

They all did a standing ovation last night when Obama said send him a bill to prevent insider trading by congress.

They all clapped but they don't or won't do anything about it.

With a 90% reelection rate why should they?

Then there will be no one to prevent the taking of wealth from those who have much. There will be no court to enforce contracts. Money itself would become meaningless paper. Wealth itself will be a memory.

I have to disagree Danni...

1. You are correct, there will be no one to prevent taking of wealth from other's, but you can bet your ass it wont be a metrosexual male or dainty woman doing the taking. There will be the haves and the have not's, just nature's rules will be enforced. There will not be a need for "courts" to enforce contracts. Death will enforce contracts.

2. Wealth will not be a memory. If you are strong and can defend what's yours, you will be wealthy.

Ray,
If what you say is true then why do people elect authoritarian regimens to govern them? People don't want to be free?
#46 | Posted by Huguenot

That's what 3,000 years of history seems to say. The idea of living free is a new concept in human thought. I think the idea of social cooporation will grow in generations to come as people realize that social division is counterproductive. But don't think that the nation-state will go away easily.

It would be funny to watch a bunch of pussy liberals rioting. All you would have to do is bitch slap a few of them and they would run home to their mommy.

Lets see if I get this right, Soros funds OWS anarchy movement and then predicts well, anarchy. What a fucking genius. Not to forget that he is a democrat and has his hands all over the democrat party. Buying votes and influencing government at the highest level. The only I see as more dangerous in the world right now is Barack Hussein Obama.

Because the hardest thing to tell someone is "No".
#45 | Posted by Huguenot at 2012-01-25 12:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Never been a problem for me!"
~Ms. Huguenot

This from a WWII concentration camp survivor.

Guess what Soros, a full scale class war has been in progress for thirty years and you are one of the beneficiaries. The cycle of wealth concentration and wars are as long as the history of civilization and involves pharoahs, kings and religion. It is said the the Rothschild family is worth $175 trillion and right at the center of it. Kinda dwarfs the Gates and Rockefeller stories.

@57
LOL :)

I think the idea of social cooporation will grow in generations to come as people realize that social division is counterproductive.

-Ray

Social division is the inherent by-product of capitalism. and capitalism has been extremely productive.

Social cooperation is not natural/compatible to human nature.

the trick is keeping capitalism in check enough to keep the bottom 'social division' at least somewhat productive, while at the same time not diminishing or thwarting the upper 'social division' from realizing its full potential.

Of course, Soros, because you are one of the jackasses creating this illusion of a 2 class society and enticing some people to attack others for being free and pursuing happiness the way they choose.

America especially has no issue here. Anyone and everyone is free to make the life they choose and have the intellectual capability to achieve. Other countries in the world have problems here because they do have ridiculous laws or cultural problems preventing anyone from choosing any path in life. America does not have this problem.

The liberals though want equal results though really they want class warfare because it ensures strife among the people which keeps them in power.

The sad part is all the people have to do is ignore morons like soros and simply live their lives as they choose and their problems are solved.

I think the idea of social cooporation will grow in generations to come as people realize that social division is counterproductive.

"Social Cooperation"? Sounds like other buzzwords like "Social Justice" and "Sharing" and "Concern for others" and "Fairness". And this would all depend on who was benefitting the most from this "Cooperation"...

If you are strong and can defend what's yours, you will be wealthy.

The liberals though want equal results though really they want class warfare because it ensures strife among the people which keeps them in power.

Guilty of his own accusations. Starting with "Liberals" means you are dividing us into groups to ensure strife among the people.

People don't elect authoritarian regimes per se. But people in positions of authority tend to extend their reach. again, human nature.

Interesting that guy Soros donates so much to the left and still has $22B and change left over. And probably only pays about 14% in taxes.

The left loves the rich 1%.

Starting with "Liberals" means you are dividing us into groups to ensure strife among the people.

No. Liberals did that. I dont want to live with liberals. Their views are not mine. I dont want to subscribe to them. I am not with them. If someone attacks the U.S., then yes, maybe we can work together to fight a foreign force, but as far as living with them, I want them kept as far away from me as possible. Problem is, they need me to further their world view. I dont need them.

I want them kept as far away from me as possible. Problem is, they need me to further their world view. I dont need them.

That's 100% you creating that wedge, not them. I tolerate your views even though I don't agree with them. I don't claim you need to stay far away from me because of them, again that is you.

Guilty of the exact crimes you accuse others of.

What have I accused anyone of doing? Yes, it is me creating the wedge, but liberals want to close the wedge for their own benefit. The founding of this nation is more akin to my beliefs. That much is fact. Otherwise, liberals wouldnt be trying to change it so much. Liberals have made it so our children do not see this nation as a collection of states, but one massive commune where everyone has to "share". Most kids gloss over the United States portion and dont think of states as being autonomous..That's a shame because it's the way it was meant to be.

I have no problem with someone being liberal. I just dont want their polices affecting my life..

See Boaz, we actually agree even though the previous post you would have included me in the Liberal column because we generally don't agree.

Using these labels like "Liberal" and "Conservative" are attempts to direct a conversation before it starts.

What have I accused anyone of doing? Yes, it is me creating the wedge,

Read your posts.

Liberals did that. I dont want to live with liberals. Their views are not mine. I dont want to subscribe to them. I am not with them. If someone attacks the U.S., then yes, maybe we can work together to fight a foreign force, but as far as living with them, I want them kept as far away from me as possible. Problem is, they need me to further their world view. I dont need them.

#67 | Posted by boaz at 2012-01-25 02:42 PM

"Liberals have made it so our children do not see this nation as a collection of states..."

Not exactly, but we do encourage an understanding about how those states got their shapes, all too often being nothing more than arbitrarily drawn lines on a map, and to ask themselves, what value do states perform in our society and whether or not there is an alternative organizing construct that is better suited to meet our needs as a society. It's really not meant as a threat on anybody's life in any way.

The only way you could get any work out of the welfare class would be to re-enslave them. But they wouldn't even make very good slaves so they would only be good for soylent green.

what value do states perform in our society

IMHO, States should allow Americans to live in an area that more represents their individual views while adhering to a main theme of freedom.

The idea that all states should be 100% uniform is geographically impossible. The people in the South are not the same as those in the Mid-west as those in the West as those in the North as those in the Northeast. There is no single set of laws that can respect all people.

I feel the Founders understood the only hope for this noble experiment to work is for the states to have the freedom to meet the needs of their citizens and that local government is always better than centralized for day to day affairs.

You are correct Kanrei...

The people only have power at the local level. Our founders understood this and that's why there is limits on how much influence the fed gov is supposed to have in our daily lives..or supposed to..

I actually had an argument with a cousin during the debate last night. She stated the liberal mantra of the rich paying "their fair share". I asked her how much she paid in taxes last year. She stated 15%. I said no, the actual amount. She said $6K. I said Romney paid 2 million last year, he paid more than her, how is THAT not fair?

#38 | Posted by boaz

Brilliant logic Failed Judge Boaz. Now ask her how much she made and compare purcashing powers.

Crisis

As anger rises, riots on the streets of American cities are inevitable. "Yes, yes, yes," he says, almost gleefully.

funny, but when Gabby Giffords got shot, conservatives were accused of inciting violence.

considering how much Soros is considered an "icon" in the leftist community...he is coming dangerously close to actually inciting violence.

If you consider that he has the influence to get leftie idiots to do whatever he tells them........

of course, if this happens.....the only result is a bunch of dead lefties in the streets. so he should watch what he says.

I think Soros is a Sith Lord. They always come in twos...

... I almost forgot to mention the armed sentries w/50 Cal Barretts on the perimeter?

Flag: Won't be eating a lot of side-o-beef paying 5+ dollars/shot...

Typical "Fiscally Responsible Conservative". Uses 5 bucks to do what could be done just as efficiently with sixty-five cents.

Those unable to care for themselves (i.e. liberals) will be killed.

Your world-view is twisted. Of the dozen or so people I associate with that live either 90% or 100% off of the grid, only a few would even come close to being considered conservative and, based on your extremist views, you'd consider them liberals.

Soros seems gleeful about inciting class warfare, but he should be more concerned about which side will win. I think we, the upper class could crush the revolt and chase the welfare scum back to their ghettos and trailers quick easily.

Formidable Warrior Thom

I think we, the upper class could crush the revolt and chase the welfare scum back to their ghettos and trailers quick easily.

You're middle class at best.

And you should be careful about the trailers crack. Many of those salt-of-the-earth types are the ones who vote for republicans as if their life depends on it.

-And you should be careful about the trailers crack. Many of those salt-of-the-earth types are the ones who vote for republicans as if their life depends on it.

well, both sides privately throw their consituents under the bus all the time. It's the American Way.

I think we, the upper class...

If Soros is correct (I believe he is an old doddering jerk and won't be right), you can bet we'll have the end of leftyism as we know it. We won't be arguing this lesbian/gay/transsexual BS all the time since people will just want to live and to focus on the relevant things individuals did long ago before we had all this affluence and time on our hands to ponder these peripheral inane matters. Power will be returned to the states and we'll get back to the basic elements of living. It'll be refreshing and uplifting.

Ray,
If what you say is true then why do people elect authoritarian regimens to govern them? People don't want to be free?

#46 | Posted by Huguenot

Nug, many people are just like a flock of sheep. They do best in a heard with a few big guard dogs around them and a sheep hearder guiding them thru life to be sheared every spring and slaughtered when they get older to feed the hearders.

When the Nazis took total control of Hungary in 1944, the Holocaust followed. In two months, 440,000 Hungarian Jews were deported to death camps.

To survive, George, then a teenager, collaborated with the Nazis.

First he worked for the Judenrat. That was the Jewish council set up by the Nazis to do their dirty work for them. Instead of the Nazis rounding up Jews every day for the trains, they delegated that murderous task to Jews who were willing to do it to survive another day at the expense of their neighbours.

Theodore hatched a better plan for his son. He bribed a non-Jewish official at the agriculture ministry to let George live with him. George helped the official confiscate property from Jews.

By collaborating with the Nazis, George survived the Holocaust. He turned on other Jews to spare himself.

He's a hell of a good guy, heh?

Like he was ever incarcerated in a death camp, right!!

Soros is a great predictor of world events since he is the one that sets them up, and this is a way for the Obama fan to stop the Tea Party this year. OWS will create such an air that there will be a clampdown on civil liberties but it will focus on Conservatives, NOT the Occupy my Ass astroturf crowd. This is so pathetically obvious and OF COURSE the DOJ is working with ACORN and Project Vote, which once employed Barack Obama.

"New Documents Show Department of Justice Coordination with ACORN-Connected Project Vote"

"Me and several of my friends already have a plan. Once society falls, kill anyone who approaches, leave the bodies as a warning. Looting and foraging are going to be big. Inmates will be in their element and you wont be able to trust anyone in the first 90 days. Everyone will be looking at you just to see what supplies or ammo you have..The weak will be die. Those unable to care for themselves (i.e. liberals) will be killed.

It's going to suck..."

But you'll be happy, right, Boaz?

I will survive, Mary...

Those unable to care for themselves (i.e. liberals) will be killed.
It's going to suck..."
But you'll be happy, right, Boaz?

#90 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore at 2012-01-25 07:18 PM | Reply |

Geez, Boaz, that's sad. I kind of liked MTW.

How does one win a class war. Is it victory when the unproductive have subjugated the productive? Able to sit around idly, enjoying the fruits of those who are able to contribute without having to contribute themselves? I only ask because I'm not sure what the bongo players and potheads that make up the bulk of the occupy movement would have to offer a lawyer or accountant or airline pilot who earns a high income, not because of coercion, but because society willingly exchanges money for a rare good or service that they have to offer.

The absolute worst think that could ever happen to the poor is for the rich to disappear, because then they are going to have to pay their own taxes. They will also find themselves short of all those goods and services that the rich got rich by providing for society.

It doesn't seem like such a great deal to me.

"Nug, many people are just like a flock of sheep. They do best in a heard with a few big guard dogs around them and a sheep hearder guiding them thru life to be sheared every spring and slaughtered when they get older to feed the hearders."

I would hazard a guess that if there were free election held today in North Korea, Kim Jong Un would be elected god by a margin similar to the one enjoyed by Hitler. North Korea is a perfect example of a Marxist success, where the idea of personal freedom has not just been eliminated, but has become an object of derision. Marx correctly understood that for revolutionary socialism to work, this was a must.

Your grand children will be grow up to be virtual slaves.

You want THAT to be your legacy to them?

Think, man.

For the love of all things good.

Think.

Be Well.

#40 | Posted by dethspud

Deth you are true and noble and obviously well educated and able to think things through for yourself.

unfortunately this is what THEY are thinking:

"Me and several of my friends already have a plan. Once society falls, kill anyone who approaches, leave the bodies as a warning. Looting and foraging are going to be big. "

"what a perfect headline to expose libfux for what they are."

soros on coming class war..

hee hee hee hee hee"

"SOROS! BOO!"

I will survive, Mary...

#91 | Posted by boaz

LOL my bet is your pathetically simple ass will get greased within days.

Social cooperation is not natural/compatible to human nature.
#60 | POSTED BY YODAR013

It it wasn't the human race would not exist.

the trick is keeping capitalism in check enough to keep the bottom 'social division' at least somewhat productive, while at the same time not diminishing or thwarting the upper 'social division' from realizing its full potential.

Simply, capitalism is a form of accounting that produces wealth. It doesn't work unless people are free to exchange. What YOU call capitalism are the consequences of government meddling, waste and corruption.

It staggers my mind that people treat politicians like they were angels that came down from heaven to maintain social order. Politicians, by the nature of the job, are sociopaths.

Knock, Knock. . .

Who needs a class war?
You bunch of internet thugs are at each others throats in this thread.
If this is anyone's wish:
they've already won, apparently you all have enough hate to fuel a war on your own.
For those of you unprepared for Soros' & Huxley's visions, you are still my neighbor. And not all of us prepared for such events harbor as much anger and hate as some in this thread.

Boaz reads way-y-y too much dystopian fiction. In the real world people in trouble collectively help each other. The riches will be in their enclaves and everyone else will be just fine without them.

It it wasn't the human race would not exist.

-ray

IMHO:

social cooperation only works in small numbers, think families/tribes. The tipping point had a good chapter that alluded to this, the number has to be less than 150.

the human race exists more so because of natural selection/competition/
darwinism. hence why capitalism is more compatible and successful.

unabated capitalism is not good, hence the need for government intervention. think monopolies and more specifically, cell phones all having different chargers.

oh, and capitalism is not a form of accounting.

"Soros: U.S. Class War is Coming"

I would agree with Boaz on a lot but he's probably off a little. "Liberals shouldn't have as much of a problem as he states since they have no "class".

oh, and capitalism is not a form of accounting.
#100 | Posted by Yodar013

That's because you know nothing about capitalism. You are confusing capitalism for abuses of capitalism.

unabated capitalism is not good, hence the need for government intervention.

As if unabated government is good for the economy. Where I come from, we call it tyranny and oppression.

please explain how you think I'm "confusing capitalism for abuses of capitalism".

And try to not use strawmen.

#4 | Posted by L_E_Light = Le Loon

#5 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS

the dumbass doesn't have enough bullets and assumes the masses aren't armed because they are "liberhul" or "demoncrats".

No. Liberals did that. I dont want to live with liberals. Their views are not mine. I dont want to subscribe to them. I am not with them. If someone attacks the U.S., then yes, maybe we can work together to fight a foreign force, but as far as living with them, I want them kept as far away from me as possible. Problem is, they need me to further their world view. I dont need them.

#67 | POSTED BY BOAZ

We don't need you motherfucker. My bet is you can't grow food, make lumber, raise cattle or anything makes a difference to survival. I can also hunt fish and forage with the best of them. You can't have it both ways turd.. get along, get out of the way or get run the fuck over.

They are looking for a govt that will take care of them cradle to grave, but if you riot and bring down said govt, what's left? Only people like me who dont like liberalism and you wont have the govt guns to force taxation on us once society breaks down.

#32 | POSTED BY BOAZ

and you won't have the military letting YOU suck on its tit for healthcare, food or shelter. There won't be a pension either you retard. The only person that seems to benefit MOST from the government are people like YOU. Boaz= military welfare queen.

I am self sufficient, self employed, heavily armed and won't feed losers like you if there is a meltdown. How do you like them apples buttercup?

I will survive, Mary...

#91 | Posted by boaz
LOL my bet is your pathetically simple ass will get greased within days.

#95 | POSTED BY JPW A

I will put $5 dollars on that bet you are right.

The person fomenting unrest is the person predicting it. Amazing, what an insightful genius.

If the world turns to shit, I will live precisely up to the moment I get hungry, grouchy, and say something smart to someone who is hungrier, grouchier, and armed. AKA about 6 minutes.

Legio is a broke ass bitch and doesn't have $5. Even if he did, I'll take that and whatever else i wanted from that pussy and he'd thank me.

If you look at past revolutions they didn't spare the wealthy. Also wealthy people like George Soros, Warren Buffet, and Johnny Diamond even though they're siding with the Liberals they would be on the guillotine.

I know the old saying keep your friends close and your enemies closer, but this is suicide.

#2 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS AT 2012-01-24 06:55 AM | REPLY | FLAG:
jfk, great quote.

I know the old saying keep your friends close and your enemies closer, but this is suicide.
Posted by 90c2cab

Well if he's to be spared, it won't be because he didn't speak on our behalf when he had a chance.

All you have to do is join the military and they provide you with the largest tit to suck from. Unlimited health care, GI Bill, work training, hell after you are done companies get to suck from the tit too just for hiring you. sure you may have to risk your life but, but aren't we all by just having you around waiting for us to fail because you sucked the tit dry fighting endless wars? So now you can kill us with your special skills that you learned sucking from lady liberty's tit? hell not like we are even safer because of you, you let two planes fly into our tallest buildings! Where where all those billion dollar jets you brag about being able to fly?

Legio is a broke ass bitch and doesn't have $5. Even if he did, I'll take that and whatever else i wanted from that pussy and he'd thank me.
#110 | POSTED BY 101CHAIRBORNE

That would be change from you blowing HIV positive lobbyist behind the capitol building for $5.

I have know a lot of folks on the left and a lot on the right. I can not see the pony tailed, sandal wearing, metro sexual left being much of a viable force to be reckoned with. A couple of million military vets really hate these pompous jerks. Who has the guns, training and access to heavy weapons? Don't wish for violence if you can not out fight your opponent. Do not attack unless you have a place to retreat. The learning curve in armed combat is very steep. If there is a second civil war in this country, the inhabitants of Boson and New York City will be eating raw rat meat in the dark and cold with in sixty days. LA and San Francisco will be fighting the new Azitland army of six million illegal Mexican aliens demanding the return of California to the Republic of Mexico. This is what the left has brought upon themselves.

All you have to do is join the military and they provide you with the largest tit to suck from. Unlimited health care, GI Bill, work training, hell after you are done companies get to suck from the tit too just for hiring you. sure you may have to risk your life but, but aren't we all by just having you around waiting for us to fail because you sucked the tit dry fighting endless wars? So now you can kill us with your special skills that you learned sucking from lady liberty's tit? hell not like we are even safer because of you, you let two planes fly into our tallest buildings! Where where all those billion dollar jets you brag about being able to fly?

So, when America fails because of liberals aka American citizens. Our military is going to kill us? So, shouldn't we fight harder to cut military spending knowing you are just going to kill us like the Egyptian military did to it's people?